| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Index | 23 reviews in total |
22 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
Very underrated Kurosawa masterpiece, 18 December 2003
![]()
Author:
David (davidals@msn.com) from Chapel Hill, NC, USA
LOWER DEPTHS perhaps isn't the place to start if you're completely
unfamiliar with Kurosawa - but it still ranks as one of his great
films, and definitely one of his most underrated.
Based on a Maxim Gorky play (an earlier Jean Renoir film draws upon the
same source material), LOWER DEPTHS seems a bit stagey at first, but
Kurosawa manages to enliven it considerably - the performances are all
top-notch, and the combination of skillful editing (straight cuts only
here, but the usual Kurosawa multi-camera shooting method) and
inventive set design (with diagonals and angles trapping characters,
heighetning the intensity of the dialogue and acting) making this an
unforgettable film to watch - easily as accomplished as the better
known THRONE OF BLOOD from a little earlier. One will definitely note
how tightly constructed - in all ways - this film is.
This film does (along with IKIRU, RED BEARD and HIGH & LOW) illuminate
some of Kurosawa's underlying philosophies, specifically a sense of
social realism in cinema that can cast a critical gaze upon injustice,
and in this film a sense of anger and frustration is articulated with
an unusual degree of eloquence, testament to both Kurosawa's technical
virtuosity, and his greater awareness of the world.
But for all of the cruelty on display here, there's an equal amount of
humor, typically irreverent and loaded with sly social commentary, but
also spontaneous: the two impromptu musical episodes, which blend
Japanese theatrical conventions with a Chaplin-like sense of visual
choreography to very striking effect.
Not as well known as SEVEN SAMURAI, THRONE OF BLOOD or YOJIMBO, but
just as accomplished - filled with delight and insight.
14 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
The Human Heart in the Depths, 3 April 2006
![]()
Author:
yippeiokiyay from United States
It's one of Kurosawa's most neglected masterpieces. "The Lower Depths"
takes us into a ravine tenement, run by greedy, brutal landlords, and
inhabited by the lowest of society's strata. All action takes place in
two locations: the interior of the tenement, or the tenement grounds.
How amazing, then, is the fascination this film exerts on us, with its
very modest settings. I am astonished at the creativity of the film
shooting these restricted spaces, in so many varied and telling ways:
space expands and contracts as is necessary to the story: the outside
is either threatening or an escape, but even once outside, we see that
there is no escape, and diagonals show us the human dimensions of
restricted choice. Space speaks volumes in the film, accompanied by the
beauty of the ensemble acting, expressing profound truths.
We find ourselves engaged in the lives of these people, and puzzled
over the character of Bokuzen Hidari as the pilgrim. Is he good? If he
is good, and pacifies the dispossessed by acknowledging their
illusions, does it mean that self-deception is good? What wonderful
ensemble acting! The director put them through long, tough rehearsals,
and the result is a seamless film. No wrong notes, no overacting, just
a beautiful and strange film that haunts us after we've experienced it.
Such invisible, great acting, and humor and pathos.
The character of the actor is the finest piece of work by the Kurosawa
veteran Kamatari Fujiwara. It is amazing that this actor appears in
such diverse roles as Matahichi in "The Hidden Fortress" and as a
corrupt executive in "The Bad Sleep Well". What astonishing range and
depth! How brilliantly Kurosawa uses the actor's range! And, of course,
we have our beloved Toshiro Mifune, laughing, kicking up his heels in
devilish delight, trying to impress the girl, pouting with the
landlady, listening with suspicion, then respect to the pilgrim...doing
so many things so well, we are bereft when he is absent for the film's
conclusion.
And what a conclusion! The harsh clappers that end the movie, the
frontal shot of the gambler as he addresses us (for the only time in
the film) directly, and the sudden end! Gorky...Kurosawa, Bokuzen
Hidari, Toshiro Mifune, Kamatari Fujiwara and the rest....they live on
in this masterpiece, for which I am very grateful.
12 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Worth every bit of patience, 22 August 2006
Author:
birthdaynoodle from garbanzo
The Criterion Collection offers two different film versions of "The Lower Depths": one made in 1936 by Jean Renoir and another one made in 1957 by Kurosawa. The two directors never worked together on either film. In fact, they only met once in their lives, many years later. Both films are based on Russian writer Maxim Gorky's 1902 play, which describes life in a miserable slum where most characters have lost all sense of hope. Renoir deals with this serious subject matter in a much more humorous and amusing way than Kurosawa, whose film is slower, decidedly somber and a lot more difficult to digest. While Renoir's work takes the viewer in and out of the slums, Kurosawa doesn't allow one to see beyond the wretchedness of the underworld. Both films are great, but it was probably Kurosawa's which left a more durable and deeper impression on me.
14 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Too Polished, 25 February 2005
![]()
Author:
Mark D. Brown from California, USA
First, I must provide the obligatory warning that this film is
absolutely not a good film for introducing a viewer to the power of
Kurosawa. Nevertheless, this film is one of his most well-crafted
ensemble films. The performance of Bokuzen Hidari as the wandering
pilgrim or priest Kahei is his pinnacle in Kurosawa's films. After his
comic-relief roles in the more well known films "Ikiru" and "Seven
Samurai", this role is Hidari's chance to show his own version of
wisdom and authority. Similarly, Kamatari Fujiwara's powerfully
sympathetic performance as the alcoholic actor is another surprising
demonstration by an actor who had, hitherto, been cast in
unsympathetic- even adversarial roles in previous Kurosawa films. As
one comes to expect from Isuzu Yamada, her character is a feisty and
commanding presence that drives the plot along.
Toshiro Mifune, however, was not the best choice for his role as the
petty thief- try as he might to look like a immature and puerile common
criminal , the false swagger fails to hide the actor's inherent
dignity. Nevertheless, his energy and effort still make his performance
believable- if incongruous. In general, however, his unsuitability for
his role is the only significant snag in an otherwise fluid and natural
performance on the part of all the actors. Also, the sets, as one would
expect for Kurosawa, are meticulously detailed, well-lit, and
authentic-seeming.
The story- based on the Maxim Gorky play, however, is not that
compelling. In part, I think, it is my reaction to a socialistic
morality play brought to the silver screen. Also, however, Kurosawa has
tried too hard and has polished the performance and settings for too
long. As well and smoothly as the actors interact, as convincing they
are in their roles, their performance just does not lead anywhere
dramatically. However, I saw the Jean Renoir version- a much less
refined effort, in my opinion- and had much the same reaction,
concluding that the story, itself, and not Kuroasawa's over-controlling
treatment is what hampered my engagement.
In spite of that... That is to say... In spite of the fact that the
movie's story is not very compelling for me at all, I still have high
regard for the film because the acting performances are so solid and
engaging. For that reason, I strongly urge devotees of Kurosawa's films
to check this movie out at some point while keeping in mind that it
remains less than a sum of its parts.
15 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
mystified, 21 May 2001
![]()
Author:
loverealfilm
I cannot comprehend the low rating here, or the comments from the bozo
which
seem stuck on the main entry page here.
This film has all the pieces from your typically masterly Kurosawa.
Incredibly interesting and well done. Try to move beyond Shichinin no
Samurai, and Yojimbo, and delve into his more poignant works such as
Donzoko.
TRACE
7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Ugliness and kindness of everyone as a comedy, 19 July 2007
![]()
Author:
Furuya Shiro from Kumamoto, Japan
I enjoyed it. Everyone in the movie has very distinct character. I
really enjoyed the superb performances of skilled actors who acted
without going out from the dirty room and surrounding area.
After watching the movie, I read its original stage drama, "The Lower
Depth" by Gorky. Most of the characters and the scripts are the same as
the original drama. On Gorky's book, I could not help reading it with
exact accent and gesture in the movie. Particularly, I can't imagine
better way of speaking the pilgrimage Luke's scripts than Kahei acted
by Hidari Bokuzen. I am sure the scripts of the movie are based on
Nakamura Hakuyo's Japanese translation published from Iwanami. Even the
Russian stage drama is adapted to completely different locale, you
don't feel any awkwardness. This means perhaps, both the original drama
and its adaptation are really great.
What only a movie could do is that you can enjoy subtle expression of
countenance at close up. There are unforgettable performances by face,
such as the moment of instant tension when the land owner, acted by
Nakamura Ganjiro, and Sutekichi the thief, acted by Mifune Toshiro,
stand together; or the moment the actor, acted by Fujiwara Kamatari,
goes out of the house after gulping sake.
The scene of dancing with mouth instrumentation ('kuchi-syamisen in
Japanese) is a great fun. Particularly I enjoyed the fat man Tsugaru
dancing with sling; I found the actor is a professional sumo wrestler.
The most unforgettable personality is the old man Kahei. Can I become
such a nice old man who can solace and encourage everyone around me?
This movie can work out without Sutekichi the thief, but the old man.
Therefore, the old man Kahei could be the lead character.
By the way, as a movie that describes the lower depth life with humor
and music, I remember "Woman of Breakwater", by Philippine director
Mario O'Hara. People in "Woman of Breakwater" came to live outside of
the breakwater of Manila Bay. Everyone wants to flee from there, but
can not. Just behind the breakwater is a park, and modern buildings.
Describing the life of the poor out of the sight of the rich, it
portrays mutual love among the people. "Donzoko" does not have such
social viewpoint. Instead, it tries to show ugliness and kindness of
everyone as a comedy.
6 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
The positive functions of "useful lies", 12 January 2006
![]()
Author:
KFL from Bloomington, IN
Having watched Kurosawa's retelling of Dostoyevsky's "The Idiot" a
couple weeks ago, and come away feeling that one viewing was already a
bit too much, I was not expecting much from this. After all, Gorky is
generally regarded as a notch or three below Dostoyevsky.
But whereas "The Idiot" did not begin to mesh with a Japanese idiom,
"The Lower Depths" fits in very well indeed. Much of the film involves
the hopes, dreams, schemes and machinations of a handful of characters,
all fixated on escaping the tenement and its soul-numbing poverty.
An enigmatic old man who appears one day and spends some time in the
hovel has a salutary effect on several of the residents, merely by dint
of a level of kindness and sympathy that any of us would take for
granted. When he leaves, the spark of compassion he has kindled dies
quickly. Yet before he arrives and after he has left, there nonetheless
remains a minimal spirit of camaraderie. I have not read Gorky's novel,
but the "depths" here may (be taken to) refer to this bare-minimum
level of feeling for one's fellow paupers.
Running through the script is the theme of lies and (self-)deceptiotn,
and how they can ease the bitter reality that society's outcasts must
face every day. This above all works well here, for the Japanese
themselves have a utilitarian (so to speak) view of truth and
falsehoods. The hoary Japanese adage "uso mo houben", often rendered "a
white lie can be expedient", could have been a tagline for this movie;
for the alcoholic ex-actor and several others have little other than
self-delusion to help them get through another day.
Kurosawa manages to inject a measure of droll comedy while keeping the
grim facts unprettified, showing us how the luckless souls at the very
bottom of society grasp at the slimmest of hopes and somehow manage
(...or don't manage) to keep on going. Superb.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Unusual Kurosawa, but still a strong movie, 7 August 2000
![]()
Author:
TallGuy from Geneva, Switzerland
This movie is less easily accessible than other movies by Akira Kurosawa. None of the samurai honor, swordfighting action or visual beauty of his more well known efforts, Still, if you give yourself the time to view and appreciate it, it is a strong, involving movie with better staying power than most of what hits the silver screen in a typical season.
8 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
A Lesser Kurosawa's Film, 11 May 2010
![]()
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A group of worthless people lives in a slum, including a sick terminal
woman with her drunkard husband; a gambler; a pilgrim; a former samurai
and an actor. The prostitute Okayo (Kyôko Kagawa) disputes the love of
the thief Sutekichi (Toshirô Mifune) with her landlady and sister Osugi
(Isuzu Yamada) that is married with Rokubei (Ganjiro Nakamura), leading
to a tragedy.
I have watched most of Akira Kurosawa's films and the unpleasant
"Donzoko" is the only one that I really did not like. It is quite
impossible to write a plot summary of the annoying, pointless and dull
story. The theatrical screenplay is tiresome and too long despite the
good acting and the histrionic Kyôko Kagawa and in the end this is a
lesser work of this outstanding director. My vote is four.
Title (Brazil): "Ralé" ("The Rabble")
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
great film, 4 July 2008
![]()
Author:
sfdavide from san francisco, ca
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I loved this film. I liked the Renior version also but felt the darkness of this film made it more realistic. I think that if people are in this situation they will act more this way then like they did in the Renior film. The acting was fabulous including Toshiro Mifune, Koji Mitsui as the Gambler, Gonjiro Nakamura, the landlord and especially Kamatari Fujiwara as the actor and Bokuzen Hidari, "Gramps". I loved the way Kurosawa used stage actors mostly to film this play but they did not show they were stage actors. The scenery was wonderful and not many directors can film a movie and make it interesting with only two locations. I think this should be near the top of Kurosawa's other films
| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |