| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Index | 42 reviews in total |
27 out of 27 people found the following review useful:
Great old champ!, 29 June 2001
Author:
PrincessAnanka from United States
Don't even try to compare this wonderful old WArner Brothers thriller from l934 with today's thrillers. It was made at a time long gone when atmosphere, sets, lighting and camerawork were king. I adore getting this movie out at least once a month along with "Mystery of the Wax Museum" and "Night Monster" (another reviewer has also cited "Night Monster" as the classic it is)turn out the lights and lose myself in the early Technicolor two-strip photographey which is beautifully pastel and atmospheric in its eerie greens, pinks, crimson and gold. The Anton Grot sets are unforgettable. The cast of Hollywood's greatest character actors throw themselves into their roles (I doubt they had any other choice. After all, the demonic Michael Curtiz was cracking the whip as director). Fay Wray is pretty and screams now and then. Most irritating of all is Lee Tracey as the relentlessly wise-cracking reporter. Glenda Farrell had the same role in "Mystery of the Wax Museum" also filmed in early color and she was fantastic. A great old thriller, set in a remote mansion by the sea. The monster is terrifying. Ironically, you never see any carnage, blood or torture. Hats off to those long-ago film masters who knew how to do things right.
28 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
Love Those Two Colors!, 25 October 2006
![]()
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
Wow, what a shock - a 1932 color movie! Well, sort of......only two
colors, but they look great.
I only got this because I saw it at the library as part of a two-pack
with "The Return Of Dr. X." It is part of a Hollywood "Legends Of
Horror" package that includes several other films I am familiar with
and think highly of, so I can see a possible future purchase.
Anyway, the first thing that struck me watching this was that fantastic
two-strip Technicolor. Immediately there is a street scene of green and
brown that looks tremendous....and eerie. You would think that only
black-and-white might make this look eerie, but not so - that
combination of green and brown was very effective and made this a
fascinating visual film. Hats off to the UCLA film restoration team,
which made this 75-year-old film look really good.
As for the story, well, let's just say it doesn't measure up to the
visuals. It starts off looking like a fun movie, even - surprise - a
comedy as the newsman "Lee Taylor" (Lee Tracy) cracks a few corny
jokes. However, it settles down into a crime story (more than horror)
and we wind up with a whodunit and a room full of suspects, a la
Charlie Chan or Sherlock Holmes. The suspects are all scientists
working in the Academy of Surgical Research. A bunch of recent hideous
crimes by the "Moon Killer" were all done in the vicinity of the
academy, so they're the prime suspects. Even the head man at the
academy, "Dr. Xavier," looks a bit suspicious. He is played well by
Lionel Atwill.
The police give "Dr. X" 48 hours to find out if any of his employees
are the killer before they totally take over the investigation and ruin
the reputation of the scientific institution. All of the scientists, by
the way, look and act creepy which adds to the mystery. Heck, they all
could be serial killers.
The film drags during much of that period - except for a short testing
session that Dr. X sets up to see if any of his subordinates are,
indeed, the killer. Apparently, it's true because someone kills one of
the suspects during the experiment! Then there is another long lull and
the cops are getting impatient with the good doctor. They give him
another ultimate so he "tests" his employees again, this time using his
daughter "Joanne" (Fay Wray) as a guinea pig, so to speak.
Then, we finally see who the real killer is and that part is fun to
watch and he transforms into a hideous monster-like man. I guess this
why the film is called a horror film instead of a crime movie. I won't
give the ending away but I admit, it's pretty good.
If that long middle part had been spiced up a bit, this would have
super, but it was too talky for too long. Still, this isn't bad and I
love those two colors. I wish more movies looked like that.
25 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
Full Moon High, 25 August 2002
![]()
Author:
telegonus from brighton, ma
Old dark house thrillers were all the rage in the early talkie era.
Doctor X combines a spooky old house with a mad scientist horror story,
and as directed by Michael Curtiz in early two-strip Technicolor, it's
a quite good show even by today's standards.
Lionel Atwill's Doctor X is a scientist who runs a medical research
institute in New York City near where a series of grisly murders have
recently occurred. He and his entire teaching staff are suspects in the
case, as the police have determined that the killer has some medical
knowledge. The ever-helpful doctor seeks to prove the authorities
wrong, and transports his staff to the cliffside manor, Blackstone
Shoals, to prove them wrong, and gets more than he bargained for.
Newspaperman Lee Tracy is along for the ride, and can't seem to keep
his mouth shut, as he continually makes wisecracks. His character is
utterly of the time, and as such a fascinating glimpse of a bygone
type, both of real life and the movies. Fay Wray is her usual lissome
self, with her peculiarly gyrating physicality far more interesting
than her delivery of dialog. She's a brunette here, and proves herself
once again filmdom's definitive Scream Queen, on at least one occasion
shrieking with no provocation whatsoever, as if in preparation for the
horror to come.
For a 1932 movie, this one moves quickly. There are enough dour and
sinister-looking suspects to keep one guessing the identity of the
murderer till near the end. Curtiz shows an often sadistic sense of
humor, as when several suspects are manacled to their chairs to witness
reenactment of one of the murders, only to have the real killer turn
up! The director's control of the material is complete, and he shows
himself once more one of great unsung masters of the studio era.
22 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
Excellent, fast-moving creepy treat in two-strip Technicolor, 16 August 2004
Author:
Arne Andersen (aandersen@landmarkcollege.org) from Putney, VT
Use of Technicolor in its early two-strip days was primarily reserved
for musicals and comedies -it was rarely used for dramas. That's why
it's such a treat to see how well it could be used in a production such
as this, where cinematography is king. Only Michael Curtiz could light
a set and create compositions that are enhanced by the limited pallet -
only blues and reds registered here - of early Technicolor. One is
reminded of the red and blue hues of 3-D comic books.
This is a visual treat - the sets and the cinematography are the whole
show.
Tight direction, excellent use of close-ups, and a rapid running time
all make this a true cinematic classic. I grew up on the black and
white version shown on television and now can't imagine it in any but
the Technicolor original.
However, the script is shot full of holes. How did Lee Tracy know it
was a scrub woman who was killed when the body arrived at the morgue
and how did he know who accompanied the police into the morgue since
they were all concealed in a vehicle and he was hiding behind a barrel
on the wharf? How did the killer know Tracy was hiding in the skeleton
closet and why is there a hole in the wall for passing gas through?
There were five murders up until the washerwoman's death that starts
the film, yet the wax models displayed in the mansion only cover the
first four. How did the red liquid in the tube reach enormous heights
during the first experiment when the killer was loose and not attached
to the apparatus? Why was one of the doctors killed? Most importantly,
how did the killer have the time (between setting up the experiment and
actually appearing to claim a new victim) to create the synthetic flesh
attached arm and face enhancements?
These only come to mind when critically viewing the film and looking
for loopholes. If you're about sheer entertainment and viewing
pleasure, you're hooked from the first reel and you believe everything
you see.
A great horror film and a rarity in two-strip Technicolor. Add it to
your collection - and thanks to UCLA for restoring it.
17 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
One of my Top Two Favs, 24 May 1999
![]()
Author:
Norm Vogel (norm3vog@blast.net) from S. Bound Brook, NJ
As a collector of old mystery-horror-comedy films (over 700
in
my collection!), "Dr. X" (& "Night Monster") rank as my Top
Two
Films of All-Time! And, that's quite a statement!
Why? The marvellously spooky sets by Anton Grot, the superstitious antics
of
the maid, plus the ad-libbing of Lee Tracey make this film a gem! The
entire film is extremely "atmospheric" and the effects of the "monster"
shadows on the walls, clutching hands, wind (machines!), and all the rest
really add to it!
Sometimes I watch this film just to observe the SETS!
(If you see it, watch the scene where Lee Tracey is trying to
get into the house on Blackstone Shoals....the "wind" is
howling
like crazy, but not many of the trees are moving! I LOVE
it!)
If possible, try to watch this film in the original tri-color
technicolor version, as it's a lot better!
A wonderfully creepy film!
13 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Doctor X (1932) **1/2, 28 January 2006
![]()
Author:
JoeKarlosi from U.S.A.
DOCTOR X is one of those heartbreaking films to watch for a fan of old
horror movies, because it has so many wonderful things going for it yet
just narrowly misses the mark of being really good due to a liability
or two which could have been avoided. As is so often the case with
early '30s fright films like this, the need was felt to add a
"funnyman" to the proceedings to perhaps give audiences of the day a
chance to laugh along with being scared. The culprit in this case is
Lee Tracy, who plays a typical golden age newspaper reporter who snoops
around and gets his nose tangled into everyone's business.
The "business" at hand is a string of killings in New York regarding a
fiend who strangles people and then apparently cannibalizes them. Dr.
Xavier (the always enjoyable Lionel Atwill) heads a group of doctors
who are all suspects up for scrutiny, and though we have to deal with
the frequent lapses into silliness from Mr. Tracy, this old chestnut is
interesting and gripping a fair amount of its running time. Director
Michael Curtiz does a fine job of visually entertaining us with strange
angles, quick closeups and flashy set designs. An added delight is the
early use of two-strip color that gives the film a rather eerie
dimension with its muted greens. Fay Wray (KING KONG) steps into
another early horror picture here, but really doesn't have much to do
and isn't of much use to the story. There's a completely out of place
beach scene with Wray and Tracy that will leave you wondering who
thought it shouldn't be left on the cutting room floor (perhaps it was
an excuse to get a pantie shot of Fay as she sunbathes under her big
beach umbrella).
The film's strongest moment comes in a revelation sequence late in the
movie where we finally get to see who the crazed murderer is, and it's
still chilling even now to watch him go through his insane routine.
You're bound to have the words "synthetic flesh" etched into your
subconscious for a long time after seeing DOCTOR X, and if there's one
thing you'll remember, this will be it.
13 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Great old champ!, 29 June 2001
Author:
PrincessAnanka from United States
Don't even try to compare this wonderful old WArner Brothers thriller from l934 with today's thrillers. It was made at a time long gone when atmosphere, sets, lighting and camerawork were king. I adore getting this movie out at least once a month along with "Mystery of the Wax Museum" and "Night Monster" (another reviewer has also cited "Night Monster" as the classic it is)turn out the lights and lose myself in the early Technicolor two-strip photographey which is beautifully pastel and atmospheric in its eerie greens, pinks, crimson and gold. The Anton Grot sets are unforgettable. The cast of Hollywood's greatest character actors throw themselves into their roles (I doubt they had any other choice. After all, the demonic Michael Curtiz was cracking the whip as director). Fay Wray is pretty and screams now and then. Most irritating of all is Lee Tracey as the relentlessly wise-cracking reporter. Glenda Farrell had the same role in "Mystery of the Wax Museum" also filmed in early color and she was fantastic. A great old thriller, set in a remote mansion by the sea. The monster is terrifying. Ironically, you never see any carnage, blood or torture. Hats off to those long-ago film masters who knew how to do things right.
12 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
"Synthetic" early horror film is fun despite a hokey plot..., 1 December 2005
![]()
Author:
Neil Doyle from U.S.A.
When you think of it, everything about this film is strictly
synthetic...the plot, the hokey comic relief, the occasional ham
acting--but the atmosphere photographed in crisp looking two-strip
Technicolor is fully charged and the taut direction of Michael Curtiz
(long before he did another more polished noir called THE UNSUSPECTED),
makes this a very watchable early horror film from Warner Bros.
The Anton Grot sets in early color will keep the viewer totally
enhanced even when the plot holes become too obvious. The annoying
comic relief supplied by Lee Tracy as a fast-talking newspaperman (was
there any other kind?), is fortunately not much of a handicap when the
cast includes an assortment of richly eccentric characters.
I have to confess I guessed who the murderer was from the start--but it
didn't dampen my enjoyment of the melodramatic and very creepy events.
The storyline concerns a killer known for striking when there's a full
moon and Lionel Atwill is the doctor who thinks he can solve the crime
by some scientific detective work of his own.
It's the sort of film that became a staple of the "old dark house"
mysteries audiences loved in the '20s and '30s--and even into the '40s
with films like THE CAT AND THE CANARY. None of it seems quite as
compelling as some of the better known fright films (including MURDER
IN THE WAX MUSEUM), but we do get a chance to hear some first rate
screams from Fay Wray (who looks very attractive in close-ups even
though the Max Factor make-up is a little too extreme), and the capable
cast includes such sturdy performers as Lionel Atwill and Preston
Foster.
Trivia note: The killer's synthetic flesh make-up is very effective
when he's in full mode on the kill. Kudos to Michael Curtiz for a
fun-filled fright film.
8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Beware The Full Moon & What It Brings!, 22 January 2000
![]()
Author:
Ron Oliver (revilorest@juno.com) from Forest Ranch, CA
A creepy laboratory where eccentric doctors engage in bizarre
experiments. An intrepid reporter & a beautiful young woman
involving themselves in terrible danger. And a fiendish
strangler who only strikes during the full moon...
DOCTOR X does have an absurd plot, but it is undeniably
entertaining to watch. Much of the credit for this must go to
the
look of the film. Art Director Anton Grot designed some
very
spooky interior sets. The Max Factor make-up is striking.
And
both elements are enhanced because this was one of the
first
movies to be shot in two-strip Technicolor.
Lee Tracy, one of the most enjoyable actors of the early
1930's,
plays another in his long line of fast-talking wise-crackers
-
this time a newspaperman out to get a big story. Fay Wray
is
lovely as always & gets to use her famous scream (a year
before KING KONG). Lionel Atwill hams it up a bit as the
instigator of many of the more unusual elements in the
plot.
7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Fun chiller, one of the best of the '30s, 22 July 2009
![]()
Author:
TheManFrom_A_L_I_A_S from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
The 1930's was one of the most interesting transitional periods for the
horror genre; it marked the heyday of the classic Gothic horror film,
and the seeds of elements from the contemporary noir thrillers and 'Old
Dark house' comedies which would later evolve into the 'Gruesome True
Crime' films, and much later; the Slasher flick. 'Doctor X' is a great
embodiment of all those different eras in one neat package.
Like a noir film, the film takes place mostly at night with many
expressionistic camera angles and reliance on shadows to create
ambiance, like a crime thriller/whodunit, the film has police,
reporters and multiple suspects, like an Old Dark House film, there's
creepy but comical servants and well, an old dark house, and like
various Gothic horror films, there's a mad scientist villain who may as
well be a magician. Half the fun, however, is figuring out who the
villain is.
The plot is somewhat convoluted, but told in a linear enough fashion. A
series of grisly killings that take place in the full moon(which may
or, may not involve cannibalism) which the police determine could have
only been committed using a certain kind of scalpel found exclusively
at a currently closed university run by Doctor Xavier(Lionel Atwill);
it seems all the doctors are likely suspects, but at the same time each
has a plausible alibi, Xavier is given 48 hours to determine which of
his faculty is the killer. Meanwhile, a wisecracking reporter(Lee
Tracy)is hot on the trail not only of the killer, but of Xavier's
daughter(Fay Wray, a year away from the role that would make her famous
in 'King Kong'). Hilarity, or what we're supposed to see as hilarity,
ensues, along with some good natured scares.
The film has several odd elements worth mentioning, not the least of
which is that it was one of the rare films of this era shot in color.
For one, as often as Tracy's reporter character is criticized for being
annoying(And a gag involving a hand-buzzer wears thin REALLY fast), he
does not slow down the narrative as much as you would think. For some
odd reason, characters like him who are often the sidekick of the main
hero really do annoy me, but I had no problem with him here, because he
IS the hero, not a sidekick. You'd expect that giving such a character
such prominent screen time would make him more annoying, but it
doesn't. Thankfully, there is no straight man for his antics to draw
attention from, so his antics seem natural. Plus, it works as a
character trait when you think about it, he's selfish and annoying and
only thinks he's funny, but that's one of his flaws. And best of all,
he actually does get to show some depth and dignity by being THE man
who defeats the villain at the end. It may not be three-dimensional
character development, but it's something you didn't see everyday in
such comedy-relief characters.
What's also interesting are some of the 'jump' scenes. Several years
before Val Lewton perfected the 'bus' sequences in his films, 'Doctor
X' throws in several; from a genuinely chilling scene where the Moon
Killer zeroes in on our hero, to a scene where one of the suspected
doctors is introduced in silhouette, his pointed beard and disheveled,
pointing hair spikes making him look like the devil. Great stuff. It's
also interesting how the title could refer to either Xavier(Who IS a
suspect just as much as the others), or as a metaphorical term for the
search, after all, if one of the doctors has to be the killer, than the
search is for 'Doctor X'. Clever.
So other than some plot holes, flat gags, the usual contrived love
story, and a never explained motive for why the killer is compelled by
the full moon, the film is a ton of fun to watch. And even just the
HINT that the killer may or may not be a cannibal must have made this
too gruesome for words back in the '30's. The color is also a nice
plus.
Don't miss it. Just be sure to apply a lot of 'Sssssssynthet-tic
Flessshhhh' before watching it(A scene which was a real creeper then,
and still is today).
Y'know what's funny? The more I re-evaluate the '30's horror classics I
loved as a kid, the more I realize that, aside from the Whale films and
the Lugosi/Karloff trilogy, the majority of the best films of the era
were not from Universal. Bizarre.~
| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |