Clips of atomic explosions, pornography, and B-movies are spliced together to evoke certain emotions.


1 win. See more awards »


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Fireworks (1947)
Drama | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

Depicts a dream sequence about the brutal rape and torture of Anger himself (as a teenager) by a group of sailors on the street (after trying to pick one of them up).

Director: Kenneth Anger
Stars: Kenneth Anger, Gordon Gray, Bill Seltzer
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Obsessed with a general's woman, a clergyman has strange visions of death and lust, struggling against his own eroticism.

Director: Germaine Dulac
Stars: Alex Allin, Genica Athanasiou, Lucien Bataille
Entr'acte (1924)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

An absolute dada movie. Somebody gets killed, his coffin gets out of control and after a chase it stops. The person gets out of it and let everybody who followed the coffin dissapear.

Director: René Clair
Stars: Jean Börlin, Inge Frïss, Francis Picabia
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

Stan Brakhage films the birth of his first child, Myrrena.

Director: Stan Brakhage
Stars: Jane Brakhage, Myrrena Brakhage, Stan Brakhage
Animation | Short | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

Abstract images drawn directly onto the film are accompanied by three pieces of jazz performed by the Oscar Peterson trio.

Directors: Evelyn Lambart, Norman McLaren
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

A pulsing, kaleidoscope of images set to an energetic soundtrack. A young women swings in a garden; a woman's face smiles. The rest is spinning cylinders, pistons, gears and turbines, ... See full summary »

Directors: Fernand Léger, Dudley Murphy
Stars: Fernand Léger, Dudley Murphy, Katherine Murphy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

A woman returning home falls asleep and has vivid dreams that may or may not be happening in reality. Through repetitive images and complete mismatching of the objective view of time and space, her dark inner desires play out on-screen.

Directors: Maya Deren, Alexander Hammid
Stars: Maya Deren, Alexander Hammid
At Land (1944)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

Silently, a woman wakes on a beach as the tides go in reverse. Her dreamscape unfolds as she tries to locate a chess piece traveling from the beach to a party to a country road and then back.

Director: Maya Deren
Stars: John Cage, Maya Deren, Alexander Hammid
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

A woman dressed elegantly walks purposely through the water gardens at the Villa d'Este in Tivoli, as the music of Vivaldi's "Winter" movement of "The Four Seasons" plays. Heavy red filters... See full summary »

Director: Kenneth Anger
Stars: Carmilla Salvatorelli
Report (1967)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

A compilation of selected bits of archival footage put to a narration of news reports describing the day President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.

Director: Bruce Conner
Cosmic Ray (1962)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Experimental short uses Ray Charles' "What'd I Say" as accompaniment to constantly shifting collage of female nude, cartoons, and newsreels of atomic bomb explosions.

Director: Bruce Conner
Short | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

This short experimental film tells the story of a man who comes to Hollywood to become a star, only to fail and be dehumanized (he is identified by the number 9314 written on his forehead),... See full summary »

Directors: Robert Florey, Slavko Vorkapich
Stars: Jules Raucourt, Voya George, Robert Florey


Uncredited cast:
Himself (archive footage) (uncredited)


Clips of atomic explosions, pornography, and B-movies are spliced together to evoke certain emotions.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis







Release Date:

10 October 1969 (Denmark)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Did You Know?


Shown in France in 1973 as part of a program entitled "Cinéma Underground". See more »


Edited from Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse (1940) See more »


I pini di Roma
Composed by Ottorino Respighi
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

17 April 2003 | by (Luoyang, China) – See all my reviews

It's not often that I read through the comments index of a movie before writing a review of my own, but I am always interested to hear what other people have to say about more obscure or unusually interesting movies, like this one. I was amazed scrolling through the index at the things that people had to say about this movie. One reviewer hailed A Movie as the greatest stock footage compilation ever made and presented it as a milestone in movie history and then went on to give a completely wrong interpretation of it, even going to far as to compare it to Jackass. I allow that individual interpretation allows for a wide variety of different opinions, but this guy was entirely too confident in what he was talking about to have left so much out.

Another reviewer told a story about how a few people in his class on the first day of film school were asked their opinions about the film, and after a couple people tentatively raised their hands and gave foolish answers, he stepped in to save the day and enlighten the rest of the class with his sheer brilliance. RIGHT. His review consisted of more rhetorical questions than anything else, I'm sure he spent more time trying to sound like he knew what he was talking about (which, given the fact that he made not a single solitary assertion about the film in any way, he probably doesn't) than the 36 minutes that he allotted for contemplating the meaning of the film.

Another reviewer, some angry kid from Connecticut, wrongly condemns the film as being a classic without reason or sufficient merit. This review is a classic example of someone who completely missed the point and, instead of trying to sound like he knows exactly what's going on, writes a scathing review out of anger that he's completely clueless. The reviewer on the movie's title page (at the time of writing this review, was written by matthew wilder) probably leaps all bounds in his wrongness in analyzing this movie, claiming that it represents all of human happiness, which is probably the furthest thing from the mind of anyone who has actually seen it. Matt, if you ever see this movie again, do it while you're AWAKE.

Don't hail a movie like this just because a lot of people have before you or because you watched it in class on the first day of film school. It's not hard to derive at least SOME meaning out of a movie like this. Consider, for example, the opening of the movie. It starts with a countdown to showtime, which pauses to show a beautiful woman undressing. So now that the film has your attention, it promptly displays a THE END title, and continues on to display the things that typically go on, as it were, after the ending, or at least the things you don't see. Boats crashing, failed technological innovations, the Hindenburg crashing, etc.

There is a great bit of irony in the energetic score to the film, which highlights both hilarious human shortcomings (like experimental bicycles which turn out to be complete failures, although there are certainly some that I wouldn't mind riding around town) and unbearable disasters, juxtaposing them together to emphasize the human (i.e. American) tendency to not really think much about what is on screen. As long as it's naked or goes boom, we're entertained (this may be Bruce Conner's prediction for the state of the cinema in the early 21st century, much like Metropolis was Fritz Lang's pessimistic view of future society – both of which are startlingly accurate).

A Movie is not a hard movie to watch, personally I found it to be enormously entertaining. But it is certainly not a movie to forget or to write off as negligible or trivial, or to condemn simply because you don't understand it. This is the kind of movie that will inspire a wide variety of interpretations, and the ones I criticize in this review I do so because they missed so much information from the film. Even the fact that the entire thing takes place after a title saying THE END is an enormous hint as to what it's all about. Things like that don't often make their way into the movies for no reason. The movie is, in fact, 12 minutes long, but please, PLEASE spend more than `3 times that' thinking about it, if you are, in fact, interested in saying anything interesting or intellectual about it. You can't analyze this movie on first sight the way you can with just about every Hollywood movie that comes out these days.

It seems, as a matter of fact, that Bruce Connor was right about the entertainment of the future.

10 of 16 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Is this available ANYWHERE? oobleckboy
Speed?? tburrowes
Music? Platinumvampyr17
wonderful acting lyndacarterismymom
Discuss A Movie (1958) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page