MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 973 this week

Number 17 (1932)
"Number Seventeen" (original title)

 -  Crime | Mystery | Thriller  -  18 July 1932 (UK)
5.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.9/10 from 2,535 users  
Reviews: 50 user | 18 critic

A gang of thieves gather at a safe house following a robbery, but a detective is on their trail.

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1673 titles created 13 Oct 2011
 
a list of 62 titles created 26 Aug 2011
 
a list of 76 titles created 25 Nov 2011
 
a list of 30 titles created 01 Jun 2011
 
a list of 55 titles created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Number 17 (1932)

Number 17 (1932) on IMDb 5.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Number 17.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Leon M. Lion ...
Ben
...
Nora - the Girl
John Stuart ...
Barton - the Detective
Donald Calthrop ...
Brant - Nora's Escort
...
Henry Doyle
Ann Casson ...
Rose Ackroyd
Henry Caine ...
Mr. Ackroyd
Garry Marsh ...
Sheldrake
Edit

Storyline

Detective Gilbert is searching for a necklace robbed by a gang of thieves. In the beginning, the gang is in a house in London, then they are running away from police. It will not be easy for the detective to recover the jewel. Written by Claudio Sandrini <pulp99@geocities.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

TV-PG | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

18 July 1932 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Number 17  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Alfred Hitchcock did not want to make this film. He had wanted to direct a prestige production of John Van Druten's play "London Wall," but to punish Hitchcock for the financial failure of his previous film East of Shanghai, British International Pictures head John Maxwell took him off "London Wall" and put him on "Number Seventeen" instead. Hitchcock himself has referred to the film as "a terrible picture . . . very cheap melodrama". See more »

Goofs

Hitchcock uses models quite well for the bus and train sequence, given the age of the film. However as the model train approaches the ferry it is seen to have about 8 carriages. When Doyle is being pursued across the carriages, it can be seen that there are many more than eight carriages - at least five behind the middle carriage (where Ben and Nora are) and at least five in front of this middle carriage. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Ben: Oh! Oh, Gawd! Oh, Gawd! Oh, Gawd! Oh!
Fordyce/Barton: How do you feel? Now, where's that candle? Here, have some of this.
See more »

Connections

Remade as ITV Play of the Week: No. 17 (1958) See more »

Soundtracks

"I Don't Need a Television"
(uncredited)
Music by Harry Shalson
Lyrics by John Malvern
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

Pretty good, but watch it twice and listen carefully
22 April 2000 | by (Germantown, Tennessee) – See all my reviews

This might just be a problem with only me, but I tend not to be able to clearly hear some of the speech of the actors in old movies like this. It could be that the film is old or the actors don't annunciate(not sure if I spelled that right) enough. Overall, the film is like what the other reviewer said: slow at first, but once you know generally what is happening, it draws you in immediately. Also, this is one film that I demand to be remade, for it looks quite dated in some parts, even a little cheesy. Another reason is that this movie should be given a wider audience. It deserves it. The remake might have to be a bit longer, though, since I'm not sure how a modern crowd would feel about paying money to see only a 63 minute movie. In summary, see this to be entertained but prepare to be forgiving for the, shall we say, "time gap."


16 of 22 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Actually pretty good! poefan
Cameo appearance muswellmovies
Discuss Number 17 (1932) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?