MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 53,434 this week

Double Exposure (1935)

5.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.6/10 from 84 users  
Reviews: 3 user

Director:

Writers:

(story), (story)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 84 titles created 02 May 2012
 
a list of 70 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 1483 titles created 2 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Double Exposure (1935)

Double Exposure (1935) on IMDb 5.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Double Exposure.
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Photographer / Robert
Jules Epailly ...
Ben Ali Oop
John Berkes ...
Photographer's Assistant (as Johnny Berkes)
Loretta Sayers ...
Wife of Ben Ali Oop
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Comedy | Short

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

23 November 1935 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Big V Comedies (1935-1936 season) (#5): Double Exposure  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(RCA Sound System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Included in Warner Home Video's 2006 6-disc DVD release "The Busby Berkeley Collection". See more »

Soundtracks

"Out for No Good"
(1933) (uncredited)
Music by Harry Warren
Played when "Robert" enters the hotel room
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Poor, poor Mr Hope...
2 July 2006 | by (www.martsander.com) – See all my reviews

Please don't watch this film. It's like a concentrate of what was bad in 1930s comedy. This absolutely ridiculous shorty can of course generate some interest as it is one of the very first pictures Bob Hope was in, but otherwise - and even to the absolute Hope fans - it's much better left undisturbed. Really makes you a bit uncomfortable and ashamed and you feel for Mr Hope - the road to stardom was obviously paved with bitter pills like this one that one had to swallow to get a real part in a real film. And to think this was done at the time, when there were comedies by Lubitch and Capra, elegant and witty films that were shot well. This mishmash is barely out of cheap burlesque, and not worth a look for any realistic reason. I think it took the "scriptwriters" less time to concoct this turkey than it takes us to watch it.


6 of 17 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Double Exposure (1935) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?