| Page 1 of 9: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] |
| Index | 89 reviews in total |
119 out of 134 people found the following review useful:
Too subtle and yet too obvious, 24 October 2004
Author:
George M (ghmcal@wm.edu) from Williamsburg, VA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This film is commonly called one of the masterpieces of international
film. Indeed, a well-known "intro to film" textbook uses it as a case
study in notable film-making. But, as more than one reviewer so far has
pointed out, 'Tokyo Story' is slow, obscure, and sometimes seemingly
sterile. Understanding how a great classic could be seemingly soulless
requires some study - of Japanese culture, as others have pointed out,
of film technique, and of ourselves. Fortunately, that understanding
more than fully repays itself, as is true of any great piece of art.
I should begin by warning the first time viewer that the film is not in
any familiar style. Other reviewers have mentioned the camera, the
angles, the acting, the elision - I hardly need dwell on these. Those
used to Hollywood films of almost any era will find 'Tokyo Story' odd
and unsettling, just because the style is so different. And of course
the culture is radically different. In this forum one can hardly even
begin to discuss the way that Japanese fathers discuss their children
amongst themselves, or the marriage culture of 1950s Japan. But I think
the film is great even if one has no understanding of continuity
editing, or post-war Japan, or a dozen other obscure topics. This is,
after all, the central feature of great art: Even those of us who do
not fully understand still realize, in some unspeakable way, that we
are in the presence of something great.
The most common accusations leveled against this film, oddly, assert
alternatively that it is a cold, soulless exercise in technique or, on
the other hand, that it is a soap opera, with no real substance. I
think neither of those is true. There can be no question that it is
easily seen as cold. Nothing really happens, by modern standards. It is
merely a family that comes and goes and lives and dies. Of course, to
those who accuse it of being a soap opera, that death is the foremost
evidence of its manipulative guilt. But, for those who have seen it,
recall the mother's stroke, or where Keizo is told to look one last
time - would a soap opera elide such a supremely emotional scenes?
No, 'Tokyo Story' is neither cold nor manipulative. Rather, it slowly
brings you into a family that, while perhaps totally unlike your own,
is at its base just the same. Then it allows those things to happen
that must someday happen to all of us - growing up, moving away, and
that unspeakable, inescapable end. It is not easy; it is not obvious;
but it is not obscure, either. After it all, I can only tell you this:
If you have lived long enough to know how it feels to leave your
parents and only realize far too late, as it seems we all do, the value
of what you have left behind, then 'Tokyo Story' will reward you
perfectly. And these things - we all do these very things, so 'Tokyo
Story' is universal, is Art.
79 out of 87 people found the following review useful:
Ozu's Quietly Brilliant Masterpiece Deserves Your Attention, 12 December 2005
![]()
Author:
Ed Uyeshima from San Francisco, CA, USA
I think this movie is amazing for reasons I was not expecting. I had
heard of Yasujiro Ozu's "Tokyo Story" for several years but never had
an opportunity to see it until Criterion resuscitated it as part of
their DVD collection. Over fifty years old, this wondrous 1953 film
resonates just as deeply today. Those outside Japan rarely get to see a
Japanese film classic that doesn't involve samurai warriors in medieval
battles. This one, however, is a subtly observed family drama set in
post-WWII Japan, and it is the quietude and lack of pretense of Ozu's
film-making style that makes this among the most moving of films.
The plot centers on Shukishi and Tomi, an elderly couple, who traverse
the country from their southern fishing village of Onomichi to visit
their adult children, daughter Shige and son Koichi, in Tokyo. Leading
their own busy lives, the children realize their obligation to
entertain them and pack them off to Atami, a nearby resort targeted to
weekend revelers. Returning to Tokyo unexpectedly, Tomi visits their
kindly daughter-in-law, Noriko, the widow of second son Shoji, while
Shukishi gets drunk with some old companions. The old couple realizes
they have become a burden to their children and decide to return to
Onomichi. They also have a younger daughter Kyoko, a schoolteacher who
lives with them, and younger son Keizo works for the train company in
Osaka. By now the children, except for Kyoko and the dutiful Noriko,
have given up on their parents, even when Tomi takes ill in Osaka on
the way back home. From this seemingly convoluted, trivial-sounding
storyline, fraught with soap opera possibilities, Ozu has fashioned a
heartfelt and ultimately ironic film that focuses on the details in
people's lives rather than a single dramatic situation.
What fascinates me about Ozu's idiosyncratic style is how he relies on
insinuation to carry his story forward. In fact, some of the more
critical events happen off-camera because Ozu's simple, penetrating
observations of these characters' lives remain powerfully insightful
without being contrived. Ozu scholar David Desser, who provides
insightful commentary on the alternate audio track, explains this
concept as "narrative ellipses", Ozu's singularly effective means of
providing emotional continuity to a story without providing all the
predictable detail in between. Ozu also positions his camera low
throughout his film to replicate the perspective of someone sitting on
a tatami mat. It adds significantly to the humanity he evokes. There
are no melodramatic confrontations among the characters, no masochistic
showboating, and the dialogue is deceptively casual, as even the most
off-hand remark bears weight into the story. The film condemns no one
and its sense of inevitability carries with it only certain resigned
sadness. What amazes me most is how the ending is so cathartic because
the characters feel so real to me, not because there are manipulative
plot developments, even death, which force me to feel for them.
I just love the performances, as they have a neo-realism that makes
them all the more affecting. Chishu Ryu and Chieko Higashiyama are
wonderfully authentic as Shukishi and Tomi, perfectly conveying the
resignation they feel about their lives and their children without
slipping into cheap sentimentality. Higashiyama effortlessly displays
the sunny demeanor of a grandmother, so when sadness does take over in
her life, it becomes all the more haunting. In particular, she has a
beautiful scene where Tomi looks forlornly at her grandchild wondering
what he will be when he grows up and whether she will live to see what
happens. Even more heartbreaking is the scene where Shukishi and Tomi
sit in Ueno Park realizing their children have no time for them and are
resigned to the fact that they need to find a place to sleep for the
night. The closest the film has to a villain is Shige, portrayed
fearlessly by Haruko Sugimura, who is able to show respect, pettiness
and conniving in a realistically mercurial fashion. Watch her as she
complains about the expensive cakes her husband bought for her parents
(as she selfishly eats them herself) or how she finagles Koichi to
co-finance the trip to Atami or how she shows her frustration when her
parents come home early from the spa. So Yamamura (familiar to later
Western audiences as Admiral Yamamoto in "Tora! Tora! Tora!") displays
the right amount of indifference as Koichi, and Kyoko Kagawa has a few
sharp lines toward the end of the film as the disappointed Kyoko.
But the best performance comes from the legendary Setsuko Hara, a
luminous actress whose beauty and sensitivity remind me of Olivia de
Havilland during the same era. As Noriko, she is breathtaking in
showing her character's modesty, her unforced generosity in spite of
her downscale status and her constant smile as a mask for her pain. She
has a number of deeply affecting moments, for instance, when Noriko
explains to Shukishi and Tomi how she misses her husband, even though
it is implied he was a brutalizing alcoholic; or the touching goodbye
to Kyoko; or her pained embarrassment over the high esteem that
Shukishi holds for her kindness. Don't expect fireworks or any shocking
moments, just a powerfully emotional film in spite of its seemingly
modest approach. The two-disc DVD set has the commentary from Desser on
the first disc, as well as the trailer. On the second disc, there are
two excellent documentaries. One is a comprehensive 1983, two-hour
feature focused on Ozu's life and career, and the second is a 40-minute
tribute from several international movie directors.
62 out of 70 people found the following review useful:
Extraordinary Portrayal of Real Life, 14 July 2004
![]()
Author:
spqrclaudius
A fantastic film that belies the simplicity of its plot, Tokyo Story is the tale of a vacation gone sadly awry, with an elderly man and woman visiting from the countryside pushed to the sidelines by their busy children in the city. The younger generation (and by extension the "new" Japan) turns its back on the family from which it arose- because of selfishness, because of necessity, or because it's simply the way of the world. The movie provides no easy answers- its melancholy ambiguity is part of its charm. Whatever the case, Ozu delights in portraying the details of everyday life. The emotional resonances of this movie are extraordinary, and some shots (a child picking flowers, an old couple framed by the sea, a woman sitting forlornly at her work desk) are enough to give a sensitive film-goer the shivers. Despite the testimony of some critics, the film is not totally devoid of melodramatic elements (some stock characters and cloying musical motifs spring readily to mind), but the film is founded upon such an obvious love and respect for the importance of real-world interactions that it's hard not to be anything other than enthralled by it.
55 out of 60 people found the following review useful:
Universal appeal of Tokyo Story, 22 March 2004
Author:
Galina from Virginia, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
As with every great work, the film has its own unique perfection in
style, rhythm, details, and artist's vision - but Tokyo Story is very
universal in its appeal - it is for every parent, every son or daughter
- for everyone. It was made 50 years ago in Japan, about people who
lived far away, but it is also about all of us, our families, our
problems, our guilt and our search for love and meaning.
Ozu's film does not require one to be a movie buff or to try to solve
complex symbolism to appreciate and love it. It brings smiles because
it is a comedy (for at least the first 2/3) and sadness with a high
drama of the last 1/3 of the film.
Yasujiro Ozu's quiet and deceptively simple film tells a story of an
elderly couple who travel to Tokyo to see their grown up children and
their families - son, daughter and daughter-in-law who is a widow of
their middle son that was killed during the World War II. Their
children love them, of course but they are too busy with their own
lives and jobs to spend much time with them. Their young grandchildren
don't know them and not too eager to try to know their grandparents
better. Only the widowed daughter-in-law is the one who is really happy
with their arrival and tries to make their visit pleasurable. After
parents return home, children receive a telegram with the sad news that
the mother became critically ill. Now it is their turn to make a
journey.
Ozu does not judge anybody, but beneath the quiet politeness, smiles,
and soft voices there is a sad, inevitable, and powerful alienation of
generations in the modern world of big cities. The simple family
melodrama has been told with intensity, humanity, and honesty of
character.
P.S. The first thing I wanted to do after I finished watching this film
was to pick up the phone and call my mom. Just to hear her voice.
58 out of 67 people found the following review useful:
The excuses we make to justify our neglect of others, 14 May 2002
![]()
Author:
KFL from Bloomington, IN
An appreciation of this movie may demand some understanding of Japanese
culture. The Japanese are rather reserved, and were even more reserved back
in the early 1950's, when this film is set. No embracing, even of parents,
children, siblings; no dramatic histrionics; even a death scene in this
movie is much quieter than a Westerner might expect.
Consequently I can't really blame several reviewers here for calling this
movie boring and slow-paced. But it is not at all slow-paced from a
different cultural perspective. It just depends on what you're used
to.
If you do take the time to watch and try to understand it, you'll find an
engrossing analysis of the dynamic of a middle-class family, the rift that
grows up between generations, and of the many excuses we find ourselves
making to justify our neglect for others, even those dearest to us. These
themes are universal, but are couched in a postwar Japanese idiom, and so
probably less accessible to the average Western viewer.
I have wondered awhile about a speech at the end by Noriko, the widowed
daughter-in-law, in which she denies that she's such a good person (though
her actions in the movie indicate otherwise). I'm still not sure I
understand her motives in saying this. For the most part, however, this
movie will not leave you puzzled, but it may leave you a bit wiser, and a
bit more reluctant to make those excuses.
48 out of 57 people found the following review useful:
"Isn't Life Depressing?", 8 May 2004
![]()
Author:
Zykron G. Ghoderphest from United States
Two women are sitting on tatami mats. They are smiling and talking. One of
them says, "Isn't life depressing?" Wow... that pretty much says
it.
Tokyo Story is defenitely one of the finest movies ever made. Easy. I don't
care
what anyone says: slow or not, this is one of Ozu's finest films. Very few
movies
have made my cry, but I did indeed weep at this movie. All of the acting
performances are very believeable, especially Hara's. The interesting
knee-
level tatami cinematography suits the film perfectly. Even the music is
impeccable.
What really gets me with Tokyo Story is how stunningly realistic it is. From
the
dialogue to the story, everything feels like real life. No matter what
language you
speak, what culture or country you hail from, this element is
universal.
It's pretty much perfect... every character is fleshed out, there are no
plot holes
left open... I can't find anything to complain about it! 50 years after its
release
and it's still very contemporary... damn.
I give it **** out of ****.
40 out of 46 people found the following review useful:
FANTASTIC, 27 October 1999
![]()
Author:
Stroheim-3 from Boston, MA
I need to say this: THIS MOVIE IS ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC!!! Sure it starts
off slowly, but the fact of the matter is the film is a great story of a
family and the alienation associated with aging. This is the kind of movie
that will make you reflect upon your own family and how you treat
them.
I had never seen an Ozu film before, but now I feel as if I must see them
all. His use of cinematic space is incredible. He breaks all sorts of
conventions with his cinematography such as violating the axis of action.
This gives the viewer the sense of a large, open, unrestricted
world.
Going with this realism, the characters seem real; not for a moment did I
see the people on the screen as actors. They were the family, and you as
the viewer feels what they feel. Part of this comes from the use of
head-on-shots such that the characters are speaking TO
you.
It is a fantastic, moving piece of work and arguably one of the best films
ever made.
42 out of 50 people found the following review useful:
Things are the way that they are and it is perfect, 21 April 2003
Author:
Howard Schumann from Vancouver, B.C.
Ozu's Tokyo Story is a serene and contemplative look at the breakdown in the
relationship between grown children and their elderly parents shortly after
World War II. The film concerns itself with problems many of us must face:
the struggle to maintain a self-fulfilling life independent of parental
expectations, the changes in relationships wrought by time, and the
inevitability of separation and loss. Ozu does not point the finger at
either parents or children but, like many of his films, offers a thoughtful
meditation on the transitory nature of life.
As the film opens, we see an empty street, empty train tracks and an empty
pier, perhaps an early indicator of the sense of loss that pervades the
film. An elderly father, Shukishi Hirayama (Chishu Ryu) and his wife Tomi
(Chieko Higashiyama) are preparing to travel by train to visit their
children in Tokyo. When they arrive, they are met with indifference by
daughter Shige (Haruko Sugimura), their grandchildren Minoru (Zen Murase)
and Isamu (Mitsuhiro Mori), and son Koichi (So Yamamura), a Tokyo
pediatrician. When Koichi is called to visit a patient and Shige cannot
leave her beauty salon, the Harayamas postpone a sightseeing trip and start
to complain that they expected the children would be living in more
comfortable circumstances. Their widowed daughter-in-law Noriko (Setsuko
Hara), however, welcomes them warmly and gives them the experience of being
appreciated.
To give themselves some breathing room, the children pool their resources
and send their parents to Atami, a health spa. Their visit, however, is cut
short when the noise and crowds make going home seem like a better
alternative. When they get back to Tokyo, Shige tells them she has a meeting
scheduled at her house and Tomi decides to spend the night with Noriko.
Shukishi, in a very humorous scene, goes out drinking with old friends and
shows up late at night at Shige's house completely drunk. When the elderly
parents return to Onomichi, the mother suddenly becomes very ill and the
entire family, including youngest son Keizo from Osaka, must come and visit
them. The moment of epiphany comes when the youngest daughter Kyoko (Kyoko
Kagawa) asks Noriko whether or not life is disappointing. Her answer mirrors
Ozu's concept of mono no aware, that we cannot avoid the sadness of life,
but her beaming face tells us that things are just the way that they are and
that it is perfect.
28 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
A Classic, 5 November 2003
Author:
Mark Davies (mark679davis@btinternet.com) from Chester, England
It was only last week that i saw this film for the first time, and i
instantly loved it. It perfectly sums up the feelings from post war Japan,
and the loss of values the community had to deal with. Our sympathies are
instantly placed with the older generation, who are symbolic of the
traditional values, while we see the younger generation as selfish, and
too
busy to spend time with their parents. We have a backward view of change
and
progress not necessarilly being so
Ozu shot the film from a waist height viewpoint, which to the traditional
Japanese viewer respresents the view of someone below eye level sitting on
a
mat. This was the pose of the onlooker, and this constantly reminds us
that
the film is under the gaze, and we should take note. Like traditional
Japanese cinema the camera does not move. Panning is replaced by clever
cutting, and the mis-en-scene is very artistic. Using the foreground and
background very cleverly to show film as an art in its purest
form.
24 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
A cinema of tears, 8 April 2007
![]()
Author:
GyatsoLa from Ireland
I can vividly remember the first time i saw this movie - it was during
a festival of Japanese movies in an art house cinema here in Dublin. I
must admit to never having heard of Ozu before, i went out of boredom
and casual curiosity. I was embarrassed at the end to find myself in
tears. I quickly wiped them away in that subtle way guys do when they
don't want anyone to know, and got out to leave. What struck me was
that even as the credits were finishing, I was one of the first to go.
As i walked up the aisle I realized that most of the nearly full cinema
was still sitting quietly, without the usual post movie chatter - and
more than half of the audience had tears pouring down their faces. I
have never, ever witnessed that in a cinema.
Since then, i've watched it on DVD, and had to think a lot about why
such a simple movie is so powerful, and so many people rate it as one
of the greatest ever. And why i find myself agreeing with that rating,
i truly think it is in the top 10 ever made - certainly the top 5 of
any I've seen. But its hard at first to know why. It doesn't have the
greatest script of any movie, there are few things in it that are truly
original. The acting is great, but not the greatest ever seen, and the
technical qualities are just average. I've come to the conclusion that
the reason for its greatness is that it comes closest to pure art in
cinema. By pure art, i mean art that in its simplicity but technical
genius still reveals deep truths about our lives. When i think about
Tokyo Story I don't find myself comparing it to other movies, instead I
think of a Rembrandt self portrait, a Vermeer painting, or my favourite
short story, 'The Dead' by James Joyce. It is simple, unadorned, and
deeply wise. I realise in writing this I'm rapidly approaching pseuds
corner, but this is my genuine conclusion (writing as someone who is
shamefully uneducated in most of the arts).
Of course there have been many great movies about families, about
growing old, about the nature of life.... but I think somehow Ozu
achieved a sort of perfection with Tokyo Story. Thats why its the only
movie I would give a '10' to.
| Page 1 of 9: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |