MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 7,799 this week

Battle Circus (1953)

 -  Romance | War | Drama  -  6 March 1953 (USA)
5.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.7/10 from 635 users  
Reviews: 18 user | 5 critic

Set in Korea and made during the war, this is the love story of a hard-bitten Army surgeon, and a new nurse ready to save the world.

Director:

Writers:

(story), (story), 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 405 titles created 02 Jan 2011
 
a list of 1042 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 1015 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 75 titles created 03 Feb 2012
 
a list of 3894 titles created 4 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Battle Circus (1953)

Battle Circus (1953) on IMDb 5.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Battle Circus.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Maj. Jed Webbe
...
Lt. Ruth McGara
...
Sgt. Orvil Statt
Robert Keith ...
Lt. Col. Hilary Walters
...
Capt. John 'Rusty' Rustford
Perry Sheehan ...
Lt. Laurence
...
Lt. Rose Ashland
Adele Longmire ...
Lt. Jane Franklin
Jonathan Cott ...
Adjutant
Ann Morrison ...
Lt. Edith Edwards
Helen Winston ...
Lt. Graciano
Sarah Selby ...
Capt. Dobbs
Danny Chang ...
Korean Child
Philip Ahn ...
Korean Prisoner
...
Sergeant
Edit

Storyline

Nurse Lt. Ruth McGara is assigned to a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital (MASH) unit near the front lines of the Korean War. There she meets and is roughly romanced by Major Jed Webbe, one of the unit's surgeons. Webbe is pushy and seems to care only for momentary pleasures, but McGara falls for him just the same. Their romance blossoms in the midst of overwhelming numbers of casualties, threats from the enemy and from the weather, and emergency evacuations that test the mettle of even a unit whose very name suggests quick mobility. Written by Jim Beaver <jumblejim@prodigy.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

korean war

Taglines:

M-G-M's great drama of desire under fire!

Genres:

Romance | War | Drama

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

6 March 1953 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

MASH 66  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Sound System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Humphrey Bogart accidentally set his left thumb afire with lighter fluid while filming the scene in which his character burns some documents. The accident is visible in the film. See more »

Goofs

Shots of the helicopter main rotor speed taken from the outside as it is flying do not match the speed shown from the inside shots. The rotor is going very slowly when viewed from inside and could not sustain flight. See more »

Connections

Featured in Great Performances: Bacall on Bogart (1988) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A MASH before M*A*S*H*
15 October 2011 | by (Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada) – See all my reviews

This is an interesting movie. It's not the best war movie you'll ever see; it's not the most exciting movie you'll ever see and it's not one of Humphrey Bogart's best movies by a long shot. But it's still very interesting in its own way. I was intrigued by it at first because it's the story of a MASH unit in the Korean War - long before MASH the TV series or MASH the movie or MASH the book. To be honest, I really hadn't been aware that a story that focused specifically on a MASH unit had been done before that. I have to say that I enjoyed this much more than I enjoyed "MASH" the movie. This seemed to take a far more serious approach to the subject, and it seemed to stay on topic far better. It makes many of the same points that author Richard Hooker would make in his 1968 book (and that would be the inspiration for the later movie and TV series of the same name) - the pointlessness of war, the heroics of the medical teams and the need for those involved to just find a way

  • any way - through, whether that meant alcohol or sex (or, I suppose,
anything else.) It's different, though, in that it portrays a much more positive picture of the military.

Bogart played Major Webb, second in command of MASH 8666. He's a bit of a lonely figure with a past that doesn't really get explored much, but he's obviously a superb doctor. Into his life comes Lt. Ruth McGara (June Allyson) and they develop an interesting relationship that both sometimes fight against, that sometimes neither takes very seriously and that seems to eventually develop into something real. There wasn't really much passion (or chemistry) between them, but the relationship seemed believable to me in the circumstances, where such relationships probably come and go pretty quickly depending on who gets transferred where and when. It's a cautious relationship understandably, and so perhaps the emotional connection that sometimes seems lacking actually works. It's that relationship that's the plot device that moves this forward.

Interspersed are vignettes of war. The hospital comes under fire on occasion, it's constantly on the move to keep up with wherever the front happens to be, there's some reflection on the impact of the war on Korean civilians, and the most exciting scene of the movie is probably the North Korean prisoner who manages to smuggle a grenade into the hospital. It's not an exciting, action-packed war movie. It seems to simply give a look at the life of those serving in a MASH unit, and it seems to be one of the many "tribute" sort of movies that were made in the era. Although casualties are certainly present throughout, it's also not at all graphic in its depictions, and (even understanding the greater sensitivities the industry at the time had to such things) I found it ridiculous that Webb could perform chest surgery on a young Korean boy which included an open heart massage and yet apparently not get a spot of blood on him while doing it!

It's not great. I would call it interesting, mostly for its look at a MASH unit before M*A*S*H*. (5/10)


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Does anyone know.. nedra66
Discuss Battle Circus (1953) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?