Six of a Kind (1934)When a respectable middle-class couple take a cross-country trip by auto, they share expenses with a decidedly oddball couple, none of whom know the car carries embezzled funds. Director:Leo McCarey |
|
| 0Share... |
Six of a Kind (1934)When a respectable middle-class couple take a cross-country trip by auto, they share expenses with a decidedly oddball couple, none of whom know the car carries embezzled funds. Director:Leo McCarey |
|
| 0Share... |
| Complete credited cast: | |||
| Charles Ruggles | ... |
J. Pinkham Whinney
(as Charlie Ruggles)
|
|
|
|
Mary Boland | ... |
Flora Whinney
|
| W.C. Fields | ... |
Sheriff John Hoxley
|
|
| George Burns | ... |
George Edward
|
|
| Gracie Allen | ... |
Gracie Devore
|
|
|
|
Alison Skipworth | ... |
Mrs. K. Rumford
|
|
|
Bradley Page | ... |
Ferguson
|
|
|
Grace Bradley | ... |
Goldie
|
|
|
William J. Kelly | ... |
Gillette
|
|
|
Phil Tead | ... |
Clerk in Newspaper Office
|
The Whinneys share expenses for their trip to Hollywood with George and Gracie and thier great Dane. A clerk in Whinney's bank has put fifty thousand dollars in a suitcase, hoping to rob Whinney on the road, but instead Whinney takes another road and is himself arrested in Nevada. Written by Ed Stephan <stephan@cc.wwu.edu>
The idea in this is to take three comedy teams and combine them in one movie. The gimmick is that these represent three radically different types of humor. What happens usually is people find some things funny and ignore the others. Scan through these IMDb comments and you will see grace fall on different players in this.
The Fields poolplaying routine is priceless. I've seen it before but cannot recall where. But its inserted into this project without reference to anything else. Incidentally, it works as well as it does because there is a watcher in the frame, a deadpan face that is every bit as valuable and practiced as the actor.
That's indicative of how the experiment fails as a whole. If you know "Mad Mad Mad World," you'll know a successful example where comedic methods actually do bump up against each other and generate something resonant, rich, higher.
In this case however, the comedic models take turns. Isn't as effective.
Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.