Strangers All (1935) Poster

(1935)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Surprisingly compelling
75groucho23 April 2006
I had low expectations for this one -- It looked like another garden variety 'suffering mother' weeper. Indeed it was but it was a rather well done 'suffering mother' weeper. May Robson, who has a history of hit or miss projects, acquits herself well as the beleaguered mother in question, Anna. She's got four grown kids: Murray, the eldest, is hardworking and responsible. He and his fiancée Frances run a clothing store to support the family. Dick, the aspiring actor, is immature, selfish, and petulant. The third son Lewis is a socialist crank. And the daughter Lily was seeing a local lawyer, but is away at school and not responding to her boyfriend's letters.

This movie rises on the strength of good emotional performances from Robson as the eternally sacrificing mother and William Bakewell's turn as the frankly loathsome heel of a son, Dick. Robson can go from pathetic to raging in the blink of an eye, always authentic as the mother who loves and maybe loves too much. Bakewell's sniveling manipulator does a great job of making the audience hate him.

I won't spoil the story except to say that all three sons have lives that need attention from Anna and lead into conflict with one another. The writing that leaves the path to the outcome in doubt and taut pacing makes this one engaging. Final word: Dated, and with low production values, but worth seeking out.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watch for May Robson's performance
Paularoc8 May 2012
A widow, May Robson, has four adult children – three sons and a daughter. The daughter is away at college but the three sons still live at home. Two of the sons are lazy deadbeats – one a pseudo-Socialist and the other a wannabe actor with an unwarranted and bloated view of his own talent. Both are whiners and insufferable (but of course their mother still loves them). Preston Foster plays the only one in the household who has a job; he owns (but is in danger of losing) a small men's clothing store. He is in a chronic state of resentment at his brothers' sponging off him and has repeatedly postponed marrying his girlfriend because of the expense of supporting the rest of the family. The mother's job is to keep the bickering in the family to a minimum and to emotionally support all her children. She has a bit of money set aside and this becomes a new issue for the sons to fight about. The daughter returns home with her new husband (evidently she quit college) – both of these characters seem happy and well adjusted which is refreshing. If there were a contest on "Most obnoxious screen character ever," Bakewell's wannabe actor would be a top contender. The reason to watch this movie is to see May Robson's performance – she is good.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Revealing the reasons that families sometimes hate each other.
mark.waltz5 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Three sons, one daughter. One widowed mother who loves them all unconditionally, has tried to keep the peace, but gets frustrated over the animosity between the boys. For good reason, at least one of them is despised by his older brother, and the youngest son is on the verge of blowing things up like the younger brother in "Ragtime". He's a social justice warrior without the knowledge of any justifiable reason to be fighting for what he's fighting for, but he's hanging out nightly at Union Square with a bunch of other rebels without a cause, and ultimately that will get him into huge legal trouble. As for the daughter, she's M.I.A., off at college, supposedly engaged to a promising attorney, but when she shows up out of the blue, it's obvious that she's moved on with different plans, having married another younger attorney, and thus as messed up as at least two of her siblings.

The mother is May Robson, who became a lady for a day thanks to Frank Capra's 1933 classic that got her an Oscar nomination for Best Actress. Like Marie Dressler and a few select others, she was one of a handful of senior citizens who played leads while most of them played character parts, and as usual, Robson is very commanding. She's annoyed by oldest son Preston Foster's insistence that the two other brothers are losers (even though he's right), and middle son William Bakewell is an untrained actor who thinks he's John Barrymore. Bakewell even tries to mimic Barrymore as Richard III and does a fine job, even if the character he's playing makes you want to throttle him. Foster is stressed trying to keep his growing men's clothing shop financially sound, with fiancee Suzanne Kaaren working pretty much day and night to help him. Youngest brother James Rush is so self involved in his non-activism that he doesn't realize that he's being manipulated by some high powered trouble makers to do their dirty work for them, and ends up being arrested.

In the middle of all of this, Bakewell demands (and gets) $1000 from mom so he can go to Hollywood to try to break into the movies (having been fired from a movie he was doing in the Bronx), and sister Florine McKinney shows up to tell them that she's married another man (Phillip Trent) and thus dumping her hardworking New York based defense attorney (Leon Ames). Robson realizes that Foster needs the money to keep his shop afloat more than Bakewell needs a Hollywood break and asks for it back, but when Bakewell refuses, a family row ensues causing Robson to explode to the point where you expect her to clutch her chest. It's a powerful moment that's been building since the beginning, and Robson has you riveted. The trial sequence of Rush itself is rather unbelievable, with Bakewell breaking into "The Quality of Mercy" speech from "The Merchant of Venice" (big ham that he is), and Robson nearly gets arrested for contempt of court all because of her two son's ridiculous behaviors.

There are some still timely elements to this family drama that certainly will never be compared to MGM's "Andy Hardy" series that came along a few years later, or the brief Warner Brothers series of Fanny Hurst's "Four Daughters" where Robson played the spinster aunt. This is real crisis that many families can identify with in why siblings don't get along, and when Robson demands that Bakewell stick around until Rush's trial, you get the feeling that she doesn't care if she ever sees him again afterwards. Samuel S. Hinds gives a tender performance as a local longtime friend of the family's who is slyly courting Robson, with Foster's blessing. I've met many people like Rush over the years who feel they must get involved in some social cause yet don't understand their mission or what they are really fighting for. It's a believable element that might not be dealt with realistically in court, but hopefully makes the naive son a bit more aware of how to instill positive change. Robson is the true star here, making every moment she is on screen absolutely hers, and at the end, there's even a little slap in the face for the egotistical Bakewell whose character will probably be stuck in Hollywood epics in the background carrying spears.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
broad comedy with dramatic strokes
Howard_B_Eale30 August 2008
Though STRANGERS ALL is a very much a product of the stage, based on a play by Marie M. Bercovici, director Charles Vidor (no relation to King Vidor) does a good job of transcending its origins by keeping things moving at a brisk clip. The camera darts and circles around the constantly bickering Carter family, headed by matriarch May Robson (in a deceptively restrained and terrific performance) and blow-hard elder son Preston Foster.

It would be misleading to merely label this film a "weepie", as it is far more reliant on broad comedy: James Bush's over-the-top portrayal as radical Communist son, Lewis, prefigures Preston Sturges (and it's an offensive characterization to be sure, but undeniably funny); the central financial dilemma in the film is played for laughs; third son Dicky (William Bakewell, in one of the film's lesser performances) is an absolutely pathetic ham actor. In fact, if there's any consistency to the characterizations, its that every member of the family is basically a loser - even mom, for all her wise observations, is quite naive. When the film attempts a melodramatic climax and more or less shuns the comedy, it's not as effective, but somehow it all works well enough.

Look fast for an unbelievably young Ward Bond as, well, "Ward" - a beleaguered assistant director on a film-within-the-film movie set (one of the movie's better sequences).
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed