| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Index | 23 reviews in total |
17 out of 18 people found the following review useful:
Separation of Pain and Surgery, 13 August 2002
Author:
BaronBl00d (baronbl00d@aol.com) from NC
Boris Karloff gives a decidedly compassionate performance as a London surgeon madly trying to develop a gas of some kind to use in operations to relieve his patients of the inevitable pain that comes with surgery. The film chronicles much of the trial and error, ridicule from colleagues, and unfortunate reliance on opium based gas that surrounds Dr. Bolton, Karloff's character. Karloff walks in two circles: the first is at the hospital where he works with his son and is surrounded by other doctors and students - the second is a very poor part of the city where he helps the poor and is taken advantage of by a section of thieves and killers led by Black Ben(nice performance by Mr. De Wolf) and Resurrection Joe(played in a characteristically eerie fashion by Christopher Lee). Lee and De Wolf have a side business of killing wayward drunks and selling their bodies to the hospital. All they need is a signature from a doctor...that is where Karloff comes in. Although the film is not a "horror" film, it has some horror elements. Karloff really gives a nice, in-depth portrayal of a man destined to find a new way. The film has a great cast of British stalwarts such as De Wolf, Lee, Finlay Currie and Nigel Green. Production values are low, but the quality of film based on the budget used is exceedingly good.
13 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Karloff is great in atmospheric drama., 10 September 1999
![]()
Author:
David Atfield (bits@alphalink.com.au) from Canberra, Australia
Boris Karloff gives one of his best performances as a tormented doctor
trying to invent anaesthesia. In the process he becomes addicted to the
narcotics and begin associating with various London low-lifes - including
grave-robber Christopher Lee in a rivetting performance.
This is less horror than an atmospheric character study - and it is really
very good.
12 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful Performance by Karloff, 5 February 2005
![]()
Author:
bensonmum2 from Tennessee
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Corridors of Blood (1962) is the story of a doctor trying to discover
the secret of painless surgery. While less a horror film and more a
study of the decline in an individual caused by drug addiction, it does
have several creepy and frightening moments. Some of the surgery
sequences are gruesome. And, any film with both Boris Karloff and
Christopher Lee has got to have its share of horror moments.
The basic story - Karloff plays the doctor. He experiments on himself
with the gas he is developing to be used in surgery. He becomes
addicted to the narcotics he is using. Soon, he is unable to function
and is released from his position as a surgeon. He meets up with a
couple of baddies played by Lee and Francis De Wolff who agree to help
him get the drugs he needs. All Karloff has to do is sign some blank
death certificates. Revealing anymore of the story would be too much.
Karloff is terrific as the doctor. You can feel his anguish and pain as
he realizes what the drugs have done to him. But, you can also see the
underlying need he has for the gas. Lee is so incredibly ruthless. His
character (Resurrection Joe) kills with no remorse or qualms. This is
one character I would have liked to see more of in other films. Also
present is an excellent supporting cast lead by De Wolff and Nigel
Green.
Corridors of Blood excels at atmosphere. Even with the small budget,
the director (Robert Day) is able to portray the seediness and
depravity of the Seven Dials area. Perfect! Not a great film, Corridors
of Blood is, however, good and very watchable. Karloff's performance
alone is reason enough to see this film.
12 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Fantastic little horror gem, 31 August 2004
![]()
Author:
The_Void from Beverley Hills, England
Any film featuring both Christopher Lee and Boris Karloff is an instant
must-see for any horror fan. Alone, either one of these can carry a film;
but together they make a force to be reckoned with indeed!
Karloff stars as the central character; a doctor who, through trying to find
a way to separate pain from the knife (create an anaesthetic), becomes
addicted to the chemicals he is working with. The character that Karloff
portrays here is a world away from his most famous role; that of
Frankenstein's Monster, but Karloff has proved time and time again
throughout his illustrious career that he can handle all sorts of different
roles, and he handles this one brilliantly. Karloff draws you into his
character and really makes you believe that his ultimate, and only goal is
to create something to ease the pain of his patients. When his character
takes a more sinister turn after becoming addicted to his chemicals, Karloff
impresses more. The way his eyes look and the atmosphere of weakness that he
portrays is fantastic and just by looking at the man you can tell that he is
extremely unwell. Karloff is one of horror's finest assets, and he more than
proves himself with his role here. Of course, he doesn't need to prove
anything to anybody; it's well known that he is one of the masters of the
genre. As mentioned, starring alongside Karloff is another horror master;
Christopher Lee. Lee doesn't have a great deal of screentime in the movie;
but, as Lee would go on to show time and time again in his later career;
with just his presence, Lee can create a foreboding atmosphere about his
character that is unmatched by almost every other actor out there.
The film isn't so much a horror as a thriller charting a man's decent into
addiction, but the movie still features a lot of horror moments; most
notably the screams of the patients on the operating table and every scene
with Christopher Lee in it. Director Robert Day manages to create a
foreboding atmosphere that firmly places the viewer in 1860's London. I
didn't doubt it for a second, and that is very admirable; especially when
the budget is considered. Corridors of Blood isn't a very well distributed
film, and that is a shame as there is much to enjoy about it. However, if
you do ever get the chance to see it; be sure to take it. You'll be glad you
did.
10 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
KARLOFF TRIES TO ELIMINATE ALL PAIN & SUFFERING!, 26 May 2003
![]()
Author:
whpratt1 from United States
Long before anesthesia, operations in London hospitals were wards of screaming patients in great pain and suffering. In 1840, Dr. Thomas Bolton (Boris Karloff),a great humanitarian surgeon, tries to eliminate all the pain and suffering connected with surgery. Bolton tries out experiments on himself and as a result becomes addicted to the drugs which he is taking. Some of Dr. Bolton's pain-killing gas works against him and a patient revives and attacks employee's of the hospital, therefore, Dr. Bolton is dismissed. Bolton wanders into the Seven Dials, a disreputable tavern and is taken over by the innkeeper, Black Ben(Francis De Wolff) and his assistant, Resurrection Joe(Christopher Lee)(The Dracula of the 60's) This film was originally titled "Doctor from Seven Dials, and this film was produced back-to-back with "The Haunted Strangler" by the same director, Robert Day. This film is a great old gaslite melodrama of Old London in B&W and gives you the creeps with all the cries of pain, blood and pain. Karloff plays a very calm doctor in Wolf's clothing, ready to do his THING!
11 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Boris Karloff: Man with a Mission, 25 August 2004
![]()
Author:
Coventry from the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
(Small plot spoilers)
`Pain and the knife are inseparable' is an often-heard line in this film,
referring to the fact that surgeons until late in the 19th century had to
perform their operations without anesthetics. The always-amazing Boris
Karloff plays Dr. Thomas Bolton, a humanitarian medic determined to find
ways to perform an actual painless operation. But Dr. Bolton doesn't receive
any support from his closest colleagues, nor from the prominent hospital he
works for, so he begins to experiment upon himself. Pretty soon, the heavy
effects of opium and other hallucinogenic products turn him into an addict
and he loses his grip on reality. The hospital precautionary suspends him
after a couple of almost-fatal operations, but Dr. Bolton continues his
experiments. His search for an efficient anesthetic leads him to a filthy
environment of crooks and body snatchers
(End spoilers)
`Corridors of Blood' is a modest, but well thought out chiller that can
depend on a charismatic performance by Boris Karloff. It's hard to pick a
favorite Karloff film with all the milestones he starred in, but this simply
has got to be one of his most intriguing performances. The film also is
another proof that a giant budget isn't the main requisite to shoot an
effective terrifying tale. Director Robert Day succeeds in creating a
perfect 1840 London Victorian atmosphere. Even though the basic plot is more
of a drama and/or historical study, Corridors of Blood still features
several outstanding and pure `horror' moments, like the fast-faced images of
patients suffering on the operating table. One last aspect that is certainly
worth mentioning is the brief appearance of Christopher Lee as `Resurrection
Joe'. Lee, recovering from his very first Hammer successes, impresses as an
ultra-creepy villain.
10 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Well worth seeing for many reasons, 6 February 2001
Author:
pmsusana from New Orleans, Louisiana
Boris Karloff, as usual, is a joy to watch, as is Christopher Lee, who was right on the verge of becoming a big star in the Hammer films. This film is also notable for strongly evoking the grimy atmosphere of those out-of-the-way areas in 1800's England, worthy of comparison to David Lean's "Oliver Twist" (1948). Coincidentally, not long after seeing this film I happened to read the true life story of Horace Wells (1815-1848), a Connecticut dentist who experimented on himself with ether, chloroform, and laughing gas in an effort to discover a painless method of oral surgery. He succeeded, but became an addict in the process; his behavior subsequently became so violent that he was placed in prison, where he committed suicide. I wonder if Karloff's character in this film is at least partially based on Horace Wells.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Gothic shocker rides Hammer's coat-tails, 27 January 2005
![]()
Author:
Libretio
CORRIDORS OF BLOOD
Aspect ratio: 1.66:1
Sound format: Mono
(Black and white)
London, 1840: Whilst attempting to formulate an anaesthetic solution, a
dedicated surgeon (Boris Karloff) becomes addicted to narcotics and is
blackmailed by local bodysnatchers.
Riding the coat-tails of a Gothic revival occasioned by the recent
success of Hammer's THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1957), Robert Day's
CORRIDORS OF BLOOD is an odd mixture of historical drama and Grand
Guignol theatrics. Producer Richard Gordon lured Karloff away from
Hollywood - where his movie career had become stalled in a B-movie rut
(VOODOO ISLAND, FRANKENSTEIN 1970, etc.) - for a couple of lurid
shockers in which good men are thwarted by circumstances beyond their
control. In GRIP OF THE STRANGLER (1958), he played a novelist who
stumbles onto a horrific secret whilst researching a series of murders
from recent history, while in CORRIDORS OF BLOOD, he's a drug-addicted
surgeon who falls prey to a gang of criminals masterminded by East End
pub landlord Francis de Wolff. Less a horror film than a melodrama with
ghoulish trimmings, the movie hedges its commercial bets by including a
number of gory thrills (a leg sliced open, a face destroyed by acid,
etc.), but the narrative is motivated chiefly by Karloff's altruistic
pursuit of an anaesthetic formula that will alleviate the terrible
suffering of patients during surgery.
Produced under the title 'The Doctor from Seven Dials', the finished
movie went unreleased until 1962 due to indifference by distributors
MGM, by which time co-star Christopher Lee had earned a prominent
screen credit, despite playing a small - but significant - role as
'Resurrection Joe', a sinister Cockney thug who murders carefully
selected patrons of de Wolff's squalid pub and sells the remains to
local doctors. Lee filmed this glorified cameo before THE CURSE OF
FRANKENSTEIN catapulted him to international stardom, which accounts
for his limited screen time, though his intense performance is one of
the film's highlights. Adrienne Corri (VAMPIRE CIRCUS) distinguishes
herself as de Wolff's partner in crime, and there's a feast of familiar
faces in supporting roles, including Francis Matthews (DRACULA: PRINCE
OF DARKNESS), Betta St. John (THE CITY OF THE DEAD), Finlay Currie and
Nigel Green. Superb art direction (by Anthony Masters) and
cinematography (Geoffrey Faithful).
5 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Why did it take four years to release this film? It was excellent and very watchable., 6 September 2008
![]()
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
This is a deceptive little film. First off, because it was made and sat
for four years before release, you might be inclined to think it is a
dud--but that's far from true. The film is very good--good enough to
almost earn an 8. Second, while the film has some horrific scenes and
features Boris Karloff and Christopher Lee, it is not a horror film but
more of a drama. So if you see it, don't expect monsters or
madness--instead, there are just bad people and good people doing bad
things.
The film is set in 1840 and Karloff plays an exceptionally skilled
surgeon who is dismayed that there are no drugs to alleviate the
suffering of patients during surgery. Basically, people were wide awake
and felt EVERYTHING during surgery and amputations! This is true, as
the first anesthesias didn't come about until around 1850. Despite his
concerns, other doctors didn't share his enthusiasm for change, so
Karloff foolishly begins experimenting on himself--inhaling a mixture
of various chemicals (including opium). Not surprisingly, he becomes
addicted and this once sweet man becomes an unwilling pawn in the seedy
underworld.
The film gets very high marks for construction, writing, direction and
the performance of Karloff. There isn't much I'd change about the film,
though fans of Christopher Lee might be disappointed that his role
isn't that big and his character isn't that interesting (despite the
fact he's a cold-blooded murderer). Give this intelligent little film a
watch--it's really very good.
6 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Karloff On Laughing Gas! Hot Damn!, 23 December 2006
![]()
Author:
michaeldukey2000 from United States
Who'd a thunk that old Boris would discover first Nitrous Oxide and then a powerful opiate based anesthetic that would turn him from respected physician to Raving Junkie? Karloff and you will realized and so will you that this was easily his best film role of the fifties and he tackles it with refined enthusiasm that makes the film a joy to watch along with it's dingy atmosphere and low key creepiness of Christopher Lee as a murderer for profit. Originally lensed in and released in England in 1958 when Lee was just becoming hot on the Hammer circuit this wasn't released in the States until some four years later when Lee was much better known and Karloff's film career was fading.It's not a fantastic film but it sure isn't dull and it's worth It just to see Karloff howling on laughing gas which makes you realize that in his whole career we never got to see him joyous and he sells it here to the max. One of my late night favorites
| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |