Brave Warrior (1952) Poster

(1952)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Good Indians and Bad Indians
JamesHitchcock27 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Although "Brave Warrior " is sometimes described as a Western, it is set several decades earlier and a long way further east than most films in the genre. It may seem obvious that first the East and then the Midwest had to be won before Americans could make a start on winning the West, but in fact there are relatively few films about frontier life in the early nineteenth century compared with the thousands set in the West during the second half of that century. ("The Kentuckian", Burt Lancaster's first film as director, is another example of a "Mid-Western" from the fifties). The explanation I have heard is that the Hollywood studios had on their doorstep the California deserts which could easily represent Texas, or Nevada, or any one of several other Western states without too many people noticing, but nowhere that could convincingly stand in for the deciduous forests of the eastern USA in the same way.

"Brave Warrior" is set in Indiana during the War of 1812. Or, should I say, it is ostensibly so set. The film, to judge by the arid landscapes, was obviously set somewhere in the West, and the costumes, with the exception of the military uniforms, are all those of the second half of the century rather than the first. The historical inaccuracies do not end with the costumes; one of the main characters is the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh, here shown siding with the Americans whereas in reality he sided with the British. The main white character is Steve Ruddell, an old friend of he chief, who has been asked by Governor William Henry Harrison, the future President, to win over the Shawnee to the American side. There are, however, two further complications. One is that both Steve and Tecumseh are love with the same woman, Laura MacGregor. The other is that Laura's Irish-born father Shayne is (unknown to her) a spy for the British.

Fifties Westerns differed in their treatment of Native Americans. Some, such as "Only the Valiant", portrayed them as bloodthirsty villains, the bad old view which had prevailed in many films from the thirties and forties. Some, such as "Apache" went to the opposite extreme and portrayed them as innocent victims of white greed. Some, notably "Broken Arrow", took the middle ground and tried to show good and bad on both sides. And some, of which "Brave Warrior" is a prime example, divided them sharply into Good Indians and Bad Indians. The Bad Indians are those who try to resist conquest by the whites. The Good Indians are those who not only refuse to resist this process but actively collaborate with it.

In this film, the main Good Indian is Tecumseh, the main Bad Indian being his brother, known as 'The Prophet' (not a historical character). Tecumseh is shown here as being not only a convert to Christianity but an uncritical admirer of white Americans and their civilisation; he has built the town of Tippecanoe where his people can live the same life as that enjoyed by their white neighbours. Because the Prophet is unwilling to go along with this programme of cultural assimilation he is painted as the villain of the piece. The prevailing racial attitudes of the 1950s, however, meant that Tecumseh's loyalty to the American cause could not be rewarded with marriage to a white woman; the love-triangle theme is quietly dropped in the second half of the film, and Laura ends up with Steve.

"Brave Warrior" seems to have been a low-budget B-movie, which explains why the film-makers couldn't afford either a trip to shoot on location in Indiana itself or more accurate costumes. (They probably re-used costumes from an earlier film). The low budget would also explain a few other things about the film; the stunt scenes, for example, are unconvincing, with punches all too obviously being pulled in the badly choreographed fight scenes. The cast are also mostly unconvincing, with Christine Larson making a bland heroine and Jon Hall a wooden hero. Jay Silverheels as Tecumseh is unconvincing for different reasons; he takes the view that because he is playing the film's noble hero everything he says, no matter how commonplace, has to be delivered in an exaggerated, portentous tone of voice which makes him sound as though he were delivering a mighty oration on a particularly elevated theme.

With its confusing and historically inaccurate plot and its weak acting, "Brave Warrior" is one of the poorer Westerns of the fifties. It is, however, worth watching for the unintended insights it can provide into the social attitudes of the period. 4/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Reasonable western with curiosity values
Marlburian6 November 2005
This is a reasonable Western with plenty of interesting points for students of the genre. For a start it has a Native American in a starring role. (There may be other instances of this in films made in the mid-20th century but none come to mind.) Jay Silverheels is Tecumseh, the Brave Warrior of the title, though his physical heroism is confined to a knife fight with his brother; his bravery relates more to his wisdom in coming to terms with white Americans, even building a town like one of theirs in which to house his people. He may be ahead of his time in social planning, but he is surely unwise in showing interest in the white heroine. Silverheels does well in this role, certainly when compared with his poker face and wooden lines as Tonto in the Lone Ranger series.

Very few of Jon Hall's films have made it to British TV, so it was good to see him. The rest of the cast do well enough, though their faces are unfamiliar to me and their names do not appear in Quinlan's directories of film actors. Katherine Larson looks and performs better than many heroines in Westerns of this era.

Best of all, it is an "early" Western, set in the early 1810s as tensions mount between Britain and the United States. The Brits are the baddies, but not too much so, thus there is novelty in the plot. The civilian clothes and army uniforms are of the period, as are the single-shot weapons, even if these seem to be reloaded incredibly quickly, especially in the river skirmish that opens the film.

The plot seemed to have an historical basis, so I checked, to discover, not surprisingly, that the film had tampered with the facts.Tecumseh and his brother appear to have been on better terms in real life, and they did found a "town" for their people, but whether this was on white men's lines is not stated.And though the film portrays Tecumseh as being on the side of the United States, after the events it depicts he did join the British side. (One does wonder what damage all these inaccurate Westerns did to people's understanding of American history.)
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A disappointing minor western
Tweekums19 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Set much earlier and further east than most films of the genre this film sees both British and United States trying to gain the support of the Shawnee Indians in the territory of Indiana. As the film opens a US raft loaded with salt to pay the Shawnee for land sold for settlement is ambushed and destroyed by British forces; when the payment doesn't arrive Chief Tecumseh wants to go to Vincennes to talk to the governor but his hot-headed brother 'The Prophet' wants to attack the Americans for their failure to pay. While Tecumseh is seeing the Governor his brother raids the town, burning one house and raiding the stores for the payment he believes was being withheld. We soon learn that 'The Prophet' is getting information from one of the people in the town, Shayne MacGregor, who is also working with a British general. Shortly after this happens Steve Ruddell turns up, he is the hero of the story and a friend of both Tecumseh and MacGregor's daughter Laura. Steve identifies the general but can't believe that Shayne is involved with him. In order to get the Shawnee back on side Steve gets the governor to build them a 'proper' town but as soon as Tecumseh leave to tell the other tribes his brother takes over and it is only a matter of time before war starts; a war that will be lost by the Americans if they can't find the cannon the British general had brought south from Canada.

Having recently enjoyed several westerns I'd not heard of until I'd seen them listed in the TV guide I had reasonable hopes that this one would be similarly entertaining; alas it was not to be. Much of the acting was fairly wooden although given the dialogue I'm not sure how much was the fault of the actors and how much the writers. I didn't know anything about this conflict, or even know if any of the protagonists were real before watching this... a quick check on line suggested that there were such people and events but it would appear that reality and the film were very different! The scenery looks pretty good although once again this is false as it was filmed in the arid areas of Southern California where so many westerns were shot rather than in Indiana. On the plus side there were some decent action scenes and as they were bloodless the film is not unsuitable for younger viewers.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tomahawking History
KingCoody20 March 2007
The only thing the real Tecumseh and this film's Tecumseh have in common is they were both Native Americans. Following on the heels of the successful Broken Arrow with James Stewart and Jeff Chandler as The Apache Leader Cochise,Hollywood flirted with the Indian as A Sympathetic Figure for a moment in series of films of dwindling quality. Columbia got on the bandwagon with this non epic depicting the historic Tecumseh as wishing to live in peace with the advancing White Eyes. In reality Tecumseh led a bloody campaign that for a brief moment seemed to be on the point of keeping the Midwest Native. The Indian Wars East of the Mississippi were far more bloodier than the ones John Ford,Raoul Walsh and others portrayed for the movie going public. Anyway The Bad White Eye and the Bad Indian ruin everything even causing the scene from the Glen Ford William Holden western The Man From Colorado of a burning town to be used again. So historical no as usual, action packed in recompense, no. Worth a peek only if you need to.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This Tippecanoe is a bad Tip and Trip
bkoganbing18 April 2015
The Brave Warrior in this title refers to the Shawnee chief Tecumseh who made a valiant effort to unite Indian tribes against encroaching Americans going over the Appalachians and settling in Indiana Territory. Jay Silverheels plays Tecumseh and his one-eyed brother The Prophet is played by Michael Ansara. But if you're expecting to see the real story of the Battle Of Tippecanoe than skip this one by. I would recommend a made for TV film about Tecumseh that stars Jesse Borrego that came out in the Nineties.

The white hero of this film is the fictional Steve Ruddell played by Jon Hall. Hall is a confidential agent sent by President Madison to find out about British agents stirring up the various tribes. Not that there wasn't enough stirring in the other direction from a group of young Turk Southern and Western Congressmen, among them Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun. But that's real history.

According to this Hall is the one in charge not Governor William Henry Harrison and he's giving James Seay who plays Harrison orders. Harrison is also not in uniform which is one of the many inaccuracies about Brave Warrior. Harrison in fact was a military man and was most definitely in charge.

It's B film from Columbia so do not expect any high standards. The whole thing is shot on a western set and looks nothing like Indiana in the early 19th century.

Skip this trip to Tippecanoe.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A brave warrior = a dud movie.
hitchcockthelegend30 May 2011
Brave Warrior is directed by Spencer Gordon Bennet and written by Robert E. Kent. It stars Jon Hall, Christine Larson, Jay Silverheels and Michael Ansara. Filmed in Technicolor with photography by William V. Skall, the plot is loosely based around the events of the War of 1812 and the Battle of Tippecanoe.

"This is a story of two men in a town all drawn by a strong destiny into the maelstrom that was to be the War of 1812 between the United States and England. One of these men was an American, Steven Ruddell, the other was Tecumseh, greatest of all Indian chiefs. Who had his head quarters at the town of Tippecanoe, home of the Shawnee Indians. The fuse was burning close to the powder keg of war when a flat boat carrying a shipment of salt from Vincennes, capital of the United States territory of Indiana, sailed up the Wabash river bound for Tippencanoe………"

History gets fudged as the makers produce a film that looks real nice, but is a dull as dish water on an entertainment level. Silverheels turns in a good show, but the makers fail to give the character the dignity he warranted, while Skall's capturing of the scenic locale at Simi Valley, California, is of a high calibre. Everything else feels unnatural, almost as if the production team hadn't a clue how to make this little slice of history into a feature length movie. Mercifully it clocks in at a short 73 minutes, but for many, myself included, that's 73 minutes too long. 3/10
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jay Silverheels vs. Michael Ansara in 1812
cinema_universe13 April 2003
At least one Native American had a starring role in this typical western programmer. Michael Ansara (who has played American Indians many times) is very capable as Silverheel's contentious one-eyed brother.

There's some manipulation of the historical facts (the story takes place as the War of 1812 is about to start), but I've seen much greater historical distortions in many, many films (like in "Gone With the Wind"...).

Overall, this was pretty enjoyable, but not a film I would bother viewing more than once. The dialog was dull. The scenery was nice. The Technicolor was fantastic.

I rated it "4", just for the chance to see Jay Silverheels in something other than "The Lone Ranger".
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"You speak with the tongue of truth. It shall be done."
classicsoncall29 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
All those leftists clamoring for the Washington Redskins to change their name better not get hold of this picture; it might completely disappear from movie archives all together. There are just so many politically incorrect scenes that I'm sure it would drive liberals over the edge. Like those of Shawnees beating on tom-toms in rhythm and the ubiquitous 'How' used as a greeting at one point in the picture. I'm much more tolerant but even I was embarrassed by some of this stuff.

Which is kind of odd because I think the picture was trying to be somewhat revisionist in it's own way. Jay Silverheels' character Tecumseh was portrayed as being generally supportive of the white man's government and wanted to find a way to live peaceably among them. It was his brother The Prophet (Michael Ansara) who aligned with the British and plotted to rid the Indiana frontier of it's Western moving settlers. The story is loosely based on events just prior to the War of 1812, but even the term 'loosely' is used loosely here. Any resemblance to actual history in the story is probably by accident.

The most interesting part of the story, at least to me, was Tecumseh's concept of building an Indian village in the manner of white settlers in an effort to assimilate and be accepted more readily. I don't think I've ever experienced that idea in a movie before and it sounded like it might have worked if given a chance. But then you had the raid that destroyed Tippecanoe and it was downhill for the Shawnees from there.

Except for catching Jay Silverheels in a leading role and the vibrant Techincolor cinematography mentioned by other viewers, there's not much else to recommend here. Jon Hall is pretty much wooden as ever and the film's romantic interest (Christine Larsen), on the fence between Silverheels and Hall, didn't convince me that she belonged with either one. I especially couldn't get over the scene when the Indians attacked the MacGregor home, and Steve Ruddell (Hall) had Laura leave and go for help! What??!! What was he thinking? She should have given him the boot right then and there.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Jay Silverheels is a noble Tecumseh
NewEnglandPat3 July 2003
The War of 1812 is the setting for this low-budget but nostalgic western. The reality is that Tecumseh established an Indian confederacy to drive out white settlers but here the chief is portrayed as tolerant and peaceful towards white settlers. The film has the look of a Saturday matinée double bill entry and although there are a few clashes between the Indians and the colonists, the movie offers nothing new. Jon Hall is the star here and goes under cover as a government agent to find out who is stirring up the Indians. Jay Silverheels is the title character and is better than he needs to be as the wise and dignified Shawnee chief. Michael Ansara as the warlike Prophet leads the Indian uprisings and his attacks on the colonists and British spies are major plot angles. The bright, rich technicolor hues enhance the picture and the music accompaniment is also good.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Actionful tale of the War of 1812
lorenellroy4 February 2008
The least visible war in US history is probably the war of 1812 with the British and other than The Buccaneer (filmed twice )I am unable to recall any movies made about it ,apart from this modest but reasonably effective action picture

Tension is building around the Northern border of the USA and the British are stirring up trouble by enlisting hostile Indians to their cause.Tecumseh (Jay Silverheels)is well disposed to the Americans but his more hot tempered brother ,known only as The Prophet(Michael Ansara)is openly at odds with him and challenges his authority over the tribe . The British incite The Prophet to raid settlements and they also have a nest of spies to keep them informed of goings on in the US settlements.Combating their nefarious schemes -well,nefarious if you are an American that is !-is the rugged American agent Steve (Jon Hall)who persuades Tecumseh to build "a model white town"at Tippecanoe and this immediately becomes a target for The prophet and his allies .Steve also finds time to romance the daughter of the local fur trader -who just happens to be a British spy and who Tecumseh is also in love with

The main virtues of the movie are its pace (brisk direction from Spencer Gordon Bennet)and some nice colour photography.Silverheels is fine as Tecumseh but the other performances are adequate ,no more than that .The ending seems rushed and has a curiously bitter sweet tang to it

This is a brisk B feature and will provide enjoyment if your expectations are modest and you enjoy lively period movies
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Peppered with inaccuracies!
trevorandrewmillar-7076928 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
When it comes to historical inaccuracy, this film wrote the book! For a start: It never mentions that President Madison started the war in the first place,(by attacking, occupying and destroying Toronto) he thought that, with Britain preoccupied with Napoleon, she would be in no position to defend Canada; he also thought that britain would lose since our "best" general, Wellington, was tied up with the Peninsular War in Spain; but he had reckoned without General Isaac Brock, our REAL best general (never mentioned in the film), who not only burned Washington and occupied New York, but captured Detroit! Also, Tecumseh supported Britain, not the US; he even went on fighting after the Brits retreated across the Canadian border! AND, contrary to what Americans think, Britain WON the war; Wellington marched into Paris after Waterloo and forced the US Ambassador (Thomas Jefferson!) to sign a peace treaty (at gunpoint!) promising never to threaten Canada ever again! The only battle the Yanks won was New Orleans, and that was fought AFTER Jefferson had signed the treaty, so there!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Technicolor Intrigue in Early Indiana
richardchatten24 June 2020
Veteran action director Spencer Gordon Bennet's first Technicolor film is a well-mounted western set early in the Madison presidency when war with Britain was imminent.

Leading lady Christine Larson is a feisty young colleen with enormous red hair (requiring Harry Cording to adopt an Irish brogue as her father); while like John Carradine in 'Drums Along the Mohawk', Michael Ansara as the malcontent fanning anti-English feeling among the Indians sports an eye-patch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jay Silverheels Says "Ugh!" Unconvincingly
boblipton19 April 2022
Jay Silverheels is Tecumseh, persuasively arguing that this is Indiana, after all, as Jon Hall tries to keep the peace, even as one-eyed Michael Ansara tries to make trouble. This causes the Blackhawk War. No, Abraham Lincoln doesn't show up, but you do have James Seay as William Harry Harrison.

William Skall shoots the Battle of Tippicanoe in Technicolor very nicely if all too briefly, but this wouldn't be a Sam Katzman production with the incompetent Spencer Gordon Bennett directing if there wasn't something odious about the production, and here's it's performances, with most of the performers speaking like they've never used words before.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
As a matinée, not that bad...
tim-764-29185614 October 2012
The dialogue might be wooden and condescending, veering on patronising, but there's some fair action and decent man-to-man fighting among the Shawnee Native American tribes, back in Indiana, at the turn of the 19th century.

The story's supposedly set around ousting out the British from the frontier-land, as the emerging U.S claim the land for themselves. The idea here, is that which ever side wins over these Indian tribes will score, strategically. When these white dignitaries hold 'discussions' in meeting rooms, these are dry and boring and where the worst script atrocities occur, especially when there is a Shawnee Chief present to (mildly) offend.

Looking, however at its positive aspects and maybe its key audience on release - young boys wanting a cowboy and Indian film, it fares a lot better, with the aforementioned action and stirring rough and tumble. The film looks quite good, too, at least when it's outside in the big old West, rather than the stuffy studio sets. I saw it on a UK commercial TV channel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good intentions, poor execution of the truth.
mark.waltz24 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This western concerning a conflict during the war of 1812 is enjoyable for the story, but not exactly a great history lesson. It's also black and white as far as the bad and good characters are concerned, resulting in pure evil vs. Pure goodness, sinister men against completely noble men, both the white man and the natives presented in this manner. It also indicates that even the good white men felt that the native tribes could only prevail if they adapted to the white way of living.

Ruggedly handsome Jon Hall considers Shawnee native Tecumseh (Jay Silverheels, a real life native of Canadian origin) to be his brother, and would like nothing more than peace from the Shawnee tribe. But he finds resistance in Tecumseh's real brother, Tenskwatawa (Michael Ansara) who objects to peace between white men and the Indians. This causes Ansara to be ejected by his own tribe, increasing hostilities and having brothers on opposite sides, with Ansara joining forces with the British and Silverheels along side Hall.

Then there's the fact that Tecumseh loves a white woman, Christine Larson, who hopes to marry Hall. The nobleness of Silverheels makes him too good to be true, and in real life, was not on the white man's side. So it's a mixture of 90% fiction and 10% basic facts, and has to be viewed through the lense of movie makers messing with history simply for story telling purposes. I wouldn't be showing this in a class on American history without that warning, and would follow it up with a discussion of what was truthfully told and what was a tall tale.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed