IMDb > Horror Maniacs (1948) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
Horror Maniacs More at IMDbPro »The Greed of William Hart (original title)

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 6 reviews in total 

7 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

What have they done to the audio track?

5/10
Author: rwagn from Columbus, Ohio
21 February 2009

In an attempt to clean up the soundtrack, which is rather scratchy and noisy, a digital audio remastering was done. The problem with this remastering is that between every line of dialog (where the background soundtrack noise would be audible) has now been reduced to absolute silence. The effect is jarring when you watch the movie as the dialog appears to start and stop. It is bad enough when listening via regular TV speakers but when run through an amplified system it becomes unnerving. Additionally, when there is background music in these segments between dialogue the music sounds incredibly muted. The same problem exists on Alpha Video's companion DVD "Sweeney Tood" so beware. These movies are 70+ years old and some leniency must be allowed when viewing these old prints. In this case, those who transfer these items to digital should have left well enough alone.

Was the above review useful to you?

8 out of 11 people found the following review useful:

Cheap, tattered disappointment, unworthy of Slaughter

2/10
Author: Erewhon from Los Angeles, California
8 September 2004

Knowing that this movie is Tod Slaughter's take on the tale of Burke and Hare promises a great deal more than this tawdry, cheap little bore could possibly deliver. It's shot on cramped, ugly sets, the story moves in fits and starts, it's endlessly talky and never gives Slaughter a chance to cut loose in his grand style. The movies he made in the 1930s are all entertaining and, for the tolerant, enjoyable and watchable even today. But if you like those, you can safely skip this one. Slaughter is given few chances to emote in his gloriously florid style; instead, he's handed reams of dull lines to read, as is everyone else. He has a few moments, but not many; more are provided by Aubrey Woods as Jamie with the barrow.

Was the above review useful to you?

8 out of 11 people found the following review useful:

the correct running time

Author: todmichel (jcmichel1940@gmail.com) from Saint-Ouen, France
22 May 2002

This film is not at all "under one hour of running time", I suspect that some US video collectors saw only a cut version. The original running time - in Great-Britain - was 79 mins (7005 feet). It was released in the USA (as "Horror Maniacs") in the early Fifties, as part of a double-bill with another Tod Slaughter film ("The Curse of the Wraydons", renamed "Strangler's Morgue"), cut to 72 mins. And more recently, an American video company "offered" a totally butchered version, reduced to 53 mins!

Happily enough, the complete 79 mins version is now available from some video companies.

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

Simply Slaughter

6/10
Author: BaronBl00d (baronbl00d@aol.com) from NC
27 May 2001

Under an hour in length, this film about two bodysnatchers named Wally Hart and Mr. Moore(obviously meant to be Burke and Hare)showcases the immense talent of British ham Tod Slaughter, one of the truly forgotten kings of horror. It is weak in plot development, and it has little action, but the film does a good job creating the atmosphere of the poor and wicked in Edinburgh during a time when bodies were needed for medical use. A lot more could have been done with the film, but taken as it is, it is entertaining just as a vehicle in which to see Tod Slaughter cackle and gesture about. It is not Slaughter's best, however, but he does have moments as an amoral ressurectionist who kills for money with no compunction or moral barrier at all. The rest of the cast is average at best, and the film suffers from a very evident low budget. This was one of Slaughter's last "big" films. It is a shame that he was never given a budget for a film that would have made him more popular with audiences today. So few people have seen his films, and this film seems to be somewhat obscure. I recommend the film based on his presence(not performance).

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

Poor

Author: Michael_Elliott from Louisville, KY
11 March 2008

Greed of William Hart, The (1948)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

Tod Slaughter, Britain's biggest horror star, makes one of his final appearances in this film also known as Horror Maniacs. The history behind the film is actually a lot more interesting than the film itself. This was originally called The Crimes of Burke and Hare with those two names used in the film. However, the British censors objected and a relative of Hare threatened to sue so they had to dub the names, which cost so much money that the producer's couldn't afford a music score. As for the film, it's a pretty dull take on the Burke and Hare story with Slaughter very dry up until the end when he goes so over the top that you can't help but laugh. Clearly this was meant to challenge The Body Snatcher but doesn't come close.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

A horror flick that emphasizes the "dread" in "dreadful".

2/10
Author: mark.waltz from United States
21 October 2014

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

A movie so poorly made that it seems 20 years older than it is, "Horror Maniacs" (or "The Greed of William Hart") is a creaky antique that makes its subject matter deadly dull even if the actual history behind its connection with real life events is fascinatingly macabre. With names changed due to lawsuits from family members of the characters it portrays, a lot of the details are obviously missing, mainly because the print available is approximately 25 minutes short of the original running time. The editing out of the character's real life names is so badly dubbed that what was looped in sounds louder than the rest of the soundtrack.

The difference between this and other Tod Slaughter films is that his earlier films gave a historical feeling of what the old gaslight theaters of the late 1800's and early 1900's must have been like with the melodramatic thrillers that were popular during this era. This one isn't even an interesting account of the Burke and Hare case of the 1820's in Edinburgh. Slaughter plays his character as if he was mentally retarded and he seems relatively normal when compared to his nefarious partner played by Henry Oscar. Aubrey Woods gives an interesting performance as the very sensitive Jamie Wilson, a rather effeminate young man who shows fear at the very mention of people disappearing in the area where he lives. There is really no element of terror here which makes the insinuations of what the two grave robbers (who also kill for profit) all the less menacing.

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Ratings External reviews Plot keywords
Main details Your user reviews Your vote history