9 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Welles' images match the beauty of Shakespeare's language, 3 January 2006
![]()
Author:
EddieK from United States
Considerable controversy has surrounded the 1992 restoration and
re-release of Orson Welles' "Othello." First, the film was wrongly
labelled a "lost classic" - not technically true, as Welles aficionados
will realize. More seriously, the restoration crew (under the aegis of
Welles' daughter, Beatrice Welles) re-synced the dialogue and
re-recorded the musical score - an abomination to Welles purists. While
it would have been preferable to adhere to Welles' vision for the film,
such an endeavor becomes extremely difficult when no written record of
Welles' intent exists (as it did with his famous 26-page memo to
Universal regarding "Touch of Evil"). So it's true that the restored
version lacks a degree of authenticity, but what are the alternatives?
Grainy, scratched, poorly synced public domain prints (c.f. "Mr
Arkadin" and "The Trial")? Or, worse, no available copy at all (c.f.
"Chimes at Midnight")?
Anyway, on to the film. "Othello's" existence helps disprove the
charges of profligacy and "fear of completion" that plagued Welles'
career after "Citizen Kane." Shot over four years in Morocco and Italy,
and financed largely by Welles himself, "Othello" manages to avoid a
low-budget look, thanks largely to virtuoso editing that masks the
incongruities of time and space. Welles' powers of invention are on
full display here, most obviously in the famous Turkish bath scene (an
improvised set necessitated by a lack of costumes). Set designer
Alexandre Trauner's astute choice of Moroccan and Venetian locations
instantly establishes a geographic authenticity; Welles initially
exploits them for all their stark beauty before retreating into noirish
interiors, underscoring Othello's descent into darkness.
Aside from Michael Macliammoir's chilling Method performance as Iago,
the acting in Welles' "Othello" has been criticized as too restrained
and modulated for Shakespearean tragedy. Such criticism is largely
unwarranted, for this "Othello" is as much for the eyes as the ears:
Welles' bold framing and expressionistic camera angles free the play
from its theatrical moorings (pun intended), undermining the need for
stage elocution. Indeed, the camera is the true star of this film, as
Welles generates images that match the grandeur and eloquence of
Shakespeare's language.
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |