Play Girl (1932) Poster

(1932)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
odd title for an odd little film
AlsExGal7 February 2010
Sometimes I think Warner Bros. named these early 30's films just as quickly and casually as they filmed them. There is nothing in this film about "play-girls". Also, although Winnie Lightner is top billed, this is really Loretta Young's picture. Loretta plays Buster Green, a salesgirl in a department store who wants to eventually become a store buyer. She wants no part of marriage and especially motherhood since her own mother died in childbirth. As they say, life is what happens when you are making plans. Buster falls for and marries the charming Wally Dennis, who claims he is a salesman but is actually a professional gambler. She doesn't find out until after they are married about the gambling, but Wally promises to get a real job. Months later, Buster finds out she is pregnant and only then finds out Wally didn't actually get a job like he promised he would - he is still gambling.

Loretta Young does the same wonderful job with this material that I have come to expect from her as she runs the gamut of emotions from hope to disappointment and from anger to terror, and she is one of two reasons to watch the film. The second reason are the antics of top-billed Winnie Lightner, who is actually playing in support here in this, the twilight of her film career. She plays Buster's best friend, roommate, and coworker prior to Buster's marriage. Her comic one-liners and facial expressions are priceless. If you know much about her rather short film career, one of the funniest moments in the movie is when she is scrubbing the apartment bathroom at night while the song "Singin in the Bathtub" plays in the background. That was the song she sang in the Warner Brothers all-talking revue in 1929 - "The Show of Shows" - when she was at the top of her game. Lightner is also quite good opposite Guy Kibbee, who plays the store assistant manager who loves her and won't let her work in any of the store departments where she might meet a man she likes better than him.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
You Can Bet on Loretta Young
wes-connors18 January 2010
Transfers at the "Mayfield Department Store" result in beautiful Loretta Young (as Buster "Bus" Green) being assigned to "Infants Wear" while comic relief pal Winnie Lightner (as Georgine Hicks) is sent to "Plumbing Supplies". The women, who share a bed, are unhappy with the new assignments. At home, they arrange a dancing date with Ms. Young's boyfriend James Ellison (as Elmer) and pal Norman Foster (as Wallace "Wally" Dennis), a "blind date" for Ms. Lightner. But, Mr. Foster thinks Young is "hot" and begins to pursue her. The two unexpectedly fall in love, but Foster has a dark secret. He's a compulsive gambler...

Meanwhile, sharp-tongued Lightner is romanced by older man Guy Kibbee (as "Finky" Finkelwald). This is a strange, carelessly scripted story about the effects of gambling. The heroine's problems, caused by her gambling husband, are alleviated by her own gambling; it doesn't make sense. An interesting point of characterization is that when Young's character was born, her mother died; for this reason, she is supposedly reluctant to marry, and have children. She is mistakenly called a "Play-Girl". But, Young and the cast are enjoyable. In real life, Young was close to co-star Foster; he married her sister, actress Sally Blane.

***** Play-Girl (3/12/32) Ray Enright ~ Loretta Young, Winnie Lightner, Norman Foster, James Ellison
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I know that I'm taking a huge risk in saying this, but it's probably not a great idea to marry a man with an addiction.
planktonrules24 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Two ladies are roommates and work at the same department store. One, Winnie Lightner, is older and less attractive and seems to be there more for comic relief than anything else. This sort of friend is a common cliché in films of the period and often these sort of roles were played by supporting actresses like Glenda Farrell or Helen Broderick. The 'pretty friend' (also a cliché) is played by Loretta Young---who, despite years in Hollywood is still a radiant teenager.

Young meets Wally (Norman Foster)--a handsome man who is a professional gambler. At first Loretta has no idea that this is how Wally can afford his lifestyle, but when she finds out, he promises to get a real job. Based on this promise, they marry and the audience collectively gasps because this just spells impending doom! Not surprisingly, despite his promise, this addict soon goes back to his old ways. Eventually, she's had enough and they have a huge blow-up. Will he give up gambling? Will he be there when...the BABY arrives? Will they patch things up by the end of this film? Well, what do you think?! Overall, this is a formulaic film with quite a few clichés. Yet, despite this, it's well-acted and entertaining and worth seeing if you are a fan of classic Hollywood films. Certainly far from great and a bit silly, but enjoyable.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loretta Young Shines in this Suspenseful Romance!
wireshock25 April 2001
Given her origins--her mother died while giving birth to her--Buster Green (Loretta Young) is averse to taking risks and not inclined to marry. Her plan is to rise above her station as a department store clerk through dedicated hard work. But when she meets Wallie Dennis (Norman Foster) she finds herself succumbing to his spontaneous style and marries him--only to find out on their honeymoon that he makes his "living" as a gambler.

He promises to reform but betrays her faith in him time and again. So when she finds herself pregnant she feels she has no choice but to cast him out and go it alone. Faced with mounting bills and prospect of giving birth to her child in poverty, she turns to gambling herself in a desperate attempt to reverse her fortunes.

19 year old Loretta Young is superb in this cautionary romantic tale; her combination of pluck and beauty make us root for her all the way. Winnie Lightner, playing her stalwart friend and defender Georgine, lends the story a down-to-earth realism as well as comic relief.

Gregg Toland's cinematography is crisp and economical--a highlight is the suspenseful scene that overlays a slow zooming in on Young's reactions over exciting footage of the horses at the track as her horse gains on the others in the race. Ray Enright's pacing of the story is masterful: the last ten minutes as things come to a head will keep you on the edge of your seat.

This general storyline has been filmed dozens of times--but Loretta Young's performance and the taut direction makes this one a keeper!
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An odd one
marcslope16 May 2016
One-third knockabout comedy, two-thirds weepie as mad Winnie Lightner gets top billing and chews up the scenery as Loretta Young's gal-pal, but is really incidental to the story and disappears for long segments. (She does get some good insults in, scrapping with fellow salesgirl Dorothy Burgess.) But the bulk of it is Loretta in distress, falling reluctantly for gambler Norman Foster, marrying him, quitting her job, getting pregnant, then throwing him out of the house when she mistakenly thinks he's returned to his gambling ways after getting an honest job as a garage mechanic. (Where'd he acquire the skill? No idea.) He returns at the darnedest time, just in time for a happy ending. The always dull direction of Ray Enright does nothing to enhance this, and it feels a little like two movies sewn into one one-hour feature, but Gregg Toland's cinematography is lovely, and Loretta in a quintessential suffering-Depression-gal role she played many times is worth watching.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Loretta was never more beautiful
PeterPangloss7 January 2006
Loretta Young is perfectly lit here, which enhances her beauty immeasurably, and she is quite believable in this role. I first saw her in her later movies--and on her TV show, swirling through the door every week--so it's quite a revelation to see her at the absolute peak of her talent and looks. Winnie Lightner does her usual gum-chewing, wisecracking shtick, and the rest of the cast is quite good. The script is a little weak, and things get a bit maudlin at times, although the pre-code one-liners are fun. (Winnie, as her bloomers blow off the makeshift clothesline and out the window: "Oh, that was my last pair of panties!" Loretta: "What will you do?" Winnie: "Stay off of ladders!")
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Carried By Beauty
bkoganbing17 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This B picture from Warner Brothers casts Loretta Young and Winnie Lightner as pair of shopgirls who both work for Guy Kibbee as a supervisor. Winnie plays up to Kibbee who's doing one of his patented old rogue characters. But Loretta is looking for something with a little more excitement and thinks she's found it in Norman Foster.

The problem is that while Loretta thinks she's married to a high living salesman, she's really marrying a very high living gambler. And when two might turn into three a crisis ensues.

Play-Girl runs exactly an hour which clearly puts it in the B category. Loretta and the cast do breathe some life into it, she's just beautiful and Lightner is cast in parts that Ruth Donnelly or Patsy Kelly would be playing in a higher grade film. What happens to Loretta in the film is just plain ridiculous and how Foster is redeemed is even more so.

But if you love Loretta Young than you must see this film. Her beauty literally carries it.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Loretta the lovely
Fred_Rap25 November 2007
The title is meaningless, the story just as pointless, and whatever interest there is to be derived from this girl-loves-gambler weepie comes from the delicate beauty of Loretta Young. The film is a feast for the eyes (with nary a morsel of food for thought) as masterly cinematographer Gregg Toland captures the poetry of Young's huge, soulful peepers and full promising lips with one lovestruck close-up after another. The following year's "Zoo in Budapest" and "Man's Castle" would cement her position as the Depression's most desirable waif, the pin-up girl of the bread lines. With the barrelhouse comedienne Winnie Lightner as her wisecracking pal and Guy Kibbee, criminally wasted as Lightner's swain.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very early Loretta Young film about the impact gambling has on a young couple...
cfscfs27 April 2001
Very early Loretta Young film: she's not even top billed. Winnie Lightner is - an interesting younger character actress. But it really is Loretta's movie. The plot involves Loretta's character falling in love with a gambler - and the complications which arise. Norman Foster plays the gambler: ironically, he married Miss Young's sister (Sally Blane) in 1937 - after being divorced from Claudette Colbert. Most memorable scenes in this movie are set in a department store circa 1932.

Movie is also notable as (apparently) the first movie of a very young James Ellison. Neither the title "Play Girl" or the alternate title "Love on a Budget" really describe this film. Entertaining melodrama from the early days of sound.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Empty fluff
gridoon202426 May 2018
Predictable story of department store clerk Loretta Young (she's beautiful and erotic and gives an honest performance) marrying compulsive gambler Norman Foster. Winnie Lightner provides the comic relief as her best friend. There is some pre-code innuendo, but it's all rather mild. ** out of 4.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Young Loretta Young+Gregg Toland=Movie
theognis-8082121 June 2023
Glamour is what is missing from movies today. Alone in our living rooms and Inured to the smaller-than-life figures on our little TV sets, we've lost sight of the larger-than-life gods on the mammoth screens in darkened movie palaces, surrounded by hundreds of our neighbors. Not even Marlene Dietrich photographed by von Sternberg and Lee Garmes could outshine spectacular 19 year old Loretta Young, presented here by the great Gregg Toland. This cautionary tale of a naive young woman, swept off her feet by a glib, compulsive gambler (Norman Foster) should edify young couples everywhere. This mercifully brief, cliche-riddled show should also serve as a reminder that the screenplay is the most important element in any movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Marginally less excruciating than a tooth extraction
1930s_Time_Machine6 September 2022
Warner Brothers should have been embarrassed to release this. The story is both absurd and boring, the characters are as unbelievable as they are annoying and the direction is of the: just read your lines in turn and avoid any interaction with your fellow actors. As for the acting, Loretta Young is the only person who is actually acting giving this movie the impression that her scenes are taken from a different (professional) film which have been spliced into this dreadful piffle.

Worst of all is Winnie Lightner. I don't like to say anything bad about people, she might have been a lovey person but as an actress she is beyond terrible. She's so extraordinary awful that she almost makes this film unwatchable. Words cannot describe just how bad she is!

One slightly interesting line is said by Miss Young which portends her future fling with 'the king of Hollywood' - commenting on her beau's kissing technique she says: 'They can do better in movies - come on Gable, get hot.' There's absolutely nothing else of interest in this.

Maybe the reason this was made was simply to provide evidence to to those people now who believe that films of the 1930s were dreadful?
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ay Dios Mio
view_and_review28 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Ugh! This movie is cringeworthy. A guy named Wally (Norman Foster), who looked and sounded like the source code for 30's comedic acting, was so full of himself it's a wonder he didn't burst. When he laid eyes on Buster (Loretta Young), he bet $10 that he could get a dance with her. It wasn't five minutes later that he was pressing on Buster so hard she could barely breathe. She playfully rebuffed him, but it looked more like an invitation. The next day he showed up at her job laying some bunk game on her that only made him look worse. Had any man tried those same tactics today they would've been locked up for harassment and assault. It was very uncomfortable to watch.

So what do you think Buster did?

She married the man.

Persistence pays. And this is the advice men had been receiving for years. "If she rejects you, she's just playing hard to get. Keep trying and you'll win her over."

Another thing that seemed to be common in movies in the 1930's was not knowing very much about your new husband or wife. In this case, Buster married Wally without knowing that he was unemployed! Dude made all his money gambling. If he won, he had money, if he lost, he didn't. It was all adding up to Buster looking like a dumb dame.

She finally pulled the plug on old Wally when she was informed that $90 was missing from their bank account. That was the last straw. Buster wisened up and kicked Wally to the curb. But wouldn't you know it, he withdrew the money to surprise her with a baby buggy for their unborn child. So, even when Buster did the right thing she was wrong.

Naturally, she was miserable without him and had to have him back. He showed up at the end to be her knight in shining armor and they lived happily ever after.

"Play Girl" was such a mess. This movie sent out all the wrong signals and had a awful plot and a weak script. Wally was the type of guy who should've ended up alone, wallowing in his own misery until he got a clue about women and his own vices. Instead he got the girl and won big gambling which made him a hero.

Ay dios mio.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed