Simplet (1942) Poster

(1942)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Is It A Plane, Is It A Bird ...
writers_reign27 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
... no, it's Fernandel who THINKS he's a bird (Don't ask). By now we are used to hearing orchestras strike up to accompany someone who feels moved to start singing in the street, or even in the rain, but this is arguably the first and only time an unseen orchestra has been on hand to accompany a man who bursts into song whilst nestling in a tree. Why a tree? Simple, where else would you find a bird or, to put it another way, Simplet, where else would you find an actor named Fernandel who directed himself playing a character named Simplet whose natural habitat appears to be a tree from where he 'talks' to the birds, thus anticipating Alan Jay Lerner who would later write a song entitled I Talk To The Trees. Alfred Greven, the honcho at Continental Films was nothing if not shrewd and to lure Fernandel into working for the German-run company he not only allowed him to direct but also to bring his brother-in-law, Jean Manse on board as co-screenwriter and lyricist - and for good measure allowed Manse to appear in a small role. The story is pure fluff, the village is making a modest living from the visitors who come there to see Simplet so that when he is exiled to a neighboring village they begin to feel the pinch and want him back (shades of Pagnol's La Femme du Boulanger which had appeared three years previously, but Manse wasn't going to let a little larceny impair the goose laying the golden eggs). As a second strand there is Simplet's yen for La Cigale who is already in a relationship but prepared to string him along. By 1941 of course Fernandel was as big a star as anyone including Gabin and Raimu and audiences weren't about to worry about nepotism or plagiarism. He made them laugh. Sue him.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Simply Marvelous!
JohnHowardReid2 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
SYNOPSIS: Although more or less adjacent, the villages of Rocamour and Miéjour are in a state of undeclared war. Fernandel plays the title character, a somewhat child-like innocent whom we first discover sitting in a tree, from which vantage point he delivers a delightful song to a traveling peddler (Mariotti).

COMMENT: Because this film was produced by a German company (Continental Films – the name has been removed from all current prints, including the DVD) and released by yet another German combine (Tobis Sound Films), its satire on French yokels has not been taken in the comic spirit which Fernandel and his fellow artists no doubt expected from their French countrymen and women. No doubt the satire hit right home, and in retrospect it would seem that is why the whole idea was so heartily endorsed by Berlin's stooge, Alfred Greven, and Fernandel so enthusiastically given carte blanche to make the movie. However, miscalculated in 1942 as the film was, there's no reason to hold it against Fernandel and company today. A telling satire it certainly is, but with even more certainty – if taken in the right spirit – it's very, very funny. In fact, I regard Simplet as simply one of the finest films ever made.

Fernandel himself has one of his best roles – if not his very best! A difficult part which he plays with charming insight. He acts as a catalyst for much of the fun, but by no means all of it. In fact, it could be argued that it's Henri Poupon's mayor who has the movie's main role. I could easily provide a valid synopsis to this effect: The mayor of a small country town in the north of France has to deal with a number of problems including the hostility of a neighboring village; the visit of a minister from the central government; a fête; the unveiling of a statue; the love affairs of the village beauty; the approaching death of a leading citizen; and the occasional forays of the village idiot. (Mind you, to describe Simplet as an idiot would be wrong. He is living in his own little world of trees and birds and fun. When he ruins the unveiling ceremony, he's genuinely surprised at the villagers' irate response. He expected cheers and laughter!)

All the actors are superb. Fernandel brilliantly plays the yokel as if he were a city man. It's all the other players who dress like yokels. And Fernandel talks to the birds as if it were the most natural thing to do in the world. It's all the other characters who get uptight. Furthermore he has little to do with some of the episodes. In the Cigale scenes, he's no more than a bystander at best. It's Cigale herself (a brilliant performance by Colette Fleuriot – who made only a handful of movies) around whom the action revolves in these riotous scenes. As for Poupon, he also has very few direct confrontations with Fernandel. And I believe it's partly because the director/comedian drops out of the action for many scenes that the movie as a whole is so enjoyable. It's Mariotti who actually opens the movie in the neighboring village and then comes upon Simplet, delightfully perched in a tree, as he approaches Rocamour. And when asked what he's doing in the tree, Fernandel voices the delightful "On m'appelle Simplet". And at this point, photographer Armand Thirard demonstrates his mastery of 3-D effects by panning his camera across the branches so that they seem to leap out into the room or auditorium. (I don't know how this 3-D effect was achieved. The later 3-D effects with the close-ups were filmed back in the studio. Thirard not only flooded the actors' faces with light but hit their heads from behind with an enormous amount of light as well. Don't ask me how this managed to produce 3-D. But it did!) Of course, Thirard brought off a marvelous 3-D effect in Les Diaboliques (1955) which mightily impressed everyone and was the talk of the town. But here he is, creating 3-D effects back in 1942. Funny thing, when CinemaScope came out in 1963, it was advertised as the process "you see without glasses." What no-one noticed was that you didn't need glasses to see 3-D. All a producer needed to do was to hire Armand Thirard!

Finally, the direction. As I've noted above, amazingly for a first-time director, Fernandel does not put a foot wrong. Some sources say that he was assisted in this initial endeavor by Carlo Rim. Be this as it may, the direction is not only extremely accomplished but delightfully stylish. Yet, surprisingly, Fernandel directed only two more movies: Adrien in 1943 and Adhémer ou le jouet de la fatalité (1951).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simply Fernandel
dbdumonteil29 September 2010
...notably in Pagnol's "Angèle" but this time there's an unexpected twist which reveals us that in fact....

Carlo Rim's screenplay is rather desultory ,less funny that "le Mort en Fuite" but it encompasses a lot of subjects: smuggling,rivalry between two villages and snatches of "Romeo and Juliette",celebration of a local glorious man (Mister Fougasse (sic): it' s a kind of Provençale brioche)complete with speech and parade,and a strange superstition that says that a village idiot is a good luck charm ,which the movie "proves ":as soon as Simplet is driven away from the village ,all the brats in his village have measles and that's not all.The ten plagues ,like in Mosis's time perhaps.

The songs are pleasant but the eponymous tune has bitter accents .

Best scene: a young girl is about to deliver a small congratulatory speech in honor of the minister;but she can only utter one word "Heureux....".An old surly woman takes her place.when she's finished ,the minister kisses....the girlie as the lady furiously glances at the politician.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed