| Barbet Schroeder | ... | Young Man / Narrator | |
| Claudine Soubrier | ... | Jacqueline | |
| Michèle Girardon | ... | Sylvie | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Fred Junk | ... | (uncredited) | |
| Michel Mardore | ... | (uncredited) | |
| Bertrand Tavernier | ... | Young Man / Narrator (voice) (uncredited) | |
Directed by | |||
| Eric Rohmer | |||
Writing credits | ||
| Eric Rohmer | (written by) uncredited | |
Produced by | |||
| G. Derocles | .... | producer | |
| Barbet Schroeder | .... | producer | |
Cinematography by | |||
| Bruno Barbey | |||
| Jean-Michel Meurice | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Jackie Raynal | (uncredited) | ||
| Eric Rohmer | (uncredited) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| Rendezvous in Paris | Clerks. | Amélie | Pépé le Moko | Suzanne's Career |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Romance section | IMDb France section |
This is a short film by Eric Rohmer--and the first of his six so-called 'Morality Tales'. Unlike some of his later films, this one seems much more like a typical French New Wave film--with its unusual camera work (looking more like an amateur film at times), use of natural settings and unusual style.
"The Bakery Girl of Monceau" begins with a young man noticing a pretty lady as he walked to college. He's interested in her but they don't know each other at all--and he's working up the courage to talk to her. Eventually, he bumps into her and they talk a bit. He asks her out for coffee but she declines--but tells him she'd be willing in the future. The problem, however, is that for some time he returns to his daily route and doesn't see her. Instead, however, he becomes interested in a girl who works in a bakery. What will become of this and will the original girl return?
While I know that many love Rohmer and New Wave films, this one seems like it's more a practice film than a finished product. It's incredibly mundane--to the point of almost being banal. Because of this, it's not for the casual viewer--and a film that is really impossible to rate.