I accuse
(1941)
|
|
| 0Share... |
I accuse
(1941)
|
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
|
|
Heidemarie Hatheyer | ... |
Hanna Heyt
|
|
|
Paul Hartmann | ... |
Professor Thomas Heyt
|
|
|
Mathias Wieman | ... |
Dr. Bernhard Lang
|
|
|
Margarete Haagen | ... |
Berta
|
|
|
Charlotte Thiele | ... |
Dr. Barbara Burckhardt
|
|
|
Christian Kayßler | ... |
Landgerichtsdirektor Kriebelmeyer
(as Christian Kayssler)
|
|
|
Harald Paulsen | ... |
Eduard Stretter
|
|
|
Albert Florath | ... |
Professor Schlüter
|
|
|
Ilse Fürstenberg |
|
|
|
|
Karin Evans | ... |
Erna Balg
|
|
|
Hans Nielsen | ... |
Dr. Höfer
|
|
|
Franz Schafheitlin | ... |
Rechtsanwalt Straten
|
|
|
Erich Ponto | ... |
Professor Werther
|
|
|
Otto Graf | ... |
Staatsanwalt Engel
|
|
|
Werner Pledath | ... |
Pastor Gömer
|
In this morbid Nazi sanctioned pro-euthanasia melodrama, a successful doctor is forced to make a heart wrenching decision after his beautiful young wife is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.
This film was made to justify the killing of disabled Germans in the so-called Nazi euthanasia program, properly known as Aktion T-4. It's not about choice. It's not about euthanasia. It's about marginalizing persons with disabilities -- and justifying their deaths in a murder machine which was the dry run for the Final Solution. The previous writer didn't mention this in his/her review. This "film" must be viewed and reviewed from its true historical perspective. There was no sort of moral "choice" involved in Aktion T-4.
I chose purposefully not to comment on content. The only reason to seek out this thing is for the study of Nazi propaganda -- and not very successful propaganda at that. And as Aktion T-4 and history proves, being "put to sleep" has nothing to do with disability rights or choice.