| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Index | 61 reviews in total |
47 out of 51 people found the following review useful:
A good story and incredible performances make this a film not to be missed..., 16 September 2000
![]()
Author:
Doug Phillips (janabro@aol.com) from Seattle, Washington
One of my favourite films of all time, this Broderick Crawford, Judy
Holliday, William Holden vehicle was magnificently written by Garson Kanin
and superbly directed by George Cukor.
Cukor did something that is seldom done with any film: He decided to
rehearse `Born Yesterday' as if it were a play (which it was on Broadway and
of which Judy Holliday performed the role of Billie Dawn 1,200 times) and
had a complete theater built on one of the studio's soundstages and filled
it with an audience so he could perfectly time the laughs and the pauses so
the movie-going public wouldn't miss a thing.
This bit of directing genius is part of what is responsible for the
remarkable film that is `Born Yesterday.'
The other part of the equation is the casting of Broderick Crawford as the
slimy, junk dealer turned multi-millionaire, Harry Brock.
Rita Hayworth was originally slated to star as Billie Dawn but when she
married Ally Khan and put her screen career on hold the producers ran
through an entire list of potential candidates
It was only with great
reluctance that they finally decided to use Judy Holliday in the role she
created on Broadway not believing she was a big enough `name' to pull in
audiences.
Lucky break for them: She went on to win the first Oscar ever awarded to an
actress for a comedic role.
Her every movement, glance and word is a study in brilliance of the
not-so-dumb blonde, Billie Dawn.
Unfortunately Judy Holliday's career was cut short when she died of breast
cancer just a few weeks short of her 44th birthday who knows what kind of
work she could have accomplished had she only lived.
`Born Yesterday' went on to receive five Academy Award nominations,
including Best Picture, but the only award went to Judy Holliday for Best
Actress; she also won the Golden Globe in the same category that
year.
This is a finely crafted tale of greed, corruption and the ultimate price
that must be paid by those that believe they can manipulate the law and the
government by for and of the people.
It is a brilliant movie and should not be missed.
44 out of 47 people found the following review useful:
Timeless Judy, 25 March 2006
![]()
Author:
marcosaguado from Los Angeles, USA
She bursts into the screen. Every tiny little nuance in her extraordinarily telling eyes are absolutely true and we surrender to her persona without even thinking about it. She was miraculous. "I'm stupid and I like it" she tells William Holden with devastating sincerity. She exudes such honesty that it's impossible to be indifferent to her. Ruth Gordon and Garson Kannin concocted a realistic fairy tale that Judy Holliday inhabits (rather than inhibits)with overwhelming naturalness. It is a sensational creation and George Cukor, as usual, puts the camera at her service to magnificent results. Look at the card game, no cut aways from her face for which, I was enormously grateful. If you haven't seen it, rent it now. You'll have an unforgettable time.
41 out of 51 people found the following review useful:
Unique Gem, 4 August 2004
![]()
Author:
WindWoman3 from United States
Okay, so Bette and Gloria lost out to Judy Holliday in this Oscar race 50
years ago. In 20/20 hindsight, have there not been enough scenery-chewing,
over-the-top dramatics that have won Academy Awards over the years? Even
the least of actors acknowledge that comedy is more difficult to play well
than drama.
When I watch "Born Yesterday" - I KNOW I'm observing two masters at work:
Judy Holliday and Broderick Crawford. (Holden gives a good performance, of
course, but can't hold a light to his co-stars in this particular project.)
Holliday is mesmerizing with every expression, every screechy syllable - and
watch those hands during the gin game! Perfection in each gesture.
Crawford pulls off a nifty trick by making the viewer simultaneously loathe
and feel compassion for his character.
Although she died before I was even a twinkle in my mother's eye, I think I
could have hung out with Judy Holliday (nee' Judith Tuvim.) I like
intelligent people, and I've read that she was a brilliant woman. Makes
sense: it takes some serious smarts to play so dumb. She was a funnier
Marilyn before there WAS a Marilyn.
Partially because she died so young, and partially because of her refusal
to play patty-cake with the HUAC, she is now an under-appreciated memory.
There's one more reason to love Judy: can you think of any other person
hauled before the HUAC who had the . . . <ahem> . . . gonads to
confound the committee by appearing as a character from one of their own
movies? And pull it off? Now that, ladies and gentlemen, takes guts AND
brains!
Treasure this unique gem and then . . .
Thank God for the short-lived, but stunning talent of Judy Holliday.
31 out of 34 people found the following review useful:
Political Corruption and a Victorious Naivitee, 11 January 2006
![]()
Author:
theowinthrop from United States
It is amazing to think that a talented person like Judy Holliday really
was a star only for one decade (on film), and only in a total of nine
films. She actually made more than nine, but several of them (prior to
"Adam's Rib") were actually small roles or small pictures - including
(interestingly enough) "Too Much Johnson" a film that was made by Orson
Welles for a Broadway comedy he was directing in 1938. From "Adam's
Rib" through "The Bells Are Ringing" Judy managed to demonstrate she
was a gifted comic actress, a good dramatic actress, and a fine, even
sexy musical comedy star. She would even win an Oscar for her second
starring role ("Born Yesterday" - the currently reviewed movie). This
should have guaranteed some degree of posthumous movie glory. It does
to those who take the trouble of watching her performances, but most of
her films are rarely shown (or, in the case of "Adam's Rib" they are
shown because the real stars are Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn;
and "The Bells Are Ringing" is recalled as one of Vincent Minelli's
musicals).
Judy died of cancer in 1965, much too young. Had she lived twenty or
thirty more years (even up to the present) her filmography would have
been longer and more elaborate. A decade's worth of good performances
is too dependent on the tastes associated with that decade. And Judy
will always be part of the Eisenhower years - not the most glamorous
period of our history.
"Born Yesterday" was a play by Garson Kanin, dealing with an
unscrupulous, self-made scrap metal dealer and millionaire named Harry
Brock. On Broadway, the part was played by Paul Douglas opposite Judy,
and apparently they did not get along too well. Yet their stage
chemistry worked, and the show ran for four years. Oddly enough, when
the film was made, Douglas was not the star - the role went to
Broderick Crawford (who had won the Oscar for best actor in "All The
King's Men" the previous year. Yet six years later, Douglas did very
well as McKeever, the Wall Street corporate leader, opposite Judy as
Laura Partridge, in "The Solid Gold Cadillac". In retrospect it would
have been interesting seeing Douglas play a more violent type, but
Crawford does quite nicely as the street smart Harry.
Harry, Billie Dawn (Judy - his girlfriend), and his bodyguard/cousin
Eddie come to Washington, D.C. Harry wants to expand his scrap iron -
garbage dump empire by getting legislation passed allowing him an
exception to certain tariffs and taxes. This requires his bribing a
Congressman (Larry Oliver) who might sway the required committee in
changing the law. Supervising this is Harry's lawyer Jim Devery (Howard
St. John), an alcoholic who was once quite promising as a legal scholar
(he was close to the great associate justice Oliver Wendell Holmes,
whom he says was his "god"). But Harry, although rather rough himself
in manners, decides that Billie should sharpen her image. She seems too
naive, but it is actually that she has never been stimulated (certainly
not by the rough, unread, uncultured Harry). Harry has attracted the
attention of a reporter named Paul Verrall (William Holden), and on
Devery's suggestion, he hires Verrall to transform Billie into a
socially acceptable girlfriend.
Paul and Billie fall in love, of course, and the education works too
well. In fact, while comparable to Eliza Doolittle's education by Henry
Higgins it is actually different. Eliza gains a firmer grasp on her
self respect because her speech and manners improve. But she never
questions the social order of things, or Higgins' political and
economic views. That's because Eliza is never trained to be thinking
that widely. But Billie is - Paul has her reading books, and looking up
words. His education is far more sweeping. As a result, she starts
questioning what Harry and Devery are doing in Washington - which Harry
is not very happy about.
"Born Yesterday" works due to the acting of Holliday, Crawford (who for
all his roughness is funny - see his constant frustration playing gin
with Billie), Holden, and St. John. It ends up as reaffirmation of
democracy over corruption, and of the possibility of an individual to
grow. And it did set the stage for Holliday's screen personae as the
urbanite whose humanity and intelligence won out in the end.
26 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Judy, Judy, Judy!, 1 February 2006
![]()
Author:
jotix100 from New York
"Born Yesterday" is a comedy with some serious ideas behind it. The
film does a wonderful job in its subtle take about corruption in high
places, the role of the lobbyists and influential people in Washington
politics. The movie presents an interesting aspect for today's
audiences, as things related to the film have been in the news lately,
making the film relevant.
The comedy by Garson Kanin ran for years on the New York stage. Judy
Holliday had starred on Broadway opposite Paul Douglas. For the movie
version Broderick Crawford was selected. George Cukor directed with his
well known style and getting excellent performances of this ideal cast.
The film is the gem it is because the great star turn by Judy Holliday,
an actress that was unique in everything she did. Billie Dawn was one
of the best achievements in the movies. Ms. Holliday was an intelligent
actress who knew what made her character work. She made a wonderful
contribution with Billie, who in spite of being supposed to be a girl
without brains, Ms. Holliday shows her to be a smart no-nonsense woman
with more common sense than anyone could give her credit for.
Broderick Crawford made quite an impression as the ruthless Harry
Brock, a man that can't see the goodness in Billie. He constantly
belittles her and even goes as far as slapping her on occasion, but
that is what someone like him would normally do when he can't get his
way, or thinks is being threatened by a woman like Billie. Mr. Crawford
was a wonderful actor as proved in his appearances in Fellini's "Il
bidone", and in "All the President's Men".
The other good performance was William Holden, who as Paul Verrall,
transforms Billie from an abused woman into someone that is not afraid
to open her mouth against the bully that has been taken her for granted
for a long time. Mr. Holden clearly understood the man he was playing
and makes a wonderful match for Ms. Holliday.
"Born Yesterday" is a fun film to watch because all the elements that
went into it and the inspired direction George Cukor and the ensemble
work of the cast, but especially from its star, Judy Holliday.
21 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
Ms. Dawn Goes To Washington, 25 December 2004
![]()
Author:
Griffin-Mill from United States
A brilliant Judy Holliday performance is the main attraction in this
witty, brisk adaptation of Garson Kanin's Broadway success. As a
gangster's moll who gradually awakens to her civic responsibility,
Holliday expands her dumb-broad persona from her previous film with
Cukor, Adam's Rib, into a character who's sweet, memorable and
surprisingly tough.
Born Yesterday is a suitable companion piece to Frank Capra's Mr. Smith
Goes To Washington, a much more self-consciously "important" film that
imparts similar messages about political corruption and the
responsibility of individuals to require ethical governance. The
message is arguably more powerfully imparted here - filtered through
the perspective of the selfish, spoiled and barely-literate Ms. Dawn -
than in the film focused on Jimmy Stewart's eloquent (and
intimidatingly ethical) Mr. Smith, an "everyman" who is vastly morally
superior to most audience members.
William Holden is relaxed and charming as the Henry Higgins-ish
newspaper man tasked with opening Billie's eyes and Broderick Crawford
is suitably broad and menacingly raspy as her corrupt, vulgar
boyfriend. However, the movie is all Holliday's from the opening
scenes, which play on the audience's lack of familiarity with the
actress by presenting her as a refined, statuesque beauty in an
extended sequence until, at last, she squawks out her first lines in
nearly impenetrable, helium-voiced Brooklynese to hilarious effect.
A richly deserved Best Actress Oscar for the newcomer Holliday, despite
formidable competition from grande dames Bette Davis (All About Eve)
and Gloria Swanson (Sunset Boulevard).
17 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
A perfect performance from a classy lady!, 4 May 2006
![]()
Author:
CMUltra (collectormanultra@yahoo.com)
Delightful! Hilarious! How often do we get to see a perfect
performance? We're closing in on a century of movies and, as we can
see, it's pretty rare. So flawless was Judy Holliday's portrayal of
Billie Dawn that, as a relative unknown, she came from behind to beat
out two heavyweights for the Oscar in 1950. I'm sure this was due in no
small part to her refining the role for nearly three years on stage.
Everything else fell into place as well. Broderick Crawford was just
excellent as Harry Brock. Crawford is able to swing you back and forth
between anger and sympathy for his character. Not an easy task! William
Holden is perfectly calm and reserved as Paul Verrall. His character
forms a wonderful opposite to Billie. And, with direction, George Cukor
worked his usual magic.
Most of the themes are timeless. A person lives in ignorant bliss until
their eyes are opened. They realize that there is a better life for
them and begin their struggle for improvement. They discover that their
greatest opponents to advancement are not those above them, but those
at their current level.
A few of the elements are dated. Particularly Jim's speech about how
hard it is to find a corrupt politician in Washington. Wow. Maybe that
was the case in 1950. Now it's impossible to find an honest one.
It all comes back to Judy Holliday. This movie is her vehicle. She was
a rare talent who we were only able to see for a very short time. I
love all of her movies and this one, Born Yesterday, is my favorite.
Thank you Judy!!!!!!
15 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
To All The Chumps and Babes Who Make This World Go, 15 August 2007
![]()
Author:
bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
Any play that runs 1642 performances on Broadway for three years you
know will wind up in Hollywood. But usually the Broadway cast never
makes it intact.
It didn't here, but we were lucky to get Judy Holliday to repeat her
acclaimed Broadway role her as Billie Dawn, gal pal of junk tycoon
Broderick Crawford. Judy only got the role because Rita Hayworth
decided to marry Aly Khan and after testing several others who weren't
quite right Harry Cohn decided to go with the original. She rewarded
Cohn's late faith with a Best Actress Oscar for 1950.
Speaking of Oscars, Cohn had an interesting problem on his hands which
he solved with Born Yesterday. Broderick Crawford had brought home an
Oscar the year before for All the King's Men. But Crawford was hardly
traditional leading man material. But there sure were enough
similarities with the dictatorial minded Willie Stark with the
tyrannical Harry Brock so that Cohn could cast Crawford and keep the
momentum going for his career. Crawford's part was played by Paul
Douglas on stage who would get to Hollywood right around this time as
well.
Still neither Holliday or Crawford were box office and Columbia needed
one name that had some guaranteed pull with movie audiences. That's
where Bill Holden came in. The part was built up from the Broadway
version, all that tourist business at the Capitol and other Washington
sites were not on Broadway. The role of the intellectual newspaper
reporter was played by Gary Merrill and Merrill was certainly better
suited for the part than Holden. Personally I think that Cohn should
have gone with his other reliable leading man, Glenn Ford in this part.
Still even with the built up role Holden was a definite number three in
this film.
The plot is very simple, the magic of Born Yesterday is watching
Holliday's character grow in awareness of what's around her. She's the
play thing of junk tycoon Harry Brock, a self made millionaire who's
street smart, rich, and nothing else. He's aware of it though and aware
that Holliday lacks the social graces as well.
Since Crawford can't or won't learn them, at least he wants a polished
hostess to make up for it. He hires newspaper reporter Holden to teach
Holliday. But he teaches her about democracy and the corrupting
influence of special interests of which Crawford is one and she's now
aware of.
Crawford also put a lot of his holdings in her name for tax purposes.
That's a created situation, Crawford regrets starting.
Holliday became so identified with the Billie Dawn role that when she
started having blacklisting problems due to her left wing politics, she
went into character as Billie Dawn before Congress. The chumps in
Congress actually bought it all and she skated. Actually in real life
Holliday was a well read intelligent woman, the last thing from Billie
Dawn you could imagine.
Judy Holliday spent the remainder of her career between Broadway and
Hollywood so her film output remains small and she died way too young.
Still as another uneducated character in a film said, what there is, is
cherce.
Born Yesterday is as cherce as it gets.
17 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
A seemingly neglected, wonderful movie, 9 July 2001
![]()
Author:
bleakeye from not sure
A hidden gem (I say 'hidden' because as this comment is being written, there
are only 400+ votes here in the ImDb for this movie) of a movie from 1950 is
"Born Yesterday". Nominated for several Academy Awards and won Best Actress
for Judy Holliday's performance of a "not-so-bright" fiancee of another
"not-so-bright" but rich and powerful "junkman" played by Broderick
Crawford. William Holden also shows another of his fittingly played
performances as the newspaperman who teaches Judy Holliday's character the
better things she's neglected to even try to learn. Another fine "Broadway
Hit" that is preserved on film.
Great acting and dialogue does enhance the quality of a movie and this
proves it. It also tells a simple story of intelligence that should be
heard once in a while. It is not perfect (probably as a result of because
of the movie's age and contrast with modern society) but the imperfections
could be ignored for it's truly wonderful feeling that reminds me of "Mr.
Smith goes to Washington". A movie that should be seen by many politicians
and anybody in power. It's just too bad that this movie came at the time of
"Sunset Boulevard" and "All About Eve" because it seems to have been
neglected as of late.
Also, I would like to say to those who say Judy Holliday's performance isn't
as deserving against Bette Davis' in All About Eve and Gloria Swanson's in
Sunset Boulevard to figure out which one of the roles were the most
difficult to play for each particular actress and in fact for any actress.
I'm sure that Gloria Swanson's performance was difficult, but it was
seemingly so close to her real life that it doesn't seem so difficult
(Although that well known fact made 'Sunset Blvd' a greater Masterpiece).
As for Bette Davis in 'All About Eve', it was also great but not very
difficult for her (She never had a bad performance in her movie career).
Anyway, I recommend this movie to anybody who wants a meaningful movie for a
change.
11 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
One Holiday performance I especially liked, 27 May 2004
![]()
Author:
perfectbond
More often than not, I get annoyed at the sound of Oscar award winning (for this part) Judy Holiday's (né Judith Tuvim) voice but it served her character well in this moving drama in which she plays a dim witted and exploited partner of a uncouth and domineering man (Broderick Crawford). William Holden, as always, is very good in his role; this time he is the reporter hired to refine Holiday but falls in love with her. There are so many memorable scenes in this movie but I think the best ones are the card game between Judy and Broderick, the somewhat heavy handed references to Jefferson, and of course the comeuppance of Broderick. The supporting actors, especially Broderick's longsuffering lawyer are also more than competent in their complimentary roles. 8/10.
| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |