| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Index | 68 reviews in total |
79 out of 85 people found the following review useful:
Show me an actor of Walter Huston's caliber working today., 14 November 2004
![]()
Author:
ecjones1951 from United States
"Dodsworth" has been on my short list of must-see films for decades,
and I finally had my chance to see it last night. I'm still in awe.
(Others have made cogent observations about the acting of the other
principals in the cast, so I will confine my comments specifically to
Walter Huston.) There are people who will complain that this film is
"slow," that it is "boring," that "nothing ever happens in it." Too bad
for them, because this is a master class in acting of the highest
order.
It is difficult to pull off a film like "Dodsworth" without betraying
its stage origins, but this one feels and moves like a movie, not a
play. (Of course, its genesis is a lengthy Sinclair Lewis novel, but
the contributions of the gifted Sidney Howard -- who adapted the novel
for the stage and the screen -- cannot be overlooked.) Walter Huston,
who also played Sam Dodsworth in the Broadway play, was that rarest of
actors, equally adept at playing to the back row of the balcony and
giving a quiet wink to another 20-foot-tall face on a movie screen.
Anyone can buff up and wield a sword or tumble from a parking garage
after being shot eleven times. But it takes a truly gifted screen actor
to make the mundane seem utterly real; to shade a line just so, to
achieve perfect pitch with every gesture, every glance. Huston was just
such an actor, who, if he is remembered at all today it as John
Huston's father, or the "old guy" in "The Treasure of the Sierra
Madre." Too bad again, because Huston was one of the finest actors in
the history of American movies. He was not a movie star, but he totally
embodied every role he ever played, and never gave a poor performance.
The narrative of "Dodsworth" is mature, intelligently handled material.
It is impeccably directed by William Wyler. No one has ever remade it,
though remakes have been considered. There are directors working today
who could handle "Dodsworth," but it really merits more sophisticated
treatment than the extensive nudity and profusion of strong language
that would inevitably be written into a new script. It's much better
left alone, and it deserves a far larger audience than it has ever had
in the 68 years since its release.
54 out of 59 people found the following review useful:
A Minor Classic, 17 November 2005
![]()
Author:
brocksilvey from United States
"Dodsworth" is a disarmingly honest and frank depiction of a failed
marriage, based on the Sinclair Lewis novel. Its naturalistic acting
and its refusal to make its characters anything less than full-bodied
human beings make it feel way ahead of its time. It's never mentioned
along with other classic films of the period--probably because it
doesn't have an epic scope--but it should be.
Walter Huston gives an absolutely flawless performance in the title
role. His type is so recognizable, even today: the successful American
business man who values the simplest and most traditional of American
values, and who comes across as provincial and crass to the rest of the
world. Ruth Chatterton meets Huston's performance every step of the way
as Dodsworth's wife, glad of the material comfort her husband can
provide, but embarrassed by him and aware that he will prevent her from
joining the world of high culture to which she wants to belong. It is
to the movie's distinct credit that neither of these characters is
either hero or villain. Dodsworth is crass and unsophisticated; yet at
the same time he's honest and never misleads his wife into thinking
he's something that he's not. Mrs. Dodsworth has a right to be bored by
the kind of life Dodsworth is content with, but she might have thought
of that before so readily accepting his financial success.
I don't really know for sure, but I have a feeling this movie might
have made people very uncomfortable in 1936. I doubt married couples
were encouraged to turn too critical an eye on their own marriages back
then, and I suspect that more people than not decided to stick it out
in unhappy marriages rather than violate a sense of social propriety.
Before the days when people dated for a few years before getting
married, many people probably learned about the kind of person they
were marrying only after the wedding day. "Dodsworth" beautifully
captures the sad, melancholy feeling of waking up one morning and
realizing you're not married to the person you thought you were.
Grade: A
46 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
Three Great Performances, 27 November 2005
![]()
Author:
drednm
Dodsworth is one of the best dramas of the 1930s. Walter Huston stars
as Dodsworth, a middle-aged auto tycoon who looks forward to
retirement. His wife--Ruth Chatterton--is not quite ready for the
rocking chair. They embark on a grad tour of Europe. From the start
Chatterton falls for the cosmopolitan airs of Europe and the attentions
of the debonair men. More and more she leaves Dodsaworth alone as she
flits among the cafe society. By accident he runs into a lonely
American widow (Mary Astor) living in Italy. As the husband and wife
drift farther apart, he moves closer to Astor. Yes it sounds like soap
opera, but the acting is so good and the characters so real you forget
the plot mechanics.
Huston has one of his very best film roles as the floundering Dodsworth
who needs an anchor. Chatterton is excellent as the foolish wife (this
was her last film), and Astor is a wonder as the American widow. The
three stars turn in towering performances.
The rest of the cast includes Maria Ouspenskaya and the old countess,
Spring Byington and Harlan Briggs as the best friends, John Payne as
the son in law, David Niven as a gigolo, Gregory Gaye as the suitor,
Paul Lukas as Arnold, and Odette Myrtil as the social leach.
There was talk in the mid-90s that Harrison Ford would star in a new
version of Dodsworth but he never followed through because he wanted to
continue his "action" roles. Too bad. Ford has certain qualities that
would have made him (or Warren Beatty) ideal for the part. But Ford and
Beatty are too old now. Oddly only Huston and Ouspenskaya earned Oscar
nominations. Hard to see how Chatterton and Astor got bypassed.
This is a great American film.
52 out of 67 people found the following review useful:
National Tycoon's European Vacation, 5 March 2004
Author:
lugonian from Kissimmee, Florida
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
DODSWORTH (United Artists, 1936), directed by William Wyler, stars
Walter Huston (1884-1950) in what is rightfully acclaimed to be his
best screen performance in a motion picture career that spanned from
1929 until his death in 1950. Recreating the role he originated on
Broadway in 1934, and based on the novel by Sinclair Lewis, this Samuel
Goldwyn production is a perfectly transferred masterpiece.
The story revolves around Samuel Dodsworth (Walter Huston), a
millionaire industrialist of Zenith, Ohio, president and founder of
Dodsworth Motor Company, who, after twenty years of building up his
automobile establishment, sells it over to Union Motors, and leaves the
factory with fond memories of hard work behind him. Now retired, he
finds that he must succumb to his wife Fran (Ruth Chatterton), whose
main goal is to enjoy life starting with an extensive six month
European vacation from London to Paris. While on their continental tour
on the Queen Mary, Sam excites himself by seeing the world for the
first time while his wife, yearning for a more sophisticated existence,
tries to recapture her youth by winning admiration with younger or
sophisticated men: Captain Clyde Lockert (David Niven), and Arnold
Iselin (Paul Lukas), a suave international banker, each becoming
short-lived affairs. As Fran entertains herself without Sam, Sam finds
good company with Edith Cortright (Mary Astor) a American divorcée
traveling alone. What was originally intended to be a sort of second
honeymoon for this middle-aged couple, Sam and Fran find that, after
years of marriage, they have become strangers, drifting apart. Fran
becomes even more bitter when she learns that her now grown married
daughter (Kathryn Marlowe) is expecting a child, making Fran to realize
that she is to become a grandmother. Still deeply in love with Fran,
Sam is unwilling to profess to himself that she is a selfish woman
trying to hold on to her youth but reluctantly consents to Fran's
request to get a divorce. Traveling around the world alone, Sam
reacquaints himself with Edith Cortright. As for Fran, she finds love
with the impoverished Kurt Von Obersdorf (Gregory Gaye), with whom she
plans to marry. After meeting Kurt's aristocratic but strong-willed
mother (Maria Ouspenskaya), who is totally against this marriage, Fran
becomes mortified when she's asked, "Have you ever thought what it
would be like to be the old wife of a young husband?" As for Sam, his
life has become a renewed experience with Edith at her Italian villa
until Fran informs him she wants to come back into his life again.
Walter Huston, more an actor than star, makes a perfect Dodsworth. He
even delivers the film's most memorable line, "Love has to stop
someplace short of suicide." Ruth Chatterton, a capable actress whose
career by then was then on the wane, gives one of her best on-screen
performances, in fact, her last great performance ever recorded on
film. Her classic moment is telling her husband, Sam, "You're rushing
at old age. I'm not ready for that yet!" Sadly, many of her previous
screen efforts are overlooked and forgotten today. Years before cable
television dominated the airwaves, DODSWORTH appeared to be the only
Ruth Chatterton movie in circulation on commercial or late night
television. While Fay Bainter, who co-starred opposite Huston in the
stage version of DODSWORTH, would have been equally excellent in the
role of Fran, Chatterton's performance nearly dominates without taking
away from Huston's performance. At times she could become annoying, but
that's the essence to her character.
Nominated for eight Academy Awards, Huston did get recognized for his
performance as Best Actor as did the movie for Best Picture. Curiously,
Ruth Chatterton performance was overlooked by the judges of the
academy. What's even more ironic is that Maria Ouspenskaya, making her
movie debut, in a performance that takes up no more than five minutes,
earned an award for Best Supporting Actress, the nomination that should
have been offered to Mary Astor, who not only has more screen time, but
is more essential to the story. Aside from that, Astor, who was playing
a woman some years older than her true age, is strikingly beautiful and
shares the film's now many classic scenes, including the one where she
looks eye to eye at Fran (who claims to be 35), and telling her,
"Don't." Her one word says it all. What also makes the movie succeed,
even after all these years, is the frankness and very adult-minded
theme dealing with realities of mid-life crisis. Next to Paramount's
MAKE WAY FOR TOMORROW (1937), DODSWORTH is the only known major motion
picture of that time to bring out the realities of old age openly and
honestly. The Alfred Newman underscoring which sets the mood and
dramatic appeal is also an added plus as well as part of the Samuel
Goldwyn trademark.
Supporting players include Spring Byington, Odette Myrtil, and John
Payne, billed as John Howard Payne, making his movie debut, as Harry,
Emily Dodsworth's husband.
DODSWORTH became one of many Samuel Goldwyn features to be distributed
to video cassette. Aside from its many revivals on commercial
television since the 1970s, DODSWORTH did enjoy frequent showings on
cable television's American Movie Classics in 1993, and more than a
decade later, premiered March 1, 2004, on Turner Classic Movies.
DODSWORTH, winner of one Academy Award, for which best art direction by
Richard Day, is the type of movie once seen, it's hard to forget, and
improves itself with repeated viewing. Producer Samuel Goldwyn
accomplished in transporting a stage play into a cinematic achievement.
Not once during its presentation did DODSWORTH have the appearance of a
filmed stage play. In spite that DODSWORTH in not becoming as better
known as it deserves to be, it still ranks one of the finest and most
adult stories ever to be produced in the 1930s. Huston, Chatterton and
Astor, all deliver excellent performances under William Wyler's superb
direction. (****)
37 out of 41 people found the following review useful:
They don't make such adult films anymore., 31 January 1999
![]()
Author:
walrus-5 from Porto Alegre, Brazil
If you're tired of the actual Hollywood teenager productions, you have a chance to see some maturity watching "Dodsworth". The relationship of the Dodsworths are amazingly realistic, and the wonderful performances by Walter Huston and Ruth Chatterton only improve the reality of the situation. He is amazing as a retired middle-aged industrialist and she is faultless as his futile, snob and frustrated wife. This film also got me some extra points because of Mary Astor, at the highest point of her beauty. It's masterly directed by William Wyler, and the cinematography is wonderful. One of the greatest films from the first decade of the sounded films.
35 out of 39 people found the following review useful:
One of the greatest films of the thirties., 4 May 1999
![]()
Author:
Joseph Harder from warren michigan
Some years ago, I read a short piece in TV Guide by the critic and screenwriter Jay Cocks, in which he listed ten 'great, underrated films'. One which I had never heard of before was Dodsworth.I trust Jays taste in films, so i decided to take a lot at it. I promptly saw it on Video and was enthralled.Once more, William Wyler reveals why he has to be ranked among the great Hollywood directors. Dodsworth is that rarity, a film for adult people. In addition, it boasts a literate script, fine acting by an superb cast, and an very fine design. One of the favorite themes of the fiction of Henry James,. the conflict between American innocence and European sophistication, is here explored with a concision and an empathy James only occasionally managed. In addition, the film is a profoundly moving love story. One can only wonder why this exquisite movie was not even nominated for the AFI list of great American films.
28 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
Superb classic, 28 February 2002
![]()
Author:
wilm-1 from Houston, Texas
It's impossible to do justice to this work, which chronicles the complex breakdown of a long and successful marriage that cannot adjust to new challenges. Unlike many movies of the 1930s with high production values and a feel for old, glamorous Hollywood, the drama remains focused and disciplined. Aside from its subtle analysis of the end of a relationship, the movie does a superb job of contrasting the differences between the new, powerful go-getter culture of 20th-Century America and the more restrained, skeptical traditions of Old Europe. The movie in some ways represents a dialogue between these two cultures, which at time clash, most poignantly when an old Austrian baroness speaks frankly to the wife of an American industrialist. A great overlooked classic.
25 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
Possibly the Greatest Movie You've Never Heard of, 28 December 2005
![]()
Author:
bestactor from USA
Dodsworth is one of those Hollywood treasures that the insiders and historians worship but that the general public knows nothing about. There are more famous classic films from the 1930's but not one is any better than Dodsworth. Dodsworth belongs in the class of Lost Horizon, Mutiny on the Bounty, Gone With the Wind, etc. as one of the greatest films of the thirties. It also deserves to be recognized as an old movie that plays well today. This movie does not seem nearly as dated as so many other 70 year old movies. Much of the credit goes to the great novel by Sinclair Lewis, but many great books have been turned into inferior films. The screenplay, direction, acting, photography are all outstanding. The cast is simply extraordinary, one of the best ensembles ever assembled. Just look at the number of soon to be major stars in the supporting cast. Watch it!
25 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
Sweet Bird of Youth, 2 March 2004
Author:
harry-76 from Cleveland, Ohio
We're taught to "take kindly to the counsel of the years, gracefully
surrendering the things of youth." [Desiderata.] While most people allow
maturation to occur naturally and be at peace with their physical
evolvement, some do not.
Like Sinclair Lewis' heroine, people who doggedly resist change may end up
disappointed and bitter. Such resistance is the basis for this perceptive
adult drama on marital strife.
Ruth Chatterton is ideally cast, looking young while obviously no longer in
her early thirties. Her frivolous banter provides a dramatic clash with
Walter Hutson's aging hero.
While I find "Dodsworth" strangely depressing, it's a personal reaction, for
this is a very well conceived and produced film, securely directed by
William Wyler, and solidly scripted by Sidney Howard.
Mary Astor shows warmth as "the other woman" and Spring Byington offers an
emotional balance to the proceedings. With excellent cinematography and art
direction, "Dodsworth" remains a telling adult drama of the dangers which
may transpire by not surrendering youthful matters to advancing years.
19 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
Great Moviemaking, 7 February 2000
![]()
Author:
klaatu-10 from Charlotte, NC
It is hard to believe that this film is 64 years old. Walter Huston gives a performance of depth and understanding. He is matched by Mary Astor. The acting seems much more 'modern' than other films from that era, and the story will definitely hold comtemporary audiences. One of my choices for one of the greatest films of the 1930s.
| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary |
| Ratings | Awards | External reviews |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |