| Page 1 of 15: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 144 reviews in total |
94 out of 127 people found the following review useful:
Is there any law against writing a review?, 7 June 2005
![]()
Author:
Brandt Sponseller from New York City
First I'll throw in my two cents on an issue I wish I didn't have to
comment on. Almost everyone knows that East of Eden is based on the
novel by John Steinbeck. Although I'm more of a fan of fantastic and
surreal literature, Steinbeck and Hemingway are probably my two
favorite realist authors. East of Eden is an epic masterpiece, well
worth reading. It's also close to 200,000 words long, so obviously,
some details and plot points are going to be left out or changed in a
two-hour movie, and that shouldn't make a difference. The film is a
separate artwork in a completely different medium that should be judged
on its own merits, not compared to the book. (For more on this, see my
"novel to film mini-rant" in my user profile.)
Director Elia Kazan's East of Eden presents itself as a disarmingly
simple film. Many might feel that it's slow or uneventful. But the
superficial appearance is intentionally misleading, a filmic
representation of the elegant austerity of Steinbeck's literary style;
the plot, subtexts and filmic artistry are all really quite complex,
and this is the rare example of a film that grows on you more and more
after you've seen it.
The plot is a rough "modern" (circa the 1910s) retelling of the
biblical tale of Cain and Abel, set in and between Salinas and
Monterey, California, as an allegory of good versus evil. But both
Steinbeck and screenwriter Paul Osborn weave a dense allegorical
tapestry, with those polar ethical opposites becoming less clear-cut as
the film progresses.
Cain is Cal Trask (James Dean) here, Abel his brother Aron (Richard
Davalos). Their father, Adam (Raymond Massey), owns a "ranch" upon
which he grows lettuce. He sees the attainment of excessive profit as
negative, and instead focuses his intelligence and skills on trying to
better mankind somehow, the practical upshot of which is that Adam is
trying to conquer the problem of the preservation of (transported,
especially) food via refrigeration or freezing. Adam is sternly frugal
and religious, and favors Aron. Thus Cal is something of a hoodlum when
the film begins. He's irreverent and tends to wander off. We see him
being belligerent and somewhat (self) destructive. Aron, in contrast,
seems decorous and easy-going, as does his girlfriend Abra (Julie
Harris). In other words, Cal and Aron are basically presented as Goofus
and Gallant at the start of the film.
Cal and Aron were told by Adam that their mother was dead. But Cal has
suspicions about this, and the first part of East of Eden is concerned
with Cal's attempt to discover the truth about his mother. He learns
the truth, and the second half covers a number of parallel, somewhat
unexpected transformations in the Trask family and their close friends.
This is also paralleled with the burgeoning of World War I, which has a
complex impact on these (then) small California towns.
The first thing that you're likely to notice with the recent Warner
Home Video DVD of East of Eden, after the novelty of the 3-minute
"Overture" (which doesn't add much at home, but is interesting
historically and doesn't negatively affect anything), is the beautiful
cinematography. This was one of the earlier "Cinemascope" (anamorphic
35mm widescreen, with up to a 2.66:1 aspect ratio) films, shot also
with a new "Warner Color" process. The results, employing gorgeous
California landscapes artfully shot by cinematographer Ted D. McCord
under Kazan's direction, are breathtaking. Everything looks
scrumptious--from old downtown streets to the rocky ocean shores,
distant mountains over sprawling fields, romantically shot freight
trains--even the sugar factory standing in for Adam's "barn" and the
Monterey whorehouse are beautifully photographed. One of the more
famous scenes features Cal and Abra in a dense, colorful, flower-filled
field. The Warner Color manages to look both intense and subdued at the
same time, which fits the atmosphere of the film perfectly. Kazan
employs a lot of subtle camera motions and angles to emphasize the
drama, including marvelously skewed angles during confrontations
between Cal and Adam.
The score, by Leonard Rosenman, is also worth mentioning, as the mood
of the film hinges on it so much. It's lush and sophisticated, with a
slight Aaron Copland flavor to my ears. This was Rosenman's first
scoring gig. He had been James Dean's piano teacher and had actually
studied with famed 12-tone ("serial") music proponent Arnold
Schoenberg. Ironically, he felt himself an odd choice and initially
suggested that Kazan ask Copland to score the film instead. That
probably led to some of the Coplandish tonalities, although to many
ears, Rosenman tends to sound more like Alban Berg, another, more
famous, Schoenberg protégé.
Of course as a realist drama, the performances in the film are crucial.
Dean is outstanding, as one would expect, but so is Harris and the rest
of the cast. Part of this must be due to Kazan, as Harris, for example,
doesn't come across nearly as well to me in some of her other films,
such as Robert Wise's The Haunting (1963).
If East of Eden has a flaw, it's that its relatively short (compared to
the material available) running time makes for some unexplained or
shallow turnabouts of character in the complex of good/evil interplay.
Aron seems particularly distant to the viewer, for example, which is
appropriate to the final state of his character, but which could have
been explained better in transformation.
But this is a fabulous film, with grand, biblical and universal
subtexts and an unusually developed but extremely charming romance.
Unless you're completely averse to realist drama, you must see East of
Eden at least once.
56 out of 74 people found the following review useful:
Perhaps the best of the three?, 2 November 2003
Author:
blackitty2 from Hattiesburg, MS
I recently purchased this film, having never seen it before, and feeling
somewhat peeved at the fact that it is never shown on TCM. Immediately, I
recognized it as one of the best films ever made. The adaptation from the
very dense and wonderful Steinbeck novel obviously required much of the
relationship between Adam and Charles to be deleted, however I felt the
film
did not suffer from this at all.
James Dean is a completely different animal than the other actors of his
time, and from start to finish in this film, he is spellbinding. The
emotional intensity and reality he brings to the film is so convincing it
is
almost painful to watch at times, especially when he goes to see his
mother
for the first time and he desperately tries to speak to her as he is being
wrenched away. The tone of his voice, his subtle gestures, his utter
desperation for love is amazing and completely his own. I once read that
Dean did not consider East of Eden to be his best film, but I disagree
with
him there. I have never seen a film (or an actor) that even came close to
matching this one, particularly when viewed from its position in time and
the nature of cinema in the 1950s. James Dean put himself 'out there'
emotionally in such a raw way that the power of that brave acting yet
holds
the ability to touch the audience with every viewing. I think the film
makes a hugely important statement about the human condition that is still
valid a half a century later.
48 out of 69 people found the following review useful:
Simply superb., 5 January 2000
![]()
Author:
David Atfield (bits@alphalink.com.au) from Canberra, Australia
Elia Kazan deserved his recent honorary Oscar, no matter what political
mistakes he may have made. He deserved it because he is one of the supreme
artists of the cinema. His ability to draw superb performances from his
actors, is coupled with an astonishing ability to depict these emotional
states visually, through the use of camera angles, lighting and symbols.
"East of Eden" must be seen in the widescreen format to truly appreciate its
visual style. It is arresting, sometimes beautiful and always
powerful.
Then there are the performances. James Dean's heartbreaking realization of
Cal, consumed by jealousy; Jo Van Fleet's magnificent portrayal of his
mother; Richard Davalos (why didn't we see more of him on the screen after
this film?) innocent, virginal, doomed; Raymond Massey who has never been
better in a multi-layered performance; Burl Ives' commanding police chief -
and, as usual in a Kazan film, even the smallest part is played to
perfection (who'll forget the girl in the brothel or the nurse at the end?).
After seeing the film a few times I really appreciate the performance of
Julie Harris too. I once thought her a little too mature for the role - but
now I see how her reactions to the events really enhance the emotional
impact of those events. Kazan allows her to be in frame during some of the
most crucial encounters between Cal and his father - and her face tells a
million stories. This is a true "supporting" performance - her performance
helping Dean realize Cal. Brava Julie!
I'm a lot older now than when I first saw this film - but I still relate so
strongly to the communication breakdown and the need for love between father
and son. The improvement of my own relationship with my father makes me see
the film differently but with no less emotion. Like all masterpieces this
film does not date, we just see it differently as we age. This is
undoubtedly one of my top five films. How about a theatrical revival? I
have never seen it in a cinema. Remember see it in widescreen - not pan and
scan.
27 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
Powerhouse Film, Powerhouse Performances, 2 June 2004
![]()
Author:
Thomas W. Muther, Jr. (twm-2) from Topeka, KS
Ever felt lost? have trouble finding your place in the world? feel
jealous of, or ignored by, a family member? If you answered yes to any
of these questions, beware--the resonance you may feel toward the
characters of this film may be so intense, the emotional pull of its
story so overwhelming, that at its end you will find yourself
exhausted, spent, trembling in its cathartic wake. I find it so every
time I see it. As an examination of the terrible undercurrents in
family relationships, of adolescent angst and loneliness, of the
universal need for love and the awful consequences of its being
withheld, it is nearly peerless. Movies that toyed with similar themes,
like "The Graduate" or "Rebel Without a Cause," though great films, do
not come close to packing the emotional wallop this film delivers.
To a large part, the intensity of the affective response generated by
watching "East of Eden" must be attributed to the strength of the
performances. No false notes here. Raymond Massey, a truly superb actor
who has largely, and undeservedly, been forgotten, gives one of his
best performance as the father with a secret, a man with the best
intentions in the world, who has nonetheless unwittingly crippled his
son Cal with his sometimes harsh criticisms and his favoritism of his
brother Aron. Julie Harris is simply wonderful as Abra, a young woman
who gradually becomes disenchanted with the "perfect" brother, Aron,
finding herself becoming more and more interested in the vaguely
frightening, yet vulnerable Cal. Her "speech" near the end of the film
to Cal's father is heartrending. Everyone else is fine, from the always
dependable Burl Ives to Albert Decker, and Jo van Fleet deserves
special mention as the supposedly dead mother. The vehicle which
propels the film, however, is James Dean who not only gives the best
performance in his all too short career, but one of the best in
cinematic history. It is truly amazing to watch him work here. The
viewer becomes like putty in his hands, bending and rending our
emotions at will. It's a performance not to be missed.
The movie has received criticism because it does not follow the book,
and leaves out at least the first two thirds of the novel. "East of
Eden" is one of my favorite books, yet I have no trouble accepting this
film on its own merits--which are considerable. A movie CANNOT be a
book, though there have been several directors who seem blithely
unaware of this giving us plodding movies straight-jacketed by their
literary source. One cannot judge this movie solely by comparing it to
the book, and with each deviation from the source, give it a demerit. I
believe this movie is every bit as great as the book--but it is NOT the
book. And John Steinbeck himself loved this movie, reportedly saying
that the movie was a greater achievement than his book had been. That's
a recommendation good enough for me, and should be enough for the
lovers of the book. You CAN love both. I do.
47 out of 71 people found the following review useful:
James Dean embodied the confused attitudes of a generation..., 16 February 2003
![]()
Author:
ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) from Mexico
James Dean plays Cal, a son of Adam Trask (Raymond Massey) who feels
unloved and unwanted by his stern father, a situation not helped by
Adam's apparent acceptance of Cal's brother... Cal suspects that his
mother, long believed dead, is the madame of a local brothel, and when
this is confirmed, the young man is convinced that he has found the
reason why he is bad...
His awkward, unhelpful attempts to find himself and come to terms with
his situation led young audiences to identify with him immediately, an
identification that was compounded by his role in 'Rebel Without a
Cause' where again, only with more violence, he rebelled against his
middle class family...
The impact he had made on the anxious, unhappy youth of that time was
confirmed as much by his death as by the style and abandon of his
life..
Dean was a youth who rebelled against the riches of the American Dream,
though he finally denounced it all in a reckless moment... Dean
therefore embodied the confused attitudes of a generation who had never
suffered through the Depression and rejected the acquisitive attitudes
of their parents, while at the same time they hankered after the
American Dream... Dean gave physical form to the perplexing confusion
of ideals, that haunted the majority of postwar American youth...
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Dean's Best Performance-An Outstanding Film, 17 November 2006
![]()
Author:
aimless-46 from Kentucky
If you have ever come out on the short end of a sibling rivalry and/or
felt seriously wronged by a parent(s), you will probably connect nicely
with "East of Eden" (1955). Since the majority of viewers meet these
criteria it is easy to see why the film finds a new audience with each
generation. And it is easy to understand the tears that are often shed
by both first-time and repeat viewers.
Although set at the start of World War I, the generational issues
portrayed really had came to a head by the mid-1950's. Which is why the
film was so timely and contemporary when it was released. It was Elia
Kazan's troubled relationship with his own father that first attracted
him to Steinbeck's novel and caused him to focus the film on the
portion of the story that addressed this issue.
Originally I ranked it a distant third in the James Dean film pecking
order but over the years it has somehow passed "Giant" and "Rebel
Without a Cause" IMHO, and I now find it to be clearly his best and
more enduring work. It is a real actors/director's film, with just six
significant characters and with especially good performances from Dean
and from Julie Harris. Both were a bit old for their parts but Dean's
boyish manner allowed him to sell the character and Harris (who had
convincingly played a twelve year old just a few years earlier in
"Member of the Wedding") looks the proper age in every scene except one
(an outdoor scene shot in the bright sun). She struggles sometimes with
reining in her sophistication but that could just be the subjective
perception of this viewer.
Here are some random points to appreciate in this great film:
Don't misinterpret Cal's (Dean) motivation, he is not doing things to
win his father's love but because he loves his father (communicated by
the early scene where he watches his father working in the kitchen).
The former motivation would be simplistic; the latter opens up a host
of interesting and ironic interpretations as you realize the seemingly
bad son Cal actually understands his father and admires his goodness
more than "good" son Aron (Richard Davalos).
Aron is not really the innocent figure he appears to be, he does not
like Cal and throughout the film betrays him.
Abra (Harris) is caught between the two brothers, moving steadily from
Aron to Cal as the film progresses. Aron represents everything she
understands that she should be and Cal represents everything she has
been denying herself. The story is largely seen from her point of view,
and her growth parallels her (and the audiences) slow realization that
Cal is not bad but misunderstood. The two are slowly falling in love
but do not kiss until she gets up in the ferris wheel, a place where
(symbolically) she is no longer standing on solid practical ground.
It is really a coming of age story for both of them, with Abra slowly
embracing new areas of human experience and Cal moving from adolescence
to manhood; thanks largely to her timely interventions. Watch for
subtle details that Kazan has included, like Cal's inability to make
extended eye contact with his father, brother, and mother; something
that he has no problem doing with Abra. And Cal's unsteady progress as
he moves forward momentarily and then retreats by looking away.
Note Kazan's use of a raked camera angle for the scenes inside the
Trask home, unfortunately this device is a little too extreme and calls
attention to itself. Also used in "The Third Man", it was done here to
reinforce the off-kilter nature of this family's dynamic. It goes away
after the scene in which Cal finally confronts his lifelong jealousy of
his brother and accuses his father of rejecting him because he is so
much like his mother, telling Adam (Raymond Massey) that he cannot
forgive himself for having married Kate. This is the point at which Cal
moves forward into permanent manhood, prior to this he had stepped
forward briefly and then retreated back into childhood.
Watch for the method-acting device of an actor playing with an object
as a means to introduce naturalism into the scene (Abra first flirts
with Cal with a flower, Jo Van Fleet makes a show of taking out and
lighting a cigarette, Cal repeatedly dips his finger into a wine
glass). "East of Eden" would be nothing but an overwrought melodrama
without a host of little things like this that humanize the story.
Watch for the awkward tension in all the scenes between Cal and Adam,
Kazan cultivated the off-screen friction between Dean and Massey;
reasoning that it would translate into more realistic on-screen
sequences between the two actors.
Watch for the stunning sequence late in the film when Cal slowly moves
out from under the tree branches (his menace reinforced nicely by the
score).
Finally note the contrast between the restrained closing scene (which
is also the climax) and the melodramatic style of the almost everything
that has preceded it in the film.
Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
35 out of 51 people found the following review useful:
There were some serious acting chops behind the legend..., 25 September 2004
![]()
Author:
Howlin Wolf from Oldham, Gtr Manchester, England.
The early, violent death of someone so famous was a tragedy; but for
someone who's never seen a Dean performance ("East of Eden" is his only
movie I've seen to date; it has since been joined by "Rebel Without a
Cause" as of Nov. 2007, and "Giant", in Jan. 2010) it's easy to get
suckered by these details into believing that this is the only thing
that adds substance to the man. Not so.
In "East of Eden" he delivers an intense performance as,
unsurprisingly, an enigma; an individual too sensitive for life in his
own world. It sounds from this as if it could well be similar territory
to "Rebel Without a Cause", and given the events it's also perhaps not
too far away from the real person - but nevertheless it's a striking
portrayal that shows unmistakable 'fire' and talent.
James Dean is not one of those people who've come to be mythologised
due to outside circumstances entirely beyond their control; for the
consummate skill in his craft and the posthumous Oscar recognition
brings something just as weighty to the table. About as far removed
from the Orlando Bloom poster boy of his generation as it's possible to
be, my expectations were completely trumped. There was real depth
present, too.
All else is at least good, but it's the memory of a sobbing Cal all at
once being transformed into a creature of hidden menace that I will
take away with me. A riveting display from a fine actor, and
undoubtedly a lasting testament to a lamentably short career. 9/10.
23 out of 31 people found the following review useful:
Excellent Story With Characters Who Aren't Always Who They Seem, 7 March 2007
![]()
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
Wow, what an impressive screen debut for a 24-year-old. That was the
famous James Dean, here in his first of three starring roles before
death took him at a tragically young age. Just as impressive, however,
is the overall performance of the rest of the cast, including
lesser-known Richard Davalos, who also was making his movie debut.
The most impressive person connected to this movie, however, was
director Elia Kazan who not only excelled directing this film but - in
the same year - directed "On The Waterfront." Now, that's not a bad
year of work!
"East Of Eden" is billed as a modern-day story of "Cain and Abel,"
between good and bad brothers with one of them feeling rejected by his
father. The small Biblical account of the two brothers only mentions an
offering they both gave God and then saying the brother whose offering
wasn't accepted went out in a fit of jealousy and killed the other.
True, the "offering" by "Cal" (Dean) and its rejection by his dad
"Adam" (Raymond Massey) leads to a climactic scene near the end of the
film, but - this is just an assumption - most people viewed this simply
as a story between "good" and "evil" pertaining to Dean and Davalos'
characters.
I didn't see either of those guys as either the "good" or "bad"
brothers. In fact, this film story is unusual in that every main
character's personality begins in one direction and, as the film
progresses, ends in almost the opposite. Nobody is as they first seem.
"Cale Trask" is shown early on to be a totally rebellious and immature
loser who commits a few stupid acts of vandalism and has a desire to be
a loner. As the film goes on, we see a softhearted guy who needs and
desires love and companionship like everyone else. The fact he only had
one parent, and that one didn't seem to love him, has messed his mind
up a great deal.
Meanwhile, his older brother "Aron" (Davalos) is pictured as the kind,
dependable, levelheaded guy who has a nice sweetheart who he plans to
marry very soon. "Aron" has always made his dad proud which makes Cale
jealous and bitter (hence, the Cain/Abel analogy.) In the last third of
the film, however, Aron's personality reveals some dark, selfish traits
and he isn't so "good" anymore.
Julie Harris plays "Abra," who begins as a sweet, likable and
trustworthy person but in the end proves insincere in her "ready to
marry" and "I'm in love with Aron" remarks as her feelings develop for
the younger brother. She does a nice job at the end, however, helping
Cale reconcile with his ailing dad.
The fourth major player, the father of the two boys, is portrayed - at
least by Cale - as man who has played favorites with his sons and is
more of a businessman than a loving father. However, we see later that
he is not a bad guy at all. He is happy to praise his younger son when
merited, is quick to forgive but, like a lot of fathers in "the old
days," I believe, had a hard time outwardly expressing love for his
children despite, in his heart wanting the best for them.
The fifth major character in the film, "Kate," has the least amount of
lines but is the most powerful figure in the movie. She's the mother
who abandoned her kids when they were babies and left her husband
because she "didn't want to be tied down to a ranch." Wow, Thank God
our mothers didn't have that selfish attitude! She's pictured as a very
hard, bitter woman who has made a success of herself and to hell with
everyone else. However, once again, as the story unfolds, we see an
opposite side. Cale, checking rumors she was in the area, sought her
out and discovered she, indeed, was his mom. (Nobody in the Trask
family knew she lived nearby, with the dad telling the kids she was
dead rather than risk hurting their feelings.). Anyway, later she
surprises us by softening up and loaning Cal $5,000 for a business
venture to help him and help bail out his dad. That amount of money is
equal to at least $100,000 today, so it's a generous, kind person who
would say "okay" to that monetary request. The more she speaks, the
softer she sounds, even if she wouldn't want to admit it.
The only character I wish had a bigger role was "Anne," played by Lois
Smith, who was beautiful and had an intriguing role that I thought
would amount to more. I'm glad to see that she is still acting on a
regular basis today.
Overall, it's a solid drama with complex characters who make you
reflect about them long after you view this. I don't know why it took
so long for me to finally see this movie, but I was impressed. (May I
recommend the two-disc, special-edition DVD?). This movie is
wonderfully directed, acted and photographed. I've only seen it once
(last night) and I am not in love with the film (yet), but I am
surprised it only garnered one Academy Award. I think it deserved more.
21 out of 34 people found the following review useful:
Elia Kazan and James Dean at their best, 28 June 2005
![]()
Author:
rontaube from Twin Cities, Minnesota
I've seen this movie several times, most recently on DVD with an additional DVD that includes the premier and a documentary about James Dean. Each time I see this movie I see it from a new perspective. I learned from the DVD and from reading Elia Kazan's comments that the character Cal (played by Dean) is really Steinbeck in many ways in his youth and Kazan also identified with him. I learned that there was real friction between Dean and the man who played his father, Raymond Massey and that Dean deliberately provoked Massey to get angry with him to bring out the moment in the film of the father's feelings towards his son. I also marvel each time i see this movie at the outstanding performance of Jo Van Fleet. She deserved her best supporting actress academy award. This movie resonates on many levels as do most of Kazan's films. It is modern retelling of the garden of eden story and it is the story of the troubled youth of the fifties fighting against the conservatism of the Eisenhower years. It is a story of the confusion and conflicts in a family with a war approaching and it's a story about a woman (Van Fleet's character) who doesn't like being bottled up in a controlled religious setting. Many things to enjoy here and one wonders where the artists of Kazans stature are in this day and age. I only wish that all of Kazan's films were on DVD, such as Baby Doll and Wild River. I wonder if anyone but me notices that on the extra DVD where there is an interview with John Steinbeck that he shifts and contorts his mouth in a manner very like Dean in the movie. It was said that neither Steinbeck nor Kazan originally liked Dean but both agreed that he was perfect for the part and both identified with him very much.
24 out of 40 people found the following review useful:
Steinbeck's brilliant novel into a stunning film, 19 May 2004
![]()
Author:
Charles Reichenthal (churei@aol.com) from Brooklyn, New York
Elia Kazan, no matter what one thinks of his political indiscretions, did direct some brilliant motion pictures, but EAST OF EDEN is not only his best but, certainly, one of the finest movies ever produced out of Hollywood. One can sense the worth of the film immediately in the scene where James Dean stealthily follows his 'mother' Jo Van Fleet down a dusy street. One can actually see the heat rising from the street, and the cinematography makes one feel lost in the hot temperature. From that moment on, EAST OF EDEN, though only a portion of the book, stands as one of those rare films in which everything comes together with an emotional explosion that never lets up, building to a climax of greatness. James Dean gives one of the screen's finest performances, and his scenes with Raymond Massey detonate with the power of emotions unchecked and real. Julie Harris is equally remarkable, as is Richard Davalos as Dean's brother who helps to lead the story directly into a parallel with the Cain-Abel conflict. Jo Van Fleet deserves her Oscar and every other honor, and Lois Smith breaks your heart in her small role as a trapped young girl in VanFleet's 'house'. Rosenman's scoring is likewise stunning and always 'right'. EAST OF EDEN stands with CITIZEN KANE, 2001, THE THIRD MAN, and very few others, as a milestone in helping us to applaud filmmaking as an art form.
| Page 1 of 15: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |