6.5/10
130
2 user 1 critic

La reine Margot (1954)

Reviews
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Armando Francioli ...
Joseph Peyrac La Môle / Duke of Mole
Robert Porte ...
...
Annibal de Coconas (as Henri Genès)
...
André Versini ...
Fiorella Mari ...
Henriette
...
Patrizia Lari ...
Carlotta
Nicole Riche ...
Gilonne
Louis Arbessier ...
Guy Kerner ...
Jean-Roger Caussimon ...
Le gouverneur de la prison / Prison Governor
Jean Témerson ...
L'aubergiste de 'La belle étoile' (as Jean Temmerson)
Olivier Mathot ...
Pierre
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

16th century | based on novel | See All (2) »

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

25 November 1954 (France)  »

Also Known As:

Bartholomäusnacht  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Eastmancolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Remake of Queen Margaret (1914) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Colorful story of the 16th century Valois & Wars of Religion
24 July 2002 | by (Albuquerque, NM) – See all my reviews

This is a good movie, and although camparisons with its 1994 successor are inevitable, it wears well on its own and better in some ways. This is old-fashioned French film making, not noticeably different from Hollywood historical epics of the same era w/ the exception of a flash of nudity here and there. It is important to remember that at the time of this film, only Gance (screenplay) was an international legend. Moreau is fine as Marguerite de Valois & Françoise Rosay as Catherine de Medicis does a good job of chewing up the scenery. The '54 style potrayal of Henri d'Anjou as a very effeminate homosexual has been proven to be historically inaccurate, but Daniel Ceccaldi is amusing in the part. The acting for Charles IX, De la Mole, Coconnas et al is up to '54 par, acceptable and not terribly detracting from the story.

The inevitable discussion will be around comparing the two version, '54 & '94. Chereau lifted entire sections of the screenplay from 1954, and didn't do a bad job with them, for all that. A more faithful adaptation of the Dumas père novel, the '54 version cannot really be said to be a better movie. It is more "French," to be sure, and less sensationalized, but it, too, drags in spots just as the '94 does. The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre IS depicted, but not in an overlong and blood-drenched manner.

Moreau is rather cool as Marguerite whereas Adjani is overwrought in the '94, but both actresses give fine performances, each in their own manner.

This '54 version is a movie for an older generation, perhaps more academic in its approach, whereas the '94 is for a younger generation who like more zap and pizzazz in their cinematic representations.


8 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?