10 user 2 critic

Take a Letter, Darling (1942)

Approved | | Comedy | 6 May 1942 (USA)
A struggling painter takes a job as a secretary to a female advertising executive. While working to obtain an account from a tobacco company, they end up falling in love.



(screen play), (story)
Nominated for 3 Oscars. See more awards »


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Comedy | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

Robin Hoodish gangster in 1929 Chicago is an object of affection, kind to New York hood and bad to a bad crook.

Director: H. Bruce Humberstone
Stars: Cesar Romero, Virginia Gilmore, Charlotte Greenwood
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Salty owes money to Doc Baxter; he and his pal Smitty have one month to pay up. They get a race horse and a disbarred jockey, Johnny Cates, who must fake his identity to race. Johnny and ... See full summary »

Director: Raoul Walsh
Stars: Alan Ladd, Gail Russell, William Demarest
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

A minority stockholder takes on the crooked board of directors at a billion dollar corporation.

Director: Richard Quine
Stars: Judy Holliday, John Williams, Paul Douglas
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

Susan Miller works behind the girdle counter in a department store and dreams about the beautiful clothes and glamour she can never hope to have. Enter May Worthington and Warren, a pair of... See full summary »

Director: Rouben Mamoulian
Stars: Henry Fonda, Gene Tierney, Laird Cregar
The Egg and I (1947)
Animation | Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

On their wedding night, Bob reveals to Betty that he has purchased an abandoned chicken farm. Betty struggles to adapt to their new rural lifestyle, especially when a glamorous neighbor seems to set her eyes on Bob.

Director: Chester Erskine
Stars: Claudette Colbert, Fred MacMurray, Marjorie Main
Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

After her husband dies in a fire, a woman is left to tend for her young son and the family farm on her own. Soon, she takes in a drifting handyman, they fall in love, and a resentment ... See full summary »

Director: Henry Hathaway
Stars: Susan Hayward, Stephen Boyd, Barbara Nichols
Drama | Romance | Western
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

Sheriff Halliday doesn't approve of his children dating or marrying half-breeds and his blind hate threatens to alienate his whole family.

Director: Joseph H. Lewis
Stars: Joseph Cotten, Viveca Lindfors, Betsy Blair
Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

After fighting with husband Stephen, Jan storms out with a suitcase. Meanwhile, Stephen gets drunk, picks up Grena and brings her back to their apartment. But a fight leads to a dead body, ... See full summary »

Director: J. Lee Thompson
Stars: Dennis Price, Derek Farr, Patricia Plunkett
Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

In 1944, the family lives of three San Francisco Marines are affected by their personal experiences on the front lines in the Pacific and vice-versa.

Director: Philip Dunne
Stars: Robert Wagner, Dana Wynter, Jeffrey Hunter
Crime | Drama | Film-Noir
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

When ruthlessly dedicated postal inspector investigates the murder of a co-worker, he finds that the sole witness, a nun, has been targeted by the killers.

Director: Lewis Allen
Stars: Alan Ladd, Phyllis Calvert, Paul Stewart
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

Hot-tempered Kathleen Maguire enlists the services of a young attorney to help her zookeeper father get his job back after he is fired for political reasons. In the midst of uncovering ... See full summary »

Directors: Melvin Frank, Norman Panama
Stars: June Allyson, Dick Powell, David Wayne
Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

The life of air pioneer Amelia Earhart is here given a fictionalized treatment, with a speculative conclusion.

Director: Lothar Mendes
Stars: Rosalind Russell, Fred MacMurray, Herbert Marshall


Complete credited cast:
Tom Verney
Jonathan Caldwell
Ethel Caldwell
G.B. Atwater
Fud Newton (as Charles E. Arnt)
Uncle George
Aunt Minnie
Margaret Seddon ...
Aunt Judy
George Reed ...
Sam French
Sally French
Sonny Boy Williams ...
Micky Dowling
John Holland ...


A struggling painter takes a job as a secretary to a female advertising executive. While working to obtain an account from a tobacco company, they end up falling in love. Written by Ken Carson <kcarson@efn.org>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


She Had Him Put in a Full Day's Work ... At Night!




Approved | See all certifications »




Release Date:

6 May 1942 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Ela e o Secretário  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Mirrophonic Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


"The Screen Guild Theater" broadcast a 30 minute radio adaptation of the movie on November 9, 1942 with Rosalind Russell reprising her film role. See more »


Tom Verney: You're a beautiful brain and beautiful clothes. No temperature, no pulse. That's all.
A.M. MacGregor: Where did you learn about women, Verney?
Tom Verney: It isn't a matter of learning. It's instinct.
A.M. MacGregor: I'm a brain with no pulse, eh? I'm a woman, Verney, more woman than you'll ever know.
See more »

Crazy Credits

At the end of the last scene, the camera zooms in on a billboard, which shows the closing credits...and an ad for the film's fictional tobacco company. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

O tempora! O mores! O Paramount!
5 February 2009 | by (Standing Athwart History Yelling "AIIIIEEEE!!!") – See all my reviews

The title of this comment is not reflective of this movie, a witty and expertly-handled farce; a shiny, energetic bit of bric-a-brac representing a memento of what we'll look back on one day as the high point of American popular entertainment (if not American civilization - once so down-to-earth, and disarmingly unpretentious). Rather, it refers to the sad reality of what the powers that be are allowing to befall the pre-1950 Paramount back catalog, as vital a part of American cultural history as any you'd care to name. Whether it's Sony, or Universal, or Vivendi into whose corporate clutches the rights have now fallen, I've frankly lost track of - it's one of them, though (and maybe all three).

Point blank: these films are not being cared for, let alone properly restored. You see it time and again with vintage Paramount films - if it's a famous title they're sure they can make money on (like DOUBLE INDEMNITY, say, or the ROAD comedies or Sturges classics) the print looks and sounds pristine; but these days - if it's one of the hundreds of less-well-remembered Paramounts - invariably the picture is bleached and indistinct, the sound deteriorated, and the entire experience of watching the film deeply compromised. There's no other word for it than "disgraceful" (particularly as it's been Sony/Universal/Vivendi who've been keeping these films OUT of circulation for decades now, resulting in their less-well-remembered status in the first place!) if for no other reason that it robs us, and future generations, of the joy of REdiscovery that's such a rewarding aspect of watching vintage Hollywood films; of seeing, and appreciating, aspects and nuances that its contemporary audience perhaps missed, or weren't even looking for, the first time around.

I'm possibly making a mountain out of a molehill here, and particularly in TAKE A LETTER's case, as the picture is soft but certainly still watchable, though the crispness and contrast of the original image isn't there. (The the cast-listing after the picture ends, however, is so washed out it's utterly illegible. You can barely make out a single name.) And compared to the unmitigated audio-video horror that is now SWING HIGH, SWING LOW (another Fred MacMurray Paramount comedy, screened by TCM a few weeks ago), TAKE A LETTER is flawless by comparison. But it bothers me no end that seemingly nothing is being done to restore, to save, these movies. Paramount wasn't PRC or Monogram, for God's sake: their roster of pre-1950 features are easily the equal of Warners, MGM....any of the other majors. How is it possible that a billion-dollar entertainment conglomerate, even though it's one unconnected to the making of these pictures, can show such casual contempt for film history? "Lost" films are one thing; this is more like watching them being abandoned. Maybe an old-fashioned write-in campaign is called for.

18 of 18 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: