IMDb > Il pianeta degli uomini spenti (1961) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 1 of 3:[1] [2] [3] [Next]
Index 21 reviews in total 

25 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
Some of my favorite cheese..., 31 August 2002
6/10
Author: Don (scifiguy-2) from Las Vegas, Nv.

I happened to see this many times in the 1960's, at kiddie matinees in the theater. Imagine 50 cents for a triple feature every weekend, for years on end. There were a lot of dog films, but this one stood out with decent f/x and unique sound effects. It's one of the earliest space-operas depicting dog fighting ships in space, preceded only by the 1959 Toho production of "Battle In Outer Space". Say what you want about the bad voice dubbing and the unknown Italian cast. Films like this were not being produced in the U.S. during this period, due to lack of effects technology, and budget constraints. At the time, it was a bold attempt in a genre that was just beginning. Jaded modern viewers should see this in context within the history of fantasy films. Pure science fiction was rare during this period, and a treat for fans at the time. Claude Rains has some very good dialouge, as a cynical mathmatician guiding efforts to thwart alien invaders. The ships are well conceived, with the footage re-used in later films. Unfortunately, the editing is choppy and the video transfers that exist are very poor. It would be nice to see a widescreen restoration.

Was the above review useful to you?

17 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
momma mia, atsa somma crummy meataball!, 9 April 2004
Author: march9hare from sparks nv

Claude Rains stars as Prof. Benson, a cynical mathematical genius/recluse who must save the world from implacable aliens. The movie has an interesting premise - a planetoid enters into orbit around the Earth causing widespread upheavals of Nature, and turns out to be a sort of alien Noah's Ark - but is marred by a tiny budget, hambone acting (except for Rains), oafish direction, and really crummy effects even for 1961. This may not have been Rains' last film, but he certainly deserved better. Having said all that, for some odd reason this one remains a favorite. Guess there's no accounting for taste. Seriously though, there are worse. MUCH worse.

Was the above review useful to you?

16 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
An interesting and atmospheric movie., 24 January 2003
6/10
Author: m-fan

The mysterious sounding music of the main title when the film starts sets the pace for the whole movie, which is laid-back yet enchanting (especially if watched at night).

It is not hardly a typical space battle type picture so this should not be expected. As a matter of fact this movie shows a much more realistic viewing of what space travel will be like when it finally becomes common place. For example the rockets are propelled by some type of gas, and permission has to be given from mission control before engines are started, and rocket courses and accelerations have to take into account things like planet gravity and possible g forces on the crew.

The main characters are interesting and even though it is overdubbed the dialog is good, with a few exceptions which are fun to laugh at. The acting by Claude Rains is very good, and you can actually feel sympathy for professor Benson, who has nothing to keep him going but science (and Eve though he finds it hard to admit it even to himself).

The story is interesting and has a few twists to it that keep things moving along. The movie also presents an interesting commentary on possible future government-military-industrial and international organization. This movie might not fit everyone's taste, yet people who sometimes enjoy laid-back atmospheric fantasies should enjoy it.

Was the above review useful to you?

14 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Watching Italian Sci-Fi is like taking a candy striped drug trip, 11 October 2001
8/10
Author: thebigcube

I'm very tired of Italian Science Fiction getting a bad rap for being dull films. Just sit back and let your self be hypnotized by the world that a film like BATTLE OF THE WORLDS creates and I guarantee you will find your self on a trip to the end of the universe. The sound effects and use of color alone will have you wishing this film will never end...and it almost seems it doesn't

Was the above review useful to you?

11 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Tries to be intelligent SF, but..., 22 October 2002
6/10
Author: Rich Meyer (muzik@ptd.net) from Saint Clair, Pennsylvania

The one problem with Battle of the Worlds is that it tries to be a lot of things and doesn't quite pull any of them off. It tries to be a regular Italian space opera. It tries to be intelligent science fiction. Claude Rains definitely tries to make it a monodrama.

Unfortunately, the script doesn't let it be any of these things, and Claude's overacting makes you almost want to take a swing at the poor guy...I'm hoping that he had a good time while he did this movie (since it was really his last film), because it really was fun to watch him in this movie. His performance as a cantankerous, pajama-wearing, genius of a hermit who can answer any problem through calculus just didn't help things, and his character's attitude toward everything that wasn't math or himself make me wonder why his co-workers didn't lock him up in a rubber room.

The effects are a little on the loq quality side, even considering the general quality of Italian Sci-Fi movie SFX, but they don't really detract that much from the movie.

Was the above review useful to you?

4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Classic Sci-Fi with some snappy philosophical dialogue, 20 September 2008
8/10
Author: Rabh17 from United States

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Okay-- The Earth is threatened by an Outsider-- a dark world that comes out of the Intergalactic Depths to wreck havoc on the Earth. Attempts to investigate gives rise to a fleet of flying saucer ships that destroy all who approach!! DOOM!!!

Yes-- this is 1961!

This was not a movie of the Space Age-- but more precisely a Movie from the Age of Outer Space.

And despite it being an Italian film, it is quite good, giving a strong nod to the basic lay science of Outer Space as it was known in that bygone era. So forget any descriptions such as 'Spagetti Space Opera'. They don't do justice to this film.

For me as a kid in 1968 when I first saw it on TV-- in grainy Black & White -- it was merely an exciting film about space rockets and flying saucers. The dialogue outside of the spaceship scenes was gibberish and mainly ignored. And when I WAS paying attention, my mother kept calling to me from the kitchen to turn off the 'Idiot Box' and demanding if I had finished my homework like I was supposed to.

Aaaaaagh!

But Now as an adult, I hear the dialogue between "Dr. Benson" and his subordinates and the Council as rich in almost Shakespearean content as you listen to Dr. Benson excoriate his underlings and the Powers-that-Be about the power of calculation over the reliance on machines.

"What's the purpose of Life, if you won't Know?" he demands in what seems to be a fit of madness. . . except he really isn't mad- just Misunderstood Genius.

So when you watch this movie-- Pay Attention to Dr. Benson. He IS the center of this movie.

And try to identify the classical string piece that always starts playing when Dr. Benson hits intellectual revelation!

Was the above review useful to you?

8 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Fascinating, But A Bit Too Oblique For It's Own Good, 6 March 2007
5/10
Author: Steve Nyland (Squonkamatic) from New York, USA

Antonio Margheriti's Italian Spaghetti Space Operas are some of the most interesting science fiction from the 1960s. Starting with SPACE MEN (or ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE) and culminating with the brilliantly mod GAMMA ONE QUADROLIGY, Margheriti helped to shape the ultimate form of the genre -- Kubrick's 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY -- and gave it a truly modern ring (for the time) that was only bettered by the Soviet era science fiction like PLANETA BUR and MECHA NEVSTRACHU. A journeyman filmmaker with a background in production design, Margheriti was not as visionary in his approach as contemporary Mario Bava, who's PLANET OF THE VAMPIRES remains the most impressive example of Spaghetti Science Fiction, but Margheriti had perhaps a more populist approach to his work that still endears forty-plus years later. His use of models, miniatures and pyrotechnics alone would have earned him a very respectable place in the annals of the genre by themselves.

BATTLE OF THE WORLDS is his second trip into the galaxy for entertainment, and compared to the previous year's ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE, this movie is almost a quantum leap forward in terms of ambitions for his plot, characters and action sequences. And I suspect that as is the case with ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE a great deal of the critical responses this movie has accumulated ("Atsa one-a lousy meataball") has to do with the really crummy surviving prints of the film, or rather the surviving home video transfers available on public domain oriented DVD collections. BATTLE OF THE WORLDS was certainly a much more impressive experience when shown in it's correct original widescreen ratio, probably 2:35:1 Techniscope by the looks of the pan and scanning going on to condense the film for small screen. The color on the transfers -- which are likely traceable to the same early 1980s transfer to VHS -- are almost uniformly rotted nearly to sepia in spots, with plenty of surface noise & jumbled damage to individual frames. What most people are reviewing is the DVD they saw, not the film itself.

I must admit that the first time I saw this movie I despised it, didn't understand it, and shelved the poor video for a few years until I sold it before realizing who director Anthony Dawson was. Now seeing it again a few years older and wiser I still must come clean and say I don't understand the plot, how the story gets from A to B to C, and have actually been paying attention just to figure it all out. From what I can gather, Earth finds itself under assault from a wandering "planet" that has come from another galaxy (a story idea Margheriti would later re-visit in his Gamma One project), ostensibly to conquer Earth as a new home for it's passengers. Only crazed astronomer/mathematician Claude Raines understands the phenomenon as what it really is: An attack, and urges the united Earth government bodies to act before it is too late.

In pursuit of that end there are lots of frantic rocket ship battles, near collisions, big Margheriti explosions and of course a location shoot at a local power plant or electrical substation standing in for a spaceport. There is a base on Mars, guys in pressure suits doing stuff on the surface of the invading planet, a cute little puppy dog and even some romance. Including, oddly, old man Raines almost openly having a thing for his 20 year old assistant with her dark, fluttering eyelashes. Raines is easily the most impressive aspect of the film but mostly because he emotes such vigor in his role, and seems to be enjoying it so much, that you can't help but be charmed by the effort. Even if it's hard to understand what he's on about half the time. But like a Spaghetti Western what makes it "work" is the collection of individual moments that make up the film, some of which are actually very well done.

5/10: Look fast for Spaghetti Western hero Giuliano Gemma in one of his first screen roles, and yes: We NEED a better print, badly.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Solid Early '60s Italian Hard Sci-Fi, 3 August 2010
7/10
Author: mstomaso from Vulcan

The appearance of Claude Rains is not the only surprise in Anthony Dawson's Il pianeta degli uomini spenti (A.K.A. Battle of the Worlds). Rains plays an eccentric, reclusive, contemptuous elderly scientist who leads a powerful research team. Professor Benson is the best, and he has little patience for lesser minds. His only link to humanity seems to be Eve (Maya Brent), his assistant. Her coming of age, the insubordination of one of the younger members of his research team, and the impending arrival of an enormous and mysterious space object - The Outsider - combine to challenge "the old man's" carefully-constructed self concept, his arrogance, and, ultimately, the continuation of life on earth.

Ultimately, this is one of Italy's best and most serious sci-fi films, and one of the better early '60s sci-fi films to come out of Europe. The relatively primitive (but creative) effects coupled with the very serious and dramatic tone of the dialog may be difficult for most American viewers. Giorgio Giovannini's soundtrack is jarring and intense. And the excellent, but sometimes surreal, Marcello Masciocchi cinematography won't help the average viewer enjoy this film. The international cast (mostly Americans) does very well.

Given the film's dubious pedigree and silly cliché title, I can certainly understand why some reviewers felt compelled to use the words "cheesy" and "spaghetti" in their reviews. I am tempted to point out that macaroni and cheese is a very tasty dish, but I will refrain. Approach this film with an open mind and you might just be able to get something more than guilty pleasure from it.

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Now I know why they call it "cheesy sci-fi"..., 30 June 2006
3/10
Author: Matthew Conn (valkensyc@hotmail.com) from United States

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Wow. Really, wow. This movie has tons of potential, and goes absolutely nowhere! The special effects are top notch considering the time in which it was made. The technology smacks of the odd "computer" style of the sixties where lighted buttons with no labels dominated the sci-fi realm. Very "Star Trek"-esquire.

That aside, the only saving grace of this film is Claude. His charatcer actually has life to it. It is a bit much, but considering his co-stars, it is no wonder why.

The whole film is perfect to be ripped on. Get your sci-fi buddies, grab a bag of chips and some cheese dip, and wail away at this one. Tom Servo and Crow would be your best co-pilots on this journey into the horribly lame.

Was the above review useful to you?

3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
"It's not difficult to tell the truth, but it's impossible to be believed.", 10 May 2006
4/10
Author: classicsoncall from United States

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I guess every great actor is allowed at least one poor casting decision, and with this film, that distinction goes to Claude Rains. It's hard to believe the Professor Benson of this film is the same man who brilliantly portrayed Captain Renault in 1942's "Casablanca". Here he's one dimensionally annoying as a bull headed scientist who's undeniably impressed with himself and isn't shy about letting you know it - "There's only one opinion that interests me, and that's my own."

Benson's mathematical calculations convince him that a body in outer space will come within ninety five thousand miles of Earth, even though colleagues and military strategists fret over it's seeming collision course with our planet. What Benson didn't count on, and by his own admission the only time he was ever wrong, is that once the asteroid reaches it's predestined location, it starts orbiting the Earth. With obvious implications that a guiding force is at the core of the mysterious body, Benson demands that Earth's 'High Command' not destroy it, but allow him and a team of his fellow scientists investigate.

I always get a kick out of the way sci-fi flicks of the era took such liberty with the vast amounts of time involved in space travel, and reduced them to mere minutes for purposes of the story. In about the time it took to count down from ten to one, blast off, Benson's team was on the asteroid, investigating a cable laden labyrinth with an ominous red glow. With a destruct sequence in effect, Benson prefers to confront the truth of the mystery of the 'Outsider', while everyone else with him wisely decides that maybe it's time to go. On that note, one of the team members sadly concludes that Benson had a formula where his heart should have been, as the planet goes kablooey.

"Battle of the Worlds" is a gross exaggeration in selection of a title. Nothing on that vast a scale occurs, though there are occasional skirmishes between Earth rockets and alien flying saucers. If there's a positive to be found here, at least the sci-fi elements of the picture were a notch above other films of the era, as film making technology relentlessly moved toward breakthroughs that would appear in "Star Trek" in a few more years.

Was the above review useful to you?


Page 1 of 3:[1] [2] [3] [Next]

Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings External reviews
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history