MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 43,876 this week

No Blood Relation (1932)
"Nasanunaka" (original title)

6.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.9/10 from 161 users  
Reviews: 3 user | 7 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

Writers:

(novel),
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 141 titles
created 13 Jan 2011
 
a list of 44 titles
created 03 Jul 2011
 
a list of 242 titles
created 29 Jul 2011
 
a list of 483 titles
created 17 Nov 2011
 
a list of 35 titles
created 1 month ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: No Blood Relation (1932)

No Blood Relation (1932) on IMDb 6.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of No Blood Relation.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Yoshiko Okada ...
Tamae Kiyooka
Shin'yô Nara ...
Shunsaku Atsumi
Yukiko Tsukuba ...
Masako, Atsumi's wife
Toshiko Kojima ...
Shigeko, Atsumi's daughter
Fumiko Katsuragi ...
Kishiyo, Atsumi's mother
Joji Oka ...
Masaya Kusakabe
Ichirô Yuki ...
Keiji Makino
Shozaburo Abe ...
Gen the Pelican
Ken'ichi Miyajima ...
Secretary
Kanji Kawahara ...
Detective
Kenji Ôyama ...
Lodger
Kikuko Hanaoka ...
Waitress
Tomio Aoki ...
Neighbour's child
Ryuko Fuji ...
Boarding house lady
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

based on novel

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

16 December 1932 (Japan)  »

Also Known As:

No Blood Relation  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (16 mm)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Onlookers, ships
26 February 2012 | by (Greece) – See all my reviews

The film opens with a whip pan blurring a 360 circle around a middle-class Tokyo neighborhood and an intertitle popping-up to announce 'Thief!'. A crowd runs across the street and clamors around a man. Outraged at the accusations, he makes a vehement public display, a show, that allows him to extricate himself. Only in the following scene do we recognize that we were, in fact, tricked. All this prefigures main tenets in the film about trickery, motion, acting, bargains, subterfuge, moral dilemmas and cleverly situates us inside the movie as part of the crowd of onlookers who will have to surmise a plot from the spirals of deceit.

Ordinarily it would be about sex and money as the main objects of power. Here the coveted treasure is a child. Motherhood is the social role worth deceiving for. The plot is about a famous Hollywood actress coming back from the Americas to reclaim the daughter she abandoned. Meanwhile the child is growing up with her dad and stepmother.

So a double perspective is what we have, on one hand the love and safety of the family nest, but which exists on a certain dishonesty on the part of the father and the ability of the stepmother to perform a role, on the other hand the biological mother who really wishes to atone and make good, noble intentions but once more obscured by deceit and pretending. The father is sent to prison for financial mismanagement, karmic payback.

So the first layer is successful, a melodrama but structured in such a way as to allow us to recast tumultuous dramatic life as a matter of theatric conventions. The household is the stage. Actresses vie for control of the kid's innocent gaze. The larger world is the adults' organized cruelty.

This is fine. But there is no additional layer as a way of annotating the first in terms of images being performed. This would involve our gaze next to the kid's. The camera would travel around the edges of who these people present themselves to be. Instead you will notice that the camera is always thrust in the face of the participants, head-on, anxious, like a mic set up for a comment. They comment but always as expected after first meeting them.

The audience is never really outwitted as promised by the opening scene of deceit in broad daylight. There is never any serious doubt about who the daughter belongs with. Morally the thing is of simple value.

Sternberg was getting this part right at around the same time, staging images in a way that we became complicit in dreaming about them.


1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss No Blood Relation (1932) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?