Criminal from all over the country converge on the Lakeside Inn in Willow Springs where bank robber Duke Temple (Stanley Fields) has stashed $100,000. Wilbur Keeks (Joe E. Brown),soda jerk ...
See full summary »
The operators of a bankrupt carnival sideshow hope to restore their fallen fortunes by staging a fake 'public wedding' in the mouth of their unprofitable giant whale. But the intended '... See full summary »
Two American-army officers are working on a new type of machine-gun for anti-aircraft warfare, when one of them is murdered. The other vows to get the spies that are after the invention and avenge his friend's death.
Amelia is a gifted violinist who is in danger of quitting the Brissac Academy of Music. Julius arranges to have a scholarship given to her through his employee Tony so that Julius can ... See full summary »
Olivia de Havilland,
Walter and Vivian live in the country and have a difficult time keeping servants. Walter hires an private detective who has been fired for arresting the District Attorney. They only way ... See full summary »
Detective Sam Campbell and his perky sidekick Robby Vance are called in on a routine child support dispute. Things take an unexpected turn when the client's ex-father-in-law, the head of a ... See full summary »
Criminal from all over the country converge on the Lakeside Inn in Willow Springs where bank robber Duke Temple (Stanley Fields) has stashed $100,000. Wilbur Keeks (Joe E. Brown),soda jerk at the town drugstore, who had aided in the capture of Temple, tries to prevent the crooks from wrecking the inn. Written by
Les Adams <email@example.com>
During the early to mid-1930s, Joe E. Brown was a hot commodity at Warner Brothers. He was a top start and he commanded top money to make a long string of agreeable comedies. However, in a bone-headed career move, Brown was convinced to sign with tiny David Loew Productions and his career was in a tailspin. I've seen four of the six Loew films with Brown and most of them are adequate but no more--the best of which was the first, "When's Your Birthday?". The final two, this film and "The Gladiator" are on the same disk.
Despite the unimpressive pedigree (Loew only made these six films), the film does feature a few interesting supporting characters. First and foremost, Jane Wyman co-stars in this one (before she gained fame at Warner). You've also got Sidney Toler (later to play Charlie Chan in a bunch of films), Berton Churchill (a great character actor known for his blustering rich-guy characters) and Barbara Pepper (a name you probably won't recognize though she later played Mrs. Zipfel on "Green Acres"). So, at least Brown had some good support--other than the inexplicably cast Lyda Roberti (whose presence in any film is cause to question the sanity of Hollywood, as she could barely speak English).
I as VERY concerned with the long, long list of writers for the film. Usually would indicate a film that has a poor script--one that needed a lot of re-writes. Well, we'll see....
The movie begins with Brown playing Wilbur Meeks--a rather typical character for him because Meeks is a bit of a blow-hard. You see, after a big-name wanted criminal is apprehended, Meeks takes credit for his--even though he really is just a boob who just happened to be in the right place at the time. As a result of his dumb luck, he becomes fat-headed and brags about his supposed part in all this--so much so that the gangsters friends wonder if perhaps Brown knows something about the hidden loot.
In the meantime, Wyman and her aunt move into the abandoned mansion where the mobster was headed. He was going to look for SOMETHING there. It's pretty much a cinch that sooner or later the gang will show. And, when they do, the home has been turned into an inn and so the crooks pose as guests. And before long, they are chasing Wyman and Brown. Can they...blah...blah...blah....
The bottom line is that this is a decent enough film but they forgot that it was supposed to be a comedy--though Toler's character is MILDLY amusing. If you ignore the lack of comedy, then it's an adequate movie---and nothing more--due to a poor script.
1 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?