6.2/10
285
12 user 2 critic

The Fall of Berlin (1950)

Padeniye Berlina (original title)
Surrounded by a few party officials, Alexei Ivanov, a stakhanovist smelter, is decorated by Stalin. The "Little Father of the Peoples" takes this opportunity to invoke threats of war.... ... See full summary »

Director:

Reviews
2 wins. See more awards »

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Documentary | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  
Director: Yuli Raizman
Stars: Leonid Khmara, Rudolf Boettger, V.I. Chulkov
War | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  
Director: Vladimir Petrov
Stars: Aleksey Alekseev, Aleksandr Antonov, Mikhail Astangov
The Vow (1946)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.9/10 X  
Director: Mikheil Chiaureli
Stars: Mikheil Gelovani, A. Mansvetov, Aleksei Gribov
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

Philosopher Slavoj Zizek examines the hidden themes and existential questions asked by world renowned films.

Director: Sophie Fiennes
Stars: Slavoj Zizek
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Mikheil Gelovani ...
...
Vladimir Savelev ...
Adolf Hitler (as V. Savelyev)
Marina Kovalyova ...
Natasha Rumanyova Vasilnyeva (as M. Kovalyova)
M. Petrunkin ...
M. Novakova ...
Yuri Timoshenko ...
Kostya Zavchenko (as G. Timoshenko)
A. Urasalyev ...
Nikolay Bogolyubov ...
Factory Superintendent Kumchinsky
...
Hermann Goering (as Y. Verikh)
Sofiya Giatsintova ...
MRs Ivanov - Alexei's mother (as S. Giatsyntova)
K. Roden ...
Charles Bedston
Boris Tenin ...
Gen. Chujkov
Viktor Stanitsyn ...
Oleg Frelikh ...
Edit

Storyline

Surrounded by a few party officials, Alexei Ivanov, a stakhanovist smelter, is decorated by Stalin. The "Little Father of the Peoples" takes this opportunity to invoke threats of war.... One day, war indeed breaks out. Bombs fall on the field where Alexei finds himself in the company of the schoolmistress Natacha, his fiancée. Alexei joins the Red Army and soon becomes a sergeant. Fighting rages and German troops advance. Natacha is arrested and deported. But the tide turns decisively with the German defeat at Stalingrad. Now the major offensive against Hitler can begin. Written by Guy Bellinger

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama | War

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

21 January 1950 (Soviet Union)  »

Also Known As:

The Fall of Berlin  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(original) | (1953)

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Magicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

After Joseph Stalin's death, this film was pulled from distribution during the "de-Stalination" of the USSR. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Bad movie. Simplistic portrayal of Hitler and Nazis.
1 March 2008 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

There are certain subjects that do not lend themselves to mockery. One of those subjects is Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Any movie that tries to treat Hitler and the Nazis as a bunch of buffoons is a movie that is destined to fail dramatically, and thus this movie is a supreme failure. What is ludicrous about this movie is not so much its stilted portrayal of Adolf Hitler but the fact that anyone would even want to go out of their way to try to reduce Adolf Hitler to a caricature and an item for derision. Hitler's career is a matter of historical fact which requires no further literary embellishment. Hitler's policies of deceit, aggression, war and genocide speak for themselves. What more can be said or added about what he said and did or the havoc and suffering he caused?

Treating Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as a joke is historically unsupportable. It would be like mocking a serial killer. Mock all you want, the killer is still a killer. To reduce the personality of Adolf Hitler to the level of audio and visual clichés simply does not convey his cunning, his destructiveness, his demagoguery and depravity. Adolf Hitler was anything but a joke. Any person who could smile and laugh around children, extend the most gracious courtesies to his personal guests, laugh and joke with his closest staff, indeed, even root for his favorite team in the Olympics, while AT THE SAME TIME plotting to start a war and exterminate millions of people is the kind of chilling personality that defies superficial treatment on the screen, or anywhere else for that matter. Hitler ranting and raving? If this was all that Hitler was about, then maybe it would be funny, but Hitler was no mere screaming buffoon and to try to pass him off as being that does not do justice to the millions of victims who succumbed to his policies. A screaming buffoon could have never done what Hitler did. To lead an entire nation to war and to pursue policies that directly affected the course of history required a degree of determination and self-control that this movie fails to attribute to the Fuhrer. By reducing Hitler to a mere caricature of a dictatorship undermines the basic premise of the movie, that the Soviet Union under the leadership of Joseph Stalin was a strong, viable and credible nation, for how strong does a country and the political leadership need to be to defend itself against somebody that according to the movie is nothing more than a pathetic joke?

This has to be one of the worst propaganda movies ever made. Hitler was already dead, World War Two was already history, Nazi Germany had already been defeated and obliterated from the political map, yet the Soviet Union decided to produce what has to be one of the worst movies ever made, which is saying a lot in a era of bad movies stretching back to the dawn of the age of Holloywood. The acting is poor, the story is pure Soviet propaganda bombast, the cinematography is almost laughable. But what is particularly annoying is its portrayal of Adolf Hitler as a caricature. The portrayal of Adolf Hitler is so ridiculously superficial that it reduces Hitler to an item of mockery and derision which is neither necessary or true. There is one thing that can be said about Adolf Hitler: what he did and what he stood for inspires contempt, scorn and outright rejection, but not derision. There is nothing funny about Hitler's decision to go to war and invade the Soviet Union. Nor is the portrayal of Adolf Hitler as some kind of screaming, argumentative hysterical malcontent historically accurate or dramatically strong. Historical evidence seems to suggest that Hitler was no more prone to fits of anger than anyone else and that he followed a plan of action that was well thought out and meticulously implemented with the full support of the entire Nazi Party and an entire nation, including its army, naval and air force, whose resources were mobilized to achieve what Hitler wanted. In Mein Kampf Hitler put the whole world on notice as to what he intended to do if he had the power and that the nobody took him seriously is anything but funny; it is tragic. This movie makes fun of Hitler but what Adolf Hitler did inspires anything but laughter. He wasn't funny when he was alive and to make fun of him after he's dead is more of a reflection of the mentality of whoever made this movie than on the Adolf Hitler himself.

One question this movie raises is why would anyone even want to make such a movie? To mock and deride at Hitler four years after the end of World War Two and Hitler's death seems rather pointless and a mere exercise in displaced rage. By 1949 the career of Adolf Hitler was already well documented and spoke for itself. The whole world knew what he had done and was still in the process of recovering from the consequences of his actions. But for a movie company to actually spend time and money to produce a movie that portrays Adolf Hitler and his Nazi cronies as corrupt, effete, irresponsible sycophants isn't saying anything that was not already public knowledge and merely confirmed the obvious. Now if this movie was intended to be a satirical comedy or a farce, then there might be a valid place for a goofy, campy portrayal of Hitler. However this movie apparently was not a comedy or a satire, which makes the movie completely irrelevant and an exercise in cinematic mediocrity.


3 of 34 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?