Down 15,848 this week

The Fall of Berlin (1950)
"Padeniye Berlina" (original title)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 236 users  
Reviews: 11 user | 2 critic

Surrounded by a few party officials, Alexei Ivanov, a stakhanovist smelter, is decorated by Stalin. The "Little Father of the Peoples" takes this opportunity to invoke threats of war.... ... See full summary »


0Check in

Related News

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 73 titles
created 11 months ago
a list of 12 titles
created 8 months ago
a list of 44 titles
created 3 months ago
a list of 26 titles
created 2 months ago
a list of 25 titles
created 3 weeks ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: The Fall of Berlin (1950)

The Fall of Berlin (1950) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Fall of Berlin.

User Polls

2 wins. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Drama | War | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Two great armies duel to the death with a million guns and ten thousand tanks - THE GREAT BATTLE.

Directors: Yuriy Ozerov, Julius Kun
Stars: Nikolay Olyalin, Larisa Golubkina, Boris Zajdenberg
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

We are responsible for our dreams. This is the ultimate lesson of psychoanalysis - and fiction cinema.

Director: Sophie Fiennes
Stars: Slavoj Zizek
Lovefilm (1970)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

Jansci reminiscences about Kata his childhood friend in pre-WWII Budapest, They are separated as a result of WWII. Reunited as adults, they struggle with whether they will stay in each others lives.

Director: István Szabó
Stars: Judit Halász, András Bálint, Edit Kelemen
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

Russian provincial town in the middle of the 1930s Stalin's Great Purge. Ivan Lapshin, the head of the local police, does what he has to do. And he does it well.

Director: Aleksey German
Stars: Andrei Boltnev, Nina Ruslanova, Andrey Mironov
Stalin (TV Movie 1992)
Biography | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

The life and career of the brutal Soviet dictator, Joseph Stalin.

Director: Ivan Passer
Stars: Robert Duvall, Julia Ormond, Maximilian Schell
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

THE PERVERT'S GUIDE TO CINEMA takes the viewer on an exhilarating ride through some of the greatest movies ever made. Serving as presenter and guide is the charismatic Slavoj Zizek, ... See full summary »

Director: Sophie Fiennes
Stars: Slavoj Zizek
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  
Director: Peter Claus Schmidt
Seconds (1966)
Drama | Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

An unhappy middle-aged banker agrees to a procedure that will fake his death and give him a completely new look and identity - one that comes with its own price.

Director: John Frankenheimer
Stars: Rock Hudson, Salome Jens, John Randolph
Drama | Romance | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

During World War II, 19 year old soldier Alyosha gets a medal as a reward for a heroic act at the front. Instead of this medal he asks for a few days leave to visit his mother and repair ... See full summary »

Director: Grigoriy Chukhray
Stars: Vladimir Ivashov, Zhanna Prokhorenko, Antonina Maksimova
Stalingrad (1990)
Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

The WWII pivotal battle of Stalingrad is shown through the eyes of the soldiers and officers on both sides of the war.

Director: Yuriy Ozerov
Stars: Powers Boothe, Liubomiras Lauciavicius, Sergey Nikonenko
Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

The Russian POW joins the partisan guerrillas and proves his loyalty fighting the Nazis.

Director: Aleksey German
Stars: Rolan Bykov, Anatoliy Solonitsyn, Vladimir Zamanskiy
War | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.9/10 X  
Director: Vladimir Petrov
Stars: Aleksey Alekseev, Aleksandr Antonov, Mikhail Astangov


Cast overview, first billed only:
Mikheil Gelovani ...
Boris Andreyev ...
Vladimir Savelyev ...
Adolf Hitler (as V. Savelyev)
Marina Kovalyova ...
Natasha Rumanyova Vasilnyeva (as M. Kovalyova)
M. Petrunkin ...
M. Novakova ...
Yuri Timoshenko ...
Kostya Zavchenko (as G. Timoshenko)
A. Urasalyev ...
Nikolay Bogolyubov ...
Factory Superintendent Kumchinsky
Jan Werich ...
Hermann Goering (as Y. Verikh)
Sofiya Giatsintova ...
MRs Ivanov - Alexei's mother (as S. Giatsyntova)
K. Roden ...
Charles Bedston
Boris Tenin ...
Gen. Chujkov
Viktor Lyubimov ...
Captain (as V. Lyubimov)
Viktor Stanitsyn ...


Surrounded by a few party officials, Alexei Ivanov, a stakhanovist smelter, is decorated by Stalin. The "Little Father of the Peoples" takes this opportunity to invoke threats of war.... One day, war indeed breaks out. Bombs fall on the field where Alexei finds himself in the company of the schoolmistress Natacha, his fiancée. Alexei joins the Red Army and soon becomes a sergeant. Fighting rages and German troops advance. Natacha is arrested and deported. But the tide turns decisively with the German defeat at Stalingrad. Now the major offensive against Hitler can begin. Written by Guy Bellinger

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Drama | War


See all certifications »




Release Date:

21 January 1950 (Soviet Union)  »

Also Known As:

The Fall of Berlin  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


(original) | (1953)

Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Film was made and released a little less than five years after the war's end. See more »


Edited into Histoire(s) du cinéma: Une vague nouvelle (1998) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Bad movie. Simplistic portrayal of Hitler and Nazis.
1 March 2008 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

There are certain subjects that do not lend themselves to mockery. One of those subjects is Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Any movie that tries to treat Hitler and the Nazis as a bunch of buffoons is a movie that is destined to fail dramatically, and thus this movie is a supreme failure. What is ludicrous about this movie is not so much its stilted portrayal of Adolf Hitler but the fact that anyone would even want to go out of their way to try to reduce Adolf Hitler to a caricature and an item for derision. Hitler's career is a matter of historical fact which requires no further literary embellishment. Hitler's policies of deceit, aggression, war and genocide speak for themselves. What more can be said or added about what he said and did or the havoc and suffering he caused?

Treating Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as a joke is historically unsupportable. It would be like mocking a serial killer. Mock all you want, the killer is still a killer. To reduce the personality of Adolf Hitler to the level of audio and visual clichés simply does not convey his cunning, his destructiveness, his demagoguery and depravity. Adolf Hitler was anything but a joke. Any person who could smile and laugh around children, extend the most gracious courtesies to his personal guests, laugh and joke with his closest staff, indeed, even root for his favorite team in the Olympics, while AT THE SAME TIME plotting to start a war and exterminate millions of people is the kind of chilling personality that defies superficial treatment on the screen, or anywhere else for that matter. Hitler ranting and raving? If this was all that Hitler was about, then maybe it would be funny, but Hitler was no mere screaming buffoon and to try to pass him off as being that does not do justice to the millions of victims who succumbed to his policies. A screaming buffoon could have never done what Hitler did. To lead an entire nation to war and to pursue policies that directly affected the course of history required a degree of determination and self-control that this movie fails to attribute to the Fuhrer. By reducing Hitler to a mere caricature of a dictatorship undermines the basic premise of the movie, that the Soviet Union under the leadership of Joseph Stalin was a strong, viable and credible nation, for how strong does a country and the political leadership need to be to defend itself against somebody that according to the movie is nothing more than a pathetic joke?

This has to be one of the worst propaganda movies ever made. Hitler was already dead, World War Two was already history, Nazi Germany had already been defeated and obliterated from the political map, yet the Soviet Union decided to produce what has to be one of the worst movies ever made, which is saying a lot in a era of bad movies stretching back to the dawn of the age of Holloywood. The acting is poor, the story is pure Soviet propaganda bombast, the cinematography is almost laughable. But what is particularly annoying is its portrayal of Adolf Hitler as a caricature. The portrayal of Adolf Hitler is so ridiculously superficial that it reduces Hitler to an item of mockery and derision which is neither necessary or true. There is one thing that can be said about Adolf Hitler: what he did and what he stood for inspires contempt, scorn and outright rejection, but not derision. There is nothing funny about Hitler's decision to go to war and invade the Soviet Union. Nor is the portrayal of Adolf Hitler as some kind of screaming, argumentative hysterical malcontent historically accurate or dramatically strong. Historical evidence seems to suggest that Hitler was no more prone to fits of anger than anyone else and that he followed a plan of action that was well thought out and meticulously implemented with the full support of the entire Nazi Party and an entire nation, including its army, naval and air force, whose resources were mobilized to achieve what Hitler wanted. In Mein Kampf Hitler put the whole world on notice as to what he intended to do if he had the power and that the nobody took him seriously is anything but funny; it is tragic. This movie makes fun of Hitler but what Adolf Hitler did inspires anything but laughter. He wasn't funny when he was alive and to make fun of him after he's dead is more of a reflection of the mentality of whoever made this movie than on the Adolf Hitler himself.

One question this movie raises is why would anyone even want to make such a movie? To mock and deride at Hitler four years after the end of World War Two and Hitler's death seems rather pointless and a mere exercise in displaced rage. By 1949 the career of Adolf Hitler was already well documented and spoke for itself. The whole world knew what he had done and was still in the process of recovering from the consequences of his actions. But for a movie company to actually spend time and money to produce a movie that portrays Adolf Hitler and his Nazi cronies as corrupt, effete, irresponsible sycophants isn't saying anything that was not already public knowledge and merely confirmed the obvious. Now if this movie was intended to be a satirical comedy or a farce, then there might be a valid place for a goofy, campy portrayal of Hitler. However this movie apparently was not a comedy or a satire, which makes the movie completely irrelevant and an exercise in cinematic mediocrity.

2 of 33 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
english subtitles? psaikodaed
Discuss The Fall of Berlin (1950) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: