IMDb > King of the Underworld (1939)

King of the Underworld (1939) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (see all 6 | slideshow)

Overview

User Rating:
6.3/10   280 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Up 46% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writers:
George Bricker (writer)
W.R. Burnett (story)
more
Contact:
View company contact information for King of the Underworld on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
14 January 1939 (USA) more
Genre:
Tagline:
Ruthless Killer vs. Lady Doctor ! It's red-blooded action all the way ! more
Plot:
Niles and Carol Nelson are married doctors who save one of ganglord Gurney's men. Gurney exploits them... more | add synopsis
Plot Keywords:
User Comments:
If it weren't for Bogart's performance, this film would barely merit a 4. more (12 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Humphrey Bogart ... Joe Gurney

Kay Francis ... Dr. Carole Nelson
James Stephenson ... Bill Stevens
John Eldredge ... Dr. Niles Nelson
Jessie Busley ... Aunt Josephine
Arthur Aylesworth ... Dr. Sanders
Raymond Brown ... Sheriff
Harland Tucker ... Mr. Ames
Ralph Remley ... Mr. Robert
Charley Foy ... Slick
Murray Alper ... Eddie
Joe Devlin ... Porky
Elliott Sullivan ... Mugsy
Alan Davis ... Pete
John Harmon ... Slats
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Also Known As:
Unlawful (USA) (working title)
more
Runtime:
67 min
Country:
Language:
Aspect Ratio:
1.37 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Mono (RCA Victor System)
Certification:
Finland:(Banned) (1939) | USA:Approved (PCA #4405)

Fun Stuff

Quotes:
Joe Gurney: [Explaining why he shot someone] It says in the book that Napoleon said a good general has got to know when to be just, severe, or mild. more
Movie Connections:
Soundtrack:
Jezebel more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful.
If it weren't for Bogart's performance, this film would barely merit a 4., 30 January 2007
5/10
Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida

This film is a very limp remake of an earlier Warner Brothers film, DR. SOCRATES. While this original film was pretty good, the changes made in the script did NOT improve the story at all and there were so many logical errors that the film is pretty skip-able unless you are a huge fan of Humphrey Bogart and gangster films (like me).

For some odd reason, instead of the original story idea of a doctor being forced to do medical treatment for the mob and being thought by outsiders to be a member of the gang, this time it's been altered a bit. Instead, the man who chooses to be a mob doctor is soon killed and his wife (Kay Francis--who was totally innocent but also a doctor) is unfairly blamed for helping the gang. Although there is no evidence at all that she was involved, the licensing board threatens to take away her license unless she can prove her innocence! This just doesn't make any logical sense--and using a flawed and illogical situation as the basis for the film is a serious problem! Plus what idiots would suggest that she needs to prove her innocence and resort to risking her life!? Now the logical errors don't stop here. For example, when the same gang later comes to Francis and forces her to help them, she doesn't immediately run to the police or FBI but plans on proving her innocence all alone and at a very leisurely pace! Duh! It is only after working with them for some time does she consider telling the authorities and she comes up with a COMPLETELY FAR-FETCHED plan to capture the gang and hand them over to the law! She convinces Bogart that infection in his arm has spread to his eyes (which it had) and he would be blind unless he allowed her to give him a miracle eye medication. This is tough to believe, but plausible. But, when she also says she needs to give it to all the gang members AND they must all keep their eyes tightly shut during the process, this is just stupid. Of course, she gave them something that temporarily blinded them all and they were soon apprehended, but believing these guys all did what she told them was just pushing credibility into the toilet (though I must admit, it was kind of funny to watch).

Now apart from the bad script problems, the film was still pretty watchable for fans of old Warner Brothers gangster films. In particular, Bogart was funny as the dumb gang leader who fancied himself to be the next Napoleon. Plus, he thought he was A LOT smarter than he really was and he thought when the doctor called him "moronic" that it was a complement! Sure, realism was not the trademark of this performance, but it was enjoyable and made me laugh a few times. Also, the very end of the film had a cute ending (after the blindness bit) and was a good wrap-up to the movie. So from a comedic point of view, this was a pretty good drama!

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (12 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for King of the Underworld (1939)

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Dr. Socrates The Fugitive Public Hero #1 Bank Alarm A Man's World
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
IMDb Crime section IMDb USA section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.