IMDb > "Suspicion" (1957) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
"Suspicion" More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 5 reviews in total 

10 out of 11 people found the following review useful:

scary stuff

Author: etjetj-1 from Sweden
18 July 2005

The episode "The Voice In The Night" must be one of the scariest episodes ever made for TV. Everyone about my age, who saw the rerun in the early 70's seem to remember it, but hardly anyone know what it was. Perhaps due to the fact that it has always been considered to be part of "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" in Sweden - perhaps Swedish TV had got the episode "by mistake". Anyhow, the episode in question is about a honeymoon couple (James Donald and Barbara Rush) who suffers a shipwreck and end up in a everlasting fog, from which there seem to be no escape. Trouble starts when everything gets infected by a mysterious fungus.... It is all told in flashback to a couple of seamen (during a foggy night) who are told not to turn their lanterns in the direction of the man who is telling the story. If it ever was rerun again - or made available on DVD.

Was the above review useful to you?

8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

A Nice Little Series

Author: tom sawyer (sawyert2003@yahoo.com) from Waterford, Michigan
8 August 2006

I have only seen a few episodes of this series and I like it. I own the story A Voice in th Night and it is truly a suspenseful and scary story with a lot of subtle horror. The stories and the writing I have seen from just a few episodes is crisp and tight in the telling of very good and entertaining stories. Seriously, this needs to be on DVD like another series Bus Stop almost from the same era. As it is, this series stand alone on the strength of just the few stories I have seen. I seriously hope I can find more of this long forgotten and little known gem. If you can get copies or even few them, you will not be disappointed. At least not from the few I have seen.

Was the above review useful to you?

6 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

Rarely seen TV Show but very good on suspense

Author: William R. Tiede from Dallas, TX
23 September 1999

Hitchcock directed one episode of NBC's Suspicion episodic drama series, entitled 4 O'Clock, even though his own Alfred Hitchcock Presents was still airing on CBS.

A man who works in a clock repair store suspects his wife is meeting with someone in his own house while he is at work. He decides to get his revenge, which allows Hitchcock to work his magic and add lots of suspense and plot twists for you in just an hour's time.

TVLand broadcast this during their 100th birthday tribute to Hitchcock, but who knows if they will broadcast it again later. If you get a chance to see this, please take advantage of the opportunity!

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

TV with real scripts

9/10
Author: Karl Ericsson (karlericsson@telia.com) from sweden
10 December 2013

I'm amazed at the convoluted scripts for these 45 minutes plus shows. This series, as far as I have seen it (10 films, the Hitchcock-directed by no means being the best of them), is better than Twilight-Zone, Hitchcock Presents, Hitchcock Hour and all other TV-series. I own a DVD with 15 films (haven't seen all of them yet) in real bad quality but that doesn't stop me from enjoying them. That this series isn't on the market smells Conspiracy real bad. Many films are out there but the best ones are Always missing, kind of. What makes this shows so unique is that it looks true much more than any other series I'v seen and truth is something very unattractive in America North.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

Not with a bang, but a whimper

Author: F Gwynplaine MacIntyre from Minffordd, North Wales
6 December 2003

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

'Suspicion' was an anthology series featuring dramas of suspense. (So why wasn't it titled 'Suspense'?) The opening credits were eye-catching but unpleasant, and the droning theme music gave me a headache. The most famous (and probably the best) episode of this series is "Four O'Clock", which originally aired 30 September 1957. This is the only episode of 'Suspense' which was directed by Alfred Hitchcock.

Shortly before this episode aired, Hitchcock gave a long interview to Pete Martin of the Saturday Evening Post. This interview has been reprinted several times; it discusses several of Hitchcock's motifs in detail (including his notorious dislike of eggs, his penchant for blonde heroines, and his famous dismissal of actors as 'cattle'). During the interview, Hitchcock describes the premise of "Four O'Clock", but then he wickedly refrains from revealing the ending ... thus keeping readers in suspense. Far more Hitchcock fans have read this interview than have actually seen "Four O'Clock", so they are probably curious to know how it ends.

In the teaser scene which opens "Four O'Clock", we see bland husband Paul Steppe (very well played by E.G. Marshall) constructing a time bomb in his cellar. The bomb's timing device is a modified wall clock, and it uses conventional house current. We see Steppe setting the timer, plugging in the clock, then watching as it detonates a tiny amount of gunpowder. Satisfied by this, Steppe unplugs the clock.

Middle-aged Steppe has observed his wife acting very friendly with a handsome young man, and he concludes that she's philandering. Hence his decision to blow up his house with his wife in it. He plans to be far away when it happens, of course. Steppe knows that his wife will come home shortly before 4.00pm, so he sets the timer on his bomb (now containing a full charge of gunpowder), plugs it into the wall socket, and gets ready to scarper.

But just before Steppe can leave, two burglars break into his cellar. They tie him up and (improbably) gag him, then they depart ... leaving Steppe tied to a chair in his cellar, unable to leave or to call for help, and unable to turn away from the time bomb as he watches the clock's hands ticking steadily towards 4pm.

Great set-up, yes? So far, this is what Hitchcock described in his interview with Pete Martin. The rest of this hour-long drama ratchets up the suspense as the clock ticks towards doom. E.G. Marshall, bound and gagged, turns in an amazing performance as a desperate man whose thoughts we hear in voice-over. SPOILERS COMING. He tries various schemes to attract attention. A small boy glimpses him through the cellar window, but doesn't summon help. Through the ceiling, Steppe can hear his wife upstairs entertaining her handsome admirer (well played by Richard Long) ... who turns out to be her brother from out of town. Steppe's suspicions were groundless, and now he's going to die...

We are with Steppe in the last few seconds (in a brilliantly edited sequence) as the clock ticks to 4pm. Then, suddenly, we cut away to an exterior of the house in long shot. A crowd have gathered outside the cellar... and an ambulance is ready to take Steppe away. He's gone insane, but he isn't physically harmed. What happened?

BIG SPOILER NOW. The ending is a cheat. We saw in the teaser that the time bomb runs on house current. Now it turns out that, in fact, the clock is running on batteries: Steppe only needed the house current to detonate the gunpowder charge. (This is utterly ridiculous.) Unbeknownst to Steppe (and us), his wife had shut off the house's electrical current that morning. (Conveniently, *after* he made the test run which we saw in the teaser.) So, the battery-operated clock ticked along merrily until doomtime, but then there wasn't any electricity to set off the charge. Oh, pull the other one!

Right up until this gimmicky and dishonest ending, 'Four O'Clock' is a taut suspenseful drama with a fine performance by E.G. Marshall ... but that ending made me want to chuck my television out the window. No wonder Hitchcock refused to reveal how this story ended. Also, we get the usual fallacy that a gagged person cannot cry out to attract attention. (Wrong; a gag prevents the victim from speaking coherently, but does nothing to constrain the voice's loudness.) Nowadays, a drama about home-made bombs would likely never get shown on American television.

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Awards
External reviews Plot keywords Main details
Your user reviews Your vote history