| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Index | 42 reviews in total |
23 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
Not just a whodunnit, but a who-the-heck-is-that-er?, 22 April 1999
![]()
Author:
Thomas Clement (Mr. OpEd) from Los Angeles
Stunningly original. It's great fun sitting with people seeing the film for the first time and telling them all the big stars who are in it! "OK," they finally say, "I've seen George Scott and I've finally seen Kirk Douglas; where's everybody else?" Once you experience this classic, you'll know what I mean. Scott (one of the few Americans who can sustain a British accent) is wonderful as the sleuth. Houston's slight-of-hand direction is bang on. Goldsmith's wicked little theme and moody score need to finally be released on CD (Varese? Silva?).
19 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Intriguing mystery from John Huston with celebrity cameo roles, 9 November 2000
![]()
Author:
(clive@moviebuff.freeserve.co.uk) from Eastbourne, Sussex, England.
Another first rate thriller from John Huston but this time with a subtle difference. Kirk Douglas and George C. Scott are the leading actors but other stars were brought in to play small cameo roles hidden under heavy disguises! Among them are Tony Curtis, Robert Mitchum, Frank Sinatra and Burt Lancaster. Part of the mystery (and enjoyment of the film) was to guess where and when these stars appeared. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that a trick was played on the unsuspecting audience and that other (unknown) actors stood in for both Frank Sinatra and Burt Lancaster during the actual film and that these two stars only put in an appearance at the very end of the film when disguises were taken off to reveal who was who! Even so, this still remains a film worth seeing as the clever story holds your attention throughout. The film had a good supporting cast including Dana Wynter, Clive Brook and Herbert Marshall. Kirk Douglas wore the most disguises during the film and seemed to be having a good time in his various roles. "The List of Adrian Messenger" could best be described as an old fashioned mystery thriller and is none the less enjoyable for that. It is well directed by John Huston who also managed to fit in a guest appearance in the climatic hunting scene. 8/10. Clive Roberts.
18 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
A gem, 8 February 2000
![]()
Author:
vukodlak from Belgrade
Because of that gimmick with Curtis, Mitchum, Sinatra and Lancaster people
seem to regard this film as a sort of spot-the-star contest. But it is
much
more than that. Excellent acting (especially Douglas in what must be his
best role since Paths of Glory), superb music (Jerry Goldsmith) and
brilliant direction of John Huston more than make up for occasional lapses
in the story.
The story is quite simple, but the less said the better. The 'list' in
question is a list of 10 names of people from all over the UK, who seem to
have nothing in common except...well just see the movie.
And spotting the stars is quite fun too.
18 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Scary and Unorthodox, 28 April 2003
![]()
Author:
(rms125a@hotmail.com) from New York, NY
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is the first murder mystery, to my knowledge, where the bad guy
has already killed most of his victims (including scores of innocent
people via airplane bomb) in the first part of the film.
Kirk Douglas' character is heinously evil, and not just in the present
time frame, but going back to his days in the Japanese prison camp
during World War II (important plot narrative not to be overlooked)
where he sabotaged his fellow inmates' escape attempts in his function
as a mole at the camp.
Chilling at moments as the murderer just goes along killing in
nefarious and creepy disguises. Well worth seeing without commercial
interruptions.
11 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Mystery thriller with a gimmick., 12 January 2005
![]()
Author:
Jonathon Dabell (barnaby.rudge@hotmail.co.uk) from Wakefield, England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A good, old-fashioned mystery thriller, The List of Adrian Messenger
offers a rare chance to see director John Huston serving up an
atypically light-hearted style of film. Huston is usually the champion
of dark and difficult stories in which flawed characters undergo moral
and religious crises. But The List of Adrian Messenger is more of a
playful suspense story - similar to the kind of thing Hitchcock might
have made at that time - and it comes across as a likable and
occasionally exciting film.
Retired British Intelligence agent Anthony Gethryn (miscast George C.
Scott, struggling with his inconsistent English accent) investigates
the murder of Adrian Messenger, killed in the bombing of a plane.
Shortly before his death, Adrian predicted that an attempt might be
made on his life, and Gethryn is understandably intrigued when Adrian's
prediction is proved true. Aided by a survivor from the plane blast,
Raoul LeBorg (Jacques Roux), Gethryn links the killing to a list he was
given just before Adrian's demise. It becomes apparent that the murders
are the work of George Brougham (Kirk Douglas), a wartime informer and
a long-lost brother to a British aristocrat, who is deviously murdering
his way to a fabulous inheritance. Gethryn realises that Brougham is
only two killings away from claiming his prize, and sets about
ensnaring the villain before his sinister scheme is complete.
The gimmick in the film is that four major stars have brief guest roles
beneath heavy make-up. Tony Curtis, Robert Mitchum, Frank Sinatra and
Burt Lancaster are the stars - they're quite hard to spot (Mitchum is
probably the easiest, but the others are very well disguised). It's an
interesting gimmick, though I agree with other reviewers who have
pointed out that in some ways it diverts the viewer's attention away
from important plot developments. If you forget the gimmick and watch
The List of Adrian Messenger purely as a suspense thriller, it holds up
pretty well, with clever twists and turns and a very memorable final
sequence in which Brougham plans an elaborate killing during a fox
hunt. There are better and worse films of this type out there, but this
one will do nicely just the same.
8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Above Average Mystery with a gimmick, 3 July 2006
![]()
Author:
theowinthrop from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is one of those mysteries where a talented amateur (George C.
Scott) slowly unravels what the police (despite having all the
resources) can't seem to figure out.
Anthony Gethryn is a friend of the family of the Eark of Glenyre (Colin
Brook). One of the cousins of the Earl's current heir (his grandson) is
Adrian Messenger (John Merrivale) who is an author. Messenger has been
working on what he calls a mystery plot, which he mentions vaguely, but
with some ill-ease, to Gethryn. It seems he has been tracing a series
of people he (Messenger) knew who have mostly died in grotesquely
horrible accidents. He promises to tell Gethryn about it, but he has to
take an air flight on business. Earlier we saw an odd looking religious
man handing in a package that was supposed to go on the plane.
Naturally the plane blows up killing most of the passengers and crew.
But a badly injured (actually dying) Messenger tells the surviving
passenger (Jacques Roux - Raoul Le Borg) a message for Gethryn. It is a
long disjointed message, and Gethryn does get it after Roux is picked
up (by then the sole survivor of the bombed plane).
Gethryn slowly works out the message on a set of blackboards with the
assistance of the recovered Roux and Lady Jocelyn (Dana Wynter) and Sir
Wilfred Lucas (Herbert Marshall). Gradually he realizes that the list
of names are of men who were prisoners of war with Messenger, and that
they and others were betrayed by another man who will kill anyone who
is in his way to claim a large estate.
The gimmick of this film (which makes it a guessing game, but also
ruins the mystery to some extent) was to guess who were the celebrities
in cameo roles in this film. The five celebrities were Burt Lancaster,
Kirk Douglas, Robert Mitchum, Frank Sinatra, and Tony Curtis. In the
case of Lancaster, Mitchum, Sinatra, and Curtis the disguises are not
too bad (although Mitchum bone structure is a dead give-away. But
Douglas (and I am not ruining the story to say this) is in four
disguises, and like Mitchum it is just too difficult to hide his bone
structure. One of his disguises, by the way, looks like Dr. Hawley
Crippen.
Despite the gimmick taking one's attention away from the actual
mystery, the film is a good one, well directed by John Huston (who has
a cameo here as well, as does his son), and has some nice countryside
photography - particularly of the final fox hunt. It is a decently
made, above average mystery.
11 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Was it that bad?, 27 June 2004
![]()
Author:
Rob Falconer from Penarth, Wales
Looking through the readers' comments, nobody seems to like this film very much. OK, so it is gimmicky, but that was the trend in the early sixties. I failed to spot most of the made-up stars as I assumed they would have been central to the plot, which most aren't. But the plot is unusual and interesting, and the film really shows what it's like to be in love when it seems unreturned (few others might describe this film as romantic, and yet it is one of the most realistically romantic films I've seen - one can really identify with the French "hero" on seeing his apparently superior rival). Also, Jerry Goldsmith's score is phenomenal. And, in his final "unmasking," is Kirk Douglas trying to suggest he was the George C. Scott character too? The resemblance is quite strong.
13 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
This is why you go to the movies., 26 February 2002
![]()
Author:
eronavbj from Williamstown, NJ
Entertaining...that's what this film is - the reason you go to the movies
in
the first place.
If you like mysteries, this is among the best. The clever use of cameo
appearances only makes it better.
It was so magnetic, I had to see it again almost immediately. The plot is
second to none.
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Huston Takes a Vacation, 7 April 2007
![]()
Author:
Robert J. Maxwell (rmax304823@yahoo.com) from Deming, New Mexico, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
It's an easy-going, mildly entertaining mystery, the solution of which
is given before the ending. The mystery itself could have been cooked
up by Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle as a neat Sherlock Holmes short story.
This one is rather dragged out. There's a subplot involving a French
businessman and Dana Wynters that has nothing to do with the main
story. Some of the Reveals are telegraphed ahead of time. Holmes could
have solved the whole thing in a few hours over three pipes of shag.
That doesn't matter. It's kind of relaxing and enjoyable. I mean, here
are all these famous faces hidden behind rubber masks, sometimes with
dubbed voices. The only one we can consistently recognize from
beginning to end is Kirk Douglas. (That nose! That chin!) Well, that's
not entirely true. In an epilogue, Robert Mitchum struggles manfully to
remove his makeup and when he's through he looks almost exactly as he
did before. Some mysteries are easier to solve than others.
No need to go on about the plot. I will bet my riding breeches that
whoever wrote the script had read "The Hound of the Baskervilles" not
long before.
However, here are John Huston and a lot of megastars of the time having
a vacation in Ireland. (Not the only Huston vacation, to be sure.) Few
of the megastars appear in the same shot. That's because -- well, it
works this way. You hire, say, Burt Lancaster for a week. No more than
that because he's expensive. And you shoot all his scenes in a few
days. Then you do the same with, say, Frank Sinatra. By featuring them
all in short and separate scenes, you wind up with more cameos for your
buck.
The lead is George C. Scott, with a reasonable British accent, at least
to untutored ears. The unnecessary French friend may have added some
appeal for French audiences. Kirk Douglas has a more substantial
supporting role as the head heavy, and Robert Mitchum is on screen
several times as a drunken scoundrel.
The director, John Huston, had an estate in Ireland at the time and
rode in exaltation to the hounds in fox hunts. Fox hunts -- "The
unspeakable after the inedible," commented Oscar Wilde.
Yet I have this vision of them all having drinks and dinner at Huston's
country place. And Huston getting to his feet at the end of a long
evening and suggesting they all start half an hour later tomorrow. To
him, at least in my vision, this is what "Donovan's Reef" was to John
Ford. And the disguised cameos are kind of fun, even after you know
who's who.
8 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
The gimmick - I disagree, 14 April 2005
![]()
Author:
Julie Hoverson from Seattle
I wanted to say something in praise of the masked star gimmick -
something I haven't seen anyone else mention.
Rather than viewing the various "heavily made-up" characters as a spot
the star contest, look at it from the other side and, suddenly, the
gimmick becomes an ingenious way of covering up the killer - hiding him
from the audience. Since the filmmakers knew they couldn't find a way
to make a full head latex "invisible" to the audience, (and presumably
didn't want to go with a completely other actor) they went the
Purloined Letter route and threw in a bunch of such "spottable"
characters to keep the audience from guessing which one was the killer.
Much like the movie The Spanish Prisoner - where every person seems
somehow fakey UNTIL you watch from the viewpoint of "spot the scam" and
realize the EVERYONE sounds fake (i.e., like they're scamming someone)
so you CAN'T spot the con artists.
Brilliant, really. In both cases.
| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |