MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 112,031 this week

Night Club Scandal (1937)

6.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.7/10 from 24 users  
Reviews: 3 user | 1 critic

When Dr. Ernest Tindal's wife is murdered, evidence mounts to convict her lover, Frank Marian. But Frank knows he didn't do it.....

Director:

Writers:

(play), (screenplay)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 2508 titles
created 08 Jan 2012
 
a list of 3038 titles
created 13 Apr 2012
 
a list of 4673 titles
created 12 Oct 2012
 

Related Items

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Night Club Scandal (1937)

Night Club Scandal (1937) on IMDb 6.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Night Club Scandal.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Lynne Overman ...
Russell Kirk - Reporter
Louise Campbell ...
Vera Marsh
...
Det. Capt. McKinley
Harvey Stephens ...
Frank Marsh
J. Carrol Naish ...
...
Julia Reed
Elizabeth Patterson ...
Mrs. Elvira Ward
Cecil Cunningham ...
Mrs. Alvin
Barlowe Borland ...
Dr. Sully
John Sheehan ...
Duffy
George Guhl ...
Broun
Frank O'Connor ...
Alcott
Leonard Willey ...
Dr. Goodman
George Offerman Jr. ...
Messenger Boy
Edit

Storyline

Dr. Ernest Tindal kills his wife and plants clues pointing to her lover, Frank Marsh. Vera, Frank's sister, enlists the aid or reporter Russell Kirk in proving the innocence of her brother. Detective McKinley thinks that gangster Jack Reed is involved and shoots Reed when he attempts to escape. Reed gets away but goes to Dr. Tindal for treatment of his wound and Tindal kills him on the operating table. Kirk has uncovered some new evidence and confronts Tindal with it. Written by Les Adams <longhorn1939@suddenlink.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Thriller

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

11 November 1937 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

O Mistério do Cabaré  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Mirrophonic Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

One of over 700 Paramount Productions, filmed between 1929 and 1949, which were sold to MCA/Universal in 1958 for television distribution, and have been owned and controlled by Universal ever since. See more »

Connections

Version of Guilty as Hell (1932) See more »

Soundtracks

No More Tears
Sung by Evelyn Brent
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A remake of the superior 1932 film "Guilty as Hell"
7 August 2010 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

The original film - 1932's "Guilty as Hell" is a great little movie, mainly because of the chemistry between the two leads, Victor McLaglen and Edmund Lowe. Here the leads have all been replaced by stars who were slipping in their box office demand by the mid 1930's or were B players to begin with, although I think the performances are good here by all save one - Lynne Overman, who plays the role of the reporter that was Edmund Lowe's part in the 1932 film. He's very annoying in the first half, but he improves to the point that he's endurable by the second half. Also, it's never really explained in this remake why reporter Kirk thinks he can waltz into police detective McKinley's office anytime he feels like it.

In case you've never seen the original, this film is about the resolution of a murder case in which the young wife of a doctor is found strangled in her home. At the beginning of the film you see that her husband, Dr. Tindal (John Barrymore) is actually the guilty party, and you get to see him set up the murder scene so that the murder is pinned on her boyfriend. Thus the murder is just Tindal's way of getting even with both his unfaithful wife and the man she really loves. Things seem to be going Dr. Tindal's way until reporter Russell Kirk falls for the accused man's sister and does some further digging.

This film is almost a frame by frame remake of the original, and I knew that before I watched it. The main reason to view it is to see John Barrymore doing a good job in a lead role after Hollywood had largely written him off when alcoholism began to interfere with his ability to remember lines and even project emotion on screen to some degree. The few places where there are differences between this film and "Guilty as Hell" has to do with the production code. In 1932, you actually see the doctor strangle his wife, here you do not. In 1932, reporter Russell Kirk is spouting off all kinds of suggestive remarks, here he's just annoying. Finally, the way the doctor fools people into believing that his wife is alive when he leaves the apartment the night he kills her, thus giving himself an alibi, has been changed due to the fact that technology has rendered the original method obsolete.

I'd recommend this film just to see John Barrymore, but if you want to see this same story done right in all of its precode glory, watch 1932's "Guilty as Hell".


3 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Night Club Scandal (1937) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?