MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 6,258 this week

Forever Female (1953)

 -  Comedy  -  January 1954 (USA)
6.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.8/10 from 250 users  
Reviews: 8 user

An aging actress refuses to admit she is too old to play the ingénue role anymore.

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

Related News

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 29 titles
created 19 Jan 2011
 
a list of 89 titles
created 13 Feb 2011
 
list image
a list of 903 titles
created 17 Feb 2012
 
list image
a list of 48 titles
created 8 months ago
 
a list of 45 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Search for "Forever Female" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Forever Female (1953)

Forever Female (1953) on IMDb 6.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Forever Female.
Won 1 Golden Globe. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
...
Stanley Krown
...
E. Harry Phillips
...
Eddie Woods
Jesse White ...
Willie Wolfe
Marjorie Rambeau ...
Older Actress at Bar
...
King Donovan ...
Playwright
Vic Perrin ...
Scenic Designer
Russell Gaige ...
Theatrical Producer
...
Patty (as Marian Ross)
Richard Shannon ...
Stage Manager
...
Sally Carver
Edit

Storyline

Playwright Stanley Krown has a terrific new play. It's got a great part for reigning Broadway star Beatrice Page, and a young actress named Sally Carver will do just about anything to get the ingénue lead. The problem is that Beatrice doesn't want the great role written for her. She wants the ingénue role, something she could have played wonderfully -- when she was twenty years younger. Written by Jim Beaver <jumblejim@prodigy.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

based on play

Taglines:

That "Moon Is Blue" boy -- is in the middle Again! See more »

Genres:

Comedy

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

January 1954 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Forever Female  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Features Pat Crowley debut. See more »

Goofs

The framed caricatures that line the walls of the Sardi's set are black and white sketches that include at least one movie star (Charlie Chaplin); in reality, the caricatures at the actual restaurant in New York are in color and, because they only honor celebrities connected with the Broadway stage, would certainly not have included Chaplin. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Very good despite one character who is impossibly badly written
9 May 2012 | by (Bradenton, Florida) – See all my reviews

This is a very good film that manages to entertain even though one of the characters was atrociously written. The film begins with a cocky young playwright (William Holden) being discovered. Although he's managed to offend a famous Broadway star (Ginger Rogers), he's also impressed her with his talent and good looks. The problem is that she wants to star in his play--even though she is WAY too old for the part. Even though they re-write it for her to play a character 10 years older, she still is too old for the part. But he wants the play to be produced and he's also in love with her. What's he to do?! And, what's he to do about Sally Carver--a spunky young actress who would be perfect for the part?

While Holden, Rogers and Paul Douglas all did great because they were real professionals and their parts were well written, I couldn't say the same for Pat Crowley (who played Sally). Although her character was supposed to be very eager and raw, she often came off as annoying and obnoxious. Her constant use of the word 'Siamese' and brash persona really turned me off--as I am sure it did for the audience. It's surprising, since the studio appeared to be grooming her for stardom--and the film's credits point out that she's a new discovery. But, if you can block out her character (at least until she evolves into a REALISTIC person later in the film), you will see a cool film--one that gives Rogers a chance to stretch herself and play a riskier role--an actress whose vanity is getting in the way of common sense. Well worth seeing.


4 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
FOREVER FEMALE pamevans46
Doesn't This Sound an Awful Lot Like... Schmoozette
Discuss Forever Female (1953) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?