5.7/10
70
4 user

Behind the Headlines (1956)

Newspaper reporters compete with London police to solve a murder.

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay) (as Allan Mackinnon), (novel) (as Robert Chapman)
Reviews

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Paul Carpenter ...
Paul Banner
...
Pam Barnes
Alfie Bass ...
Sammy
...
Superintendent Faro
Trevor Reid ...
Bunting
...
Mary Carrick
Olive Gregg ...
Mrs. Bunting
...
Alfie
Magda Miller ...
Nina Duke
Arthur Rigby ...
Hollings
Leonard Williams ...
Jock Macrae
Gaylord Cavallaro ...
Jeff Holly
Tom Gill ...
Creloch
Colin Rix ...
Bernard
...
Maxine
Edit

Storyline

Newspaper reporters compete with London police to solve a murder.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Crime | Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

July 1956 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Berufsrisiko  »

Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(RCA Sound Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

The plot and cast are solid but, like the delivery, nothing is particularly of note and is quite uninspiring
20 January 2007 | by See all my reviews

Paul Banner used to be an American reporter working in London. Recently he has gone freelance, leaving his paper so that he can focus more on chasing down facts and selling his stories once he gets them – no more deadlines or misguided editors to divert his attention. When showgirl Nina Duke is murdered the press are all harrying the police for statements and facts but Banner hangs back and does a little work of his own to uncover the story. Nina, it transpires, was in jail for blackmail previously so it is possible that this was why she was killed – however can Banner get the story that the police cannot?

The concept of a journalist investigating a crime is one that had been used well in the decade around this film and had produced some classic films along the way. Here we have a British attempt at cracking the genre, albeit with an American in the lead. It is a reasonably entertaining affair although it is understandable why it has barely amassed 20 votes on this site at the time of writing. The plot is solid enough but delivered without any sense of fun, pace or excitement. It is a very British way of doing it and it does well to set the period and has the trimmings of mundane British life (as opposed to the way newsroom fizzle and journalists talk in Hollywood versions). For most viewers the result will be to rather turn off rather stick with it just because it offers little for the casual viewer to be bothered with.

The cast are reasonably good and the material is solid enough but the delivery is pedestrian from Saunders. He doesn't have that much style and he doesn't add anything to the material, instead just seemingly happy to point a camera at the words. Carpenter is nothing that special but fills the role well. He isn't particularly charismatic but the delivery of the film isn't really there for him even if he had been. Corri and Court have obvious side-kick roles and they do them well enough for the film. Solon is what he needs to be while Reid is effective when called upon.

Overall then a fairly so-so film that doesn't offer much for the casual viewer but might just fill an hour for the undemanding viewer. The plot and cast are solid but, like the delivery, nothing is particularly of note and is quite uninspiring.


7 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?
Review this title | See all 4 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page