MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 9,580 this week

A Study in Scarlet (1933)

Passed  -  Mystery | Thriller  -  14 May 1933 (USA)
5.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.6/10 from 415 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 5 critic

In London, a secret society led by lawyer Thaddeus Merrydew collects the assets of any of its deceased members and divides them among the remaining members. Society members start dropping ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(suggested by book "A Study in Scarlet"), (screenplay), 2 more credits »
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 2000 titles created 6 months ago
 
a list of 2939 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 148 titles created 7 months ago
 
a list of 1122 titles created 19 Jan 2012
 
a list of 9 titles created 5 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: A Study in Scarlet (1933)

A Study in Scarlet (1933) on IMDb 5.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of A Study in Scarlet.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
...
Mrs. Pyke
June Clyde ...
Eileen Forrester
Alan Dinehart ...
Merrydew (as Allan Dinehart)
John Warburton ...
John Stanford
...
Warburton Gamble ...
J.M. Kerrigan ...
Doris Lloyd ...
Mrs. Murphy
...
Will Swallow
Leila Bennett ...
Daffy Dolly
Wyndham Standing ...
Capt. Pyke
Halliwell Hobbes ...
Dearing
Edit

Storyline

In London, a secret society led by lawyer Thaddeus Merrydew collects the assets of any of its deceased members and divides them among the remaining members. Society members start dropping like flies. Sherlock Holmes is approached by member James Murphy's widow, who is miffed at being left penniless by her husband. When Captain Pyke is shot, Holmes keys in on his mysterious Chinese widow as well as the shady Merrydew. Other members keep dying--Malcom Dearing first, then Mr. Baker. There is also an attempt on the life of young Eileen Forrester, who became a reluctant society member upon the death of her father. Holmes' uncanny observations and insights are put to the test. Written by Gary Jackson <garyjack5@cogeco.ca>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Mystery | Thriller

Certificate:

Passed | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

14 May 1933 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

En studie i rött  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (TCM print)

Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Although the movie is credited as having been "suggested by the book by A. Conan Doyle," in fact, the plot is very different from that of the novel itself, which first introduced the character of Sherlock Holmes to the general public. Even the characters other than Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are not the original ones that appeared in the story. See more »

Goofs

Holmes and Watson's address is given as 221-A Baker Street, rather than the more familiar 221-B. See more »

Quotes

Sherlock Holmes: You came to see me professionally.
Inspector Lestrade: Well, er, unofficially.
Sherlock Holmes: I see. Heads you win, tails I lose.
See more »

Connections

Version of Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Scarlet (1968) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Good but not Great.
30 June 2009 | by (Ramsey, NJ) – See all my reviews

I was intrigued by the thought of Reginald Owen playing Sherlock Holmes because I disliked him as Ebeneezer Scrooge in MGM's " A Christmas Carol" (1938). In that role he was very subdued and did not bring the character to life, although I have been spoiled in this regard by Alastair Sim; would the same happen here?

Happily, he was much better as Holmes, but once again I have been spoiled by Basil Rathbone and Arthur Wontner. Nevertheless, he was more than adequate but was done in by the leaden pace of the proceedings in A Study In Scarlet - it could have been so much better with a little tension and suspense and a few less dead spots, as the the storyline was excellent. I especially enjoy mysteries in which the murderer is unknown until the last scene.

A good entry in the Holmes series - unless you've seen the aforementioned Rathbone or Wontner in the title role.


2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
221A Baker Street mmw-2
221A Baker Street mmw-2
The first review is somewhat mistaken jesse-lee-smith
Discuss A Study in Scarlet (1933) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?