In 1862, young English widow Anna Owens accepts the job of teaching the royal children of Siam. On her arrival in Bangkok, culture clash is immediate. The king respects Anna for standing up to him, though this appalls his courtiers. In due course, she becomes the king's confidant and diplomatic advisor; their relationship endures through many trials. Written by
Rod Crawford <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In order to remind the King about his promise to give Anna a house of her own (to which the King continually refuses to honour) she leaves many reminders about his broken promise around the palace, in particular an English china cottage which has "made in England" on the underside and the inscription over the door of the cottage "Honor Thy Promise". In 1868 England (as today), 'honour' was not spelt "honor". Minor error, but a spelling mistake non-the-less. See more »
[the Kralahome has just arrived to tell King Mongkut of the loss of Cambodia. Anna, meanwhile, continues to press the King about the issue of a private residence, to the point where even the King's staff members are singing "Home, Sweet Home"]
Your Majesty! It has begun, Toongramon. We've lost Cambodia. Our governor of Cambodia has made a treaty with the French government. They have recognized Cambodia as independent of Siam, placed it under their "protection," and this governor of ours still ...
[...] See more »
Summary: BETTER than the King and I
This has always been my favorite version of this story.
Why? Not just because it was done first (1946); that is, before the
King and I (Play-1951; Film-1956), does it make it better. Not because
the original story was a drama rather a lively Broadway musical. Not
even because the story was written by a woman about a woman and not
about a man as was shifted later by Brynner.
The performances by Irene Dunne, Rex Harrison, the production values,
the direction are all done at such a fine intimate level. The true
nuance of the hardship that Anna went through in her dealings with this
imperial king is felt throughout. The musical never depicts this which
such finely-wrought detail and care.
With our 21st century sensibilities we might think that there is
something goofy about Rex's performance. Does anyone really know what
life was in 19th Century Siam? I believe this even after reading about
the difficulty Harrison had with the depiction of this role. There is
nothing Charlie Chan-ish about this performance. The strictness and
order of the Asian mindset does create a cultural chasm at times for us
in the West. The Asian languages are structured differently than our
Western languages. The use of articles is almost non-existent,
therefore the sometimes stilted manner of vocal delivery may sound
staccato. The Asian vocal chords are sometimes different from Western
vocal chords. There exists a predominance of higher pitched voices. And
so what of it? Was the King and I more real than this movie? The only
thing that can be said about Brynner is that he is physically more
imposing than Harrison and Brynner has a rather slight Mongolian aspect
to him which brings more authenticity to his appearance.
Finally and besides my objections above, ANNA AND THE KING OF SIAM is
movie full of heart and compassion. Each turn of events is handled with
care and not given a Hollywood finish and sheen. ANNA is recommended
The finale, though some jaded observers would dismiss as formulaic, is
indeed a grand and quiet moment not to be missed.
16 of 21 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?