| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 14 reviews in total |
11 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
A Must For All Fans Of Hillary Brooke, 3 December 2007
![]()
Author:
ferbs54 from United States
Does there exist a male baby boomer who grew up watching reruns of "The Abbott and Costello Show" during the 1950s and early '60s who was able to resist falling in love with Hillary Brooke? With her sexy blond good looks and sweet demeanor, no wonder Lou and all the other guys had a major "thing" for her. Viewers may be surprised to learn, however, that before "The A&C Show," Hillary excelled at portraying so-called "bad girls," as the 1946 potboiler "Strange Impersonation" so amply demonstrates. Here, she plays the assistant to anesthesia researcher Brenda Marshall (herself so memorable in one of my Top 10 films of all time, the 1940 remake of "The Sea Hawk"), as well as the best friend from hell. Hillary sabotages one of Marshall's experiments, leading to an explosive fire and the disfigurement of her boss. She then goes about stealing Marshall's fiancé, leading to a twisty story involving betrayal, plastic surgery, murder, blackmail and identity theft. All this in a brief 68 minutes, and topped with a surprise ending that some may find cheap, but that surprisingly explains away the many plot loopholes, inconsistencies and implausibilities that have preceded it; an ending, in addition, that is wholly earned and was set up in the film's opening moments. Yes, this IS another B cheapie made on the quick by Republic Studios, but it certainly is fun. And need I even mention that it is a must for all fans of Hillary Brooke?
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Fascinating Anthony Mann Film from Republic, 1 November 2007
![]()
Author:
David (Handlinghandel) from NY, NY
First off, I practically fainted at seeing a Republic Picture that
didn't star John Wayne and wasn't one of their few big-budget movies.
That studio turned out some excellent films and they are rarely seen.
(This even though till about ten years ago our ABC affiliate showed
one, sometimes two, every Saturday night.) The movie itself is not Mann
at his best but it's very good. He's been given a fabulous cast. Brenda
Marshall is a great favorite of mine. Ruth Ford did more on stage,
maybe, than on screen. William Gargan was handsome before he moved into
character roles. And Hillary Brooke! Wow, what a performance she turns
in here! Lyle Talbot is also on board. He's somewhere between his days
as a leading man and his time with Ed Wood. He looks a bit pudgy here.
When we first meet the three principals, they're all wearing glasses.
You see, they are scientists.
In a parking garage on her way home from work, Marshall accidentally
backs her car into the inebriated Ford. And that's all the plot I'm
giving.
Brooke is given a very meaty role. It seems like the typical
best-friend part. She seems like a low-budget Eve Arden at first. But
oh no! That changes. And she is up to every twist and turn of the plot.
The movie is a little bit soap opera, a little bit noir. But it's both
highly entertaining on its on and a must-see for fans of the great
Anthony Mann.
10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Anthony Mann plays fast, loose with early noir conventions, 2 March 2002
![]()
Author:
bmacv from Western New York
Heralded noir director Anthony Mann made his name in legendary
collaborations with cinematographer John Alton (T-Men, Raw Deal, Border
Incident). But his work in the cycle started earlier when it was still
coalescing -- before its essentials had become codified.
A 1945 Republic release (under an old, pre-eagle logo), Strange
Impersonation comes in a compact package holding a lot of plot -- perhaps
too much. Pharmaceutical chemist Brenda Marshall, anxious to test a new
anesthetic she devised, goes home to do so. [On the way, however, she
gets
into an unpleasant traffic scrape involving a tipsy woman and an
ambulance-chaser.] Finally ensconced in her luxurious penthouse, she
injects
herself and goes under, only to wake in hospital, suffering disfiguring
burns from an explosion and fire among her bottles and
beakers.
The next year proves to be no picnic. During her convalescence, her rich
fiance (who owns the drug company) drops her like a hot brick. She
accidentally murders the accident victim -- see above -- who has
resurfaces
with a gun and a blackmail scheme. On the lam, Marshall assumes a new
identity and buys a swell new face through reconstructive surgery. Then
she
returns to her old firm with a notion of settling scores.
Cheeky, and with the courage of its conventions, Strange Impersonation
draws
us in by rapid and unexpected changes in its course. Marshall holds an
especially strong hand as the brainy victim of outrageous fortune, and
plays
her cards well. But she's almost matched by Hillary Brooke as her
duplicitous assistant/rival. William Gargan (later to become TV's first
Martin Kane, Private Eye) remains no more than a plot point as the duped
fiance.
Mann plays fast and loose with themes and gimmicks that were to become
staple ingredients later in the noir cycle, as if trying them on for size.
There are elements here that recall or prefigure movies such as The Woman
in
the Window, Dark Passage, A Stolen Face and No Man of Her Own, to name
just
a few. And if they're not worked out with the ruthlessness of vision that
was to shape the finest film noir, no matter. Strange Impersonation is a
swift, dark funhouse ride.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
a fun B, 29 May 2011
![]()
Author:
blanche-2 from United States
They say to keep your friends close and your enemies closer. What if
they are one and the same? Just ask scientist Nora Goodrich (Brenda
Marshall, in real life Mrs. William Holden). She is conducting an
experiment with her assistant/friend Arline (Hillary Brooke), but
Arline is after Nora's fiancé (William Gargan), a successful doctor.
While Nora is out from anesthetic, which is part of a grand experiment
-oops, a fire starts in a beaker, thanks to Arline loading it up, and
Nora's face is burned and scarred. While she's recovering in the
hospital, Arline fixes it so that the fiancé thinks that Nora doesn't
want to see him; meanwhile, Nora is wondering why he isn't coming by.
Then an unfortunate accident in her apartment causes Nora to get
plastic surgery - but with a brand-new face and a name to go with it.
This is kind of a fun B movie with an interesting cast that includes
William Gargan as the object of Nora's and Arline's affections -- bad
casting -- the role needed a good-looking B film lead like Jeffrey Lynn
or Richard Carlson. H.B. Warner, Jesus in the original King of Kings,
plays a plastic surgeon, and Ruth Ford, Mrs. Zachary Scott, plays one
Jane Karaski, who is important to the plot.
Economically directed by Anthony Mann, this is a pretty good film with
a gigantic twist at the end, one that was actually used in a couple of
other films. Not the best but satisfying nonetheless.
Don't look for lovely cinematography, camera angles, unusual sets,
great clothes, or anything like that - this movie comes to you from
Republic Studios.
4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Compact B-noir enlivened by Anthony Mann's direction, 13 August 2000
![]()
Author:
Robert Keser (rfkeser@ix.netcom.com) from Chicago
"You cannot escape the person you are," says plastic surgeon H.B.Warner,
holding up a bony finger. Nevertheless, leading lady Brenda Marshall tries,
which puts her in the postwar vanguard of stars doing identity switches
[see
Bogart in DARK PASSAGE and Stanwyck in NO MAN OF HER OWN]. The script also
stirs in elements from A WOMAN'S FACE, plus a dash of mad-scientist hubris,
then shakes it into a film noir cocktail.
Marshall plays a research chemist who tries an experimental anesthetic on
herself
["nothing can go wrong"], but ends up disfigured, then takes on the
identity
of extortionist bad girl Ruth Ford. The switch involves several plastic
surgery montages, but mostly results in a new coif, a dark rinse, and
make-up adjustments.
The plot also plays out the popular postwar subtext of
Send-Rosie-the-Riveter-Back-to-the-Kitchen: when scientific professional
Marshall turns down a marriage proposal in favor of finishing her own work,
she suffers for it at the hands of scheming Hillary Brooke, and then has to
fight to get another chance at that marriage ring.
This conventional message is somewhat at war with the subversive noir
style,
but this script includes: the unsuspected hostile motives of a friend, the
nightmare chain of events, and the police station third-degree. The novelty
here is the woman protagonist, who herself shifts into a femme fatale. In
fact, the film centers on a trio of femmes fatales: Marshall and Brooke and
Ford.
The man involved is William Gargan, relaxed and charming, so hardly an
homme
fatal.
Republic's studio style-- aimed at simple feel-good entertainment, with
invariably stodgy decor---was not exactly a natural home for noir. However,
Anthony Mann delivers lean direction, with exceptionally fluid camerawork,
some striking high and low angles, and smart playing from all [poor
Marshall
has to spend a good half-hour with her face wrapped up in bandages].
However, a few years later Mann worked out the situation-- two women
tussling over a man--more pointedly, and with lots more shadows, in the
superior RAW DEAL.
9 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
A film noir without the noir film, 11 October 2000
Author:
CatTales from United States
This film literally illustrates that without expressionist shadows or dark, dreary streets, a film noir plot turns out more like a soap opera, no matter how dark the plot is. That doesn't take away from the nightmarish quality, however, as things go horribly wrong: betrayal, blackmail, disfigurement, murder. It is only because of this that the female lead becomes our heroine but her fairytale rebirth into beauty cannot erase her "guilt" of independence - as someone has already mentioned, the post-war message was encouraging women to return to the home. However, the film cannot indulge in grim fatalism either, preferring to be prescriptive rather than prohibitive, so it displays a 'whatif?' scenario, allowing for an upbeat ending. Philosophically it falls between the more contemporary sci-fi "Dark man," and the recent spanish fantasy "Open your eyes;" perhaps today these genres are the heirs of film noir.
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Wow, this film seldom makes sense but it is entertaining., 7 January 2011
![]()
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Anthony Mann directs this movie with the most convoluted and
unbelievable plot...but it's still quite entertaining. The secret to
watching it is to just ignore the impossibility of everything you
see...just enjoy! The film starts with Brenda Marshall as an obsessed
research scientist. Her character is very one-dimensional and all she
thinks about is her work. Oddly, despite this, her boyfriend adores her
(William Gargan) and constantly is pressing her to marry him. Out of
the blue, Marshall's female assistant tries to kill her while Marshall
is unconscious. She tries to burn Marshall alive but at least succeeds
in sending her to the hospital with a disfigured face from the fire.
Then, the assistant does everything she can to destroy the relationship
between her boss and her fiancé--and she is truly a snake! After
getting out of the hospital, Marshall has (thanks to the manipulative
'friend') lost her boyfriend and is alone. Out of the blue, a nasty
lady from early in the film returns and tries to rob the Doctor at
gunpoint. In an ensuing struggle, the robber is knocked off the
apartment balcony to her death MANY stories below. Considering she's
wearing the Doctor's ring she just stole and her face was crushed in
the fall, people assume it was Marshall. Marshall takes this
opportunity to assume the dead woman's life. Then, after getting
plastic surgery to look EXACTLY like the dead woman (????), she returns
to exact revenge against the assist and the ex-boyfriend she assumed
was faithless towards her.
The film is so full of impossible and ridiculous story elements.
Attempted murders and a convenient robbery are just the tip of the
iceberg of impossibilities. Having Marshall become this other woman due
to plastic surgery is silly--especially with 1940s technology. And, in
fact, she did NOT look like this other woman--just Marshall with a new
hair color and style--yet the people from her past did NOT recognize
her!!! None of it makes any sense at all....yet the film is still
pretty entertaining and juicy throughout. Unfortunately, the ending is
terrible....and pretty much undoes most of the film!! Too bad....this
could have been a lot better! By the way, isn't Marshall's nurse the
most detestable lady?! I wanted to throttle her as she CONSTANTLY spoke
in the third person!
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
STRANGE IMPERSONATION (Anthony Mann, 1946) ***, 23 January 2009
![]()
Author:
MARIO GAUCI (marrod@melita.com) from Naxxar, Malta
The third noir from director Mann after THE GREAT FLAMARION (1945; which I haven't seen) and the minor but not unentertaining TWO O'CLOCK COURAGE (1945) also has some very welcome horror/sci-fi trappings that should endear it to fans of those kind of movies as well. Lovely blonde, bespectacled scientist Brenda Marshall (who, in real life, was Mrs. William Holden at the time) keeps postponing her marriage to colleague William Gargan because of her all-important experiments in anaesthesia, until one night her jealous assistant Hillary Brooke contrives to overdo the mixture causing an explosion in the vicinity of Marshall (who is out cold) that leaves her facially scarred. More treachery from the two-faced Brooke manages to bar Gargan from visiting the hospitalized Marshall which leads to their breaking off the engagement. A slight traffic accident on the night of the explosion has also put a blackmailing woman and a snooping lawyer in Marshall's path but, seeing the former fall to her death from the apartment window after a tussle, gives her a new lease on life which enables her to change identities with the dead woman and perform plastic surgery (courtesy of surgeon H.B. Warner). Adopting the facial features of the blackmailer (including shedding her glasses and dying her hair black), she introduces herself to Gargan and Brooke as her own school-friend from chemistry class and is soon employed by the former as his personal aide! In the meantime, Brooke starts looking into this intruder's past and, confronting Marshall with her contradictory findings, is shocked when her new rival reveals she is the old one in disguise, after all. On the other hand, the obnoxious lawyer is still on Marshall's trail and, in fact, almost gets her convicted for her own murder when Brooke refuses to corroborate her story about who she really is! The climatic interrogation sequence is where Mann lets all the expressionistic stops out until the unexpected (and unwarranted) end revelation that it has all been the heroine's nightmare!! That the film succeeds as much as it does in spite of the meager cast, inexistent production values and cop-out finale is a tribute to the mastery of a film-maker who is just finding a firm footing in a genre he will be making his own in the following year or two.
3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Anthony "Not The" Mann, 5 March 2007
![]()
Author:
andrewsarchus from Oakland CA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I'm a huge fan of Anthony Mann films in general and this one was one of the few offered on Netflix that I had not seen. Probably for good reason as it turned out. I agree with the reviewer who said this a noir plot (tragic consequences of kind acts, loss of identity, etc) with no noir visuals. Just two-shots of people talking. A "B" picture with no particularly outstanding merit in any category, including direction. The "scientist" talk and taking lab equipment back to one's home is pretty funny. The main guy scientist is such a schlub it is difficult to imagine these two females fighting over him. Also the main plot line, that of becoming another person, is a bit undermined by the fact that the same actress plays this "transformed" character all the way through. So if it obvious to us that this is the same person, why is it not obvious to the other characters in the film? Unless Mann was pulling some Bunuelian trick on us. But I doubt it. I guess it proves that everyone has to earn a living, even back then!
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Fun little sleeper that kept my attention!, 18 February 2010
![]()
Author:
mark.waltz from New York City
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A female scientist in New York, working on an anesthetic, keeps trying
to get it just right, and won't marry her fiancé until it works. She
has a devoted friend and assistant who seems very loyal. One night, she
accidentally hits a drunken woman, and gives her cash after driving her
home. Later, the assistant gives the scientist a dose of the anesthetic
to test it once again. This sets up a plot of disfigurement, blackmail,
and accidental death. Then, a twist is revealed which sets the
scientist out on the course for revenge.
TRUE SPOILERS BELOW: This is a difficult film to describe without
revealing spoilers, even though it runs just over an hour. Brenda
Marshall is the heroine, William Gargan her leading man, Hillary Brooke
the assistant, and Ruth Ford the drunken woman. After being disfigured
in a chemical explosion caused purposely by Brooke, Marshall breaks off
with Gargan, whom she thinks has lost interest in her. It was all a
trick of Brooke's to win Gargan for herself. Then, Ford shows up to
blackmail Marshall, and is killed in a struggle over her gun. Marshall
decides to take her place. After getting plastic surgery from H.B.
Warner in L.A. (who has a strange idea about her), Marshall returns to
New York, uses Ford's identity, and steps into her old job working with
Gargan. Brooke is on to her and before you know it, Marshall is
arrested for murdering herself! Yes, it is complicated, but not so
confusing that you need to watch it more than once. It all comes
together with the most delightful conclusion at the end. Some might
groan (I did at first), but when you stop and think about it, it makes
sense. After all, this is Film Noir, and nothing is supposed to make
sense until the film is over. I could have done without nurse Mary
Treen however; She is annoying enough to have been a deserving victim.
Definitely a must for students of Film Noir and lovers of classic
movies, particularly the "B's".
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |