MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 1,268 this week

Cardinal Richelieu (1935)

6.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.4/10 from 73 users  
Reviews: 3 user | 1 critic

Director:

Writers:

(play), (adaptation), 3 more credits »
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 25 titles created 08 May 2012
 
a list of 22 titles created 01 Apr 2012
 
a list of 158 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 158 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 727 titles created 1 month ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Cardinal Richelieu (1935)

Cardinal Richelieu (1935) on IMDb 6.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Cardinal Richelieu.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
George Arliss ...
...
Lenore
...
...
Andre de Pons
...
Baradas
Francis Lister ...
Gaston
Halliwell Hobbes ...
Father Joseph
Violet Kemble Cooper ...
Queen Marie
Katharine Alexander ...
Robert Harrigan ...
Fontailles
Joseph R. Tozer ...
De Bussy (as Joseph Tozer)
Lumsden Hare ...
Russell Hicks ...
Le Moyne
Keith Hitchcock ...
Duke D'Epernon (as Keith Kenneth)
Murray Kinnell ...
Duke of Lorraine
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

To thwart a king's passion, he gambled the fate of a nation!

Genres:

Drama | History | Romance

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

28 April 1935 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Cardeal Richelieu  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (copyright length) | (FMC Library Print)

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The play first opened in London in 1839; then on Broadway in New York City, New York, USA on 4 September 1839 with Edwin Forrest as the title character. There were 12 Broadway revivals, the last in 1929. See more »

Connections

Version of Richelieu; or: The Conspiracy (1910) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

What we sometimes overlook in movies
8 April 2004 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

There is no denying that George Arliss's position as a leading star of movies has declined precipitously in the last half century. That he appeared in historical films where he was involved with great events, and bringing fictional lovers together, is used as a joke to dismiss him. Only when studying his actual performances does one realize that his restrained acting was a tremendous advance over the thumping scenary tearing of the silent period. If you doubt this, look at his performance in THE IRON DUKE. Although too short to play Wellington, he does the best with the role. In the film he has to confront the French royal court after the judicial murder of Marshal Ney (1815). The actor playing Louis XVIII is overacting incredibly, and Arliss knows it. Look at the fierce disapproval in his face in that scene.

Here, he is playing Armand Du Plessis, Cardinal Richelieu, the real ruler of France from 1626 to 1642 (the titular ruler was King Louis XIII - here Edward Arnold, splendid but wasted in a small role). Richelieu took a France, long weakened by religious wars (although it had begun a good recovery under King Henri IV and his minister Sully), and made it the supreme power in Western Europe, at the expense of Charles I of England, the Germans in the Thirty Years War (he paid off the King of Sweden to prolong the war), and Spain. Richelieu is usually considered a villain in movies (like THE THREE MUSKETEERS) but he was the creator of modern France. Arliss does very well in the role, bringing the patriotism and brilliance of the cardinal out - and he also happens (for a change) to look like Richelieu. But what makes this performance most interesting is that the film captures a 19th Century theatrical workhorse - Edward Bulwer-Lytton's play RICHELIEU. It was one of the most popular "modern" plays in English and American theatre in the 19th Century, and had been performed by Edwin Booth among others. The key scene for whoever played the Cardinal was "the Curse of Rome" Scene, where Richelieu warns of the wrath of the Papacy if anything happens to him. Arliss delivers this in the film - the sole example of this 19th Century acting moment in film.


23 of 24 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Cardinal Richelieu (1935) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?