Guilty Parents (1934) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
At poverty row studios with unknowns, it's called exploitation. At Warner Brothers with Joan Blondell, this would be top billed.
mark.waltz29 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
There's obvious exploitation and very subtle exploitation, and this is the later, your typical 30's depression pre-code drama that every major star did a few of until the Hays code went haywire. Jean Lacy may not be Blondell, Rogers, Dvorak, Twelvetrees or Muir (all actresses associated with pre-code troubled young women dramas), but she's sincere in this D grade drama (one with an excellent print available) about an innocent young woman who finds out the hard way the evils of scandalous society. Left alone when the father of the child she gives up is killed, she gets into the harsh world of the party girl complete with pimp, madam and supposed society hostess setting up "entertainment" for her clients in a swell mansion. She's blackmailed into prostitution which ultimately leads to her put on trial for murder!

The blame for her scandalous life is put on her overly religious mother who objects to her liberal school education meant to warn young people about the possible hardships of an unclean life. The mother spends the first five minutes of the film spouting her judgments and then disappears, not seen outside of being at the trial. She's a pretty minor character to be mentioned in the title, so I think another one should have been used. The film itself is one of the better exploitation films that I've ever seen, certainly no "Maniac" or "Reefer Madness". The budget seems a lot higher than it most likely was, and the script is pretty no nonsense with the acting and direction first rate. The sets and costumes are similar to what would have been done as a B at the major studios, and for that, I find this a top notch drama even though it's covered in as much sin as it is sequins and "sauce".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun Drama With a Touch of Exploitation
Michael_Elliott27 September 2017
Guilty Parents (1934)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Helen Mason (Jean Lacy) is on trial for murder but her Defense Attorney says that she isn't to blame even though she did kill the man. We then flashback to a time when she was a sweet little girl whose mother simply wouldn't educate her on the facts of life. This led to Helen getting involved with the wrong crowd and before long she was working as a prostitute and connected to a really bad man.

GUILTY PARENTS is another one of those "warning" exploitation pictures that were so popular back in the day. If you're looking for a work of art then this here really isn't that but if you're a fan of the genre then there's plenty to like here, although this falls well short of exploitation pictures like MANIAC or REEFER MADNESS. In fact, the subject is to educate parents about being open and honest with your kids but in terms of "naughty" stuff there's really not too much.

The biggest thing here is when Helen gets undressed and her image is seen via a silhouette. Outside of that this is pretty much a straight drama and I was surprised to see how well made it actually was. The story itself is pretty routine for the director but director Jack Townley managed to at least keep you entertained by everything that was going on. I also thought the performances were a little bit better than what we were used to seeing. Jean Lacy was at least cute and interesting enough to keep the viewer interested in the film and the character.

It is funny watching this movie and seeing how everyone was blamed except the guilty party. I mean, we talk today about parents being too soft on kids and the kids never having to face responsibility yet here we are with a 1934 film that pretty much says that's how things should be!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible...but very entertaining!
planktonrules31 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Guilty Parents" is a terrible exploitation film that leaves viewers laughing....and a bit confused. I think most of it is because the filmmakers are warning against things they really know nothing about...such as sex!

When the story begins, Helen is on trial for murder. Her lawyer is doing his summation and essentially blames Helen's problems on her prudish mother. What follows is a lengthy flashback that follows the gullible Helen from an innocent to a hard drinkin' woman to a floozy to a murderer! And, in the end, she receives the penalty she so richly deserves...DEATH!!!!!

"Guilty Parents" is terrible for many reasons. The worst is that it's filled with misinformation. I thought it bizarre and funny that Betty was molested by some man...and only two days later was dead!!! But from WHAT??? I think they were implying she got a back alley abortion...but after two day?!?!? Huh?!?! Lots of other confusing stuff in this one as well...along with some over the top acting and lousy direction. Overall, a confusing mess of a message that is more unintentionally hilarious than anything else.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Mysteries Of Sex Life
boblipton26 December 2020
Jean Lacy is a girl whose mother, Isabel La Mal, tries to keep her innocent. Knowing nothing about reality, she becomes a prey to teen-aged boys, one of whom has her drive the car when he robs a gas station. When we next see her, she has just given up her baby, while her mother makes desultory efforts to find out what has happened to her. Miss Lacy sinks further into depravity by living with a man, and worse, becoming a chorus line dancer.

Released on the verge of the Production Code taking full effect, this looks to be what would become an exploitation film, starting out with a lot of text about how ignorance promulgated by parents will lead inevitably to their children winding up murderers. For an exploitation film, it is pretty mild stuff. There's one shot of women in their undergarments, shown discreetly in silhouette.

Miss Lacy's career in the movies never amounted to much. In 1935, she moved to New York, where she danced in the chorus and sang at night clubs. At the end of the Second World War, she returned to Los Angeles, where she produced an starred in a radio show, and later a series of television shows, aimed at women and covering subjects of public interest. She died in 1996 at the age of 82.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice to hear Donald Keith's voice for once!!
SkippyDevereaux13 November 2000
This movie was not bad, could have been better, but when you have a low budget, you can only do so much. This film reminds me of "Reefer Madness", one of those preachy movies from the 1930's that mean well, but come off sounding a bit odd. But, as I said, it was nice to finally hear the late Donald Keith's voice, even if he was only in a few scenes!!
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed