IMDb > The Hound of the Baskervilles (1939) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
The Hound of the Baskervilles
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guide
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips
Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 5 of 9: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [Next]
Index 88 reviews in total 

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

A Gigantic Hound

Author: bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
27 December 2009

Probably the best known of the Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, The Hound Of The Baskervilles gets the A treatment from 20th Century Fox and introduces the team of Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce as Holmes and Watson. They would only go on to make one other Holmes feature for Fox before the series shifted to Universal and a considerable downgrading in production values.

The film is also a chance for Darryl F. Zanuck to exhibit Richard Greene who was being groomed at that time as a possible successor to Tyrone Power as the number one heartthrob on the lot. Power was Zanuck's personal favorite among the stars, but even with favorites you have to have someone to keep them in line. And Greene's British background was more in keeping with the locale of the story. Though I certainly could have seen Tyrone Power playing the young Baskerville heir.

It's not the Baskerville heir, but a doctor played by Lionel Atwill at the Baskerville estate who suspects foul play of sorts in the death of the elder Baskerville who was his patient. Though the man died of a heart attack, Atwill tells Rathbone that near the body were "the footprints of a gigantic hound" corresponding to a legendary killer dog that has stalked the Baskerville family for generations. Atwill hires Holmes to protect Greene who is coming over from Canada to claim the estate.

There is a curse of sorts on the Baskervilles, brought on by the rakish behavior of an ancestor played in flashback by Ralph Forbes. He is the first to meet his end in an unnatural manner on that family tree.

A fine cast supports Greene, Rathbone, and Bruce who in fact are billed in that order which leads me to suspect Tyrone Power might have been originally intended for the role. Besides Atwill we also have John Carradine as the Baskerville butler, Wendy Barrie as Greene's intended, Morton Lowry as a neighboring landowner, and Beryl Mercer who is Atwill's wife with a gift for clairvoyance.

There are never any supernatural solutions in a Sherlock Holmes mystery and when the culprit is revealed the motives are more involved with the present though they are grounded in how the legend came about.

This is the first and best of the Rathbone-Bruce Sherlock Holmes films. Would all of them had maintained this level of quality.

Was the above review useful to you?

Excellent Sherlock Holmes mystery

Author: MattyGibbs from Birmingham, England
20 December 2016

This is my favourite of all the Sherlock Holmes tales and this is an excellent film version of it.

It pairs the superb partnership of Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, surely the best ever Holmes and Dr Watson. Here they investigate reports of a beast roaming the estate of a rich heir.

The setting is suitably atmospheric with the fog shrouded set of the moors evoking a real sense of menace. The tale twists and turns with various suspects thrown into the mix. It's a relatively fast paced film and always entertaining with a number of expertly filmed scenes especially the one with the hound.

If you only ever watch one Sherlock Holmes film then this is the one to watch.

Was the above review useful to you?

"Well the people around here say it's the hound."

Author: classicsoncall from Florida, New York
23 February 2016

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

When the picture opened with that great, spooky, fog enshrouded scene, it immediately brought to mind the 1941 film "The Wolf Man". As I was thinking about that, who should appear out of the darkness but a man who rather resembled a wolf man who we later find out is an escapee from Nottingham Prison. I had a pretty good chuckle over that one.

Watching these old Rathbone/Bruce team-ups well out of chronological order, I never gave a thought to the idea that the Dr. Watson character was anything more than a somewhat bumbling sidekick. In this first film of the franchise however, still at Fox studios, Nigel Bruce's Watson is considerably more reserved and professional in his manner with the legendary detective. It was an interesting take on the character, though the comedic approach seemed to work as well in the later stories to relieve some of the tension of Holmes' cases.

With a minimal number of characters, the mystery behind the murder on the moor, (say, that would have been a cool title, too) is given away a bit too handily and the viewer winds up knowing who it is even before Holmes, though it will take his logical explanation in the final scene to explain Stapleton's (Morton Lowry) motive. The build up to the finale is made more intriguing with the presence of Lionel Atwill's Dr. Mortimer, a dabbler in the occult, and his wife (Beryl Mercer) who has the psychic abilities of a medium and actually conducts a séance in the story.

Without ever mentioning it, the strange rock formations on the moor where some of the action takes place have a strong resemblance to Stonehenge, and just the name 'Great Grimpen Mire' heralds a formidably dangerous mystery about to unfold. Indeed, the picture treads ominously close to a horror story whenever Dr. Frankland (Barlowe Borland) expounds on his theories about John Stapleton, who has no reservation about claiming the man is a body snatcher.

Was the above review useful to you?

The Hounds Are Out.

Author: Python Hyena from Canada
26 May 2015

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

The Hound of Baskerville s (1939): Dir: Sidney Lanfield / Cast: Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce, Richard Greene, Wendy Barrie, Lionel Atwill: Haunting detective story about ancestry. Holmes is called to investigate attacks by apparent hounds on an estate. To protect the estate's last heir he goes undercover while partner Watson acts as an overseer. Directed by Sidney Lanfield with lighting that captures the eerie tone as ominous shadows creep about the moors. Basil Rathbone plays off the humorous intellect of Holmes who at first laughs off the report as folklore but he secretly oversees the situation from afar while donning disguises to get in closer. He proves to be an inspector of great intellect when the mystery pieces together. Nigel Bruce plays the loyal and dedicated Watson who is sent on ahead as protection while periodically reporting to Holmes. Richard Greene plays Sir Henry heir of the estate whom is the target for protection. As the film opens he tells of the curse and the hound that targets his namesake. Wendy Barrie is fun as Henry's fiancée but the relationship is too fast and corny. This relationship is predictable and without challenge while the plot is entertaining thanks to Rathbone's confidence and insight. Lionel Atwill plays the consultant who first approaches Holmes and Watson with regards to the case. The result is an entertaining suspense caper. Score: 8 / 10

Was the above review useful to you?

A Good Version Of The Story

Author: Peppermint Twisted from United States
18 October 2014

This is a very dark, mysterious version of the story - almost a horror film but not quite. Very eerie sets - especially in the Moors. The story is quite captivating and Ernest Pascal's screenplay for this film is quite good.

Basil Rathbone is perfect for the role of Sherlock Holmes and Nigel Bruce is outstanding as Dr. Watson. Both play their roles believably well.

This is the type of film I enjoy watching on a dark night with the lights off - it creates a "creepy" atmosphere just like in the film.


Was the above review useful to you?

the best adaptation out there

Author: lagudafuad from Nigeria
30 December 2012

Basil Rathbone portrayal of the great detective Sherlock Holmes is one of the most popular and this adaptation of the popular The Hound of the Baskervilles is the nearest in accuracy that I have seen of the book, recurring that I have seen the modern British Sherlock series do a version of the Hound of Baskerville, which digressed a lot to the use of drugs to portray the intensity of the hound's presence.

Many differences can be seen when watching this movie adaptation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's, Sherlock Holmes's The Hound of the Baskervilles, from the role of Beryl Stapleton (she is portrayed here by Wendy Barrie), to some other screenplay differences. That being said, this 1939 movie is one that is straight to the heart captivating, it starts with a high note, introducing us to the characters and the case at hand, it then goes smoothly down to the case and how Holmes was intending to solve it, adding the suspense that the book had, as we the viewers as well as Dr Watson (Nigel Bruce) has to wait till Holmes tells us what he has been able to deduce.

Sherlock Holmes (Basil Rathbone) and Dr. John Watson (Nigel Bruce) receive a visit from Dr. Mortimer (Lionel Atwill), who wishes to consult them before the arrival of Sir Henry Baskerville (Richard Greene). Sir Henry is the last of the Baskervilles and heir to the Baskerville estate in Devonshire.

But Dr. Mortimer tells Holmes of a legend, the legend of the Hound of the Baskervilles, a demonic dog that first killed Sir Hugo Baskerville hundreds of years ago and the same dog is believed to kill all Baskervilles that stay in the Devonshire, in which Sir Henry will lodge.

The screenplay of any book adaptation is one that needs to be judged carefully, even after reading such a book, you still have to have it in the back of your mind that not all that is written can or should be adapted on screen, in such a case the screenplay has to be well glued together not making you feel like something is off. The 1939 Hound of the Baskervilles has such a screenplay that makes you not feel lost, they did their best to tie up loose ends and make you the view feel a sense of closing as the movie itself ends.

Not many of the Basil Rathbone's Sherlock Holmes portrayal can be found in the market, but if you do search the online market hard you should be able to come across some at a good price although some are said to be on the public domain; as I to will continue the search to see if I can see all fourteen of the duo of Basil Rathbone and Niguel Bruce.

Was the above review useful to you?

Sadly, not as good as I remembered

Author: jonfrum2000 from United States
25 February 2012

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I'm a huge Holmes fan, having read all the stories decades ago, seen this movie, watched the Jeremey Brett series multiple times and listened to every radio episode available, whether part of the canon or pastiche. It's been years since i watched this version, and i looked forward to it when I saw it available on youtube. Unfotunately, I was quite disappointed.

I'm actually in favor of dramatizations being changed somewhat from their literary sources, but in this case I can't think of a single change that was neutral, much less an improvement. The change of the Barrymores to Barryman was silly - the most famous story from probably the English speaking world's most famous character is already locked in our minds. To change a character's name - for any reason - just serves to take us out of the suspension of disbelief. The role of the Barrymores to Selden is a fundamental part of the story - minimizing it took away from the drama.

Apparently, Hollywood didn't think audiences could deal with Beryl Stapleton having any part whatsoever in the plot, so she's no longer the wife. And Sir Henry asking her to marry him after we've seen them meet just once again follows an unfortunate Hollywood convention and destroys the suspension of disbelief.

And of course how it was that Stapleton lived in the district all his life and no one knew he was related to the Baskervilles is one of those jarring puzzles that Hollywood would typically drop on people just before the film ended and the lights went on. It works until they get outside and start thinking about it.

Nigel Bruce certainly wasn't the bumbling clown he later played in this series, but he's no Watson if you've read the stories. As likable as he was in this role, he was never asked to play Watson and he never did. Bruce was more Jimmie Chan than Dr Watson.

At least this was better than the later Hammer version, which went even further re-writing the story. It was a failure at the box office, with good reason.

Was the above review useful to you?

A worthy effort

Author: orsino44 from United States
9 September 2010

If ever an actor was born to play a role, surely it was Basil Rathbone as Sherlock Holmes. His physical appearance was spot on, he had a phenomenal speaking voice, and if the producers had ever gone there, an exploration of Holmes' skills as a swordsman would certainly have been safe in his hands. The problem with most of this series is that the support isn't there for him. Nigel Bruce plays Watson as less of a dolt here than he did in subsequent installments, but still plays him as a dolt. Sidney Lanfield's direction moves the story along briskly, the B&W cinematography is gorgeous, and Chief does an excellent job in the title role. The plot of the novel is followed fairly closely, and on the whole, this is a winner, though not definitive by any means.

Was the above review useful to you?

Basil Rathbone Finds Himself as Sherlock Holmes

Author: wes-connors from Los Angeles
6 August 2010

"In all (of 1899) England there is no district more dismal than the vast expanse of primitive wasteland, the moors of Dartmoor in Devonshire." Initiating their successful run of films based on Arthur Conan Doyle's imagination, famed detective Basil Rathbone (as Sherlock Holmes) and loyal companion Nigel Bruce (as Dr. Watson) are called upon to protect handsome Richard Greene (as Henry Baskerville) from the cursed "Hound of the Baskervilles". Mr. Greene arrives at the moors to take over the moody Baskerville mansion, after his uncle dies mysteriously. The death wasn't ruled as such, but Mr. Rathbone believes it was "Murder, my dear Watson," and nephew Greene is up next…

If you're not paying attention, you're liable to think Rathbone isn't the star of this fine first film in his Holmes series; but, his impression is strong throughout. The Gothic look given by director Sidney Lanfield and especially photographer Peverell Marley is outstanding. The servant class is well represented by creepy John Carradine and eerie Eily Malyon (as the Barrymans). Lionel Atwill and Beryl Mercer (as the Mortimers) dabble in the occult. Love interest Wendy Barrie (as Beryl) is pretty, but husband (in the book) turned step-brother Morton Lowry (as John Stapleton) sneaks away with best supporting actor honors. A famous last line reveals Holmes' habit...

******** The Hound of the Baskervilles (3/24/39) Sidney Lanfield ~ Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce, Richard Greene, Morton Lowry

Was the above review useful to you?

Murder, my dear Watson. Refined, cold-blooded murder.

Author: lastliberal from United States
1 August 2010

The first of Basil Rathbone's many appearances as Sherlock Holmes.

For purists, it is also a faithful adaptation of the Arthur Conan Doyle novel.

Rathbone gets to play a "good guy" for a change. He is partnered with Nigel Bruce as Dr. Watson.

Richard Greene ("The Adventures of Robin Hood"), Lionel Atwill, and Wendy Barrie provided great support.

Sir Henry (Greene) wasn't in the best shape for a wedding after that hound got to him, but he survived.

This was the start of a beautiful relationship.

Was the above review useful to you?

Page 5 of 9: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [Next]

Add another review

Related Links

Plot summary Plot synopsis Ratings
External reviews Plot keywords Main details
Your user reviews Your vote history