IMDb >
Lolita (1962)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsLolita (1962) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 44 | slideshow) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
13 June 1962 (USA) moreTagline:
How did they ever make a movie of Lolita?Plot:
A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a 14-year-old nymphet. full summary | full synopsisAwards:
Nominated for Oscar. Another 7 nominations moreNewsDesk:
(7 articles)
Lots of horrific screenings around the U.S. and UK! (From Fangoria. 8 May 2009, 1:54 PM, PDT)
Anthony Harvey Recalls Directing "The Lion In Winter" At Loews Jersey City
(From CinemaRetro. 1 May 2009, 1:14 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
Cynically romantic moreUS TV Schedule:
| Tue. July 14 | 3:30 PM | TCM |
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| James Mason | ... | Prof. Humbert Humbert | |
| Shelley Winters | ... | Charlotte Haze | |
| Sue Lyon | ... | Lolita | |
| Gary Cockrell | ... | Richard T. Schiller | |
| Jerry Stovin | ... | John Farlow | |
| Diana Decker | ... | Jean Farlow | |
| Lois Maxwell | ... | Nurse Mary Lore | |
| Cec Linder | ... | Dr. Keegee | |
| Bill Greene | ... | George Swine | |
| Shirley Douglas | ... | Mrs. Starch | |
| Marianne Stone | ... | Vivian Darkbloom | |
| Marion Mathie | ... | Miss Lebone | |
| James Dyrenforth | ... | Frederick Beale Sr. | |
| Maxine Holden | ... | Miss Fromkiss | |
| John Harrison | ... | Tom |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
152 minCountry:
UKLanguage:
EnglishColor:
Black and WhiteAspect Ratio:
1.37 : 1 moreSound Mix:
Mono (RCA Sound Recording)Certification:
USA:Approved (PCA #20000) | Canada:AA (Ontario) | Canada:G (Quebec) | Canada:R (Manitoba/Nova Scotia) | Norway:16 | France:Unrated | Brazil:12 | Argentina:Atp (re-rating) | Argentina:16 | Australia:M | Finland:K-15 (re-rating) | Finland:K-16 (original rating) | Hong Kong:III | Ireland:15 | Italy:VM14 | Japan:R-15 | Singapore:PG | South Korea:18 | Spain:13 | Sweden:15 | UK:15 (video rating) (1999) | UK:X (original rating) | West Germany:12 | Portugal:M/12Fun Stuff
Trivia:
In the novel, Lolita is a brunette. In the film, she is a blonde. moreGoofs:
Crew or equipment visible: Director Stanley Kubrick. walks through very first shot (center to right bottom) of Humbert in Quilty's house moreQuotes:
Humbert Humbert: You know, I've missed you terribly.Lolita Haze: I haven't missed you. In fact, I've been revoltingly unfaithful to you.
Humbert Humbert: Oh?
Lolita Haze: But it doesn't matter a bit, because you've stopped caring anyway.
Humbert Humbert: What makes you say I've stopped caring for you?
Lolita Haze: Well, you haven't even kissed me yet, have you?
more
Soundtrack:
Theme from Lolita moreFAQ
Who was the mysterious dark-haired woman who always appeared at Quilty's side?How old was Lolita supposed to be?
Is "Lolita" based on a book?
more
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Lolita (1962) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Lolita | City of Shoulders and Noses | Big Fish | The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne | Gone with the Wind |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drama section | IMDb UK section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |












Having read the Nabokov novel and the two well-known versions of the film, I believe the most accurate way of defining the relations is: Lyne´s film is more faithful to the literal reading of the story, Kubrick's one is far more faithful to its spirit and, what is even more important, it isn't drowned by comparisons with the book.
Probably what bothers most people who have seen both films and read the novel is that Kubrick gives ample space to cynicism, farce and mocking of all the main (and even secondary) characters: it ridicules both the cultured, refined and cosmopolitan Englishman and the pseudo-liberal and fairly tacky Americans (the cultural and behavioral differentiation reminding me of Henry James, just in reverse). The child temptress is here seen more realistically as a sexy however vacuous and irritating teenager and Humbert´s love of her as a noble and real but tremendously stupid infatuation (coming from a cold-headed intellectual like him). Also delightful the portrayal of alcoholic and neurotic Shelley Winters, and particularly of Peter Sellers as a mediocre tv writer enhanced by American middle-class culture. There is a lot of witty sociopolitical criticism here.
Adrian Lynne's version, being utterly romantic (and striving really too hard to be poetic) may seem more accurate on the love story but is really Nabokov's intention to tell a love story as such? I can't really appreciate how such wonderful novelist could be so obvious and open to his reader. Not forgetting the romanticism of Humbert's feelings of despair towards the girl, Kubrick doesn't indulge in a simple love story but explores all the most obscure consequences of irrationality and does so with irony and sarcasm (humour is everywhere) but also with a touch of compassionate dramatism when appropriate.
We have a classic here, both faithful to the novel and full of innovations. Lynne´s intent is merely a limp follower of its two (the literary and the filmic) predecessors.