Savage Sam (1963) Poster

(1963)

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A worthwhile follow-up to Old Yeller
GEM-2012 February 2005
We all know that "Old Yeller" is a classic. It will always stand out as one of the best live-action Disney films of its time. With that said, does any kind of follow-up film deserve any attention? "Savage Sam" certainly does. It is another well made Disney adventure. Classic? Almost, but "Old Yeller" was a tough act to follow.

I found "Savage Sam" refreshing because it made no attempt to be anything like "Yeller". Sam the dog is not a threat to anyone. In this movie, he is also not the center of attention. This story is different; Travis and Arliss are older. That's how it should be. Six years passed between the release of the movies.

Brian Keith was great in this film. Here, he is supposed to be the younger brother of Fess Parker's character in "Yeller". I really liked him here.

As another DVD in my Disney collection, everyone in the family enjoyed it. I give it *** out of four stars.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This Film Had a Tough Act to Follow But Just Didn't Work For Me
cairn621 July 2006
I saw this movie within the last few years and sadly is one of those films, that while not the worst I have seen...just didn't click with me. Yes, "Savage Sam" had a tough act to follow, and one has to keep in mind that it should be watched with the understanding that it was not intended to be another "Old Yeller". But due to several factors, in my opinion, this movie could have been a lot better.

*There is confusion as to how Sam is related to Old Yeller. Is he supposed to be the now grown dog seen in the original "Old Yeller" as a puppy? Or did Yeller stud another female around the same time resulting in the dog seen in "Savage Sam"? Or was the spotted dog seen in "Savage Sam" a litter mate to the yellow pup seen in O.Y?

*The acting, in my opinion seems lackluster. While Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran displayed amazing chemistry in "Old Yeller" and many of the other films they starred in together...they seemed to be "going through the motions" in this picture.

*The story pacing was a bit choppy...often boring. Fred Gipson's book of the same title provides some background and imagery, helping to keep the story moving along. Seems to be missing here.

*Finally, yes there were settler/Indian battles from that time era, but Disney did indeed paint Native Americans in an excessively evil light. Could have been handled better...this is where background and history of the conflict could have been developed a bit better.

All in all, this movie is not unwatchable...but due to flaws which I have described, I think the movie is weak...despite me keeping in mind that "Savage Sam" is no "Old Yeller".
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Old Yeller II
AaronCapenBanner6 December 2013
Norman Tokar took over directing duties on this sequel to "Old Yeller" that sees Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran return as Travis and Arliss Coates, who, several years later, now have a new dog called 'Savage' Sam(though whether he really is related to Yeller is never established) who still proves as brave and heroic as Yeller, since both boys(along with a female friend) are abducted by a hostile Native tribe, and held for some undetermined reason. Meanwhile, their Uncle Beck Coates(played by Brian Keith) is looking for them, since their parents are away taking care of a sick relative. Just how can the group get out of this predicament? Disappointing film isn't at all bad, but is forgettable and ineffectual, with little of the folksy charm of the first.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Family Story
mkiesinger7 October 2003
If you like the old Disney family movies like Old Yeller, Parent Trap, Swiss Family Robinson, Davy Crockett, etc., then you will probably like this movie. While it is advertised as a sequel to Old Yeller, the only similarities are the same actors are back for the boys and Mr. Searcy and the story does involve a dog. That's it for similarities.

You are best to watch this movie for what it is and ignore the sequel part. Brian Keith is a nice addition to the movie playing the boys' uncle and though it is familiar story, it is not a repeat of the original story as so many sequels tend to be.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Savage Arliss?
ifyougnufilms26 April 2012
This is an entertaining film thanks in part to performances by character actor scene-stealers like Slim Pickens and Jeff York, whose ornery interactions are a joy to watch. Brian Keith portrays well the rugged frontiersman, demonstrating courage and offering avuncular wisdom. Kirk and Kristen are good as the young innocents. The main problem is the frequent intrusion of the Arliss character, who has morphed from mischievous/ornery in Old Yeller to deranged/homicidal in this film. Disney loved the image and performances of Corcoran(he was indeed a good kid actor) and perhaps exerted too much influence on the writing and directing of Savage Sam. The more PC viewers have commented on the film's scenes of cruelty to animals (at times just for laughs) and the stereotyping of native "savages." There is some justification for this criticism, but it should be noted, in regard to the portrayal of the Indians, that they were a renegade band and that some white settlers are equally stereotyped. Also, one of the ranchers actually sympathizes with the Indians in their plight, and there is obvious condemnation of the "only-good-Indian-is-a-dead-one" white settler who wants to shoot the wounded. Another virtue of the film is the sweep and color of its exterior landscape shots. There is even an (almost convincing) deadly prairie hailstorm! All this considered, some first-time viewers may find the film's strengths outweigh its weaknesses.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pale imitation of "Old Yeller"...unbearable Disney corn
moonspinner5510 November 2015
Disney's 'follow-up' to "Old Yeller" from 1957, adapted from the book by "Yeller" author Fred Gipson by Gipson and William Tunberg, happily reunites Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran as the feuding Coates brothers, but this time they're not given anything special to do. The kids are looked after by their uncle, played by Brian Keith, and a floppy-eared dog, a Bluetick Coonhound, said to be Yeller's son. The production seems cheap for Disney, and the tribe of Indians who battle our heroes are like relics from a 1940s b-western. Not even Keith's macho panache can elevate this one. Norman Tokar directed, probably in between other assignments from the studio. Lumbering, by-the-numbers family entry. *1/2 from ****
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sequel? Not really
goudsward3 April 2003
Savage Sam, except for it's association with Ol' Yeller, would be a completely innocuous but more or less forgotten addition to the Disney film library. The problem with Savage Sam is twofold.

First, it was (and is) marketed as a sequel to Ol' Yeller. How could any film stand up to that kind of comparison? Yes, the book was by the same author and meant to be a tale of a son of Ol' Yeller. But trying to sell that movie as a sequel never had a chance - Fess Parker was doing a TV show and unavailable, the book itself is weak, and the scripting is sluggish.

Secondly, and this true of all movies from that time - the portrayal of the Indians was so biased that it's painful to watch as those Irish stunt men in red paint whoop it up.

Is it watchable? Yes, but view it a a separate entity, not a sequel.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Coates Boys Grown Up
bkoganbing15 August 2009
Tommy Kirk, Kevin Corcoran, and Jeff York repeat their roles from Old Yeller in this sequel film about Old Yeller's son, Savage Sam. The Coates boys from the first film have grown up considerably and Tommy is fully into puberty and thinking about York's daughter in a different light. Marta Kirsten later of Lost In Space plays a more grownup version of the part introduced by Beverly Washburn.

The parents of Travis and Arliss Coates are away and their uncle Brian Keith comes to look out for the family. Nevertheless on a Comanche raid, Kirk, Corcoran, and Kirsten are all captured although Kirk manages to escape. When Keith who is leading a posse after them finds Kirk, the dog proves invaluable in tracking the kids down and aiding in their rescue.

Although I'm still trying to figure out why anyone would want to rescue Kevin Corcoran. He's a royal pain to both the red men and white men alike. I can't believe the Indians just didn't shoot him and leave him on the trail. As he got older Corcoran's presence was more annoying than cute in a lot of movies and television he did for Disney.

In addition to Keith and York, other members of the posse consist of such western regulars as Royal Dano, Slim Pickens, and Dewey Martin all in parts they would have been typecast for.

Savage Sam is hardly as good a film as Old Yeller though it sure ends better all around for the two legged and four legged players.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it when I was 6-love it more at 53!
nsteitle6 August 2010
Stop over-thinking it! This movie was made in 1963! As a child, I didn't realize it was a sequel to Old Yeller and I didn't care. I took it for what it was-a movie about two boys and a dog in the old west. Yeah, watching it now, I see that it's corny and the portrayal of the Apaches is less than politically correct. But if you pay close attention toward the end of the movie, there is a nod to the concept that maybe it isn't really the "Indians" who are the savages after all. This is unusual for a 60's film but especially one so enthusiastically criticized here as being shallow, cheesy, etc. The movie speaks to the innocence of the early 60's-just enjoy it! And to those of you who say the dog has no personality-you must not know dogs...
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Spin Off
garyldibert17 July 2012
Savage Sam was released in the United States on June 1, 1963 starring Brian Keith, Tommy Kirk, and Kevin Corcoran. Savage Sam is the 1963 film sequel to Old Yeller written by Fred Gipson. It was inspired by the story of former Apache captive Herman Lehmann, whom Gipson had seen give an exhibition when he was a child. Norman Tokar directed the live-action film, which was released by Walt Disney on June 1, 1963.

Summary: The picture opens with Arliss coming outside and spotting his dog Sam chasing a bobcat. Now both of Arliss parents are back East attending to their Grandma leaving Travis in charge. As in Old Yeller, Travis and Arliss are at war as Travis tries to get Arliss to get some work done. Arliss wants to go hunting with his dog Sam and Travis won't let him. Therefore, Arliss who can't shoot a gun but can really throw rocks starts to throw them at Travis. Arliss has Travis pend down in the family out house when a man on a horse rides into the farm. The man turns out to be the boy's Uncle Buck. Uncle Buck tells Arliss that his daddy use to do the same thing to him when they were young, bossing him around telling him to do this and that. Travis and Arliss are out in the fields working when Sam gets into a fight with a bobcat and Arliss takes Jumper the mule and takes off chasing them. Travis goes back to the family farm where he finds Bud Searcy and his daughter Lisbeth riding telling Travis that there are Indians in the area. Bud goes into the house to eat while Travis and Lisbeth get on a horse looking for Arliss and Jumper. Travis goes up into the mountains with Lisbeth on the horse when they hear a ruckus going on. Travis gets down investigating only to find Arliss and Sam in a hole fighting the bobcat. Travis pulls Arliss out and just then, some wild horses and Indians going riding pass them.

Questions: Is what Travis saw real Indians? Did the Indians take Travis, Lisbeth, and Arliss? If they did take them, where did they go? Does Uncle Buck find out about the boys? If so, what does Buck do about it? Does Buck ever find the boys? How does the dog Sam play into all of this?

My thoughts: The film received poor reviews and fell short of box office expectations, paling in comparison with Old Yeller. Pat Hogan appears as tribesman Broken Nose. Dean Fredericks, formerly Steve Canyon on NBC, played a Comanche chief in this film. The beginning of the movie wasn't bad if you can get through the opening song which was really bad. The character Arliss had a real mouth on that boy and if I had been his big brother, I would tan the britches of that boy. I thought the cross-country scenery the Indians took with the wild horses was great. It was nice to see some of the old timers that used to play on Gunsmoke show them acting in a movie instead of just on TV. This movie didn't have a leading lady but it wasn't boring either so I'm going to give this movie 6 weasel stars. You can find this movie on Amazon.com
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This Dog Don't Hunt
wes-connors1 January 2009
Six years after "Old Yeller", Tommy Kirk (as Travis Coates) and Kevin Corcoran (as Arliss Coates) are home alone. The disappearance of "Young Yeller" is never explained. Parents Katie and Jim Coates are away from the ranch, caring for an ailing grandmother - but, don't worry, Brian Keith (as Uncle Beck Coates) checks up on the lads. Still, they are kidnapped by Native American Indians. So, can New Dog on the Block "Savage Sam" save Mr. Kirk, brother Corcoran, and Marta Kristen (as Lisbeth Searcy) from the savage Indians?

Stupid, insulting, offensive, and unworthy…

To be blunt, "Old Yeller" was one of the BEST films of this type, and "Savage Sam" is one of the WORST films of this type. They should have let sleeping dogs lie. Replacement pooch "Sam" is given no personality, and has almost nothing to do. The dog should have barked, "Get me out of this picture!" The "Injun" abduction scenes are unbelievably wretched. On the plus side, the Coates Family farm set, and location, is Disney dreamy - you couldn't help but want to live there. And, you get to see beautiful Ms. Kristen before she became "Lost in Space". But, really… you wouldn't send a dog out to see a movie like this.

** Savage Sam (6/1/63) Norman Tokar ~ Tommy Kirk, Kevin Corcoran, Brian Keith, Marta Kristen
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Far more grown-up than your regular Disney films
spevmoon25 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'm just gonna lay it out here right here and now. I have never and will never watch Old Yeller. I don't care if it's meant to be a classic. There's no way I'm spending an hour and a half of my life getting emotionally invested in these characters only to watch a 15-year-old boy breaking his heart crying as he has to shoot his beloved pet dog. Erm. No. Sorry Mr Disney. Nuh-uh. No siree Bob. Etc. Not for me. Not happening. I'm just gonna pretend that Old Yeller lived to a ripe old age, going on adventures with the boys, snuggling up at night and having cuddles with them, chasing rabbits and dreaming of lady greyhounds. Works for me.

As a result, I have to judge Savage Sam on its own merits. Being a pretty big fan of the Western movie genre, I have to say it really stands up on its own as an addition to the genre irrespective of the Disney affilation.

For approximately the billionth time, Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran were cast as brothers - and honestly I think the casting of them both is brilliant. They clearly have a good chemistry and play off each other well, and there's a real bond between them that lasted the test of time, both of them praising each others' work and character as often as possible in more modern interviews about their time at Disney and their films together. I've seen both the Hardy Boys serials where Tommy plays Joe Hardy to Tim Consadine's Frank, and although again you could see a good deal of affection between the two of them, the connection between Tommy and Kevin really seems more organic and natural. I've seen an awful lot of criticism of Kevin for being annoying and whiny and honestly - back off. He was an extraordinary child actor with an incredible range and, according to many of his coworkers, a natural intelligence and understanding of the craft of acting from a very young age. His performance as the rambunctious, pugnacious, battle-ready Arliss (is that even a real name?!) opposite Tommy's shy, sensitive, serious older brother role of Travis complemented each other so well and the dynamic worked well enough for them to be cast as brothers in pretty much everything Disney made between 1959-63.

Travis is left in charge of both the house and his little brother Arliss for an unspecified length of time while their Mama and Papa are away staying with their maternal grandmother who has been very seriously ill. Travis tries with very little success to keep the farm and Arliss in check while their parents are away, and luckily they're occasionally visited by their paternal Uncle, Beck, who somehow manages to miraculously soothe the troubled waters between both brothers. They manage to go a full five minutes without having an argument (after a protracted scene where Arliss seems intent on stoning poor old Travis to death!), but when Sam, the boys' beloved pet dog, starts chasing a bobcat, Arliss decides that chores and farming can wait, he's going to help his buddy chase the bobcat. Travis runs after him to bring him home, inexplicably accompanied by Lisabeth, a girl who is not backward in coming forward when it comes to getting what she wants - which in this instance is very clearly, and understandably, Travis - and to everyone's amazement, all three of them get kidnapped by some passing Apaches who have just stolen a pack of horses. A huge fight ensues in which we are led to believe that Sam the dog is killed! Gosh! Already?! This is gonna be a short film!! Oh no, wait, it's okay.... he's just playing dead. He's a clever boy!

Lisabeth's father and the boys' uncle Beck rally a few of their pals together and go off in pursuit. In the meantime, Arliss has managed to annoy one of the Apaches so much it's a wonder he wasn't killed twenty times over in the space of one scene, and fight so tenaciously that the Apaches decide to adopt him as one of their own. Lisabeth is understandably terrified about what will happen to her if the Apaches decide to make her one of their squaws, and Travis promises that he won't let any harm come to her, because he is a sweetheart like that. She swoons a bit. He blushes and looks a bit uncomfortable. Arliss rolls his eyes and makes a gagging noise. Soon afterwards another fight ensues in which Travis is mysteriously relieved of his shirt and is left for dead.

Fortunately, when he wakes up, Sam finds him, and the two of them set off to find Arliss and Lisabeth. Even more luckily, after approximately half a scene, they are finally reunited with Uncle Beck and the gang, and they all travel together to find Lisabeth and Arliss. But first thing's first - someone very kindly gives Travis a shirt, as they realise he's been semi-naked for approximately 20 minutes and it's a kids film. Also it seems pretty sunny in Texas and the poor love is probably in immediate danger of developing sunstroke, which is the last thing he needs. However, with Savage Sam's epic tracking skills and infallible nose, and the cosy feeling of having a gang of friends around to look after each other, they all feel pretty confident they'll soon find the missing kids and horses in no time.

Uncle Beck's posse consists mostly of middle-aged men who REALLY don't like Injuns, OR each other, and lots of in-fighting and bickering ensues, which really helps pad the thing out to an hour and a half. There's a flash storm towards the end of their journey and everyone is really worried that the storm will mean that Sam won't be able to track Arliss any more. However, they don't reckon on a) Sam's tracking skills or b) the personal hygiene of a 12-year-old boy. In no time, once the storm has passed, they find the missing kids.

A gigantic, brutal gunfight ensues, in which several of the Apaches are killed multiple times, and Sam personally saves his little buddy Arliss by savagely attacking one of the Apaches who was trying to strangle Arliss. In the meantime, Travis realises he's no fool and he goes and rescues Lisabeth, who weeps lustily into his shoulder and he looks pretty dashed pleased with himself.

Eventually, the battle is over and everyone gets to go home. Travis says he'll get some food on the go, but Lisabeth tells him that cooking is woman's work and she'll do it. He almost looks as though he's about to explain basic feminism to her, but thinks better of it because honestly he's a canonically terrible cook and he's glad of the respite.

Everything is calm and pleasant for ten seconds and then, yes, you guessed it, Sam starts fighting with the bobcat again, leading Arliss to go chasing after them both into the hills. Cue song, roll credits.

It's a genuinely sweet film, with great action sequences, some very cute dialogue and lovely interplay between shy budding lovers Travis and Lisbeth. It's quite slow-paced with a lot of dialogue-free Nice Scenery shots, but fortunately no animals die at the end of it. Not even the mule (epic spoiler, sorry). There are some proper laugh-out-loud moments, some stereotypical dry old cowboy humour, and the threat in the film is certainly present and pressing to the extent you feel a little anxious, but always with a reassuring tone that it will work out in the end.

I've seen A and B-Westerns that aren't nearly as well-made or well acted as Savage Sam. As a film in its own right, irrespective of its prequel, it holds its own as a solid example of the early 60s western film genre. I would highly recommend anyone watch it, irrespective of it being a Disney film, there's certainly something about it which makes it feel more like a regular grown-up Western, and honestly that's no bad thing.

All in all, Savage Sam is a hidden gem in the Disney catalogue which definitely does not get the love it deserves.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Okay, but not great.
insanity_845 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Both books were better than the films, but this one suffered the most by comparison. The dog didn't look like he should look in the mind of anyone I know, and the budding romance between Travis and Elizabeth was handled very clumsily. The framing is good, the visual effect is good, and the performances were adequate, but the only reason to see this is if you've seen the first one and learned to care deeply about the characters. "Old Yeller" was somewhat unpolitical and timeless, but "Savage Sam" is very dated by it's depiction of the settler/Native American struggle. The book at least was more accurate and matter-of-fact. They were probably ahead of their time by even mentioning someone who sympathized with the Native American mindset, but it's still painfully incorrect politically now. I feel the same way about another Disney effort, "Peter Pan" so maybe that's just from looking at it in retrospect.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loved it
Butter-413 April 1999
Okay...in my opinion, this sequel was better than the original. I cried my butt off in Old Yeller, but something about this movie makes me like it more than Old Yeller. I have seen Savage Sam so many times that I know ALL the words to it. It's a very good children's film, but its a "Movie that all audiences will love" If you like Old Yeller, and Where the Red Fern grows, you will love this movie.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Feels rather pointless
r96sk30 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
One to file under "Unnecessary Sequels".

It isn't a terrible film, it's just one that overstays its welcome - who's idea was it to extend this 20 minutes longer than the original? The end of the middle act and the entirety of the final act drag tremendously, not helped by the reappearance of Arliss - a character I think I truly hate... how has this made me dislike a kid!?

Arliss, at least, finally finds a use for his frankly worrying overuse of stone-throwing when he doesn't get his own way. I did like, however, that at the very end they intentionally make him annoying, as if to make a point. I must add, I do not have anything against actor Kevin Corcoran - the way the character is written is what I don't appreciate, that's all.

Tommy Kirk, who returns to play Travis, actually improves from six years prior. I felt they made him too up-and-down in the predecessor, but here he is much more likeable and I even felt attached to him. Brian Keith is a new addition, to a strong extent as he excels as Beck.

This would've been an OK production if they didn't make it go on for too long, so much fat could've been cut out. In the end 'Savage Sam' feels rather pointless.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Withering Walt.
mark.waltz27 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I consider this film the black sheep cousin to "Old Yeller", a complete disappointment considering the classic status of the more legitimate cousin. Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran are reunited from the first film, playing once again brothers unrelated to the original characters, somehow related to them. They are being raised by the embittered Brian Keith who is an Apache hunter out for revenge after other family members were killed and Kirk and Corcoran are abducted by them along with blonde Marta Kristen, one of the later "Lost in Space" sisters. Corcoran believes that one of the Apaches (Rafael Campos) killed trouble making dog Sam (the subject of the theme title song but not much else) and vows revenge.

Once again, this is a Disney film without a point of view demonstrated to express an opinion about native American treatment on film. Part of the narrative shows them as savages, basically thugs out in the country, riding the range and causing havoc for no good reason. The titled dog, Sam, is basically only heard barking through the film as some sort of guide dog and at one point is stuck in a cave with a mountain lion with Kirk or and trying to get him out, a seeing that made me feel completely claustrophobic.

Poor Campos, having played better written native American characters in Disney's "Tonka" and "The Light in the Forest", doesn't even get an understandable line, and spends all his time bullying the younger Corcoran. Considering that his character is the smallest in stature of the Apache characters, there's a lot revealed about him, but considering Campos' start in films ("The Blackboard Jungle", "Trial"), this is a complete waste of talent for an actor who showed a lot of promise and could have played some incredible roles had he had more options. At least the character he played in the following year's "Lady in a Cage" had something to do even though he was once again playing an animalistic thug.

Then there is Keith and his group of white men, basically all interchangeable and none of them really likeable. Slim Pickens basically continue his reign as playing a harder nose version of the type of jolly characters that Andy Devine had played in the 1940's. I found nothing really redeeming about this movie, and other than the opening that shows Sam frolicking with various farm animals and a crafty fox, there's nothing memorable about it. This is more adult in theme than pretty much any other Disney film I've seen, but ends up having no real purpose.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
it has its moments
rebeljenn31 March 2006
'Savage Sam' is the sequel to the ever-popular Disney film 'Old Yeller'. This film introduces a new canine hero, Sam. The boys have grown up now, and they end up being kidnapped by a tribe of Native Americans. It is up to Sam to help rescue them. I do not know how the story particularly ends, but this film was not nearly as engaging as 'Old Yeller', nor did it have the suspense and the emotional tear-jerking struggle at the end...or, if it intended to, it did not work. 'Old Yeller' is a classic, so it is difficult to create an equally good or better film, but this one does have its moments with providing some entertainment for the children. I would not recommend it unless you're really into these films and loved 'Old Yeller'...then, I suppose you have to see it.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It is Old Yeller's son
MsMeow5 August 1999
I can't believe this movie is even listed. i love it, don't get me wrong, but i didn't think anyone else knew it existed. Savage Sam is a great movie for everyone. I used to watch it at my grandmother's house on tape when i was little, but i saw it again recently and loved it just as much as ever. The characters are kind of hokey, but so what. You don't find characters like this anymore. Travis is so cute, with his hot temper and rock throwing. I think that everyone should give it a chance, after all Savage Sam is Old Yeller's pup.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Could have been better
Wise-N-Himer13 December 2005
I actually liked the book Savage Sam better even than Old Yeller. But the movie was poor and here are three key reasons why:

1) Dorothy McGuire, Fess Parker, and Chuck Conners were missing, even though their characters (Katie & Jim Coates, and Burn Sanderson, respectively) were key in the book. They were replaced by an uncle who came out of nowhere, played by Brian Keith. It really damaged the continuity of the two films.

2) Secondly, in the book Savage Sam was the son of Old Yeller, but in the movies this is obviously not the case. The puppy at the end of Old Yeller is clearly not a hound dog, and Sam is clearly not the offspring of a Lab mix like Old Yeller. The movie explanation of what happened to "Young Yeller" as well as where Sam came from? None is offered.

3) Finally, and most important, too much time had passed between the making of the films. Tommy Kirk and Kevin Corcoran were clearly too old to be playing the young Coates brothers by the time Savage Sam was made.

Pity, because it could have been a wonderful film.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unsatisfying follow-up
Wizard-816 September 2011
Not that many people, even among those who are big fans of OLD YELLER, know that a sequel was made to that beloved movie. Seeing the sequel today, I think I know why this sequel quickly drifted out of the public's conscious. Despite the movie having the name of the family dog in its title, there are large chunks of the movie where the dog is off camera. (And why is Sam shown to have a dark colored coat of hair when in the first movie as a puppy, he had golden hair?) Also, the characters of the little brother and the teenage girl are off camera for a sizable chunk of time as well. The biggest problem the movie has is that there isn't as much excitement or big feelings about anything like the first movie had. It's as if the movie was trying to be as mediocre as possible. Still, some loutish viewers may get a few laughs from how uncomfortable Tommy Kirk seems to be in the scenes where he's paired up with a female love interest.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
showing on the 'big screen'
WebMonkey-16mm29 July 2003
i've recently obtained savage sam on 35mm in technicolor no less. the kids and i love watching it on my outdoor theater setup. i show all kinds of stuff on 16mm and now recently 35mm. savage sam is a favorite.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed