1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
THE DEVIL AND DANIEL WEBSTER (William Dieterle, 1941) ****, 13 October 2006
![]()
Author:
MARIO GAUCI (marrod@melita.com) from Naxxar, Malta
One of Hollywood's greatest fantasies: after a slow start (deleted from
the shorter version), the film creates a wonderful atmosphere (with
just the right period note, i.e. not over-glamorous), blending
Americana with Expressionism (perfectly rendered by the exquisite
cinematography and remarkable special effects).
The music score by the great Bernard Herrmann (only his second film and
for which he won his sole Academy Award) is an accomplished mix of
original pieces and popular tunes orchestrated in a way that they feel
entirely Herrmann-esquire (especially for non-American viewers).
Script, direction and acting capture both the human drama and the
inherent playfulness of the whole thing (not forgetting the obvious
political angle which is, however, not unduly stressed). Both Walter
Huston and Edward Arnold (I truly doubt original choice would have been
any better) - in the title roles - capped their distinguished careers
with their respective performances here; James Craig and Anne Shirley
manage to make their characters very real in their moving plight for
happiness; Simone Simon is a delightful femme fatale with a distinctly
feline personality, which stood her in good stead for her most famous
part - that of Irina Dubrovna in the Val Lewton-produced horror films
CAT PEOPLE (1942) and THE CURSE OF THE CAT PEOPLE (1944); the
supporting cast is well chosen (including the bit parts like H.B.
Warner's Judge Hawthorne in the fantastic 'trial' sequence) but
especially John Qualen as the ultimately repentant "Miser" Stevens.
The film has any number of memorable scenes: Huston and Simon's
individual entrances, Arnold's speeches (particularly the all-important
trial), the ghostly 'dance of the damned', "Miser" Stevens's soul
personified by a moth fluttering away out of Mr. Scratch's black book
before it is captured once again. Apart from being based on Stephen
Vincent Benet's popular short story, the film has obvious parallels
with the Faust Legend; interestingly, William Dieterle had been an
actor in the Silent-screen's most famous version (directed by F.W.
Murnau in 1926). Actually, I recently watched another variation on the
theme - Rene' Clair's LA BEAUTE' DU DIABLE (1950) - which also takes a
tongue-in-cheek approach; all three are superb films in my estimation,
definitely among the best work of each director but, for my money,
Dieterle's is the most accomplished and sheerly enjoyable one.
The 'added' scenes - I first watched the film in its shorter
incarnation and dubbed in Italian - enhance the various
characterizations no end and, obviously, I prefer the original
director's cut. Much has been said about the substandard transfer (for
a Criterion release, anyway): this may well be true but it's certainly
acceptable for such a problematic title as this and, in any case, I'm
sure they did the best they could. The extras are plentiful and very
interesting: a pretty busy Audio Commentary (despite its over-emphasis
on recounting biographical details of the various personnel); the
comparisons with the alternate version HERE IS A MAN are nice though,
perhaps, the optical flourishes of the latter were too experimental in
nature; the music essay (with the ability to play the various cues) is
quite well done though, in essence, a specialty item; the reading of
the original story is, quite simply, one of the best supplements on any
disc; the two radio adaptations are less satisfactory, however,
especially in view of the low quality of the sound recording.
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |