|Page 9 of 19:||               |
|Index||181 reviews in total|
I agree wholeheartedly with many other critics; if not for the dwarfs and
the woodland animals, SNOW WHITE probably would have faded with time. But
the supporting cast is perfect. The landscape of the world in which Snow
White and the dwarfs live in is astoundingly detailed. You can see the heart
put into this movie. The DVD is sickeningly filled with everything on SNOW
WHITE. No other animated feature can touch SNOW WHITE without paying some
type of homage to it.
Princess Snow White lives as a maid thinking of love and talking to animals. When her step-mother, The Queen, is told she has been usurped as the fairest one of all by Snow White, jealously takes hold and our story begins.
Landmark, Revolutionary, The Greatest ... we have heard it all before and they are valid to a point. Maybe a century down the road when I am dead and our great-great grandchildren see this movie when it is horribly dated will we truly know. But I believe for my time, even when this movie has outlasted my grandfather, that SNOW WHITE remains one of the greatest movies ever, from one of the greatest gambles ever. I applaud everyone involved in making, restoring and maintaining this masterpiece.
There are certain motion pictures that must be recognized as "Landmarks" -- films that made such an impact on the public and on future film makers as to make them "Landmarks". D. W. Griffeth's THE BIRTH OF A NATION (1915); Disney's SNOW WHITE & THE SEVEN DWARFS; David O. Selznick's GONE WITH THE WIND; Orson Welle's CITIZEN KANE; and STAR WARS, to list a few. And now many of these classics are being given excellent DVD releases. Just as Disney's SNOW WHITE was a "Landmark" in 1937, being the first feature-length animated film, now, the 2001 DVD Platinum Editon (two Discs) release of SNOW WHITE is likely to be considered a "Landmark" in the field of DVD's! The feature itself has never looked and sounded any better then seen here -- it's state of the art! And the EXTRAS (and the access to them) are absolutely amazing! More then 3 hours of material are contained on the second disc -- and choice material it is. It like being turned loose in the Disney archives and having access to anything you wanted -- only better -- because it is so well organized on the DVD. A college film course couldn't begin to touch what you will find here. HIGHEST RATING to the Disney staff!
This is a true Hollywood classic, released for the first time in December 1937 the first full length Disney feature "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" is a brilliant portrayal of the brothers Grimm's chilling tale of an evil queen and her beautiful stepdaughter. The film reflects many of the social conditions of the time; the depression had just passed and songs such as "whistle while you work" were intended to promote a strong work ethic to the young children of America. The budget of the film was a staggering $500,000 around double the cost of an average film! Yet the pay off was huge, this was the film that established Disney as the ONLY true animation studio and led to the company's domination of the market. A must-see for all Disney fans young or old! 10/10
This must be regarded as Walt Disney's best!
I love this film and it is one of my favorite Disney movies. The characters are unforgettable and the songs stick in your head (hi ho, hi ho, it's off to work we go...).
I love the voice talents, especially the one for the evil queen and Snow White. Grumpy steals the show as the moody dwarf as well as Dopey, the silent but funny dwarf.
I recommend this movie to not just kids, but to EVERYONE.
The classic of all classics! This film is as visually stunning now as when it was first released in the thirties. The story is heartwarming and it has some truly charming songs in it. The dwarfs are good and it does have the most wonderful Disney ending.
This is really an extraordinary piece of work. You simply cannot believe the beauty of the shots, the brightness of colours, and the experimental abstract qualities of some of the most famous sequences. A real treat, and as new today as it always has been. Did you know that it would have taken 250 years for one single man to make Snow White? Michelangelo only needed 10 for the Sistine Chapel! See it again and again, you will always be astonished. And if you really want to be amazed, try and freeze frame it, and you will enjoy the beauty of every single drawing, particularly in the sequences of Snow White in the woods, and of the queen becoming a witch. I can guarantee you will not be disappointed.
Snow White and the seven Dwarfs is Walt Disney´s masterpiece and the greatest movie ever made! Not like the money-grabbing **** the Disney company brainwashes our children with these days. Walt Disney must be spinning in his grave/deepfreezer.
What was the first X-rated animated film? Most people who have any kind of
clue at all would say `Fritz the Cat', but they'd be wrong. It's `Snow
White'! - which received the equivalent of an X-rating in South Africa.
(Parts of it ARE grisly, even if the Grimm brothers' story was more grisly
still: in the story, the Queen asked for Snow White's lungs and liver - with
the intention of eating them.) This should dispel anyone's idea that the
film is all cloying sentimentality.
Here's another one: `Gone with the Wind' was the biggest box office hit of the 1930s, but what was the second biggest? Oh, well, I guess everyone here knows the answer to that one. It must be said that the second-biggest hit deserved its success far more than the first.
`Snow White' can boast other things, too. But let's not get carried away and say that in addition it's the BEST film of the 1930s, or the best animated film of all time, or Disney's supreme masterpiece, or something silly of that kind. It clearly isn't any of these things. Let's distinguish between `good considering that it's a first effort' and good simpliciter, and see how `Snow White' rates.
Many things are good simpliciter. Although the visual spectacle is dwarfed by that of `Pinocchio' and `Fantasia' - to name but two - it's still visual spectacle, and it still works. Some of the special effects can still startle us. (I have absolutely no idea how they managed to get that shot of Snow White's reflection in well, for instance.) The art direction vividly creates a world of cosy dwellings surrounded by choking forest. The use of colour is as marvellous and subtle as anything the studio produced after 1942 (if not quite up to the standards set by `Fantasia' or `Bambi'). In fact, every single feature after `101 Dalmations' (1961) fails to measure up to `Snow White' so far as colour is concerned. A muted, watercolour effect (achieved WITHOUT actual watercolours) is enlivened by the rare splash of brilliance on the Queen's cape or on the poisoned apple, but there's more to it than that. Note how we're not shown a wide palette of colours until the dwarfs appear, when it seems that every hue under the sun makes its way onto the screen. The dwarfs are the only rounded characters, representing, between them, all aspects of humanity. (Brilliantly animated, by the way.) It's surprising, or perhaps it isn't, that in an age in which computers allow art directors to fiddle around with the colour balance as much as they like, no-one seems to be able to use colour nearly so effectively.
But there are also signs that the art wasn't yet ripe. The most obvious one is the limited range: `Snow White' never does anything more than a particularly good pantomime might do (which is more than you might think), and while this isn't even a flaw, it does mean that the film simply can't compare with the broader masterpieces Disney produced immediately afterwards (`Pinocchio', `Fantasia', `Dumbo', `Bambi'). In 1937, Disney (and Hand and everyone else at the studio) still didn't know what to do to make a well-proportioned cartoon over an hour in length. After the dwarfs have been around for a while the film starts to lose its way. It even has to resort to title-card narration, indicating that while the first part of the story had been thought through properly, the rest hadn't been. And there are minor technical difficulties throughout, with awkward animation of Snow White here, a clumsy use of the multiplane camera there.
Don't get me wrong. It's a lovely film, among the better ones the studio has produced. We do it no service when we exaggerate its virtues.
I'm usually generous when it comes to reviewing, I like to pick out the
best parts in movies and say little about negative parts, but this,
this had to be a negative review and if you're a Snow White Fan and you
think it's the best Disney movie, keep scrolling. You're not going to
The thing that bothers me is that there's absolutely no substance to the story or the characters. I blame the time setting, 1937. Things weren't as advanced, animation is impressive but that's it. Walt Disney didn't really give personality to the characters, develop the story line. He just thought: damsel in distress, wicked and evil stepmother and handsome prince to rescue the damsel. End of story. Also, there was a poor shot at trying to make the screen time with the dwarfs funny, they were as annoying as Snow White. All seven were named after emotions or a symptom. Very clever *rolls eyes*
Now, Snow White on the other hand is utterly and completely sugary sweet. Her voice makes me want to hit her, the way she flounces about the place singing at everything. How innocent she plays out to be.. ugh. Compare that dullness to the likes of other Disney Princess's like Belle, Ariel, Pocahontas, Rapunzel etc. Then she's totally bland.
In a way, I have to give them the benefit of the doubt.. they did try. Apparently if Disney's Cinderella wasn't successful, then they would've had to shut down, hence, my point. Snow White was that bad and just laughable that they were nearly out of business.
Now the fans. They're obviously ass kissing. How could you like Snow White in any way? My theory is, is that they're rooting for the movie because it's Disney's first full feature length film. No offence to Walt Disney but after he died, the story lines improved and gained success and attention. The characters were more memorable, fun and the movies were a huge hit. Disney started everything, so I should be grateful because I am a huge fan but one thing's for sure is that Disney wouldn't have had a chance if it wasn't for Cinderella. In my opinion, still a very cheap and low chance at a film. Again, back to the time frame. What was it? 1930, 1940, 1950, 1960? Then Walt Disney died and movies improved? Quite suspicious to be honest.
In conclusion, I hated this movie and that evil old woman who was the wicked stepmother was terrifying! How could kids sit and like this movie without covering their eyes and crying? Just how? I would avoid this movie at any cost-- unless you're just curious at Disney's attempt at this abomination,
So I am a really good fan of OLD Disney movies and I really like to sit
down and just watch them. So a couple of months ago, I guess, I was
watching Snow White and I noticed that when the Seven Dwarfs go to wash
their hands, before "gooseberry pie", Doc never once gets his hands
wet, or his face wet. He just stands there and tells the other six
Dwarfs what to do. I thought it was interesting and amusing that when
Disney made Snow White they left that in there, as a small detail,
unnoticeable to someone not paying good attention. I'm going to watch
it again and look for some other things like this!
|Page 9 of 19:||               |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||Newsgroup reviews||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Official site||Plot keywords|
|Main details||Your user reviews||Your vote history|