MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 24,967 this week

So Red the Rose (1935)

 -  Drama  -  20 December 1935 (USA)
7.0
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.0/10 from 84 users  
Reviews: 5 user | 2 critic

SO RED THE ROSE is King Vidor's quietly affecting Civil War romance, starring Margaret Sullavan as a Southern aristocrat, the mistress of a Southern plantation, whose sheltered life is torn... See full summary »

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 171 titles
created 17 Dec 2011
 
a list of 570 titles
created 15 Jun 2012
 
list image
a list of 9998 titles
created 4 months ago
 
a list of 72 titles
created 4 months ago
 
a list of 22 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: So Red the Rose (1935)

So Red the Rose (1935) on IMDb 7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of So Red the Rose.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
...
Valette Bedford
...
Malcolm Bedford
...
Duncan Bedford
Janet Beecher ...
Sally Bedford
Elizabeth Patterson ...
Mary Cherry
...
Harry Ellerbe ...
Edward Bedford
...
Middleton Bedford
Charles Starrett ...
Johnny Downs ...
Yankee boy
Daniel L. Haynes ...
William Veal
...
Cato
James Burke ...
Major Rushton
Warner Richmond ...
Confederate Sergeant
Alfred Delcambre ...
Charles Tolliver
Edit

Storyline

SO RED THE ROSE is King Vidor's quietly affecting Civil War romance, starring Margaret Sullavan as a Southern aristocrat, the mistress of a Southern plantation, whose sheltered life is torn apart by the War between the States. During the war's darkest days she is sustained by her love for a distant cousin, a Confederate officer, played by Randolph Scott. Written by Leonel urbina

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

All the epic beauty, the gallantry of the men and women who fought "The Lost Cause" in this great, glowing picture of the Old South. See more »

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

Approved
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

20 December 1935 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

So Red the Rose  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

One of over 700 Paramount Productions, filmed between 1929 and 1949, which were sold to MCA/Universal in 1958 for television distribution, and have been owned and controlled by Universal ever since. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Have You Got Any Castles? (1938) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Free To Do What?
11 November 2010 | by (Buffalo, New York) – See all my reviews

Based on a novel by southern author Starke Young, So Red The Rose preceded that other southern perspective Civil War novel Gone With The Wind into both print and cinema. There are many reasons why this film never became the classic that Gone With The Wind became, but at least it didn't glorify the Ku Klux Klan like Birth Of A Nation.

The reason why Gone With The Wind enthralled so many people is that it both sustained interest for an almost four hour running time and created an incredible amount of interesting supporting characters, the movie and novel is definitely not just about the four leads. So Red The Rose never was able to do that and it's the difference between a reasonably good film and a screen classic.

The action centers around the Bedford family of Mississippi and it opens just before the firing on Fort Sumter. Walter Connolly is the head of the Bedford clan and wife Janet Beecher, daughter Margaret Sullavan, sons Harry Ellerbe and Dickie Moore. Ellerbe has a guest in Texas boy Robert Cummings. And there's distant cousin Randolph Scott, distant enough for Margaret Sullavan to get interested in. Remember the President and First Lady at the time also had the same last name and were fifth cousins before they married.

Scott's part is a combination of elements of both Rhett Butler and Ashley Wilkes. Like Butler he's reluctant to get involved in the war, but not for Butler's practical reasons. He has friends and relatives in the north and does not relish the idea of a Civil War like Wilkes. But later after the war hits home he rallies to the Confederacy.

The treatment of the slavery issue is what makes most people dislike So Red The Rose and Margaret Sullavan's scene where she talks the slaves into not rebelling and leaving the old plantation. Listen carefully to what she does say if you watch the film. She concedes absolutely that slavery is at an end, but when Sullavan argues and quite persuasively, you're free as soon as the Union Army arrives to enforce the Emancipation Proclamation, but free to do what? It's not like the promised land immediately arrives, freedom means that you are free to work for yourself or for wages. She raises issues that the USA was unable to grapple with during Reconstruction for a whole lot of reasons. In fact the plight of the slaves is dealt with more in So Red The Rose than in Gone With The Wind and better dealt with than in Birth Of A Nation.

In a recent book on Margaret Sullavan author Lawrence Quirk said that Sullavan at one time or another tried to get things going with Randolph Scott, Bob Cummings, Charles Starrett and Johnny Downs who were all in the cast. Rumors were flying so about what was happening off the set that Sullavan's then husband William Wyler asked his colleague King Vidor to step in to which Vidor politely and firmly decided he was not getting involved in any cast member's personal business. Sullavan could be difficult to work with.

She also was not crazy about Randolph Scott either as actor or the fact he declined her offers and maybe one influenced the other. Now Scott was not as good here as the Randy Scott we knew later on in his classic westerns, but as a Virginia born southerner he fit his role fine. Margaret decried his lack of historical knowledge, but from what I've heard about Randolph Scott his favorite reading was the financial page in the newspaper. He invested shrewdly and became one of the wealthiest actors in Hollywood.

So Red The Rose tanked at the box office leading cynical Paramount executives to call it So Red The Ink. The movie-going public just wasn't ready for a Civil War epic. But seen today it isn't as bad as its reputation would have it.


4 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss So Red the Rose (1935) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?