Down 250,332 this week

Strictly Unreliable (1932)

 |  Comedy, Short  |  30 April 1932 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.9/10 from 52 users  
Reviews: 5 user

Zasu inadvertently turns Thelma's vaudeville act into a shambles.



0Check in

IMDb Picks: April

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in April.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Strictly Unreliable (1932)

Strictly Unreliable (1932) on IMDb 5.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Strictly Unreliable.


Complete credited cast:
Charlotte Nemo ...
Bud Jamison ...
Bud (as Bud Jamieson)
The Actor
Charlie Hall ...
The Stage Manager (as Charley Hall)


Zasu inadvertently turns Thelma's vaudeville act into a shambles.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Comedy | Short





Release Date:

30 April 1932 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Western Electric Sound System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Follows On the Loose (1931) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A lesser Hal Roach series makes an amiable time-passer
16 November 2006 | by (Bradenton, Florida) – See all my reviews

While I would agree with some of the negative reviews for this short on IMDb, I have a higher tolerance for this sort of entertainment and am rating the film a bit higher. Sure, Ms. Pitts was NOT a comic genius like Laurel and Hardy or even Charlie Chase (other Hal Roach regulars), and Thelma Todd was pretty inconsequential in the film, it still was an entertaining time-passer. Plus, compared to Roach's later leading lady (Patsy Kelly--one of the loudest and more annoying comediennes), Ms. Pitts is very watchable! As far as ZaSu goes, while her attempt at dancing in the beginning of the film is pretty crudely done as well as her ruining the play at the end of the film, it's not any more or less entertaining than if the Three Stooges would have done it. In fact, this entire film is about the same pacing and about as entertaining as a Stooge short. I know this isn't saying a lot (the Stooges were NOT subtle or especially deep), but the film does generate a few laughs and isn't as awful as a Ritz Brothers or Wheeler and Woolsey flick. For fans of early Hollywood comedy, it is well worth seeing but for most others, it's pretty skip-able.

2 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Strictly Unreliable (1932) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: