Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.






Cast overview:
Johan (John) Sutter
Pete Perkin
Countess Elizabeth Bartoffski
Anna Sutter
Capt. Kettleson
James Marshall
Gen. Juan Bautista Alvarado
John Sutter Jr.
Ann Eliza Sutter
Gen. Alexander Rotscheff
General Fremont
Juan Bautista Alvarado Jr.
Mitchell Lewis ...


Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis







Release Date:

1 March 1936 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

A Conquista do Ouro  »

Box Office


$2,000,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


This was reportedly Universal's biggest box office disaster of the era. It cost $2,000,000 in 1936 when the typical Universal production cost about $100,000. See more »


Edited into Mutiny on the Blackhawk (1939) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A historical's also pretty dull and episodic and nearly destroyed the studio!
11 January 2017 | by (Bradenton, Florida) – See all my reviews

"Sutter's Gold" is a notorious film as it cost a fortune to make and lost nearly every penny of the investment. Considering that Universal Studios was teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, the timing couldn't have been worse! So why did it cost so much and why was it such a poor film? As for the cost, I frankly don't know how it cost $2,000,000 to make (a HUGE sum for the time), as the actors were mostly second or third-tier and the director a relative unknown. The money sure didn't go for salaries! Perhaps it was the scope of the film--as it was supposedly set all over the world. But most, if not all of these locations appeared to have been filmed on the Universal back lot! I just don't understand where all the money went!

As to why it's such a poor film, that's pretty easy to determine. The script was syrupy, overly sentimental and boring. That it was boring is because so much of the film comes off as episodic and disconnected. But that it was dull is a surprise because Sutter's life was pretty interesting when I read up on the man. I can only assume that this is because the script rarely bears much semblance to his actual life...and the prologue actually admits that it's mostly fiction! Regardless, it's not a terrible film but one that seems to go on and on and on....and the main character is, for the most part, a lying blowhard.

0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: