Eyes of Texas (1948) Poster

(1948)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Someday Penny, you'll learn that things are not always what they seem".
classicsoncall7 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Viewers and fans of Roy Rogers films will find a few unusual elements in "Eyes of Texas", making it somewhat out of the ordinary for a Rogers flick. For starters, Andy Devine is on board in a generally serious role as a country doctor, even though he's using the name Cookie Bullfincher. Devine's other portrayals using that name were usually done to comic effect. Instead, the comedy relief duties here were given to Pat Brady, Roy's eventual sidekick in his TV Western series of the early 1950's. Not only that, but Pat gets to strut his stuff in a musical number, with vocals on 'Killer Diller' while playing guitar. Later on, he strums a bass violin as the Sons of the Pioneers perform another number.

Roy also shares heroics in the film with his animal co-stars - Trigger and Bullet. In fact they have a scene together where Trigger tries to calm down a wild dog left wounded when a pack of German Shepherds was dispatched to attack an elderly rancher. In the story, the shepherd is given the name Lobo, and Bullet himself isn't credited for the role. I guess he hadn't signed on with Trigger's agent yet.

Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the story takes place when Roy takes a swing at Dr. Bullfincher, at which point he almost looked like a heel. The explanation offered involved Roy getting stripped of his Marshal's badge so he could investigate the outlaws as a civilian, but that didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. That was almost as much of a head scratcher as old Thad Cameron (Francis Ford) signing over a blank will to the crooked attorney Hattie Waters (Nana Bryant). Talk about asking for trouble!

Hey, keep an eye on that scene when Roy gets into a scrap with henchman Vic (Roy Barcroft) and the rest of his rowdies. The tear on the back of Roy's shirt changes size and shape throughout the fight.

Of course, Roy triumphs by the end of the story, exposing the crooked attorney and the phony heir she brought in to steal Camp Cameron out from under the orphan boys whose fathers were killed during the War. Given the historical setting of the story, it was unusual to observe the downtown street scenes populated about equally between men on horseback and those in automobiles.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ruthless Lady Lawyer
bkoganbing13 May 2011
The Eyes Of Texas has Roy Rogers as a US Marshal who uncovers a truly intricate plan involving a scheme to kill and rob Francis Ford of his ranch. Ford has made his ranch a boy's camp specifically for kids whose fathers were killed in World War II. But his sister Nana Bryant who is a lawyer has some other ideas about the property and the woman is quite ruthless in her methods.

Which include training a pack of dogs who've been killing cattle in and around the area for months before she springs them on Ford. Of course Roy does not believe the rumor that killer wolves have been raiding the local cattle.

Her chief henchman Roy Barcroft and Roy have a truly brutal fight scene where Andy Devine who's a doctor in this film rescues him. One of Roy's fancy western shirts was sacrificed for art. This fight scene was right on the edge and is comparable to the one that Humphrey Bogart and Tim Holt have with Barton MacLane in The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre which also came out in 1948. How it got through the censors is beyond me as Roy's films were marketed for the Saturday matinée kiddie trade.

Bryant who had a long career on screen mostly as good women, even playing nuns maybe has her career role in The Eyes Of Texas. I'd check this better than average Roy Rogers feature out just for her alone.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Roy Rogers Takes On Big Nasty Dogs And Mean Old Women!
FightingWesterner12 June 2010
When the owner of a ranch for orphan boys is murdered by trained dogs and his will fraudulently changed to benefit a nephew no one has met, Marshal Roy Rogers attempts to the bottom of the mysterious death, ending up at odds with not just the killers, but the whole community as well.

This is a fairly interesting murder mystery, though the murderers are revealed to the audience immediately. It's kind of rare to see a Saturday matinée western where the main heavy is an old woman! The real question is who the mysterious heir is and why he wants his uncle dead (an easy guess).

There's also a surprising amount of sadistic violence this time around, with Roy getting beaten, dragged behind a horse, and bull-whipped. Meanwhile, the dogs are mauling people and Roy even punches out Cookie Bullfincher!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More Serious Than Usual, But It's Still Roy Rogers
Snow Leopard12 June 2001
"Eyes of Texas" is more serious than most Roy Rogers movies, with less humor and singing than are found in most of his films, but it's a decent story with some real suspense, and worth watching.

In this one, Roy is a U.S. Marshall who faces a really dangerous opponent, a lawyer who is using violence, deception, and fear in an attempt to take over a family's inheritance, which would also involve shutting down a ranch that is serving as a home for orphaned boys. Roy must risk his life, his job, and his reputation in his attempt to shut down the lawyer's wicked schemes.

The movie also features Andy Devine as the town doctor, who has difficulty deciding whether or not to help Roy out on this one.

The story that follows is mostly convincing and interesting, although with a slightly different feel from many of Roy's movies. There's still plenty of Roy Rogers in it, enough to satisfy any of his fans.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Greedy Lawyer
StrictlyConfidential14 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Eyes Of Texas" was originally released back in 1948.

Anyway - As the story goes - A rancher has opened up his ranch to be a fun place for boys who lost their fathers in WW2. This generous move proves to be a very unpopular decision with a ruthless female attorney who is trying to secure the rights to all the land in the territory.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better Than I Expected
Uriah4321 December 2022
After the only other living person in his family is killed fighting in Italy during World War 2, a wealthy old man by the name of "Thad Cameron" (Francis Ford) takes it upon himself to create a ranch for young boys whose fathers had been killed in the service of their country. Needless to say, when his attorney "Hattie Waters" (Nana Bryant) sends word that his nephew--who was thought to have been killed in action--was only wounded and is finally returning home, he is overcome with emotion. So much so that he immediately goes to Hattie's office to revise his will so that his nephew will get half of all his money while the boy's ranch will get the other half. Unfortunately, being the trustworthy person that he is, he signs a blank piece of paper at Hattie's request with the assurance that she will fill it out properly. Then, upon his way home, he is attacked and killed by a pack of vicious dogs owned by Hattie and unleashed by one of her accomplices named "Vic Rabin" (Roy Barcroft). Not knowing any better, everyone assumes that he was killed by a pack of wolves. Not only that, but they also believe that Thad's long-lost nephew is legitimate as well. Regardless, this strange incident around Thad's death raises the suspicions of certain law enforcement agencies and as a result they send one of their officers by the name of "Marshal Roy Rogers" (Roy Rogers) to investigate--and this is something that Hattie cannot allow. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that, having never heard of this film before, I was expecting nothing more than a typical, low-budget, grade-B picture that was quite common during this specific time. And while it certainly wasn't a premier movie by any means, it still turned out to be surprisingly good. Admittedly, it was quite dated and some of the acting wasn't as good as it could have been. But all things considered, I enjoyed this film for the most part and I have rated it accordingly. Slightly above average.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I Think Trigger Should Have Top Billing
boblipton11 July 2023
Francis Ford thought he had lost his nephew during the War, and had turned his fortune towards a camp for the children of fallen soldiers. Now his lawyer, Nana Bryant, tells him the youngster has turned up, so he tells her to rewrite his will, leaving half to the young man, and half to the camp. He signs a blank form and then heads into town. On the way, he is attacked by angry dogs, which everyone thinks are wolves. Ford is killed, but when his will is red, he has left everything to his nephew. Marshall Roy Rogers is in town to investigate. He comes across one of the dogs, hit by a bullet -- it's Bullet in his first role. Roy and doctor Andy Devine fail to calm the animal, but Trigger does so immediately.

There's a lot going on in this Roy Rogers vehicle, so much so that it often becomes confusing, even when it's been establish that Miss Bryant, despite her vapors, is actually the lead bad guy in the show. Lynne Roberts is present as Devine's nurse and Roy's implied love interest, and the Sons of the Pioneer sing or accompany Roy in three songs. It's not one of Roy's best, but it's still lively and fun.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wildly illogical, even for a Western
Dick-423 November 2004
A movie, obviously intended for the 10-year-olds at the kids' matinees, that looks as though it was written by a 10-year-old. (I guess there were still kids' matinees in 1948. I hadn't been to one in about 11 years.)

The film depicts post-WW-II Texas (from the title, not from anything within the movie itself) in 1947 as the same as in the 1870's, with everyone wearing cowboy suits - popular with 10-year-olds - riding around on horses or buckboards, wearing guns, and engaging in shootouts on the streets, with no official accounting for the bodies. The estate settlement is inexplicably turned over to 'the insurance company', and although all the money has officially been stolen by the fake will, the crooks appeal to the townsfolk to throw the bad Government man out and 'save the children'! (How a petition from the people will accomplish this isn't clear.) In the end, all the crooks, who are the only ones who know of and can testify to the facts in the conspiracy, are dead, and the 'happy ending' leaves all the legal entanglements up in the air.

If they had thrown out the wooden-sided Ford station wagon and the telephone, made the boys Civil War orphans, and assigned the estate settlement to a court instead of the insurance company, the film would almost pass for logical by Western flick standards.

The only things close to a redeeming value in this picture are a couple of pretty good songs by the Sons of the Pioneers.

The only reason this turkey doesn't make my list of 'The Ten Worst Films of All Time' (which currently contains about 35 titles) is that as a Cowboy flick, it isn't expected to be good.
4 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good for a western
liberalcajun12 August 2006
I cannot believe that (Dick 47 and Snow Leopard) put their comments on this site blasting this movie. The film " Eyes of Texas " made way back in 1948 is one of the best of the Roy Rogers flicks. There were a few good ones. Several done with Penny Edwards were passable also. This film features Nana Bryant...and she is at her best as the crooked lawyer Hattie Waters. If you watch it again notice how well she attacks her lines. She had some experience on the Broadway stage and it shows here. Nana Bryant is a real serious actress and she is light-years ahead of the rest of the cast. Andy Devine is good as always . The plot was a bit shallow but it was written for a young audience. I think that the film can be appreciated by film historians as one of the best Roy Rogers movies.........John in Louisiana.....
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dick-42 has a point....
planktonrules3 April 2014
While I did not hate "Eyes of Texas" like Dick-42 did, he did make an excellent point about how wildly illogical this film was at times. Too often I just found myself confused why certain plot elements were tossed into the film and they made my brain hurt!!

Let's talk about the plot first--and then the more illogical stuff. The film is set at a camp for the children of dead WWII soldiers--a rather timely plot idea considering the war had only recently ended. Thad loves the kids and this is his life. However, his lawyer sends him a cable--saying that his own dead son is, in fact, alive! When Thad visits his lady lawyer (an interesting casting decision to make her a woman), she convinces him to sign a blank will form and 'she'll fill in the rest later' so they can include the son in the will. Why would anyone agree to sign a paper like this?! Didn't he KNOW that would mean he would die only minutes later?! And, of course it happens--as she sicks a pack of vicious dogs on him! This is actually kind of cool...and silly.

The evil lawyer's plan is to create a will--giving the camp and all of Thad's money to the son--not just a portion like Thad had requested. Actually, the son really IS dead--so she has a guy who is going to pretend to be the son and collect the money AND toss all the orphans out of the camp! Can Marshall Roy save the day and expose this evil plot?

Okay...here's some of the illogical stuff (apart from someone signing a blank will form):

The locals all decide to beat up Roy and get him dismissed from his job because they think he is trying to toss out the orphans. So, because they love the kids so, they become lawless and a lynch-mob mentality develops. Of course you later learn SOME of these folks were paid by the lawyer to do this--but what about everyone else?! Why would you want to help orphans this way?!

Why did Roy slug Doc (Andy Devine)?! This sure made the angry townsfolk seem reasonable (though this happened AFTER they became angry and kind of crazy). Later, Roy said he did this because he wanted to get fired so he could better investigate what was happening. Huh?! Roy...you HIT Doc! And he's your friend! Why exactly did you hit Doc?! Huh?! What?! Hitting one of the few people in town who LIKED you is an interesting strategy, I must say!

The lawyer hates one of her vicious dogs, Lobo, because he isn't mean enough AND the dog really, really, really hates her. Later, she and her evil henchman steal this dog away from Roy. Several days later, they STILL have the dog and haven't killed it. Yet, earlier in the film they tried several times to kill the dog. Why would they keep the dog once they stole it-especially since they dog wants to kill you?! They wanted it dead, right?!? SO they kidnapped it and kept it alive! Good strategy!

Overall, this is a mildly entertaining but ludicrously confusing Roy Rogers film. Turn off your brain and stop it from questioning the plot and you'll probably have a good time watching it. Otherwise, you might just want to skip this one.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some Interesting Features
dougdoepke26 April 2017
There're some novel features in this Rogers oater—a "wolf" pack, an old lady mastermind, Devine as a veterinarian, and a home for orphaned boys. Seems an old lady (Bryant) plots to steal inheritance from the boys home, and only US Marshal Rogers stands in her way. In the process, she enlists much of the town, including Devine, to discredit Roy who doesn't help himself by slugging the popular vet. Yes, good guy Roy slugs good guy Devine. Good thing our hero has Trigger and Lobo to help, and, oh yes, a fetching Lynne Roberts who would keep any guy going.

There's some okay flying fists, and fast shooting near the end, while hard riding features the predatory wolf pack. The locations are familiar ones just north of LA, so not much b&w scenery. Nonetheless, the story's an engaging one, along with its novel aspects. I should say in reply to fellow reviewers and as a Front Row geezer that I don't watch these matinees for their logic. They weren't intended as tight story lines. Now if I were watching a polished murder mystery, a very different standard would apply. Anyway, this is a highly entertaining Rogers entry and shouldn't be missed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed