Edit
12 Angry Men (1957) Poster

(1957)

Trivia

Jump to: Spoilers (7)
At the beginning of the film, the cameras are all positioned above eye level and mounted with wide-angle lenses to give the appearance of greater distance between the subjects. As the film progresses the cameras slip down to eye level. By the end of the film, nearly all of it is shot below eye level, in close-up and with telephoto lenses to increase the encroaching sense of claustrophobia.
Sidney Lumet had the actors all stay in the same room for hours on end and do their lines over and over without filming them. This was to give them a real taste of what it would be like to be cooped up in a room with the same people.
The ethnic background of the teenaged suspect was deliberately left unstated. For the purposes of the film, the important facts were that he was NOT Caucasian and that prejudice (or lack of it) from some jurors would be a major part of the deliberation process.
Henry Fonda disliked watching himself on film, so he did not watch the whole film in the projection room. However, before he walked out he said quietly to director Sidney Lumet, "Sidney, it's magnificent."
Because the film failed to make a profit, Henry Fonda never received his deferred salary. Despite this setback, he always regarded this film as one of the three best he ever made, the other two being The Grapes of Wrath (1940) and The Ox-Bow Incident (1943).
When Juror #10 concludes his race-centered rant in which all other jurors leave the table or notably disagree with him, he is told to sit down and not talk again. Indeed, from that moment until the end of the film he utters not a single word more, not even when asked to give his vote (to which he responds by shaking his head).
The movie is commonly used in business schools and workshops to illustrate team dynamics and conflict resolution techniques.
Theatrical directorial debut of Sidney Lumet.
Henry Fonda immediately complained to Sidney Lumet about the cheap backdrops outside the jury room windows when he walked on set. "They look like shit. Hitch had great backdrops, you could walk right in them," said Fonda, referring to the previous film he made with Alfred Hitchcock, The Wrong Man (1956). Lumet assured him that director of photography Boris Kaufman had a plan to make them work.
With the deaths of Jack Warden (Juror #7) on July 19, 2006 and Jack Klugman (Juror #5) on December 24, 2012, none of the 12 stars are still alive.
Nominated for three Oscars, the film lost out in all categories to The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957).
In June 2008 this film was ranked #2 on the American Film Institute's list of the 10 greatest films in the genre "Courtroom Drama".
Shot in a total of 365 separate takes.
Because the painstaking rehearsals for the film lasted an exhausting two weeks, filming had to be completed in an unprecedented 21 days.
Lee J. Cobb's character insults Juror #12 by calling him "The Boy in the Gray Flannel Suit." One year before the release of this film Cobb starred in The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit (1956), which also featured Joseph Sweeney (Juror #9).
Henry Fonda, who symbolically wears white throughout the film, personally asked Sidney Lumet to direct the movie adaptation, having been impressed with his work on the TV shows Studio One in Hollywood (1948) and The Alcoa Hour (1955).
Only two jurors are ever identified by name: #8 Mr. Davis and #9 Mr. McCardle. All but two are identified by job or profession: #1 High School Football Coach, #2 Bank Teller, #3 Owns Messenger Service, #4 Stock Broker, #6 Painter, #7 Salesman, #8 Architect, #10 Garage Owner, #11 Watch Maker, and #12 Advertising Exec.
All but three minutes of the film was shot inside the bare and confining, 16- by 24-foot "jury room".
Because of the demands of the film's low budget, if the lighting was set up for a shot that took place from one particular angle, all the shots from that same angle had to be filmed then and there. This meant that different sides of the same conversation were sometimes shot several weeks apart.
Henry Fonda was asked by United Artists to make this film, so he did it as both actor and producer. He was, however, very frustrated at being producer and decided never to do so again.
Reginald Rose's TV play script was left virtually intact in its move to feature film.
Many of the shots of the actors were filmed on their own and then edited together. This required the sound of the rain to be recorded separately for each actor.
The "unusual-looking knife" in this movie is an Italian stiletto switchblade with a Filipino-style Kriss blade.
When first broadcast as a teleplay on TV's Studio One in Hollywood (1948) on 20 September 1954, the jurors were Norman Fell, John Beal, Franchot Tone, Walter Abel, Lee Philips, Bart Burns, Paul Hartman, Robert Cummings, Joseph Sweeney, Edward Arnold, George Voskovec, Larkin Ford (credited as Will West). Sweeney and Voskovec were the only two actors to reprise their roles for the film.
The movies mentioned by Juror #4 in the double feature he saw are "The Scarlett Circle" and "The Amazing Mrs. Bainbridge" (wrongly named by him as "The Remarkable Mrs. Bainbridge"). Neither of them exist.
For many years, only the first half of the kinescope of the TV version of "Twelve Angry Men" broadcast live on Sept. 20, 1954 (Studio One in Hollywood: Twelve Angry Men (1954)) was thought to survive, and had been in the possession of the Museum of Television and Radio since 1976. In 2003 a complete 16mm kinescope was discovered in the collection of Samuel Leibowitz (former defense attorney and judge) and was also acquired by the museum.
There are no female characters in the film, aside from the extras seen in the courtroom in the prologue, although a woman's bathroom can be seen in the jury room.
Juror #7 looks at his watch a total of 28 times throughout the whole movie.
As of 2016 this is, the shortest movie in the IMDbtop 10, as well as the only movie in the top 10 to be under two hours in length. It is also the only movie in the IMDb top 30 to be under 100 minutes in length (the next film to have a two-digit run time is City Lights (1931) at #35).
The melody Juror #7 whistles before Juror #8's reenactment of the handicapped man walking to the door is "Dance of the Cuckoos", which is also the theme song for the "Laurel & Hardy" series.
Henry Fonda hired Sidney Lumet to direct because he had extensive experience in television and had a reputation for staying on schedule and within a budget.
The film cast includes three Oscar winners: Henry Fonda, Martin Balsam and Ed Begley; and two Oscar nominees: Jack Warden and Lee J. Cobb.
Both Henry Fonda and Reginald Rose deferred their salaries for the film.
9 of 9 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
According to his autobiography, Henry Fonda was disappointed with United Artists' distribution strategy and felt that the studio's approach had deprived the film of a chance at financial success. In particular, Fonda noted that United Artists placed it in theaters too large for a "small" film to fill and, in addition, did not rerelease it after it won numerous awards.
Speaking at a screening of the film during the 2010 Fordham University Law School Film festival, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that seeing the film while she was in college influenced her decision to pursue a career in law. She was particularly inspired by immigrant Juror #11's monologue on his reverence for the American justice system. She also told the audience of law students that, as a lower-court judge, she would sometimes instruct juries to not follow the film's example, because most of the jurors' conclusions are based on speculation, not fact. Sotomayor noted that events such as Juror #8 entering a similar knife into the proceeding, doing outside research into the case matter in the first place and ultimately the jury as a whole making broad, wide-ranging assumptions far beyond the scope of reasonable doubt (such as the inferences regarding the "Old Woman" wearing glasses) would never be allowed to occur in a real-life jury situation, and would in fact have resulted in a mistrial (assuming, of course, that applicable law permitted the content of jury deliberations to be revealed).
When John Calley was running United Artists from 1993-96, he gave an interview to "The New Yorker" in which he discussed UA's continuing rights to the project, and said he had looked into a possible remake that would have starred Michelle Pfeiffer and been set around the 1992 Los Angeles riots in the aftermath of the Rodney King incident trial verdicts.
In 12 Angry Men (1997), Lee J. Cobb's character was played by George C. Scott, making it the second time Scott followed Cobb in portraying the same character. He did it previously, playing the character of "Lt. Kinderman" in The Exorcist III (1990), the same character Cobb played in the original film The Exorcist (1973).
Most of the hard-working (relatively inexperienced) crew were longshoremen. Because there wasn't enough movie work to feed them all year, they'd have two union cards: their Local 52 cards and their ILA cards.
Included among the "1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die", edited by Steven Schneider.
The State Bar Associations of all (at that time) 48 states were given preview showings of the picture prior to its press previews. Subsequent to the film's release, the American Bar Association honored the film for "contributing to greater public understanding and appreciation of the American system of justice."
7 of 8 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
The story could have been set in any large city, although it's not mentioned by name, the city is obviously New York City, as evidenced by the sighting of the Woolworth Building, the Yankee tickets held by Juror #7 and the steps of the County Courthouse shown in the closing scene.
9 of 11 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
The entire movie takes place in three rooms.
Directorial debut of Sidney Lumet.
Jack Lemmon appears in Mister Roberts (1955) with Henry Fonda, in which he takes over Fonda's position of Cargo Officer when Fonda is transferred off the USS Reluctant. In the 1997 remake 12 Angry Men (1997), Lemmon plays the same juror that Fonda played in this film.
Indian singer Vennu Mallesh wrote a song titled "12 Angry Men" which pays homage to the film. It outlines the initial and final verdicts of the 12 jurors.
In 1957, United Artists distributed this film on a double bill with 5 Steps to Danger (1956) starring Ruth Roman and Sterling Hayden.
Henry Fonda and Reginald Rose combined the names of their respective companies, Orion and Nova, for the production of this film.
4 of 5 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
A full ten years after the 1957 film "12 Angry Men" was released, it inspired a plot on the "The Andy Griffith Show" in which Aunt Bee Taylor plays the lone holdout juror (exactly like Henry Fonda's character) who steadfastly votes 'not guilty'. She repeatedly holds her vote even while up against the anger of the 11 other jurors (all men). In the end, Andy himself pieces together who actually committed the crime based on his interactions with another courtroom observer. The criminal on trial was played by a young Jack Nicholson.
2 of 2 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
In 1981 a Norwegian version of the film was made by NRK fjernsynsteatret (Norsk RikskringKasting) and broadcast in 1982 and called Tolv edsvorne menn (1982). The plot closely follows the American movie version.
5 of 9 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
There are no women in the movie whatsoever but the prologue but there is a woman's bathroom in the jury room.
There are three jurors with glasses: #12 removes his from the nose six times, #4 removes it one time and #2 never removes it.
The TV western Maverick (1957) adapted the story for the 1958 episode Maverick: Rope of Cards (1958) starring James Garner.
4 of 12 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
The 1986 Hindi film Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (1986) (roughly: "A Stalled Judgement"), was a remake of this film. It was directed by Basu Chatterjee and starred Pankaj Kapur and Annu Kapoor, among others.
1 of 7 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
This film inspired a classic sketch on the Comedy Central show "Inside Amy Schumer". In it, a jury of 12 men (including one played by Jeff Goldblum) are deciding whether to convict Amy Schumer of not being sexy and attractive enough to have her own TV show. Ultimately, the men vote to "acquit" Schumer of crimes against TV viewers.
0 of 12 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
According to Jack Klugman (Juror #5) in the making-of documentary on the Special Edition DVD, his character was supposed to be about 20-21 years old and olive complexioned (possibly Italian), thereby giving more weight to his speech about being a "slum kid" and having a knowledge of switchblade knifes. Klugman wasn't sure he was right for the part given that he was 35 at the time and is Caucasian/White but he was reassured by Sidney Lumet that it would still work.
0 of 1 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink

Spoilers 

The trivia items below may give away important plot points.

Jury #8's reenactment of the old man witness' walk from his bed until the time he opens the front door is timed at 41 seconds. In actual movie time it takes 31 seconds.
The jurors entrance into the jury room is filmed in an overhead establishing shot, and the shots become progressively lower and tighter throughout the film, until the verdict is reached. For the closing shot of the jurors leaving the courthouse they are again filmed from a wide, overhead angle. Sidney Lumet claimed that the final shot was filmed through with the widest lens used in the picture, emphasizing the sense of release from the jury room.
The jurors who believe the boy to be not guilty in order are: Juror #8 (Henry Fonda), Juror #9 (Joseph Sweeney), Juror #5 (Jack Klugman), Juror #11 (George Voskovec), Juror # 2 (John Fiedler), Juror #6 (Edward Binns), Juror #7 (Jack Warden), Juror #12 (Robert Webber), The Foreman (Martin Balsam), Juror #10 (Ed Begley), Juror #4 (E.G. Marshall), and finally Juror #3 (Lee J. Cobb).
Before it is revealed in the "secret written ballot" who changed his verdict from "guilty" to "not guilty", there is a hint as to who was the one that changed his vote. If you count the ballots, including the "not guilty" ballot, the number of ballots read by Juror #1 (Martin Balsam) is 9. As it turns out, Juror #9 (Joseph Sweeney) was the one who changed his vote.
3 of 3 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
Along the movie, number 3 appears several times: the three first minutes of the movie are the only ones not happened in the jury room; the court room where the trial happens is the 228 (2+2+8 = 12; 1+2 = 3); Juror #8 affirms to have three children; at a point Juror #7 orders shut up to other juror under the pretext that as jurors they have a salary of three dollars per day; in other point Juror 6# comments that he was three days painting a house; Juror #4 explains that between the crime happened three months before the trial; and finally Juror #3 is who confronts Juror #8 against the innocence of the accused along the movie.
After the deliberation has finished, the jurors who stand up from the table are (in order): The Foreman (Martin Balsam), #12 (Robert Webber), #7 (Jack Warden), #5 (Jack Klugman), #9 (Joseph Sweeney), #4 (E.G. Marshall), #6 (Edward Binns), #2 (John Fiedler), #11 (George Voskovec), #10 (Ed Begley), #8 (Henry Fonda) and finally #3 (Lee J. Cobb).
7 of 46 found this interesting Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink
Juror #1, The Foreman, is the only Juror to never once explain why he considers the defendant guilty, or, later, not guilty. Actually, there is a very interesting psychological metaphor on the meta-level of this film, and, of course, particularly concerning this character: like a "Foreman", he leads, and is not asked why he does what he does and how he does it - one simply assumes, he knows what he's doing. Later on, when he changes his mind; he still does not explain his actions, that is saying, his decision, although he does not lead anymore, but now, follows; beautifully expressed via facial expression when he raises his hand to conclude that he now considers the defendant not guilty.
Is this interesting? Interesting? | Share this
Share this: Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Permalink

See also

Goofs | Crazy Credits | Quotes | Alternate Versions | Connections | Soundtracks

Contribute to This Page