MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 269 this week

Twilight for the Gods (1958)

 -  Drama  -  6 August 1958 (USA)
5.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.6/10 from 128 users  
Reviews: 7 user

Add a Plot

Director:

Writers:

(novel), (screenplay)
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb at Comic-Con 2014

Follow our coverage of Comic-Con 2014, direct from San Diego July 23-27 in our Comic-Con section.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 4539 titles
created 11 Jan 2012
 
a list of 82 titles
created 30 May 2012
 
a list of 50 titles
created 04 Oct 2012
 
a list of 487 titles
created 26 Nov 2012
 
list image
a list of 588 titles
created 9 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Twilight for the Gods (1958)

Twilight for the Gods (1958) on IMDb 5.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Twilight for the Gods.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Captain David Bell
...
Charlotte King
...
First Mate Ramsay
...
Harry Hutton
...
Yancy
Ernest Truex ...
Rev. Butterfield
...
Oliver Wiggins
Judith Evelyn ...
Ethel Peacock
Wallace Ford ...
Old Brown
...
Ida Morris
Vladimir Sokoloff ...
Feodor Morris
Charles Horvath ...
Lott
Robert F. Hoy ...
Keim
Maurice Marsac ...
Shipping Clerk
...
Myra Pringle
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Loved...Hated...Feared...Envied...but only this woman wanted him enough to break the laws of Gods and men ! See more »

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

6 August 1958 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Crépuscule sur l'océan  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)

Color:

(Eastmancolor)
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The "Albatross", the boat used in the film, was owned by Ernest K. Gann, the author of the novel and the screenplay. He sailed her from California to the South Pacific, where he cruised extensively. His account of the voyage is written in two of his non-fiction books: "Song of the Sirens" and "A Hostage to Fortune". See more »

Quotes

First Mate Ramsay: Simple men always solve problems with their fists.
See more »

Connections

Featured in Rock Hudson's Home Movies (1992) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Risk taking
2 May 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

This is a very remarkable film. Don't be misled by my rating of 7/10. I'm a harsh grader. On usual accepted critique methods, this is just about an "ultimate" film. Unlike the "safe" movies that people like to think of as "risk taking", this is an ultimate "risk taking" venture. It's obviously too iconoclastic for most of the rich kids on IMDb, safe in their snug cubicles.

And i understand the annoyance one would feel with this film. I feel it, too. I like "cut and dry" stories. This film is full of so many loose ends, that in spite of being set in the scenic Pacific ocean on a beautiful ship, it is the exact opposite of "escapism".

This is a very adventurous drama for the lack of violence involved. It is a drama, but it is cleverly handled. Take it off the slowly sinking ship in the ocean, and you have a stage fare. The two leads get most of the attention, but all of the characters are explored. Not only are they all very three dimensional and likable, including the bad guy, but they are almost "four dimensional". Each of these roles are mouth watering to any thespian.

Whenever you begin with a ship named "Cannibal", you know you're also dealing with symbolism. The symbolism of the written word, of a book I did not read, is far better depicted in this film than one would expect. Perhaps the character of the reverend is the ultimate symbol of Faith. Don't expect the usual hypocrite you see in most movies. Like I said, this is too iconoclastic for anything that obvious. All of the characters have more to them than meets the eye, with the probable exception of our two macho male shipmen, the young captain and his charismatic older helmsman. The world is seen mostly through their honest eyes of hard working men. The older, wiser one has seen it before. The captain is at a stage in life when he thinks he is a cynic, but is still fairly naive about people.

Which may be why Hudson was allowed to play the role. On the surface, he appears a mismatch for a role you'd expect Bogie in, or perhaps cast member Kennedy. However, the contrast of not being what one appears was set in our director's mind. He could easily have added scars, whiskers, and pot marks to our captain, but it was on purpose that we see the glamorous duo of our two gorgeous leads feel like they appear rugged, while all the time being untainted by the world. To their credit, they do a great job of conveying this feeling. One looks and sees Rock Hudson in a role that doesn't become him, but that's because the role doesn't become the character. He is a clean soul being put through the wringer of an unclean world.

There is a sad scene which is designed to make strong men cry and women gasp. It is very effective. But then this entire film is very effective.

So why do I only rate it 7/10? Honestly, I like the "cut and dry" escapism, and would rather see all the facts be known. But this is a "reality" piece. Perhaps I am not strong enough for complete reality. For instance, our hero is left dangling about the truth over whom to trust, and puts it in Faith to trust the right person. This is very realistic, but it is totally annoying to watch, when we are bursting to have it be known.

But that's why it is not revealed to our character. There are many other examples of "loose ends", such as a former airman never confronting a braggart who falsely claims to be an ex-pilot. It is never brought up again.

A few loose ends I could handle, but this is stark reality. There are many loose ends. This is a "mature" piece, designed to help us "mature" into serenity.

This is why I set it down one notch, out of my own desire for escapism. The film does what it sets out to do. The directing is excellent.

I do set it down two notches for the ending, which I did not buy. Our hero makes a huge, needless sacrifice, which is meant to be attributed to his idealism, but which leaves him pretty much penniless, which is a condition he'll stay in while he waits for a date two years later with the heroine. I felt it didn't belong in this realistic piece, and while I could forgive the "letdown" ending as part of realism, this was a Hollywood ending that just added to the annoyance.

Still, because of its iconoclastic nature of escapist scenery mixed with realism few could endure, I highly recommend this piece. It is a showcase for directing, writing, and cinema. Viewed alone, or with others, this is a very remarkable work.


0 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Burning and sinking ship in film bobo-29
Discuss Twilight for the Gods (1958) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?