13 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- "People get changed. Nobody ends like he started.", 27 October 2007
Author:
ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) from Mexico
Lat Evans (Don Murray) is an ambitious lonesome cowboy who is figuring
on hanging around for a while in Fort Brock, Montana He is a good name
back home He is out to make it mean something here He saves some
money and wants to buy a ranch So he went to the bank to see about
making a loan But Marshal Conrad (Albert Dekker) can't afford to back
gamblers For him, it's too much of a risk He advises Lat to get
himself some securitya piece of land, a deed, something to put upthen
they'll talk about a loan
But Callie (Lee Remick), the dance hall girl, who is doing it to keep
him with her, gave him her savingswith the promise to pay it back to
buy the ranch he wants
Meantime another girl appears, the pretty Joyce (Patricia Owens) She's
the niece of the banker Tidy, educated, she has been to college and
all that Of course Lat owes his start to Callie but he got to finish
by himself What he wants is a starched wife and a starched home and a
starched reputation and Callie is spoiling his chances of getting it
Murray is fine as the man with a future He doubts if he goes in there
his political chances are finished
Lee Remick hasn't cared for anybody in such a long time She's honest
enough to say she's not worth risking anything for
Richard Egan is the man who breaks his word, double-crosses his friends
and beats up his woman
Filmed in CinemaScope and color, this big-scale Western is very
entertaining with enough action around
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- The film is good, but something is missing., 23 June 2006
Author:
tmwest from S. Paulo, Brazil
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This is the story of a cowboy Lat Evans (Don Murray) driven by blind
ambition who is not fair to the woman who loves him and helped him (Lee
Remick) and his best friend who saved his life (Stuart Whitman).
Richard Egan has a good performance as the villain, who is also after
Remick but treats her badly. Murray's attitude in relation to Remick
and Whitman is so cruel and shocking that even when he tries to redeem
himself you are not convinced that he has suffered enough. When the
film starts you look at Murray like a standard western hero, and the
fact that when the film ends it still tries to make you believe Murray
is a good guy who paid for his sins, leaves the spectator with a
feeling something is missing. I liked the film, but did not like the
ending.
3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Great Cast, 20 March 2007
Author:
Homeric from Mt Muir
Terrific production values. Great cast. Lackluster script. Terrible
soundtrack. Something missing. Too clean and tidy. Not realistic in a
strange sense. A melodrama western? Not a bad film just not a really
good one and certainly not as good as it should have been given the
great cast. Lots and lots of clichés. Main character is not really
likable. Many loose ends. Underdeveloped characters. Worth watching for
Lee Remick and Patricia Owens.
I can't put my finger quite on the reason why this film falls flat.
There just isn't any sizzle or scenes that grab you. Perhaps it is
because the role of Latt (the main character) is not sympathetic. He
seems to change from a decent guy to a heel almost overnight,
forgetting about his true friends. Then he redeems himself instantly at
the end. People don't change back and forth and back again like that.
5 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- not half-bad, but could have been better, 27 January 2002
Author:
timothy-5 (mcbricker@webtv.net) from Phila, PA
I do agree with the other user's comments. While it was a treat to see
the
lush cinematography and beautiful landscape, two lovely redhead girls, and
a
behind-the-scenes look at a bygone era, this is one of those movies that
leaves too much up in the air. You wonder whether Callie will be found
not
guilty at her trial, or whether the fistfight or Lat's seeing Callie will
result in a hindrance to his professional or personal life. The film was
OK
as far as it went, but the filmed seemed to end halfway
through.
2 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :- Interesting adaptation of A.B. Guthrie's novel about a Montana cattleman's self-discovery., 1 January 2000
Author:
Tom Martin from Lansing, Michigan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Don Murray plays Latt Evans, an ambitious cowboy who puts himself in the
fast lane for success in Montana's cattle country. There is a very good
supporting cast in this story with Stuart Whitman as his friend, Albert
Dekker as a banker and Patricia Owens as the banker's niece. Lee Remick
plays her usual strong role as Callie, another friend of Evans. Richard
Egan plays an uncharacteristically villainous role and does it pretty
well.
"Remember", Evans' trail boss tells him, "people change. They don't turn
out like they started." He realizes that people make decisions and that
these decisions have implications for them and others around them. The
boss
knows Evans better than he knows himself.
In his desire to get ahead Evans loses sight of what's important in life.
He works two jobs on the cattle drive that brings him to Montana. He
spends
a hard winter poisoning wolves. In the end it is a friend's generous loan
which gives him what he really wants, his own ranch. Almost too late, he
realizes in a scene reminiscent of "The Virginian" that it is friends that
really matter.
There are two women in Evans' life and both Remick and Owens do well in
their roles. Remick's character is much better developed in the script.
She is more than slightly tarnished woman in the traditional Western
morality. Albert Dekker advises Evans to stay away from the bordello if
he
is serious about making something of himself. Callie appreciates her
status
in the community. "I'm not worth it," she advises Evans at one point when
he is about to pick a fight for her. Although she loans Evans the money
to
get him started she expects nothing for it. The loan is repaid and he
owes
her nothing more. Even the note Evans receives at the end asking for help
was written by someone else.
Patricia Owens plays the banker's niece and eventually becomes Evans'
wife.
Her character is respectable compared to Callie. She doesn't understand
Evans' friendship with Callie, but she tries to do so. Unfortunately, the
film does not do her character justice. Evans says that he loves her, but
her character gets such short shrift that it's hard to tell why. Is it
because she's respectable and Callie's not? I'd like to think there's
more
to it than that and Owens' role certainly hints at some depth to her
character.
The fight at the end probably ranks in the top ten in screen fist fights.
It is reminiscent of "The Spoilers", except that this time the mud is in
glorious color.
The ending is only partially satisfying. There are too many loose ends.
The relationship between Evans and his wife is clarified in the ending,
but
Callie's fate is left to the imagination. Evans will testify at her
trial.
"Will it be the truth?", his wife asks. "Yes", he responds. "Then you
testify", she says. What happens to Evans' position in the community and
his political aspirations in light of his support for a prostitute? The
viewer can reach his own conclusions about these issues, too. Perhaps
that's appropriate. Evans does what he thinks is right. Who can argue
with
that?
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
These Thousand Hills (1959) More at IMDbPro »
13 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

"People get changed. Nobody ends like he started.", 27 October 2007
Author: ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) from Mexico
Lat Evans (Don Murray) is an ambitious lonesome cowboy who is figuring on hanging around for a while in Fort Brock, Montana He is a good name back home He is out to make it mean something here He saves some money and wants to buy a ranch So he went to the bank to see about making a loan But Marshal Conrad (Albert Dekker) can't afford to back gamblers For him, it's too much of a risk He advises Lat to get himself some securitya piece of land, a deed, something to put upthen they'll talk about a loan
But Callie (Lee Remick), the dance hall girl, who is doing it to keep him with her, gave him her savingswith the promise to pay it back to buy the ranch he wants
Meantime another girl appears, the pretty Joyce (Patricia Owens) She's the niece of the banker Tidy, educated, she has been to college and all that Of course Lat owes his start to Callie but he got to finish by himself What he wants is a starched wife and a starched home and a starched reputation and Callie is spoiling his chances of getting it
Murray is fine as the man with a future He doubts if he goes in there his political chances are finished
Lee Remick hasn't cared for anybody in such a long time She's honest enough to say she's not worth risking anything for
Richard Egan is the man who breaks his word, double-crosses his friends and beats up his woman
Filmed in CinemaScope and color, this big-scale Western is very entertaining with enough action around
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
The film is good, but something is missing., 23 June 2006
Author: tmwest from S. Paulo, Brazil
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This is the story of a cowboy Lat Evans (Don Murray) driven by blind ambition who is not fair to the woman who loves him and helped him (Lee Remick) and his best friend who saved his life (Stuart Whitman). Richard Egan has a good performance as the villain, who is also after Remick but treats her badly. Murray's attitude in relation to Remick and Whitman is so cruel and shocking that even when he tries to redeem himself you are not convinced that he has suffered enough. When the film starts you look at Murray like a standard western hero, and the fact that when the film ends it still tries to make you believe Murray is a good guy who paid for his sins, leaves the spectator with a feeling something is missing. I liked the film, but did not like the ending.
3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Great Cast, 20 March 2007
Author: Homeric from Mt Muir
Terrific production values. Great cast. Lackluster script. Terrible soundtrack. Something missing. Too clean and tidy. Not realistic in a strange sense. A melodrama western? Not a bad film just not a really good one and certainly not as good as it should have been given the great cast. Lots and lots of clichés. Main character is not really likable. Many loose ends. Underdeveloped characters. Worth watching for Lee Remick and Patricia Owens.
I can't put my finger quite on the reason why this film falls flat. There just isn't any sizzle or scenes that grab you. Perhaps it is because the role of Latt (the main character) is not sympathetic. He seems to change from a decent guy to a heel almost overnight, forgetting about his true friends. Then he redeems himself instantly at the end. People don't change back and forth and back again like that.
5 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-
not half-bad, but could have been better, 27 January 2002
Author: timothy-5 (mcbricker@webtv.net) from Phila, PA
I do agree with the other user's comments. While it was a treat to see the lush cinematography and beautiful landscape, two lovely redhead girls, and a behind-the-scenes look at a bygone era, this is one of those movies that leaves too much up in the air. You wonder whether Callie will be found not guilty at her trial, or whether the fistfight or Lat's seeing Callie will result in a hindrance to his professional or personal life. The film was OK as far as it went, but the filmed seemed to end halfway through.
2 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-

Interesting adaptation of A.B. Guthrie's novel about a Montana cattleman's self-discovery., 1 January 2000
Author: Tom Martin from Lansing, Michigan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Don Murray plays Latt Evans, an ambitious cowboy who puts himself in the fast lane for success in Montana's cattle country. There is a very good supporting cast in this story with Stuart Whitman as his friend, Albert Dekker as a banker and Patricia Owens as the banker's niece. Lee Remick plays her usual strong role as Callie, another friend of Evans. Richard Egan plays an uncharacteristically villainous role and does it pretty well.
"Remember", Evans' trail boss tells him, "people change. They don't turn out like they started." He realizes that people make decisions and that these decisions have implications for them and others around them. The boss knows Evans better than he knows himself.
In his desire to get ahead Evans loses sight of what's important in life. He works two jobs on the cattle drive that brings him to Montana. He spends a hard winter poisoning wolves. In the end it is a friend's generous loan which gives him what he really wants, his own ranch. Almost too late, he realizes in a scene reminiscent of "The Virginian" that it is friends that really matter.
There are two women in Evans' life and both Remick and Owens do well in their roles. Remick's character is much better developed in the script. She is more than slightly tarnished woman in the traditional Western morality. Albert Dekker advises Evans to stay away from the bordello if he is serious about making something of himself. Callie appreciates her status in the community. "I'm not worth it," she advises Evans at one point when he is about to pick a fight for her. Although she loans Evans the money to get him started she expects nothing for it. The loan is repaid and he owes her nothing more. Even the note Evans receives at the end asking for help was written by someone else.
Patricia Owens plays the banker's niece and eventually becomes Evans' wife. Her character is respectable compared to Callie. She doesn't understand Evans' friendship with Callie, but she tries to do so. Unfortunately, the film does not do her character justice. Evans says that he loves her, but her character gets such short shrift that it's hard to tell why. Is it because she's respectable and Callie's not? I'd like to think there's more to it than that and Owens' role certainly hints at some depth to her character.
The fight at the end probably ranks in the top ten in screen fist fights. It is reminiscent of "The Spoilers", except that this time the mud is in glorious color.
The ending is only partially satisfying. There are too many loose ends. The relationship between Evans and his wife is clarified in the ending, but Callie's fate is left to the imagination. Evans will testify at her trial. "Will it be the truth?", his wife asks. "Yes", he responds. "Then you testify", she says. What happens to Evans' position in the community and his political aspirations in light of his support for a prostitute? The viewer can reach his own conclusions about these issues, too. Perhaps that's appropriate. Evans does what he thinks is right. Who can argue with that?
Add another comment
Related Links